Search

In protein structure prediction, such as template-based modeling and free modeling (ab initio modeling), the step that assesses the quality of protein models is very important. We have developed a model quality assessment (QA) program United3D that uses an optimized clustering method and a simple Cα atom contact-based potential. United3D automatically estimates the quality scores (Qscore) of predicted protein models that are highly correlated with the actual quality (GDT_TS). The performance of United3D was tested in the ninth Critical Assessment of protein Structure Prediction (CASP9) experiment. In CASP9, United3D showed the lowest average loss of GDT_TS (5.3) among the QA methods participated in CASP9. This result indicates that the performance of United3D to identify the high quality models from the models predicted by CASP9 servers on 116 targets was best among the QA methods that were tested in CASP9. United3D also produced high average Pearson correlation coefficients (0.93) and acceptable Kendall rank correlation coefficients (0.68) between the Qscore and GDT_TS. This performance was competitive with the other top ranked QA methods that were tested in CASP9. These results indicate that United3D is a useful tool for selecting high quality models from many candidate model structures provided by various modeling methods. United3D will improve the accuracy of protein structure prediction.

Selecting the best quality model from a set of predicted structures is one of the most important aspects of protein structure prediction. We have developed model quality assessment programs that select high quality models which account for both the Calpha backbone and side-chain atom positions. The new methods are based on the consensus method with consideration of the side-chain environment of a protein structure and the secondary structure agreement. This Side-chain Environment Consensus (SEC) method is compared with the conventional consensus method, 3D-Jury (Ginalski K. et al., Bioinformatics, 19, 1015-1018 (2003)), which takes into account only the Calpha backbone atoms of the protein model. As the result, it was found that the SEC method selects the models with more accurate positioning of the side-chain atoms than the 3D-Jury method. When the SEC method was used in combination with the 3D-Jury method (3DJ+SEC), models were selected with improved quality both in the Calpha backbone and side-chain atom positions. Moreover, the CIRCLE (CCL) method (Terashi G. et al., Proteins, 69 (Suppl. 8), 98-107 (2007)) based on the 3D-1D profile score has been shown to select the best possible models that are the closest to the native structures from candidate models. Accordingly, the 3DJ+SEC+CCL method, in which CIRCLE is used after reducing the number of candidates by the 3DJ+SEC consensus method, was found to be very effective in selecting high quality models. Thus, the best method (the 3DJ+SEC+CCL method) includes the consensus approaches of the Calpha backbone and the side-chains, the secondary structure agreement and the 3D-1D profile score which corresponds to the free energy-like score in the residues of the protein model. In short, new algorithms are introduced in protein structure evaluation methods that are based on a side-chain consensus score. Additionally, in order to apply the 3DJ+SEC+CCL method and indicate the usefulness of this method, a model of human Cabin1, a protein associated with p53 function and cancer, is created using various internet modeling and alignment servers.

We have devised a power function (PF) that can predict the accuracy of a three-dimensional (3D) structure model of a protein using only amino acid sequence alignments. This Power Function (PF) consists of three parts; (1) the length of a model, (2) a homology identity percent value and (3) the agreement rate between PSI-PRED secondary structure prediction and the secondary structure judgment of a reference protein. The PF value is mathematically computed from the execution process of homology search tools, such as FASTA or various BLAST programs, to obtain the amino acid sequence alignments. There is a high correlation between the global distance test-total score (GDT_TS) value of the protein model based upon the PF score and the GDT_TS(MAX) value used as an index of protein modeling accuracy in the international contest Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction (CASP). Accordingly, the PF method is valuable for constructing a highly accurate model without wasteful calculations of homology modeling that is normally performed by an iterative method to move the main chain and side chains in the modeling process. Moreover, a model with higher accuracy can be obtained by combining the models ordered by the PF score with models sorted by the size of the CIRCLE score. The CIRCLE software is a 3D-1D program, in which energetic stabilization is estimated based upon the experimental environment of each amino acid residue in the protein solution or protein crystals.

Almost all proteins express their biological functions through the structural conformation of their specific amino acid sequences. Therefore, acquiring the three-dimensional structures of proteins is very important to elucidate the role of a particular protein. We had built protein structure model databases, which is called RIKEN FAMSBASE (http://famshelp.gsc.riken.jp/famsbase/). The RIKEN FAMSBASE is a genome-wide protein structure model database that contains a large number of protein models from many organisms. The HUMAN FAMSBASE that is one part of the RIKEN FAMSBASE contains many protein models for human genes, which are significant in the pharmaceutical and medicinal fields. We have now implemented an update of the human protein modeling database consisting of 242918 constructed models against the number of 20743 human protein sequences with an improved modeling method called Full Automatic protein Modeling System Developed (FAMSD). The results of our benchmark test of the FAMSD method indicated that it has an excellent capability to pack amino acid side-chains with correct torsion angles in addition to the main-chain, while avoiding the formation of atom-atom collisions that are not found in experimental structures. This new protein structure model database for human genes, which is named HUMAN FAMSD-BASE, is open to the public as a component part of the RIKEN FAMSBASE at http://mammalia.gsc.riken.jp/human_famsd/. A significant improvement of the HUMAN FAMSD-BASE in comparison with the preceding HUMAN FAMSBASE was verified in the benchmark test of this paper. The HUMAN FAMSD-BASE will have an important impact on the progress of biological science.

We participated in rounds 6-12 of the critical assessment of predicted interaction (CAPRI) contest as the SKE-DOCK server and human teams. The SKE-DOCK server is based on simple geometry docking and a knowledge base scoring function. The procedure is summarized in the following three steps: (1) protein docking according to shape complementarity, (2) evaluating complex models, and (3) repacking side-chain of models. The SKE-DOCK server did not make use of biological information. On the other hand, the human team tried various intervention approaches. In this article, we describe in detail the processes of the SKE-DOCK server, together with results and reasons for success and failure. Good predicted models were obtained for target 25 by both the SKE-DOCK server and human teams. When the modeled receptor proteins were superimposed on the experimental structures, the smallest Ligand-rmsd values corresponding to the rmsd between the model and experimental structures were 3.307 and 3.324 A, respectively. Moreover, the two teams obtained 4 and 2 acceptable models for target 25. The overall result for both the SKE-DOCK server and human teams was medium accuracy for one (Target 25) out of nine targets., ((c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)