Search

Targeted proteomics represents an efficient method to quantify proteins of interest with high sensitivity and accuracy. Targeted approaches were first established for triple quadrupole instruments, but the emergence of hybrid instruments allowing for high-resolution and accurate-mass measurements of MS/MS fragment ions enabled the development of parallel reaction monitoring (PRM). In PRM analysis, specific peptides are measured as representatives of proteins in complex samples, with the full product ion spectra being acquired, allowing for identification and quantification of the peptides. Ideally, corresponding stable isotope-labeled peptides are spiked into the analyzed samples to account for technical variation and enhance the precision. Here, we describe the development of a PRM assay including the selection of appropriate peptides that fulfill the criteria to serve as unique surrogates of the targeted proteins. We depict the sequential steps of method development and the generation of calibration curves. Furthermore, we present the open-access tool CalibraCurve for the determination of the linear concentration ranges and limits of quantification (LOQ).

In recent decades, mass spectrometry has moved more than ever before into the front line of protein-centered research. After being established at the qualitative level, the more challenging question of quantification of proteins and peptides using mass spectrometry has become a focus for further development. In this chapter, we discuss and review actual strategies and problems of the methods for the quantitative analysis of peptides, proteins, and finally proteomes by mass spectrometry. The common themes, the differences, and the potential pitfalls of the main approaches are presented in order to provide a survey of the emerging field of quantitative, mass spectrometry-based proteomics.

For the quantification of certain proteins of interest within a complex sample, Western blot analysis is the most widely used method. It enables detection of a target protein based on the use of specific antibodies. However, the whole procedure is often very time-consuming. Nevertheless, with the development of fast blotting systems and further development of immunostaining methods, a reduction of the processing time can be achieved. Major challenges for the reliable protein quantification by Western blotting are adequate data normalization and stable protein detection. Usually, normalization of the target protein signal is performed based on housekeeping proteins (e.g., glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase, ß-actin) with the assumption that those proteins are expressed constitutively at the same level across experiments. However, several studies have already shown that this is not always the case making this approach suboptimal. Another strategy uses total protein normalization where the abundance of the target protein is related to the total protein amount in each lane. This approach is independent of a single loading control, and precision of quantification and reliability is increased. For Western blotting several detection methods are available, e.g., colorimetric, chemiluminescent, radioactive, fluorescent detection. Conventional colorimetric staining tends to suffer from low sensitivity, limited dynamic range, and low reproducibility. Chemiluminescence-based methods are straightforward, but the detected signal does not linearly correlate to protein abundance (from protein amounts >5μg) and have a relatively narrow dynamic range. Radioactivity is harmful to health. To overcome these limitations, stain-free methods were developed allowing the combination of fluorescent standards and a stain-free fluorescence-based visualization of total protein in gels and after transfer to the membrane. Here, we present a rapid Western blot protocol, which combines fast blotting using the iBlot system and fast immunostaining utilizing ReadyTector ® all-in-one solution with the Smart Protein Layers (SPL) approach.

Coatings are necessary to prevent protein and peptide adsorption to the capillary surface and obtain high intermediate precision. In this protocol, we first present our basic strategy to address peptide separation using three different coatings: one neutral and two cationic coatings, the latter largely differing in their induced electroosmotic mobility. In detail, we will describe how we apply the statically adsorbed coatings to obtain very high plate numbers and high repeatability.With some model examples, we clearly describe the scope of the method for the analysis of peptide samples: tryptic digests are addressed as well as small glycoproteins and glycopeptides largely differing in their effective electrophoretic mobility. We also show that the method is suitable for a fast screening of peptide samples despite a high matrix load comprising of up to 500 mmol/L sodium chloride. We demonstrate that this basic CE-MS method is rather independent of the polarity of the analytes with a very fast near-baseline separation of very hydrophobic Aβ peptides related to the onset of Alzheimer's disease. These examples will give an impression, which coating is most suitable for a specific analytical application.Special attention is paid to difficult aspects of the coating procedure and the CE-MS method, e.g., the potential of cross-contamination when changing the coatings.