Search

Introduction: Adjuvant hormone therapy is the standard treatment after total prostatectomy with positive lymph node. However, this treatment has side effects and at the time of the PSA era and extensive lymph node dissection, this principle is questioned. The aim of this study is to describe the oncological characteristics of patients that may explain the delay in introducing hormone therapy in patients with positive lymph node., Methods: Monocentric, retrospective study of 161 patients from November 1988 to February 2018 in a single French University Hospital, having undergone radical prostatectomy with positive lymph nodes on pathology. For each patient, preoperative data (age, clinical stage, biopsy results, d'Amico classification) and postoperative data (pathological results, number of lymph nodes removed, number of positive lympnodes, recurrence free survival, specific survival and overall survival) were collected. The date of introduction of hormone therapy was noted and survival without hormonal therapy was established according to the Kaplan Meier curve. The pre- and post-operative oncological factors that could influence hormone therapy introduction were investigated with Chi 2 and Student tests (statistically significant when P<0.05)., Results: The mean number of lymph nodes removed was 12 [1-40]. The mean number of positive lymph nodes was 2.5 [1-24], the mean percentage of positive lymph nodes was 25% (2.5-100). After a mean follow-up of 95 months (3-354), 88 patients (54.6%) had no hormonal treatment. The average time to hormonal treatment was 40 months [0-310]. At 3 years, survival without hormone therapy was 52% and 51% at 5 years. Only the percentage of positive lymphnodes appeared to be a significant predictor of the introduction of hormone therapy. (29.32% vs. 21.99%, P=0.047). Hormone-free survival was significantly higher in patients with lymph node involvement less than 25% (P<0.0001) or with less than 2 positive lymph nodes (P=0.0294)., Conclusion: Lymph node invasion is a factor of poor prognosis after total prostatectomy and leads to introduce hormone therapy. Our study identified the percentage and number of positive lymph nodes as factors that identify patients who may be delayed in introducing this hormone therapy., Level of Proof: 3., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: For many years it was believed that higher total testosterone contributed to prostate cancer and caused rapid cancer growth. International guidelines consider that adequate data are not available to determine whether there is additional risk of prostate cancer from testosterone replacement. Numerous studies with multiple designs and contradictory conclusions have investigated the relationship between total testosterone and prostate cancer development. To establish current knowledge in this field we reviewed the literature on total testosterone and the subsequent risk of prostate cancer as well as the safety of exogenous testosterone administration in patients with a history of prostate cancer., Materials and Methods: We searched the literature to identify articles from 1994 to 2014 related to the relationship between total testosterone and prostate cancer. Emphasis was given to prospective studies, series with observational data and randomized, controlled trials. Case reports were excluded. Articles on testosterone replacement safety were selected by patient population (under active surveillance or with a prostate cancer history). We organized our results according to the relationship between total testosterone and prostate cancer, including 1) the possible link between low total testosterone and prostate cancer, 2) the effect of high levels and 3) the absence of any link. Finally, we summarized studies of the risk of exogenous testosterone administration in patients already diagnosed with prostate cancer, treated or on active surveillance., Results: We selected 45 articles of the relationship between total testosterone and prostate cancer, of which 18 and 17 showed a relationship to low and high total testosterone, respectively, and 10 showed no relation. Total testosterone was defined according to the definition in each article. Contradictory findings have been reported, largely due to the disparate methodologies used in many studies. Most studies did not adhere to professional society guidelines on total testosterone measurements. One of 18 series of low total testosterone and prostate cancer adhered to published guidelines while none of 17 showing a relationship of high total testosterone to prostate cancer and only 1 of 10 that identified no relationship between total testosterone and prostate cancer adhered to measurements recommended in the guidelines. In 11 studies the risk of exogenous testosterone was examined in patients with a prostate cancer history. Many studies were limited by small cohort size and brief followup. However, overall this literature suggests that the risk of exogenous testosterone replacement in patients with prostate cancer appears to be small., Conclusions: The relationship between total testosterone and prostate cancer has been an area of interest among physicians for decades. Conflicting results have been reported on the relationship between total testosterone and subsequent prostate cancer. Much of this controversy appears to be based on conflicting study designs, definitions and methodologies. To date no prospective study with sufficient power has been published to unequivocally resolve the issue. The preponderance of studies of the safety of exogenous testosterone in men with a prostate cancer history suggests that there is little if any risk. However, because the risk has not proved to be zero, the most prudent course is to follow such men with regular prostate specific antigen measurements and digital rectal examinations., (Copyright © 2015 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the value of multiparametric MRI-targeted prostate biopsies in patients with suspected low-risk prostate cancer., Patients and Method: Patients with normal digital rectal examination and a PSA level between 4 and 10 ng/mL were prospectively included. A multiparametric MRI of the prostate was performed prospectively before the biopsies. 12-core randomized biopsies were performed, with additional targeted samples in each suspicious area identified on MRI. Detected cancers and their histological characteristics were compared between those two biopsy protocols. A micro focal cancer (MFC) was defined by the presence of less than 4mm of Gleason score 3+3 cancer on a single core., Results: Seventy-one consecutive patients were included. The overall detection rate was of 53% (38/71). It was of 70% (26/37) in the presence of suspicious area on MRI versus 35% (12/34) in the absence of any suspicious area (P=0.004). MRI-targeted biopsies alone detected three cancers, none of which was a MFC. 12-core biopsies alone detected 14 cancers, including ten MFC (71%). In 21 patients, prostate cancer was detected by both the MRI-targeted and 12-core biopsies. The Gleason score in the MRI-targeted area was the highest Gleason score in 90% of the cases. It was high (>6) in 76% (16/21) of the patients., Conclusions: MRI-targeted biopsies detected less micro focal cancers than randomized 12-core biopsies. They did not seem however to decrease the detection of clinically significant cancers., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)