1. Interdisciplinary decision making in prostate cancer therapy – 5-years’ time trends at the Interdisciplinary Prostate Cancer Center (IPC) of the Charité Berlin
- Author
-
Kurt Miller, Roman Reunkoff, Alexandra Baumunk, Ursula Steiner, Steffen Weikert, Martin Schostak, Lutz Moser, Carsten Kempkensteffen, Stefan Höcht, Thomas Wiegel, Julien Kushner, Mark Schrader, and Daniel Baumunk
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Quality Assurance, Health Care ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Decision Making ,Brachytherapy ,Health Informatics ,Comorbidity ,Medical decision making ,Cancer Care Facilities ,Risk Assessment ,Cohort Studies ,Prostate cancer ,Risk Factors ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Stage (cooking) ,Referral and Consultation ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,Patient Care Team ,Prostatectomy ,Gynecology ,Gleason grading system ,Chi-Square Distribution ,business.industry ,Health Policy ,Prostatic Neoplasms ,Time trends ,Organ Size ,Middle Aged ,Prostate-Specific Antigen ,Interdisciplinary consultation ,medicine.disease ,Computer Science Applications ,Berlin ,Radiation therapy ,Cohort ,business ,Watchful waiting ,Research Article - Abstract
Background Patients with prostate cancer face the difficult decision between a wide range of therapeutic options. These men require elaborate information about their individual risk profile and the therapeutic strategies´ risks and benefits to choose the best possible option. In order to detect time trends and quality improvements between an early patient population (2003/2004) and a later reference group (2007/2008) data was analysed with regards to epidemiologic parameters, differences in diagnostics and the type and ranking of the recommended therapies taking into account changes to Gleason Grading System and implementation of new therapeutic strategies, particularly Active surveillance, in 2005. Methods Data from all 496 consecutive patients who received consultation in 2003/2004 (n = 280) and 2007/2008 (n = 216) was retrospectively evaluated. Categorical variables were compared using the Chi-square test. Dependent variables were analysed using the unpaired Students´ t-test and the Mann–Whitney U-test. Results The cohorts were comparable concerning clinical stage, initial PSA, prostate volume, comorbidities and organ confined disease. Patients in Cohort I were younger (66.44 vs. 69.31y; p
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF