Search

The aim of this retrospective study was to identify clinical predictors of early biochemical recurrence (BCR) in patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) treated with carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). A total of 670 high-risk PCa patients treated with CIRT and ADT were included in the study. Early BCR was defined as recurrence occurring during adjuvant ADT after CIRT or within 2 years after completion of ADT. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify clinical predictors of early BCR. Patients were also classified according to the Systemic Therapy in Advancing or Metastatic Prostate cancer (STAMPEDE) PCa classification. Early BCR was observed in 5.4% of the patients. Multivariate analysis identified clinical T3b stage and ≥75% positive biopsy cores as clinical predictors of early BCR after CIRT and ADT. The STAMPEDE PCa classification was also significantly associated with early BCR based on univariate analysis. These predictors can help clinicians identify patients who are at risk of early BCR. In the future, combination therapy of ADT with abiraterone may be an option for high-risk PCa patients who are at risk of early BCR, based on the results of the STAMPEDE study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To compare the medical costs of active surveillance with those of robot‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy, brachytherapy, intensity‐modulated radiation therapy, and hormone therapy for low‐risk prostate cancer. Methods: The costs of protocol biopsies performed in the first year of surveillance (between January 2010 and June 2020) and those of brachytherapy and radiation therapy performed between May 2019 and June 2020 at the Kagawa University Hospital were analyzed. Hormone therapy costs were assumed to be the costs of luteinizing hormone‐releasing hormone analogs for over 5 years. Active surveillance‐eligible patients were defined based on the following: age <74 years, ≤T2, Gleason score ≤6, prostate‐specific antigen level ≤10 ng/ml, and 1–2 positive cores. We estimated the total number of active surveillance‐eligible patients in Japan based on the Japan Study Group of Prostate Cancer (J‐CAP) study and the 2017 cancer statistical data. We then calculated the 5‐year treatment costs of active surveillance‐eligible patients using the J‐CAP and PRIAS‐JAPAN study data. Results: In 2017, number of active surveillance‐eligible patients in Japan was estimated to be 2808. The 5‐year total costs of surveillance, prostatectomy, brachytherapy, radiation therapy, and hormone therapy were 1.65, 14.0, 4.61, 4.04, and 5.87 million United States dollar (USD), respectively. If 50% and 100% of the patients in each treatment group had opted for active surveillance as the initial treatment, the total treatment cost would have been reduced by USD 6.89 million (JPY 889 million) and USD 13.8 million (JPY 1.78 billion), respectively. Conclusion: Expanding active surveillance to eligible patients with prostate cancer helps save medical costs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To explore the perceptions of patients living with different stages of prostate cancer across the Asia‐Pacific (APAC) region, as while extensive quantitative research has been undertaken into outcomes of treatments for prostate cancer, little in the way of qualitative research has been performed looking at subjective perceptions of patients in regard to their perceived deficits in the treatment of this condition and such research is particularly lacking in reference to the APAC region. Patients and methods: Initial 45‐min qualitative research interrogatory interviews were conducted with 12 patients from Australia, China and Japan to identify themes that were significant to patients in the management of prostate cancer. Thereafter, 150 patients with different stages of prostate cancer underwent 30‐min online (Australia) or computer‐assisted/personal interviews categorised on the five key themes identified, in order to more fully clarify the nature of patient perceptions of how their prostate cancer had been treated and the issues they felt could be more fully addressed in order to improve the management of this condition. Results: Interviews indicated common challenges and unmet needs among patients, including: (i) patients' feelings and emotional state change during their disease journey, (ii) patients lack of knowledge about prostate cancer and disease progression prior to diagnosis, (iii) patients felt shared decision‐making was uncommon, (iv) patients have misperceptions about surgery, and (v) patients have unmet needs for greater information and support to manage their condition. Conclusions: These patient perceptions of unmet needs in prostate cancer management stand in contrast to patient awareness of other common diseases such as heart failure and diabetes. Such unmet needs vary across disease stages and between different nationalities. Patients with prostate cancer in the APAC region appear to have gaps in knowledge about their disease and wish for greater information, support and public awareness about prostate cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To report long‐term outcome survival analysis of docetaxel‐based chemotherapy combined with dexamethasone in castration‐resistant prostate cancer patients (Japan‐Multinational Trial Organization Pca10‐01 trial). Methods: The Japan‐Multinational Trial Organization Pca10‐01 phase II trial was a multicenter, prospective single‐arm, phase II trial both in non‐metastatic and metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer patients that was organized by The Japan‐Multinational Trial Organization. Patients received 75 mg/m2 of docetaxel (every 21 days) and 0.5 mg of dexamethasone orally twice a day continuing throughout the treatment period. The primary end‐point of this additional analysis was overall survival. Secondary end‐points were progression‐free survival and safety. Results: Between January 2011 and February 2014, a total of 76 chemotherapy‐naïve castration‐resistant prostate cancer patients were enrolled. The median overall survival time was 42.5 months. The median overall survival time of M1 patients was 40.5 months (M0: not reached). The median progression‐free survival time was 13.2 months (M0: 15.7 months and M1: 12.3 months). The multivariate analysis predicting overall survival of M1 patients showed that time to castration‐resistant prostate cancer (≥20 months) was an independent parameter (hazard ratio 0.39, P = 0.023). Regarding the safety analysis, 36 out of 74 patients (48.6%) suffered from any grade of adverse events after the protocol treatment, and 18 patients (24.3%) had grade ≥3 adverse events. Conclusions: Docetaxel‐based chemotherapy combined with dexamethasone can achieve excellent survival efficacy not only in M0 castration‐resistant prostate cancer patients, but also in M1 castration‐resistant prostate cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To determine the predictors of testosterone recovery after termination of androgen deprivation therapy in high/intermediate‐risk prostate cancer patients receiving external beam radiation therapy with neoadjuvant and adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy. Methods: A total of 82 patients who underwent external beam radiation therapy with androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Serum testosterone levels after androgen deprivation therapy terminations were studied. Cox proportional hazard models and the Kaplan–Meier method were used for statistical analysis. Results: Median age, baseline testosterone, nadir testosterone and duration of androgen deprivation therapy were 73 years, 456 ng/dL, 16 ng/dL and 26 months, respectively. Androgen deprivation therapy duration of 33 months (hazard ratio 0.13; P = 0.0018), nadir testosterone of 20 ng/dL (hazard ratio 0.35; P = 0.0112) and testosterone >50 ng/dL at 6 months after androgen deprivation therapy termination (hazard ratio 0.21; P = 0.0075) were significantly associated with testosterone recovery to normal levels (200 ng/dL) on multivariate analysis. Androgen deprivation therapy duration of 33 months (hazard ratio 0.31; P = 0.0023) and nadir testosterone of 20 ng/dL (hazard ratio 0.38; P = 0.0012) were significantly associated with testosterone recovery to the supracastrate level (50 ng/dL) on multivariate analysis. After dividing patients into three risk groups, the rate of testosterone recovery to the normal level after 2 years of androgen deprivation therapy termination was 100% in the low‐risk group versus 20.8% in the high‐risk group (P < 0.0001); the rate of testosterone recovery to the supracastrate level was 100% in the low‐risk group versus 51.5% in the high‐risk group (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Duration of androgen deprivation therapy and achievement of nadir testosterone 20 ng/dL both predict testosterone recovery to the supracastrate level in prostate cancer patients undergoing external beam radiation therapy with androgen deprivation therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Whether biochemical recurrence (BR) is a significant predictive factor of mortality after definitive radiation therapy for prostate cancer remains unknown. The aim of the current study was to investigate the relation between BR and overall mortality (OAM) in high-risk prostate cancer patients who were treated with carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) and had long-term follow-up in 2 prospective trials.Methods: In the 2 phase 2 clinical trials, which involved 466 prostate cancer patients who received 63.0 to 66.0 Gy of CIRT (relative biological effect) in 20 fractions between 2000 and 2007, 324 patients who were deemed to be at high risk on the basis of the modified D'Amico classification criteria and received CIRT along with androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) were examined. The OAM rate was adjusted for the ADT duration, and multivariate analyses using a Cox proportional hazards model were performed for OAM with BR as a time-dependent covariate.Results: The median follow-up period was 107.4 months, and the 5- and 10-year OAM rates after adjustments for the ADT duration were 7.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.0%-9.4%) and 23.9% (95% CI, 16.4%-26.2%), respectively. A multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of BR (hazard ratio, 2.82; 95% Cl, 1.57-5.08; P = .001) was one of the predictive factors for OAM. On the other hand, the duration of ADT had no impact on OAM.Conclusions: BR after CIRT combined with ADT is an independent predictive factor for OAM in high-risk prostate cancer patients. The results of this study could be applied to other high-dose radiation therapies. Cancer 2016;122:3225-31. © 2016 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Cancer Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To validate the ability of contemporary active surveillance protocols to predict pathologically insignificant prostate cancer among Asian men undergoing radical prostatectomy. Methods We retrospectively reviewed data on 132 patients eligible for any active surveillance criteria out of 450 patients that underwent radical prostatectomy at several institutions between 2006 and 2013. We validated the ability of seven contemporary active surveillance protocols to predict pathologically insignificant prostate cancer. Traditional and updated criteria to define pathologically insignificant prostate cancer were used. Predictive factors for pathologically insignificant prostate cancer were determined by logistic regression analysis. Results The predictive rate for updated pathologically insignificant prostate cancer of respective active surveillance criteria was 51% for Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, 41% for Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance Study, 39% for University of Miami, 32% for University of California, San Francisco, 32% for Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 31% for Kakehi and 27% for University of Toronto. Predictive rates for pathologically insignificant prostate cancer in Asian men were far lower than in USA men. On multivariate analysis, predictive factors of updated pathologically insignificant cancer was prostate volume (odds ratio 1.07, P = 0.004). By adding prostate volume to Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance Study criteria, the predictive rate for updated insignificant prostate cancer was improved up to 66.7%. Conclusions Active surveillance can be carried out considering the clinical characteristics of prostate cancers depending on ethnicity, as current active surveillance criteria seem to have a lower predictive ability value of insignificant prostate cancer in Asian men compared with men in Western countries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose We examined the clinical significance of long-term serum testosterone monitoring to predict the prognosis of patients with prostate cancer treated with combined androgen blockade. Materials and Methods We retrospectively analyzed the records of 225 patients who underwent combined androgen blockade as first line therapy for prostate cancer. The prognostic values of testosterone and other clinical factors were evaluated with respect to prostate specific antigen progression-free and overall survival. Results Median patient age was 73.0 years, median prostate specific antigen was 42.6 ng/ml and median followup was 45.8 months. No variable associated with testosterone was predictive of progression-free survival. With regard to overall survival on univariate analysis nadir testosterone less than 16 ng/dl (p = 0.0190), less than 20 ng/dl (p = 0.0020) and less than 32 ng/dl (p = 0.0146) were significant together with other clinical factors. In contrast, nadir testosterone less than 8 and less than 12 ng/dl were not significant. Multivariate analysis showed that nadir testosterone less than 20 ng/dl was the significant prognostic factor (p = 0.0048). In addition, time to nadir testosterone was about 1 year (11.3 months). Patients were divided into rapid and slow types based on time to testosterone less than 20 ng/dl before and after 6 months, respectively. No significant difference in overall survival was observed between the 2 types. The current results suggest that the critical factor for prognosis was not a rapid decrease but whether nadir testosterone achieved a level of less than 20 ng/dl. Conclusions Nadir testosterone 20 ng/dl was the most significant cutoff level for overall survival in Japanese patients with prostate cancer treated with combined androgen blockade. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractBackground: We determined the effect of prostatic biopsy on the changes in total and free prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and free-to-total PSA ratio (F/T ratio) and examined if there are differences in these parameters between patients with benign and malignant histologic findings. Methods: The concentration of total and free PSA and the F/T ratio were determined in 35 men before and 1 h after prostatic biopsy. The level of PSA was measured with a chemiluminescent enzyme assay. Of 35 patients, nine were diagnosed as having prostate cancer. Results: In patients whose biopsy revealed cancer, the F/T ratio was lower than those without cancer, although there were no differences in total and free PSA value before prostatic biopsy. One hour after prostatic biopsy, there was an increase in the level of total and free PSA and the F/T ratio in all men. The increase in the F/T ratio was greater in patients whose biopsies revealed no prostate cancer. In patients with stage B cancer, these parameters increased more than those with stage C/D cancer. Conclusion: Prostatic biopsy causes a dramatic increase in total and free PSA. The F/T ratio also increased after biopsy. The PSA response to prostatic biopsy might be different in patients with and without prostatic malignancy. The response might also be different according to stage of prostate cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Nakata I et al i . evaluated the prognostic significance of alternative antiandrogen therapy, and compared prostate-specific antigen response rates for abiraterone and enzalutamide between responders and non-responders to alternative antiandrogen therapy.[1] They found that alternative antiandrogen therapy was effective in 56.7% of patients and these responders had significantly better overall survival than non-responders, and that cross-resistance between alternative antiandrogen therapy and new hormonal therapies was not detected. Based on these findings, they concluded that alternative antiandrogen therapy might still be of therapeutic value for Japanese patients with advanced prostate cancer in the era of new hormonal therapy. To conclude that alternative antiandrogen therapy is of therapeutic value, the outcomes must be compared between the patients with or without alternative antiandrogen therapy. [Extracted from the article]