Search

Purpose: Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) is a promising technique that can acquire perfusion information without the use of contrast agent, contrary to the more established dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) technique. This is of interest for treatment response monitoring, where patients can be imaged on each treatment fraction. In this study, longitudinal correlations between IVIM- and DCE parameters were assessed in prostate cancer patients receiving radiation treatment. Materials and Methods: 20 prostate cancer patients were treated on a 1.5 T MR-linac with 20 x 3 or 3.1 Gy. Weekly IVIM and DCE scans were acquired. Tumors, the peripheral zone (PZ), and the transition zone (TZ) were delineated on a T2-weighted scan acquired on the first fraction. IVIM and DCE scans were registered to this scan and the delineations were propagated. Median values from these delineations were used for further analysis. The IVIM parameters D, f, D* and the product fD* were calculated. The Tofts model was used to calculate the DCE parameters Ktrans, kep and ve. Pearson correlations were calculated for the IVIM and DCE parameters on values from the first fraction for each region of interest (ROI). For longitudinal analysis, the repeated measures correlation coefficient was used to determine correlations between IVIM and DCE parameters in each ROI. Results: When averaging over patients, an increase during treatment in all IVIM and DCE parameters was observed in all ROIs, except for D in the PZ and TZ. No significant Pearson correlations were found between any pair of IVIM and DCE parameters measured on the first fraction. Significant but low longitudinal correlations were found for some combinations of IVIM and DCE parameters in the PZ and TZ, while no significant longitudinal correlations were found in the tumor. Notably in the TZ, for both f and fD*, significant longitudinal correlations with all DCE parameters were found. Conclusions: The increase in IVIM- and DCE parameters when averaging over patients indicates a measurable response to radiation treatment with both techniques. Although low, significant longitudinal correlations were found which suggests that IVIM could potentially be used as an alternative to DCE for treatment response monitoring. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Daily quantitative MR imaging during radiotherapy of cancer patients has become feasible with MRI systems integrated with linear accelerators (MR-linacs). Quantitative images could be used for treatment response monitoring. With intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) MRI, it is possible to acquire perfusion information without the use of contrast agents. In this multicenter study, daily IVIM measurements were performed in prostate cancer patients to identify changes that potentially reflect response to treatment. Materials and Methods: Forty-three patients were included, treated with 20 fractions of 3 Gy on a 1.5 T MR-linac. IVIM measurements were performed on each treatment day. The diffusion coefficient (D), perfusion fraction (f), and pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*) were calculated based on the median signal intensities in the non-cancerous prostate and the tumor. Repeatability coefficients (RCs) were determined based on the first two treatment fractions. Separate linear mixed-effects models were constructed for the three IVIM parameters. Results: In total, 726 fractions were analyzed. Pre-treatment average values, measured on the first fraction before irradiation, were 1.46 × 10−3 mm2/s, 0.086, and 28.7 × 10−3 mm2/s in the non-cancerous prostate and 1.19 × 10−3 mm2/s, 0.088, and 28.9 × 10−3 mm2/s in the tumor, for D, f, and D*, respectively. The repeatability coefficients for D, f, and D* in the non-cancerous prostate were 0.09 × 10−3 mm2/s, 0.05, and 15.3 × 10−3 mm2/s. In the tumor, these values were 0.44 × 10−3 mm2/s, 0.16, and 76.4 × 10−3 mm2/s. The mixed effects analysis showed an increase in D of the tumors over the course of treatment, while remaining stable in the non-cancerous prostate. The f and D* increased in both the non-cancerous prostate and tumor. Conclusions: It is feasible to perform daily IVIM measurements on an MR-linac system. Although the repeatability coefficients were high, changes in IVIM perfusion parameters were measured on a group level, indicating that IVIM has potential for measuring treatment response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Highlights • Quantitative MRI on a 1.5 T MR-linac is feasible. • Quantitative MRI on a 1.5 T MR-linac is demonstrated in a prostate cancer patient. • Accuracy and precision are comparable to literature values of diagnostic systems. Abstract Purpose Systems for magnetic resonance (MR-) guided radiotherapy enable daily MR imaging of cancer patients during treatment, which is of interest for treatment response monitoring and biomarker discovery using quantitative MRI (qMRI). Here, the performance of a 1.5 T MR-linac regarding qMRI was assessed on phantoms. Additionally, we show the feasibility of qMRI in a prostate cancer patient on this system for the first time. Materials and methods Four 1.5 T MR-linac systems from four institutes were included in this study. T 1 and T 2 relaxation times, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, as well as dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) images were acquired. Bland–Altman statistics were used, and accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility were determined. Results Median accuracy for T 1 ranged over the four systems from 2.7 to 14.3%, for T 2 from 10.4 to 14.1%, and for ADC from 1.9 to 2.7%. For DCE images, the accuracy ranged from 12.8 to 35.8% for a gadolinium concentration of 0.5 mM and deteriorated for higher concentrations. Median short-term repeatability for T 1 ranged from 0.6 to 5.1%, for T 2 from 0.4 to 1.2%, and for ADC from 1.3 to 2.2%. DCE acquisitions showed a coefficient of variation of 0.1–0.6% in the signal intensity. Long-term repeatability was 1.8% for T 1 , 1.4% for T 2 , 1.7% for ADC, and 17.9% for DCE. Reproducibility was 11.2% for T 1 , 2.9% for T 2 , 2.2% for ADC, and 18.4% for DCE. Conclusion These results indicate that qMRI on the Unity MR-linac is feasible, accurate, and repeatable which is promising for treatment response monitoring and treatment plan adaptation based on daily qMRI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]