Search

Fulvestrant (ICI-182,780) has recently been shown to effectively suppress prostate cancer cell growth in vitro and in vivo. But it is unclear whether microRNAs play a role in regulating oncogene expression in fulvestrant-treated prostate cancer. Here, this study reports hsa-miR-765 as the first fulvestrant-driven, ERβ-regulated miRNA exhibiting significant tumor suppressor activities like fulvestrant, against prostate cancer cell growth via blockage of cell-cycle progression at the G2/M transition, and cell migration and invasion possibly via reduction of filopodia/intense stress-fiber formation. Fulvestrant was shown to upregulate hsa-miR-765 expression through recruitment of ERβ to the 5′-regulatory-region of hsa-miR-765. HMGA1, an oncogenic protein in prostate cancer, was identified as a downstream target of hsa-miR-765 and fulvestrant in cell-based experiments and a clinical study. Both the antiestrogen and the hsa-miR-765 mimic suppressed HMGA1 protein expression. In a neo-adjuvant study, levels of hsa-miR-765 were increased and HMGA1 expression was almost completely lost in prostate cancer specimens from patients treated with a single dose (250 mg) of fulvestrant 28 days before prostatectomy. These findings reveal a novel fulvestrant signaling cascade involving ERβ-mediated transcriptional upregulation of hsa-miR-765 that suppresses HMGA1 protein expression as part of the mechanism underlying the tumor suppressor action of fulvestrant in prostate cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Human exposure to bisphenol A (BPA) is ubiquitous. Animal studies found that BPA contributes to development of prostate cancer, but human data are scarce. Our study examined the association between urinary BPA levels and Prostate cancer and assessed the effects of BPA on induction of centrosome abnormalities as an underlying mechanism promoting prostate carcinogenesis. The study, involving 60 urology patients, found higher levels of urinary BPA (creatinine-adjusted) in Prostate cancer patients (5.74 µg/g [95% CI; 2.63, 12.51]) than in non-Prostate cancer patients (1.43 µg/g [95% CI; 0.70, 2.88]) (p = 0.012). The difference was even more significant in patients <65 years old. A trend toward a negative association between urinary BPA and serum PSA was observed in Prostate cancer patients but not in non-Prostate cancer patients. In vitro studies examined centrosomal abnormalities, microtubule nucleation, and anchorage-independent growth in four Prostate cancer cell lines (LNCaP, C4-2, 22Rv1, PC-3) and two immortalized normal prostate epithelial cell lines (NPrEC and RWPE-1). Exposure to low doses (0.01–100 nM) of BPA increased the percentage of cells with centrosome amplification two- to eight-fold. Dose responses either peaked or reached the plateaus with 0.1 nM BPA exposure. This low dose also promoted microtubule nucleation and regrowth at centrosomes in RWPE-1 and enhanced anchorage-independent growth in C4-2. These findings suggest that urinary BPA level is an independent prognostic marker in Prostate cancer and that BPA exposure may lower serum PSA levels in Prostate cancer patients. Moreover, disruption of the centrosome duplication cycle by low-dose BPA may contribute to neoplastic transformation of the prostate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Most men with increased serum prostate specific antigen and negative biopsy require repeat biopsy because of the lack of a sensitive and specific prostate cancer detection test. In this study we evaluated the diagnostic potential of a duplex assay for prostate cancer by quantifying transcript levels of α-methylacyl-CoA racemase and prostate cancer antigen 3 in urine sediments following prostatic massage. Materials and Methods: Urine sediments from 92 patients, 43 with and 49 without prostate cancer, were collected after digital rectal examination. Transcript levels of AMACR, PCA3 and PSA in total RNA isolated from these samples were determined by absolute quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. AMACR and PCA3 scores were obtained by normalizing the transcript level to that of prostate specific antigen for each sample and multiplying by 100. Results: AMACR (p = 0.006) and PCA3 (p = 0.014) scores, but not serum prostate specific antigen (p = 0.306), distinguished specimens from patients with prostate cancer from specimens from patients without prostate cancer, and ROC analysis established the diagnostic cutoff scores for the AMACR and PCA3 tests at 10.7 and 19.9, respectively. As determined from these cutoff scores the AMACR test had 70% (95% CI 56–83) sensitivity and 71% (95% CI 59–84) specificity, whereas the PCA3 test had 72% (95% CI 59–85) sensitivity and 59% (95% CI 45–73) specificity for prostate cancer detection. The combined use of AMACR and PCA3 scores in a dual marker test increased sensitivity to 81% (95% CI 70–93) and specificity to 84% (95% CI 73–94). Conclusions: Urinary AMACR and PCA3 tests were superior to a serum prostate specific antigen test for detecting prostate cancer. Their combined use in a dual marker test further improved sensitivity and accuracy, and could serve as a surveillance test after repeat negative prostate biopsies. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The estrogenic properties of bisphenol A (BPA), a ubiquitous synthetic monomer that can leach into the food and water supply, have prompted considerable research into exposure-associated health risks in humans. Endocrine-disrupting properties of BPA suggest it may impact developmental plasticity during early life, predisposing individuals to disease at doses below the oral reference dose (RfD) established by the Environmental Protection Agency in 1982. Herein, we review the current in vivo literature evaluating the carcinogenic properties of BPA. We conclude that there is substantial evidence from rodent studies indicating that early-life BPA exposures below the RfD lead to increased susceptibility to mammary and prostate cancer. Based on the definitions of “carcinogen” put forth by the International Agency for Research on Cancer and the National Toxicology Program, we propose that BPA may be reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen in the breast and prostate due to its tumor promoting properties. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Highlights: [•] Promoter 0K and 0N are active in the ERβ transcription in the prostate. [•] Various combinations of exon 0Xs are associated only with promoter 0K of ERβ. [•] ERβ1, 2 and 5 differentially utilize promoter 0K and 0N for transcription. [•] Exon 0Xs are present in 5′ untranslated regions of ERβ2 and 5 but not ERβ1. [•] Exon 0Xs possess upstream open reading frames to reduce protein expression. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Human exposure to bisphenol A (BPA) is ubiquitous. Animal studies found that BPA contributes to development of prostate cancer, but human data are scarce. Our study examined the association between urinary BPA levels and Prostate cancer and assessed the effects of BPA on induction of centrosome abnormalities as an underlying mechanism promoting prostate carcinogenesis. The study, involving 60 urology patients, found higher levels of urinary BPA (creatinine-adjusted) in Prostate cancer patients (5.74 µg/g [95% CI; 2.63, 12.51]) than in non-Prostate cancer patients (1.43 µg/g [95% CI; 0.70, 2.88]) (p = 0.012). The difference was even more significant in patients <65 years old. A trend toward a negative association between urinary BPA and serum PSA was observed in Prostate cancer patients but not in non-Prostate cancer patients. In vitro studies examined centrosomal abnormalities, microtubule nucleation, and anchorage-independent growth in four Prostate cancer cell lines (LNCaP, C4-2, 22Rv1, PC-3) and two immortalized normal prostate epithelial cell lines (NPrEC and RWPE-1). Exposure to low doses (0.01–100 nM) of BPA increased the percentage of cells with centrosome amplification two- to eight-fold. Dose responses either peaked or reached the plateaus with 0.1 nM BPA exposure. This low dose also promoted microtubule nucleation and regrowth at centrosomes in RWPE-1 and enhanced anchorage-independent growth in C4-2. These findings suggest that urinary BPA level is an independent prognostic marker in Prostate cancer and that BPA exposure may lower serum PSA levels in Prostate cancer patients. Moreover, disruption of the centrosome duplication cycle by low-dose BPA may contribute to neoplastic transformation of the prostate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The present study examines BPA pharmacokinetics in neonatal rats following s.c. injection or oral delivery of 10μg BPA/kg BW and compares susceptibility to estrogen-induced prostate intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) following either exposure route. Serum BPA in PND3 rats was measured using HPLC–MS–MS. Free and total BPA at C max were 1.77 and 2.0ng/ml, respectively following injection and 0.26 and 1.02ng/ml, respectively following oral exposure. The AUC0–2 for free and total BPA was 4.1-fold and 1.8-fold greater, respectively, in s.c. vs. oral delivery. While exposure route affected BPA metabolism, internal dosimetry following s.c. injection of 10μg BPA/kg BW is similar to BPA levels observed in humans. Prostates from aged rats given s.c. or oral BPA neonatally and T+E implants as adults exhibited nearly identical, heightened susceptibility to PIN incidence and score as compared to neonatal oil-controls. These findings on prostate health are directly relevant to humans at current BPA exposure levels. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Objectives: To examine estrogen receptor-beta (ERβ) expression in prostate cancer (CaP) metastases, thereby providing a basis for conducting estrogen therapy studies in patients with metastatic CaP. Advanced androgen-independent CaP is a serious health problem with no effective treatment at present. Estrogens have been reported to inhibit the growth of CaP cells in androgen-free environments. Recent reports have shown that the prostatic epithelium and primary CaP cells express ERβ, with decreased expression of ERβ accompanying CaP progression. It has been proposed that ERβ may play a role in the growth regulation of prostate cells. The targeting of ERs by selective ER modulators might be an effective method of treating advanced CaP. Methods: The anti-ERβ antibody GC17 was used in immunohistochemistry to characterize the expression of ERβ in CaP metastasis specimens (n = 60) obtained from 20 patients who had died of CaP. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate the association of ERβ expression with clinical parameters, including prostate-specific antigen levels, radiotherapy, and estrogen exposure. Results: Nuclear ERβ staining was detected in all bone CaP metastases (33 of 33) and nonosseous CaP metastases (27 of 27). However, a large variability in the percentage of immunoreactive cells (5% to 100%) was found among patients, as well as among individual patient samples. A statistically significant negative association between nuclear ERβ staining and estrogen exposure (P = 0.05) was detected. Conclusions: Our data have shown that ERβ is expressed in CaP metastases, validating the initiation of studies to evaluate selective ER modulators for treatment of advanced CaP. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: To evaluate the possibility of using α-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) variants to improve the specificity of prostate cancer (CaP) detection. AMACR has been used as a diagnostic biomarker for CaP and is now a standard biomarker for needle biopsy specimens with ambiguous lesions. Methods: We used in silico analysis and molecular cloning to discover new AMACR variants and quantitative reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to measure the transcript levels of AMACR and its variants in 4 prostate cell lines and in 23 pairs of CaP and adjacent normal tissue. Results: We found 4 novel variants, IAs, IBL, IBLd, and IBLi. Transcript levels of most AMACR variants were significantly upregulated in CaP compared with its adjacent normal counterparts. A variants, the functional variants based on bioinformatic analysis, showed levels of transcript expression in CaP in this order: IA≫IAd=IIA≫IIAs>IAs. In contrast, the expression of the B variants, which appear to be nonfunctional due to the absence of exon 3, was lower than that of the A variants. IB was the most abundant form of B variant; and expression of IIB was negligible. More important, the difference between levels of variant IA, IAd, IIA, IIAs, IB, and IBLi in CaP and normal tissue was significantly higher than the difference in levels of total AMACR. Conclusions: Our data suggest that AMACR variants have better power than total AMACR in discriminating between CaP and adjacent normal tissue. These findings may be useful for the development of future diagnostic assays. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]