Search

Purpose: To evaluate sub-differentiation of PI-RADS-3 prostate lesions using pre-defined T2- and diffusion-weighted (DWI) MRI criteria, to aid the biopsy decision process.Methods: 143 patients with PIRADS-3 index lesions on MRI underwent targeted transperineal-MR/US fusion biopsy. Radiologists with 2 and 7-years experience performed blinded retrospective second-reads using set criteria and assigned biopsy recommendations. Inter-reader agreement, Gleason score (GS), positive (PPV) predictive values (±95% confidence intervals) were calculated and compared by Fisher's exact test with Bonferroni-Hom correction.Results: 43% (61/143) patients had GS 6-10 and 21% (30/143) GS≥3+4 cancer. For peripheral zone lesions, significant differences in any cancer detection were found for shape (0.26±0.13 geographical vs. 0.69±0.23 rounded; p=0.0055) and ADC (mild 0.21±0.12 vs marked 0.81±0.19; p=0.0001). For transition zone, significantly increased cancer detection was shown for location (anterior 0.63±0.15 vs. mid/posterior 0.31±0.14; p=0.0048), border (pseudo-capsule 0.32±0.14 vs. ill-defined 0.61±0.15; p=0.0092), and ADC (mild 0.35±0.12 vs marked restriction 0.68±0.17; p=0.0057). Biopsy recommendations had 62% inter-reader agreement (89/143). Experienced reader PPVs were significantly higher for any cancer with "biopsy-recommended" 0.61±0.11 vs. "no biopsy" 0.21±0.10 (p=0.0001), and for GS 7-10 cancers: 0.32±0.10 vs. 0.08±0.07, respectively (p=0.0003).Conclusion: Identification of certain objective imaging criteria as well as a subjective biopsy recommendation from an experienced radiologist can help to increase the predictive value of equivocal prostate lesions and inform the decision making process of whether or not to biopsy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To evaluate the effect of pre-biopsy magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on cancer diagnostic times, and to report MRI-directed pathology outcomes.Materials and Methods: In total, 1483 patients were referred with prostate cancer suspicion during a 30-month period. Upfront MRI was performed in 745 patients: 332 MRIs in the 15 months prior to dedicated scanning slots (group 1), and 413 in the 15 months post-introduction (group 2). A further 88 patients had initial MRI following clinical assessment. Biopsy via the transrectal (TR) or transperineal (TP) approach was performed, with MRI/ultrasound fusion for MRI targets. Clinically significant cancer (csPCa) was defined as Gleason ≥3+4. Negative MRIs were defined as Likert 1-2. Per-case clinical decisions were taken to biopsy or not.Results: 44.4% of patients avoided biopsy. 484/833 (58.1%) MRIs were negative; 37.4% of these patients had biopsy with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 92.8% for Gleason ≥3+4 and 98.3% for ≥4+3. Overall prostate cancer prevalence was 34.3% (24.6% csPCa). In 323 MRI-positive cases, any cancer was present in 78.9% (csPCa 60.4%). Of the 1483 patients, 1232 (83.1%) completed all diagnostic tests within 28 days. Upfront MRI patients met this standard in 621/833 (74.5%), improving from 66.9% to 81.1% with reserved slots (group 2) with a reduced diagnostic time from median 25.5 to 20.9 days. Biopsy scheduling delayed the pathway in 69.7%, with MRI responsible in 22.3%, reducing to 10.3% in group 2. TP biopsies met the 28-day standard in significantly less cases (29.7%), compared to TR (67.4%, p<0.0001).Conclusion: Reserved MRI slots reduces time-to-diagnosis, and upfront MRI safely avoids biopsy in a significant proportion of men, whilst maintaining expected csPCa detection rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]