Search

Objective: To assess the reproducibility and impact of prostate imaging quality (PI-QUAL) scores in a clinical cohort undergoing prostate multiparametric MRI., Methods: PI-QUAL scores were independently recorded by three radiologists (two senior, one junior). Readers also recorded whether MRI was sufficient to rule-in/out cancer and if repeat imaging was required. Inter-reader agreement was assessed using Cohen's κ. PI-QUAL scores were further correlated to PI-RADS score, number of biopsy procedures, and need for repeat imaging., Results: Image quality was sufficient (≥PI-QUAL-3) in 237/247 (96%) and optimal (≥PI-QUAL-4) in 206/247 (83%) of males undergoing 3T-MRI. Overall PI-QUAL scores showed moderate inter-reader agreement for senior ( K = 0.51) and junior-senior readers ( K = 0.47), with DCE showing highest agreement ( K = 0.47). With PI-QUAL-5 studies, the negative MRI calls increased from 50 to 87% and indeterminate PI-RADS-3 rates decreased from 31.8. to 10.4% compared to lower quality PI-QUAL-3 studies. More patients with PI-QUAL scores 1-3 underwent biopsy for negative (47%) and indeterminate probability (100%) MRIs compared to PI-QUAL score 4-5 (30 and 75%, respectively). Ability to rule-in cancer increased with PI-QUAL score, from 50% at PI-QUAL 1-2 to 90% for PI-QUAL 4-5, with a similarly, but greater effect for ruling-out cancer and at a lower threshold, from 0% for scans of PI-QUAL 1-2 to 67.1% for PI-QUAL 4 and 100% for PI-QUAL-5., Conclusion: Higher PI-QUAL scores for image quality are associated with decreased uncertainty in MRI decision-making and improved efficiency of diagnostic pathway delivery., Advances in Knowledge: This study demonstrates moderate inter-reader agreement for PI-QUAL scoring and validates the score in a clinical setting, showing correlation of image quality to certainty of decision making and clinical outcomes of repeat imaging and biopsy of low-to-intermediate risk cases.

Aim: To evaluate the effect of pre-biopsy magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on cancer diagnostic times, and to report MRI-directed pathology outcomes., Materials and Methods: In total, 1483 patients were referred with prostate cancer suspicion during a 30-month period. Upfront MRI was performed in 745 patients: 332 MRIs in the 15 months prior to dedicated scanning slots (group 1), and 413 in the 15 months post-introduction (group 2). A further 88 patients had initial MRI following clinical assessment. Biopsy via the transrectal (TR) or transperineal (TP) approach was performed, with MRI/ultrasound fusion for MRI targets. Clinically significant cancer (csPCa) was defined as Gleason ≥3+4. Negative MRIs were defined as Likert 1-2. Per-case clinical decisions were taken to biopsy or not., Results: 44.4% of patients avoided biopsy. 484/833 (58.1%) MRIs were negative; 37.4% of these patients had biopsy with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 92.8% for Gleason ≥3+4 and 98.3% for ≥4+3. Overall prostate cancer prevalence was 34.3% (24.6% csPCa). In 323 MRI-positive cases, any cancer was present in 78.9% (csPCa 60.4%). Of the 1483 patients, 1232 (83.1%) completed all diagnostic tests within 28 days. Upfront MRI patients met this standard in 621/833 (74.5%), improving from 66.9% to 81.1% with reserved slots (group 2) with a reduced diagnostic time from median 25.5 to 20.9 days. Biopsy scheduling delayed the pathway in 69.7%, with MRI responsible in 22.3%, reducing to 10.3% in group 2. TP biopsies met the 28-day standard in significantly less cases (29.7%), compared to TR (67.4%, p<0.0001)., Conclusion: Reserved MRI slots reduces time-to-diagnosis, and upfront MRI safely avoids biopsy in a significant proportion of men, whilst maintaining expected csPCa detection rates., (Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aim: To evaluate the effect of the spasmolytic agent hyoscine butylbromide (HBB) on the quality of anatomical and functional imaging of the prostate., Materials and Methods: One hundred and seventy-three patients were included in this retrospective study. Eighty-seven patients received intravenous HBB prior to scanning (HBB group) and 86 patients did not (non-HBB group). Multiparametric (mp) 3 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed using a 32-channel body coil. Two radiologists independently evaluated the image quality of T2-weighted imaging (WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, using a five-point Likert scale. DWI was further assessed for distortion and artefact (four-point Likert scale), and T2WI for the presence of motion artefact or blurring. Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) image quality was assessed by recording the number of corrupt contrast curve data points., Results: T2W image quality in the HBB group was significantly higher than in the non-HBB group (3.63±1.11 versus 2.84±0.899); p<0.001. The HBB group also showed significantly less T2W motion and T2W blur than the non-HBB group (23% and 51.7% versus 53.5% and 83.7%, respectively; p<0.001); however, there was no significant improvement in DWI or ADC image quality, or DWI degree of distortion or artefact. There was a trend towards a lower number of corrupted data points from the contrast curve (2.47±2.44 versus 3.68±2.64), but this did not reach significance (p=0.052)., Conclusion: Administration of HBB significantly improves the image quality of T2WI images. These results provide evidence for the use of HBB in routine patient preparation prior to prostate mpMRI., (Copyright © 2017 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of rectal distension on the quality of anatomical and functional prostate multiparametric (mp) MRI., Materials and Methods: Multiparametric (mp) 3T-MRI images of 173 patients were independently evaluated by two radiologists in this retrospective study. Planimetry rectal volumes were derived and a subjective assessment of rectal distension was made using a 5-point Likert scale (1=no stool/gas, 5=large amount of stool/gas). Image quality of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale. DWI was further scored for distortion and artefact. T2W images were evaluated for image sharpness and the presence of motion artefact. The stability of the dynamic contrast-enhancement acquisition was assessed by recording the number of corrupt data points during the wash-out phase., Results: There was a strong correlation between subjective scoring of rectal loading and objectively measured rectal volume (r=0.82), p<0.001. A significant correlation was shown between increased rectal distension and both reduced DW image quality (r=-0.628, p<0.001), and increased DW image distortion (r=0.814, p<0.001). There was also a significant trend for rectal distension to increase artefact at DWI (r=0.154, p=0.042). Increased rectal distension led to increased motion artefact on T2 (p=0.0096), but did not have a significant effect on T2-sharpness (p=0.0638). There was no relationship between rectal distension and DCE image quality (p=0.693). 63 patients underwent lesion-targeted biopsy post MRI, there was a trend to higher positive predictive values in patients with minor rectal distension (34/38, 89.5%) compared to those with moderate/marked distension (18/25, 72%), p=0.09., Conclusion: Rectal distension has a significant negative effect on the quality of both T2W and DW images. Consideration should therefore be given to bowel preparation prior to prostate mpMRI to optimise image quality., (Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) now plays an essential role in prostate cancer diagnosis and management. The increasing use of MRI before biopsy makes obtaining images of the highest quality vital. The European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) 2012 guidelines and subsequent Prostate Imaging -Reporting Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 recommendations in 2015 address the technical considerations for optimising MRI acquisition; however, the quality of the multiparametric sequences employed depends not only on the hardware and software utilised and scanning parameters selected, but also on patient-related factors, for which current guidance is lacking. Patient preparation factors include bowel peristalsis, rectal distension, the presence of total hip replacement (THR), post-biopsy haemorrhage, and abstinence from ejaculation. New evidence has been accrued since the release of PI-RADS v2, and this review aims to explore the key issues of patient preparation and their potential to further optimise the image quality of mpMRI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]