Search

Interval-censored failure time data arise commonly in various scientific studies where the failure time of interest is only known to lie in a certain time interval rather than observed exactly. In addition, left truncation on the failure event may occur and can greatly complicate the statistical analysis. In this paper, we investigate regression analysis of left-truncated and interval-censored data with the commonly used additive hazards model. Specifically, we propose a conditional estimating equation approach for the estimation, and further improve its estimation efficiency by combining the conditional estimating equation and the pairwise pseudo-score-based estimating equation that can eliminate the nuisance functions from the marginal likelihood of the truncation times. Asymptotic properties of the proposed estimators are discussed including the consistency and asymptotic normality. Extensive simulation studies are conducted to evaluate the empirical performance of the proposed methods, and suggest that the combined estimating equation approach is obviously more efficient than the conditional estimating equation approach. We then apply the proposed methods to a set of real data for illustration., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Left truncation commonly occurs in many areas, and many methods have been proposed in the literature for the analysis of various types of left-truncated failure time data. For the situation, a common approach is to conduct the analysis conditional on truncation times, and the method is relatively simple but may not be efficient. In this paper, we discuss regression analysis of such data arising from the proportional hazards model that also suffer interval censoring. For the problem, a pairwise pseudo-likelihood approach is proposed that aims to recover some missing information in the conditional methods. The resulting estimator is shown to be consistent and asymptotically normal. A simulation study is conducted to assess the performance of the proposed method and suggests that it works well in practical situations and is indeed more efficient than the existing method. The approach is also applied to a set of real data arising from an AIDS cohort study., (© 2020 The International Biometric Society.)

We propose a penalized variable selection method for the Cox proportional hazards model with interval censored data. It conducts a penalized nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation with an adaptive lasso penalty, which can be implemented through a penalized EM algorithm. The method is proven to enjoy the desirable oracle property. We also extend the method to left truncated and interval censored data. Our simulation studies show that the method possesses the oracle property in samples of modest sizes and outperforms available existing approaches in many of the operating characteristics. An application to a dental caries data set illustrates the method's utility.

In prevalent cohort design, subjects who have experienced an initial event but not the failure event are preferentially enrolled and the observed failure times are often length-biased. Moreover, the prospective follow-up may not be continuously monitored and failure times are subject to interval censoring. We study the nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation for the proportional hazards model with length-biased interval-censored data. Direct maximization of likelihood function is intractable, thus we develop a computationally simple and stable expectation-maximization algorithm through introducing two layers of data augmentation. We establish the strong consistency, asymptotic normality and efficiency of the proposed estimator and provide an inferential procedure through profile likelihood. We assess the performance of the proposed methods through extensive simulations and apply the proposed methods to the Massachusetts Health Care Panel Study., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Relating time-varying biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease to time-to-event using a Cox model is complicated by the fact that Alzheimer's disease biomarkers are sparsely collected, typically only at study entry; this is problematic since Cox regression with time-varying covariates requires observation of the covariate process at all failure times. The analysis might be simplified by using study entry as the time origin and treating the time-varying covariate measured at study entry as a fixed baseline covariate. In this paper, we first derive conditions under which using an incorrect time origin of study entry results in consistent estimation of regression parameters when the time-varying covariate is continuous and fully observed. We then derive conditions under which treating the time-varying covariate as fixed at study entry results in consistent estimation. We provide methods for estimating the regression parameter when a functional form can be assumed for the time-varying biomarker, which is measured only at study entry. We demonstrate our analytical results in a simulation study and apply our methods to data from the Rush Religious Orders Study and Memory and Aging Project and data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative., (Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

The hazard ratios resulting from a Cox's regression hazards model are hard to interpret and to be converted into prolonged survival time. As the main goal is often to study survival functions, there is increasing interest in summary measures based on the survival function that are easier to interpret than the hazard ratio; the residual mean time is an important example of those measures. However, because of the presence of right censoring, the tail of the survival distribution is often difficult to estimate correctly. Therefore, we consider the restricted residual mean time, which represents a partial area under the survival function, given any time horizon τ, and is interpreted as the residual life expectancy up to τ of a subject surviving up to time t. We present a class of regression models for this measure, based on weighted estimating equations and inverse probability of censoring weighted estimators to model potential right censoring. Furthermore, we show how to extend the models and the estimators to deal with delayed entries. We demonstrate that the restricted residual mean life estimator is equivalent to integrals of Kaplan-Meier estimates in the case of simple factor variables. Estimation performance is investigated by simulation studies. Using real data from Danish Monitoring Cardiovascular Risk Factor Surveys, we illustrate an application to additive regression models and discuss the general assumption of right censoring and left truncation being dependent on covariates. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., (Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

In the standard analysis of competing risks data, proportional hazards models are fit to the cause-specific hazard functions for all causes on the same time scale. These regression analyses are the foundation for predictions of cause-specific cumulative incidence functions based on combining the estimated cause-specific hazard functions. However, in predictions arising from disease registries, where only subjects with disease enter the database, disease-related mortality may be more naturally modeled on the time since diagnosis time scale while death from other causes may be more naturally modeled on the age time scale. The single time scale methodology may be biased if an incorrect time scale is employed for one of the causes and an alternative methodology is not available. We propose inferences for the cumulative incidence function in which regression models for the cause-specific hazard functions may be specified on different time scales. Using the disease registry data, the analysis of other cause mortality on the age scale requires left truncating the event time at the age of disease diagnosis, complicating the analysis. In addition, standard Martingale theory is not applicable when combining regression models on different time scales. We establish that the covariate conditional predictions are consistent and asymptotically normal using empirical process techniques and propose consistent variance estimators for constructing confidence intervals. Simulation studies show that the proposed two time scales method performs well, outperforming the single time-scale predictions when the time scale is misspecified. The methods are illustrated with stage III colon cancer data obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program of National Cancer Institute., (© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

An important task in survival analysis is choosing a structure for the relationship between covariates of interest and the time-to-event outcome. For example, the accelerated failure time (AFT) model structures each covariate effect as a constant multiplicative shift in the outcome distribution across all survival quantiles. Though parsimonious, this structure cannot detect or capture effects that differ across quantiles of the distribution, a limitation that is analogous to only permitting proportional hazards in the Cox model. To address this, we propose a general framework for quantile-varying multiplicative effects under the AFT model. Specifically, we embed flexible regression structures within the AFT model and derive a novel formula for interpretable effects on the quantile scale. A regression standardization scheme based on the g-formula is proposed to enable the estimation of both covariate-conditional and marginal effects for an exposure of interest. We implement a user-friendly Bayesian approach for the estimation and quantification of uncertainty while accounting for left truncation and complex censoring. We emphasize the intuitive interpretation of this model through numerical and graphical tools and illustrate its performance through simulation and application to a study of Alzheimer's disease and dementia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Left truncated right censored (LTRC) data arise quite commonly from survival studies. In this article, a model based on piecewise linear approximation is proposed for the analysis of LTRC data with covariates. Specifically, the model involves a piecewise linear approximation for the cumulative baseline hazard function of the proportional hazards model. The principal advantage of the proposed model is that it does not depend on restrictive parametric assumptions while being flexible and data‐driven. Likelihood inference for the model is developed. Through detailed simulation studies, the robustness property of the model is studied by fitting it to LTRC data generated from different processes covering a wide range of lifetime distributions. A sensitivity analysis is also carried out by fitting the model to LTRC data generated from a process with a piecewise constant baseline hazard. It is observed that the performance of the model is quite satisfactory in all those cases. Analyses of two real LTRC datasets by using the model are provided as illustrative examples. Applications of the model in some practical prediction issues are discussed. In summary, the proposed model provides a comprehensive and flexible approach to model a general structure for LTRC lifetime data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Interval‐censored data often arise in prospective studies involving periodical follow‐up for monitoring the failure event occurrence. In addition to censoring, left truncation also occurs if only participants who have not experienced the failure event are enrolled in the study, which clearly induces the selection bias and makes the analysis more complicated. This work provides an efficient maximum likelihood estimation approach that appropriately adjusts the biased sampling for the proportional hazards model with left‐truncated and interval‐censored data. A flexible and stable expectation–maximisation algorithm via a two‐stage data augmentation is developed to maximise the intractable likelihood function. The asymptotic properties of the proposed estimators are established with the empirical process theory. The numerical results obtained from extensive simulations suggest that the proposed method performs satisfactorily and has some prominent advantages over the competing methods. An application to a colon cancer dataset also demonstrates the usefulness of the proposed method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Many African nations continue to grapple with persistently high under-five child mortality rates, particularly those situated in the Sub-Saharan region, including South Africa. A multitude of socio-economic factors are identified as key contributors to the elevated under-five child mortality in numerous African nations. This research endeavors to investigate various factors believed to be associated with child mortality by employing advanced statistical models. This study utilizes child-level survival data from South Africa, characterized by left truncation and right censoring, to fit a Cox proportional hazards model under the assumption of working independence. Additionally, a shared frailty model is applied, clustering children based on their mothers. Comparative analysis is performed between the results obtained from the shared frailty model and the Cox proportional hazards model under the assumption of working independence. Within the scope of this analysis, several factors stand out as significant contributors to under-five child mortality in the study area, including gender, birth province, birth year, birth order, and twin status. Notably, the shared frailty model demonstrates superior performance in modeling the dataset, as evidenced by a lower likelihood cross-validation score compared to the Cox proportional hazards model assuming independence. This improvement can be attributed to the shared frailty model's ability to account for heterogeneity among mothers and the inherent association between siblings born to the same mother, ultimately enhancing the quality of the study's conclusions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Unmeasured baseline information in left-truncated data situations frequently occurs in observational time-to-event analyses. For instance, a typical timescale in trials of antidiabetic treatment is "time since treatment initiation", but individuals may have initiated treatment before the start of longitudinal data collection. When the focus is on baseline effects, one widespread approach is to fit a Cox proportional hazards model incorporating the measurements at delayed study entry. This has been criticized because of the potential time dependency of covariates. We tackle this problem by using a Bayesian joint model that combines a mixed-effects model for the longitudinal trajectory with a proportional hazards model for the event of interest incorporating the baseline covariate, possibly unmeasured in the presence of left truncation. The novelty is that our procedure is not used to account for non-continuously monitored longitudinal covariates in right-censored time-to-event studies, but to utilize these trajectories to make inferences about missing baseline measurements in left-truncated data. Simulating times-to-event depending on baseline covariates we also compared our proposal to a simpler two-stage approach which performed favorably. Our approach is illustrated by investigating the impact of baseline blood glucose levels on antidiabetic treatment failure using data from a German diabetes register. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Failure time data frequently occur in many medical studies and often accompany with various types of censoring. In some applications, left truncation may occur and can induce biased sampling, which makes the practical data analysis become more complicated. The existing analysis methods for left-truncated data have some limitations in that they either focus only on a special type of censored data or fail to flexibly utilize the distribution information of the truncation times for inference. Therefore, it is essential to develop a reliable and efficient method for the analysis of left-truncated failure time data with various types of censoring. Method: This paper concerns regression analysis of left-truncated failure time data with the proportional hazards model under various types of censoring mechanisms, including right censoring, interval censoring and a mixture of them. The proposed pairwise pseudo-likelihood estimation method is essentially built on a combination of the conditional likelihood and the pairwise likelihood that eliminates the nuisance truncation distribution function or avoids its estimation. To implement the presented method, a flexible EM algorithm is developed by utilizing the idea of self-consistent estimating equation. A main feature of the algorithm is that it involves closed-form estimators of the large-dimensional nuisance parameters and is thus computationally stable and reliable. In addition, an R package LTsurv is developed. Results: The numerical results obtained from extensive simulation studies suggest that the proposed pairwise pseudo-likelihood method performs reasonably well in practical situations and is obviously more efficient than the conditional likelihood approach as expected. The analysis results of the MHCPS data with the proposed pairwise pseudo-likelihood method indicate that males have significantly higher risk of losing active life than females. In contrast, the conditional likelihood method recognizes this effect as non-significant, which is because the conditional likelihood method often loses some estimation efficiency compared with the proposed method. Conclusions: The proposed method provides a general and helpful tool to conduct the Cox's regression analysis of left-truncated failure time data under various types of censoring. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We aim to evaluate the marginal effects of covariates on time-to-disability in the elderly under the semi-competing risks framework, as death dependently censors disability, not vice versa. It becomes particularly challenging when time-to-disability is subject to interval censoring due to intermittent assessments. A left truncation issue arises when the age time scale is applied. We develop a flexible two-parameter copula-based semiparametric transformation model for semi-competing risks data subject to interval censoring and left truncation. The two-parameter copula quantifies both upper and lower tail dependence between two margins. The semiparametric transformation models incorporate proportional hazards and proportional odds models in both margins. We propose a two-step sieve maximum likelihood estimation procedure and study the sieve estimators' asymptotic properties. Simulations show that the proposed method corrects biases in the marginal method. We demonstrate the proposed method in a large-scale Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Study and provide new insights into preventing disability in the elderly. The proposed method could be applied to the general semi-competing risks data with intermittently assessed disease status. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A platform trial is a trial involving an innovative adaptive design with a single master protocol to efficiently evaluate multiple interventions. It offers flexible features such as dropping interventions for futility and adding new interventions to be evaluated during the course of a trial. Although there is a consensus that platform trials can identify beneficial interventions with fewer patients, less time, and a higher probability of success than traditional trials, there remains debate on certain issues, one of which is whether (and how) the non-concurrent control (NCC) (i.e., patients in the control group recruited prior to the new interventions) can be combined with the current control (CC) in the analysis, especially if there is a change of standard of care during the trial. Methods: In this paper, considering time-to-event endpoints under the proportional hazard model assumption, we introduce a new concept of NCC concurrent observation time (NCC COT), and propose to borrow NCC COT through left truncation. This assumes that the NCC COT and CC are comparable. If the protocol does not prohibit NCC patients to change the standard of care while on study, NCC COT and CC likely will share the same standard of care. A simulated example is provided to demonstrate the approach. Results: Using exponential distributions, the simulated example assumes that NCC COT and CC have the same hazard, and the treatment group has a lower hazard. The estimated HR comparing treatment to the pooled control group is 0.744 (95% CI 0.575, 0.962), whereas the comparison to the CC group alone is 0.755 (95% CI 0.566, 1.008), with corresponding p-values of 0.024 versus 0.057, respectively. This suggests that borrowing NCC COT can improve statistical efficiency when the exchangeability assumption holds. Conclusion: This article proposes an innovative approach of borrowing NCC COT to enhance statistical inference in platform trials under appropriate scenarios. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Semi-parametric transformation models provide a general and flexible class of models for regression analysis of failure time data and many methods have been developed for their estimation. In particular, they include the proportional hazards and proportional odds models as special cases. In this paper, we discuss the situation where one observes left-truncated and interval-censored data, for which it does not seem to exist an established method. For the problem, in contrast to the commonly used conditional approach that may not be efficient, a pairwise pseudo-likelihood method is proposed to recover some missing information in the conditional method. The proposed estimators are proved to be consistent and asymptotically efficient and normal. A simulation study is conducted to assess the empirical performance of the method and suggests that it works well in practical situations. This method is illustrated by using a set of real data arising from an HIV/AIDS cohort study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Time‐to‐event data such as time to death are broadly used in medical research and drug development to understand the efficacy of a therapeutic. For time‐to‐event data, right censoring (data only observed up to a certain point of time) is common and easy to recognize. Methods that use right censored data, such as the Kaplan–Meier estimator and the Cox proportional hazard model, are well established. Time‐to‐event data can also be left truncated, which arises when patients are excluded from the sample because their events occur before a specific milestone, potentially resulting in an immortal time bias. For example, in a study evaluating the association between biomarker status and overall survival, patients who did not live long enough to receive a genomic test were not observed in the study. Left truncation causes selection bias and often leads to an overestimate of survival time. In this tutorial, we used a nationwide electronic health record‐derived de‐identified database to demonstrate how to analyze left truncated and right censored data without bias using example code from SAS and R. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Left-truncated data are often encountered in epidemiological cohort studies, where individuals are recruited according to a certain cross-sectional sampling criterion. Length-biased data, a special case of left-truncated data, assume that the incidence of the initial event follows a homogeneous Poisson process. In this article, we consider an analysis of length-biased and interval-censored data with a nonsusceptible fraction. We first point out the importance of a well-defined target population, which depends on the prior knowledge for the support of the failure times of susceptible individuals. Given the target population, we proceed with a length-biased sampling and draw valid inferences from a length-biased sample. When there is no covariate, we show that it suffices to consider a discrete version of the survival function for the susceptible individuals with jump points at the left endpoints of the censoring intervals when maximizing the full likelihood function, and propose an EM algorithm to obtain the nonparametric maximum likelihood estimates of nonsusceptible rate and the survival function of the susceptible individuals. We also develop a novel graphical method for assessing the stationarity assumption. When covariates are present, we consider the Cox proportional hazards model for the survival time of the susceptible individuals and the logistic regression model for the probability of being susceptible. We construct the full likelihood function and obtain the nonparametric maximum likelihood estimates of the regression parameters by employing the EM algorithm. The large sample properties of the estimates are established. The performance of the method is assessed by simulations. The proposed model and method are applied to data from an early-onset diabetes mellitus study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

High‐dimensional data are becoming increasingly common in the medical field as large volumes of patient information are collected and processed by high‐throughput screening, electronic health records, and comprehensive genomic testing. Statistical models that attempt to study the effects of many predictors on survival typically implement feature selection or penalized methods to mitigate the undesirable consequences of overfitting. In some cases survival data are also left‐truncated which can give rise to an immortal time bias, but penalized survival methods that adjust for left truncation are not commonly implemented. To address these challenges, we apply a penalized Cox proportional hazards model for left‐truncated and right‐censored survival data and assess implications of left truncation adjustment on bias and interpretation. We use simulation studies and a high‐dimensional, real‐world clinico‐genomic database to highlight the pitfalls of failing to account for left truncation in survival modeling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Scheike and Zhang [An additive-multiplicative Cox-Aalen regression model. Scand J Stat. 2002;29:75–88] proposed a flexible additive-multiplicative hazard model, called the Cox-Aalen model, by replacing the baseline hazard function in the well-known Cox model with a covariate-dependent Aalen model, which allows for both fixed and dynamic covariate effects. In this paper, based on left-truncated and mixed interval-censored (LT-MIC) data, we consider maximum likelihood estimation for the Cox-Aalen model with fixed covariates. We propose expectation-maximization (EM) algorithms for obtaining the conditional maximum likelihood estimators (cMLE) of the regression coefficients for the Cox-Aalen model. We establish the consistency of the cMLE. Numerical studies show that estimation via the EM algorithms performs well. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this study, we investigated the robustness of the methods that account for independent left truncation when applied to competing risks settings with dependent left truncation. We specifically focused on the methods for the proportional cause-specific hazards model and the Fine–Gray model. Simulation experiments showed that these methods are not in general robust against dependent left truncation. The magnitude of the bias was analogous to the strength of the association between left truncation and failure times, the effect of the covariate on the competing cause of failure, and the baseline hazard of left truncation time. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

In the standard analysis of competing risks data, proportional hazards models are fit to the cause-specific hazard functions for all causes on the same time scale. These regression analyses are the foundation for predictions of cause-specific cumulative incidence functions based on combining the estimated cause-specific hazard functions. However, in predictions arising from disease registries, where only subjects with disease enter the database, disease-related mortality may be more naturally modeled on the time since diagnosis time scale while death from other causes may be more naturally modeled on the age time scale. The single time scale methodology may be biased if an incorrect time scale is employed for one of the causes and an alternative methodology is not available. We propose inferences for the cumulative incidence function in which regression models for the cause-specific hazard functions may be specified on different time scales. Using the disease registry data, the analysis of other cause mortality on the age scale requires left truncating the event time at the age of disease diagnosis, complicating the analysis. In addition, standard Martingale theory is not applicable when combining regression models on different time scales. We establish that the covariate conditional predictions are consistent and asymptotically normal using empirical process techniques and propose consistent variance estimators for constructing confidence intervals. Simulation studies show that the proposed two time scales method performs well, outperforming the single time-scale predictions when the time scale is misspecified. The methods are illustrated with stage III colon cancer data obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program of National Cancer Institute. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A now common goal in medical research is to investigate the inter-relationships between a repeatedly measured biomarker, measured with error, and the time to an event of interest. This form of question can be tackled with a joint longitudinal-survival model, with the most common approach combining a longitudinal mixed effects model with a proportional hazards survival model, where the models are linked through shared random effects. In this article, we look at incorporating delayed entry (left truncation), which has received relatively little attention. The extension to delayed entry requires a second set of numerical integration, beyond that required in a standard joint model. We therefore implement two sets of fully adaptive Gauss-Hermite quadrature with nested Gauss-Kronrod quadrature (to allow time-dependent association structures), conducted simultaneously, to evaluate the likelihood. We evaluate fully adaptive quadrature compared with previously proposed non-adaptive quadrature through a simulation study, showing substantial improvements, both in terms of minimising bias and reducing computation time. We further investigate, through simulation, the consequences of misspecifying the longitudinal trajectory and its impact on estimates of association. Our scenarios showed the current value association structure to be very robust, compared with the rate of change that we found to be highly sensitive showing that assuming a simpler trend when the truth is more complex can lead to substantial bias. With emphasis on flexible parametric approaches, we generalise previous models by proposing the use of polynomials or splines to capture the longitudinal trend and restricted cubic splines to model the baseline log hazard function. The methods are illustrated on a dataset of breast cancer patients, modelling mammographic density jointly with survival, where we show how to incorporate density measurements prior to the at-risk period, to make use of all the available information. User-friendly Stata software is provided. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Left-truncated and right-censored (LTRC) data are encountered frequently due to a prevalent cohort sampling in follow-up studies. Because of the skewness of the distribution of survival time, quantile regression is a useful alternative to the Cox's proportional hazards model and the accelerated failure time model for survival analysis. In this paper, we apply the quantile regression model to LTRC data and develops an unbiased estimating equation for regression coefficients. The proposed estimation methods use the inverse probabilities of truncation and censoring weighting technique. The resulting estimator is uniformly consistent and asymptotically normal. The finite-sample performance of the proposed estimation methods is also evaluated using extensive simulation studies. Finally, analysis of real data is presented to illustrate our proposed estimation methods. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

ABSTRACT In multistate survival analysis, the sojourn of a patient through various clinical states is shown to correspond to the diffusion of 1 C of electrical charge through an electrical network. The essential comparison has differentials of probability for the patient to correspond to differentials of charge, and it equates clinical states to electrical nodes. Indeed, if the death state of the patient corresponds to the sink node of the circuit, then the transient current that would be seen on an oscilloscope as the sink output is a plot of the probability density for the survival time of the patient. This electrical circuit analogy is further explored by considering the simplest possible survival model with two clinical states, alive and dead (sink), that incorporates censoring and truncation. The sink output seen on an oscilloscope is a plot of the Kaplan-Meier mass function. Thus, the Kaplan-Meier estimator finds motivation from the dynamics of current flow, as a fundamental physical law, rather than as a nonparametric maximum likelihood estimate (MLE). Generalization to competing risks settings with multiple death states (sinks) leads to cause-specific Kaplan-Meier submass functions as outputs at sink nodes. With covariates present, the electrical analogy provides for an intuitive understanding of partial likelihood and various baseline hazard estimates often used with the proportional hazards model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper considers the estimation of the regression coefficients in the Cox proportional hazards model with left-truncated and interval-censored data. Using the approaches of Pan [A multiple imputation approach to Cox regression with interval-censored data, Biometrics 56 (2000), pp. 199–203] and Heller [Proportional hazards regression with interval censored data using an inverse probability weight, Lifetime Data Anal. 17 (2011), pp. 373–385], we propose two estimates of the regression coefficients. The first estimate is based on a multiple imputation methodology. The second estimate uses an inverse probability weight to select event time pairs where the ordering is unambiguous. A simulation study is conducted to investigate the performance of the proposed estimators. The proposed methods are illustrated using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) Blood Transfusion Data. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

In longitudinal studies, the additive hazard model is often used to analyze covariate effects on the duration time, defined as the elapsed time between the first and the second event. In this article, we consider the situation when the first event suffers partly interval censoring and the second event suffers left truncation and right-censoring. We proposed a two-step estimation procedure for estimating the regression coefficients of the additive hazards model. A simulation study is conducted to investigate the performance of the proposed estimator. The proposed method is applied to the Centers for Disease Control acquired immune deficiency syndrome blood transfusion data. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

A prevalent sample consists of individuals who have experienced disease incidence but not failure event at the sampling time. We discuss methods for estimating the distribution function of a random vector defined at baseline for an incident disease population when data are collected by prevalent sampling. Prevalent sampling design is often more focused and economical than incident study design for studying the survival distribution of a diseased population, but prevalent samples are biased by design. Subjects with longer survival time are more likely to be included in a prevalent cohort, and other baseline variables of interests that are correlated with survival time are also subject to sampling bias induced by the prevalent sampling scheme. Without recognition of the bias, applying empirical distribution function to estimate the population distribution of baseline variables can lead to serious bias. In this article, nonparametric and semiparametric methods are developed for distribution estimation of baseline variables using prevalent data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Researchers and wildlife managers increasingly find themselves in situations where they must deal with infectious wildlife diseases, such as chronic wasting disease, brucellosis, tuberculosis, and West Nile virus. Managers are often charged with designing and implementing control strategies, and researchers often seek to determine factors that influence and control the disease process. All of these activities require the ability to measure some indication of a disease's foothold in a population and evaluate factors affecting that foothold. The most common type of data available to managers and researchers is apparent prevalence data. Apparent disease prevalence, the proportion of animals in a sample that are positive for the disease, might seem like a natural measure of disease's foothold, but several properties, in particular, its dependency on age structure and the biasing effects of disease-associated mortality, make it less than ideal. In quantitative epidemiology, the ‘force of infection,’ or infection hazard, is generally the preferred parameter for measuring a disease's foothold, and it can be viewed as the most appropriate way to ‘adjust’ apparent prevalence for age structure. The typical ecology curriculum includes little exposure to quantitative epidemiological concepts such as cumulative incidence, apparent prevalence, and the force of infection. The goal of this paper is to present these basic epidemiological concepts and resulting models in an ecological context and to illustrate how they can be applied to understand and address basic epidemiological questions. We demonstrate a practical approach to solving the heretofore intractable problem of fitting general force-of-infection models to wildlife prevalence data using a generalized regression approach. We apply the procedures to Mycobacterium bovis (bovine tuberculosis) prevalence in bison (Bison bison) in Wood Buffalo National Park, Canada, and demonstrate strong age dependency in the force of infection as well as an increased mortality hazard in positive animals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]