Search

Background: The surgical stress index (SSI) is based on a sum of the normalized pulse beat interval (PBI) and the pulse wave amplitude (PPGA) time series of the photoplethysmography. As a measure of the nociception-anti-nociception balance in response to a standardized pain stimulus, SSI was compared with EEG changes in state and response entropy (SE and RE), PPGA, and heart rate (HR) during various targeted pseudo-steady-state concentrations of propofol and remifentanil., Methods: Forty ASA I patients were allocated to one of the four groups to receive a remifentanil step-up/-down effect-compartment target-controlled infusion (Ce(remi)) of 0, 2, 6, 2, 0 ng ml(-1), or 6, 2, 0, 2, 6 ng ml(-1), and an effect-compartment target-controlled propofol infusion (Ce(prop)) to keep the SE between 30 and 50 or 15 and 30, respectively. At each steady-state Ce(remi), maximum change in SSI, SE, RE, PPGA, and HR after a noxious stimulus was compared with the baseline value. A correlation and prediction probability (P(K)) with Ce(prop) and Ce(remi) was measured., Results: Static and dynamic values of SSI correlated to Ce(remi) better than SE, RE, HR, and PPGA. SSI was independent of Ce(prop), in contrast to SE and RE. The P(K) for Ce(remi) both before and during a noxious stimulus was better with SSI., Conclusions: SSI appeared to be a better measure of nociception-anti-nociception balance than SE, RE, HR, or PPGA.

Background: We compared two spectral entropies, state entropy (SE) and response entropy (RE), based on the irregularity of the EEG, to measure loss of response to verbal command (LOR(verbal)) and noxious stimulus (LOR(noxious)) with the bispectral index (BIS) during propofol infusion with and without remifentanil., Methods: Three groups of 20 patients received an effect-site controlled propofol infusion (Ce(PROP)) starting at 1 microg ml(-1) and increased in steps of 0.5 microg ml(-1) at 4 min intervals. In addition, a remifentanil infusion was maintained at a group-dependent, fixed effect-site target concentration (Ce(REMI)) (0, 2 or 4 ng ml(-1)). The ability of BIS, SE or RE to predict LOR(verbal) and LOR(noxious) were compared with the changes in BIS, SE and RE using logistic regression, prediction probability (P(K)), and sensitivity/specificity., Results: In all groups, BIS, SE and RE decreased with increasing Ce(PROP). However, BIS decreased more smoothly than SE and RE at deeper levels of sedation. At LOR(verbal), BIS(50), SE(50) and RE(50) increased with increasing Ce(REMI). BIS, SE and RE all detected LOR(verbal) accurately but BIS performed better at 100% sensitivity. Sensitivity/specificity for detection of LOR(verbal) decreased for all methods with increasing Ce(REMI). LOR(noxious) was poorly described by all measures., Conclusion: LOR(verbal) was detected accurately by BIS, SE and RE except for 100% sensitivity, where BIS performed better. Though BIS, SE and RE were influenced by remifentanil during propofol administration, their ability to detect LOR(verbal) remained accurate. None of the measures predicted LOR(noxious).

We evaluated the effects of a bolus (0.4 mg.kg-1) and continuous infusion (1 mg.kg-1.h-1) of ketamine on Bispectral Index (BIS) and A-Line(R) ARX Index (AAI) during propofol anaesthesia. We included 15 ASA I patients scheduled for general anaesthesia. Induction was performed by infusion of propofol at 100 ml.h-1 until loss of consciousness. Both BIS and AAI monitors responded appropriately at that time. The calculated effect site concentration of propofol at loss of consciousness was maintained by means of a computer controlled infusion system. A 'pseudo' steady-state effect site concentration was reached after 4 min. After 1 min of baseline measurements, ketamine was administered. BIS values increased from the 3rd to the 8th min after the administration of ketamine. The AAI showed no significant increase or decrease, but between-patient variability increased.

Background and Objective: We conducted an open, prospective, randomized study to compare the efficacy, safety and recovery characteristics of remifentanil or propofol during monitored anaesthesia care in patients undergoing colonoscopy., Methods: Forty patients were randomly assigned to receive either propofol (1 mg kg(-1) followed by 10 mg kg (-1) h(-1), n = 20) or remifentanil (0.5 microg kg(-1) followed by 0.2 microg kg(-1) min(-1), n = 20). The infusion rate was subsequently adapted to clinical needs., Results: In the propofol group, arterial pressure and heart rate decreased significantly from the baseline. These variables remained unchanged in the remifentanil group, but hypoventilation occurred in 55% of patients. Early recovery was delayed in the propofol group (P < 0.002). Recovery of cognitive and psychomotor functions was faster in the remifentanil group. Fifteen minutes after anaesthesia, the Digit Symbol Substitution Test score was 28.6 +/- 12.8 versus 36.2 +/- 9.4 and the Trieger Dot Test score was 25.6 +/- 8.1 versus 18.7 +/- 4.1 in the propofol and remifentanil groups, respectively (both P < 0.05). Patient satisfaction, using a visual analogue scale, was higher in the propofol group (96 +/- 7 versus 77 +/- 21, P < 0.001)., Conclusions: Remifentanil proved efficient in reducing pain during colonoscopy. Emergence times were shorter and the recovery of cognitive function was faster with remifentanil compared with propofol. Remifentanil provided a smoother haemodynamic profile than propofol; however, the frequent occurrence of remifentanil-induced hypoventilation requires the cautious administration of this agent.

Study Objective: To compare, in pairwise fashion, the effects of propofol and etomidate during ambulatory cardioversion and early recovery., Design: Clinical, prospective, randomized, blinded, monocenter, pairwise, comparative study, Setting: OR and recovery area of the electrophysiological department, University Hospital Ghent, Belgium., Patients: 34 patients with atrial arrhythmia who were scheduled for repetitive electrical cardioversion, of whom 25 patients completed the study., Interventions: Nonpremedicated patients received during the first cardioversion either propofol (1 mg/kg) or etomidate (0.2 mg/kg) until loss of consciousness, followed by electrical external cardioversion. If after restoration of sinus rhythm for at least 1 day, atrial arrhythmia reoccurred, a second session was performed a week later, using the other induction drug., Measurements: Systolic and diastolic blood pressure values taken before drug administration, at loss of consciousness, 60 seconds after cardioversion, and awake; the number of shocks, the total amount of energy, the number of patients in which we failed to restore sinus rhythm, the time before opening eyes, answering simple questions and be able to sit, were all noted. Aldrete scores and the Steward postanesthetic recovery scores were noted every minute until 10 minutes after the external cardioversion. Recovery tests were performed and evaluated 5, 10, 15, and 20 minutes after energy delivery., Main Results: Number of shocks, amount of energy, and blood pressure values were comparable in both groups. Recovery times and Aldrete and Steward postanesthetic recovery scores showed a faster awakening in patients who were induced with propofol. Overall performance of the psychomotor test was better in the propofol group, and most pronounced at 10 and 15 minutes., Conclusions: Etomidate and propofol are both useful during ambulatory external electrical cardioversion. The described doses maintain stable hemodynamic conditions in nonpremedicated patients. Recovery scores and psychomotor test indicate a faster recovery in the propofol group. However, no intergroup differences were noted at 20 minutes after the cardioversion. A safe discharge of all patients from the critical care unit or postanesthesia care unit to the ward can be considered after 30 minutes.

Background and Objective: The study was designed to compare the costs of propofol versus sevoflurane for the maintenance of the hypnotic component of anaesthesia during general anaesthesia, guided by the bispectral index, for gynaecological laparoscopic surgery., Methods: Forty ASA Grade I-II female patients scheduled for gynaecological laparoscopy were randomly allocated to two groups. All patients received a continuous infusion of remifentanil (0.25 microg kg(-1) min(-1)) for 2 min. Then anaesthesia was induced with propofol 1% at 300 mL h(-1) until loss of consciousness. To guide the bispectral index between 40 and 60, Group 1 patients received propofol 10 mg kg(-1) h(-1) initially, which was increased or decreased by 2 mg kg(-1) h(-1) steps; Group 2 patients received sevoflurane, initially set at 2 vol.% and adjusted with steps of 0.2-0.4%. The time and quality of anaesthesia and recovery were assessed in two postoperative standardized interviews., Results: Patient characteristics, the propofol induction dose, the bispectral index and the haemodynamic profiles during induction of anaesthesia, and its duration, were similar between the groups. In Group 1, 7.55 +/- 1.75 mg kg(-1) h(-1) propofol and in Group 2, 0.20 +/- 0.09 mL kg(-1) h(-1) liquid sevoflurane were used for maintenance. The cost for maintenance, including wasted drugs, was higher when using propofol (Euro 25.14 +/- 10.69) than sevoflurane (Euro 12.80 +/- 2.67). Postoperatively, recovery profiles tended to be better with propofol; however, the day after discharge no differences were found., Conclusions: When applying the bispectral index to guide the administration of hypnotic anaesthetic drugs, propofol-based maintenance of anaesthesia was associated with the highest cost. A trend towards a better recovery profile was obtained with propofol. However, on the day after discharge, no differences in quality were observed.

Background: This report describes a new closed-loop control system for propofol that uses the Bispectral Index (BIS) as the controlled variable in a patient-individualized, adaptive, model-based control system, and compares this system with manually controlled administration of propofol using hemodynamic and somatic changes to guide anesthesia., Methods: Twenty female patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II, who were scheduled for gynecologic laparotomy were included to receive propofolremifentanil anesthesia. In group I, propofol was titrated using a BIS-guided, model-based, closed-loop system. The BIS target was set at 50. In group II, propofol was titrated using classical hemodynamic signs of (in)adequate anesthesia. Performance of control during induction and maintenance of anesthesia were compared between both groups using BIS as the controlled variable in group I and the reference variable in group II, and, conversely, the systolic blood pressure as the controlled variable in group II and the reference variable in group I. At the end of anesthesia, recovery profiles between groups were compared., Results: Although patients undergoing manual induction of anesthesia in group II at 300 ml/h reached a BIS level of 50 faster than patients undergoing open-loop, computer-controlled induction in group I, manual induction caused a more pronounced initial overshoot of the BIS target. This resulted in a more pronounced decrease in blood pressure in group II. During the maintenance phase, better control of BIS and systolic blood pressure was found in group I compared with group II. Recovery was faster in group I., Conclusion: A closed-loop system for propofol administration using the BIS as a controlled variable together with a model-based controller is clinically acceptable during general anesthesia.

Background: Target-controlled infusion (TCI) systems can control the concentration in the plasma or at the site of drug effect. A TCI system that targets the effect site should be able to accurately predict the time course of drug effect. The authors tested this by comparing the performance of three control algorithms: plasmacontrol TCI versus two algorithms for effect-site control TCI., Methods: One-hundred twenty healthy women patients received propofol via TCI for 12-min at a target concentration of 5.4 microg/ml. In all three groups, the plasma concentrations were computed using pharmacokinetics previously reported. In group I, the TCI device controlled the plasma concentration. In groups II and III, the TCI device controlled the effect-site concentration. In group II, the effect site was computed using a half-life for plasma effect-site equilibration (t1/2k(eo)) of 3.5 min. In group III, plasma effect-site equilibration rate constant (k(eo)) was computed to yield a time to peak effect of 1.6 min after bolus injection, yielding a t1/2keo of 34 s. the time course of propofol was measured using the bispectral index. Blood pressure, ventilation, and time of loss of consciousness were measured., Results: The time course of propofol drug effect, as measured by the bispectral index, was best predicted in group III. Targeting the effect-site concentration shortened the time to loss of consciousness compared with the targeting plasma concentration without causing hypotension. The incidence of apnea was less in group III than in group II., Conclusion: Effect compartment-controlled TCI can be safely applied in clinical practice. A biophase model combining the Marsh kinetics and a time to peak effect of 1.6 min accurately predicted the time course of propofol drug effect.

Ten patients, undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery under spinal anaesthesia, were sedated with propofol using a closed-loop feedback control system. The bispectral index (BIS), a new processed EEG parameter, was used as control variable. Propofol administration was controlled by a patient individualised adaptive model-based controller incorporating target-controlled infusion technology combined with a pharmacokinetic-dynamic model. This feedback control system for propofol administration proved to be adequate and safe. BIS was found to be well suited as control variable.

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of frontal spontaneous electromyography (SEMG) and EEG spectral edge frequency (SEF 95%), median frequency (MF), relative delta power (RDELTA) and bispectral index (BIS) in monitoring loss of and return of consciousness and hypnotic drug effect during propofol administration at different calculated plasma target concentrations., Methods: Propofol was administered by using a target-controlled infusion at different propofol steady-state concentrations. All variables were measured simultaneously at specific calculated concentrations and endpoints., Results: Loss of consciousness was accurately monitored by BIS, SEMG and SEF 95%, and propofol drug effect by BIS only. Return of consciousness was predicted by BIS, MF and SEF 95%. Due to the biphasic EEG pattern of propofol and the lack of reproducible data at specific propofol concentrations, the clinical usefulness of SEF 95%, MF and RDELTA was very limited. SEMG was useful to detect loss and return of consciousness, but without predictive value., Conclusions: The BIS might be an accurate measure to monitor depth of anaesthesia and hypnotic drug effect. Other neurophysiologic measures have limited value to monitor depth of anaesthesia and hypnotic drug effect.

The bispectral index, a new processed electroencephalographic parameter which may give information on depth of anaesthesia, was used in 58 patients undergoing outpatient gynaecological surgery in order to study if the addition of bispectral index monitoring to standard clinical monitoring could improve the titration of target propofol concentration when using effect-site target-controlled propofol infusion for sedation. In Group 1 (n = 30), the bispectral index was recorded but the anaesthetist was unaware of the readings and therefore only classical signs of depth of anaesthesia were used to guide the anaesthetist in controlling the effect-site concentration. In Group 2 (n = 28), bispectral index readings were available to the anaesthetist and effect-site concentration was adjusted to ensure that bispectral index was maintained between 40 and 60. Similar propofol induction and maintenance doses, blood and effect-site concentrations and mean bispectral index were found in the two groups. A greater percentage of bispectral index readings lying outside the target range (i.e. < 40 or > 60) and more movement at incision and during maintenance were found in Group 1. There was a trend towards more implicit awareness in patients in Group 1. Bispectral index was found to be useful for measuring depth of sedation when using propofol target-controlled infusion. Propofol dosage could not be decreased but a more consistent level of sedation could be maintained due to a more satisfactory titration of target effect-site concentration.