Search

Propofol is routinely combined with opioid analgesics to ensure adequate anesthesia during surgery. The aim of the study was to assess the effect of fentanyl on the hypnotic effect of propofol and the possible clinical implications of this interaction. The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) data were obtained from 11 patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery, classified as ASA III. Propofol was administered by a target-controlled infusion system. Fentanyl 2-3 µg/kg was given whenever insufficient analgesia occurred. The bispectral index (BIS) was used to monitor the depth of anesthesia. A population PK/PD analysis with a non-linear mixed-effect model (NONMEM 7.2 software) was conducted. Two-compartment models satisfactorily described the PK of propofol and fentanyl. The delay of the anesthetic effect in relation to PK was described by the effect compartment. The BIS was linked to propofol and fentanyl effect-site concentrations through an additive Emax model. Context-sensitive decrement times (CSDT) determined from the final model were used to assess the influence of fentanyl on the recovery after anesthesia. The population PK/PD model was successfully developed to describe simultaneously the time course and variability of propofol and fentanyl concentrations and BIS. Additive propofol-fentanyl interactions were observed and quantitated. The duration of the fentanyl infusion had minimal effect on CSDT when it was shorter than the duration of the propofol infusion. If the fentanyl infusion was longer than the propofol infusion, an almost two-fold increase in CSDT occurred. Additional doses of fentanyl administered after the cessation of the propofol infusion result in lower BIS values, and can prolong the time of recovery from anesthesia. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., (Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Recently oral melatonin has been proposed as an agent for premedication. In this study, we compared melatonin with clonidine, considering its anxiolytic properties as well as the influence of both agents on the pharmacokinetic, hypnotic, and hemodynamic effects of propofol during propofol-remifentanil total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). The dataset under analysis included 32 patients scheduled for a functional endoscopic sinus surgery. The population pharmacokinetic modeling was done with NONMEM. The PK of propofol was described with a two-compartment disposition model, whereas the BIS and AAI were described with a sigmoidal Emax model linked with the propofol concentration via the biophase compartment. The anxiolytic effect was assessed by means of the visual analog scale for anxiety (VAS-A). The population PK/PD model was successfully developed to describe the data. No significant differences in the PK/PD of propofol were noted due to the premedication with clonidine and melatonin. Melatonin was less effective than clonidine in reducing patients' anxiety at the induction of anesthesia, whereas clonidine premedication was associated with greater decrease in heart rate and blood pressure. A decreased EC50 (2.47 vs. 3.17 mg/L) and increased slope (2.71 vs. 1.30) of the sigmoidal Emax relationship was observed for the AAI index, as compared with the BIS measurements., (© 2014, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Background: Propofol is a commonly used agent in total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). However, the link between its pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics has not been fully characterized in children yet. Our aim was to determine the quantitative relationship between the venous plasma concentration and bispectral index (BIS) effect in a heterogeneous group of pediatric patients undergoing various surgical procedures (ASA status I-III)., Methods: Nine male and nine female patients were anesthetized with propofol-fentanyl TIVA. Sparse venous samples for propofol concentrations assay and dense BIS measurements were collected during and after the end of infusion. Nonlinear mixed-effect modeling in NONMEM was used for data analysis., Results: A three-compartment model was linked with a classical Emax model through a biophase compartment to describe the available data. All clearance and volume terms were allometrically scaled to account for the body mass difference among the patients under study. A typical patient had their PK parameters observed within the range of literature values for children. The pharmacodynamic parameters were highly variable. The EC50 of 2.80 mg/L and the biophase distribution rate constant of 3.33 min(-1) were found for a typical patient., Conclusions: The BIS values in children are highly correlated with the propofol effect compartment concentrations according to the classical Emax concentration-response relationship. Children had slightly lower sensitivity to propofol and slightly higher clearance, as compared with the adult data available in literature. The intra-patient variations in the BIS require the anesthesiologist's attention in using BIS values alone to evaluate the depth of anesthesia in children., (Copyright © 2014 Institute of Pharmacology, Polish Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier Urban & Partner Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.)

This study evaluates the administration time-of-day effects on propofol pharmacokinetics and sedative response in rabbits. Nine rabbits were sedated with 5 mg/kg propofol at three local clock times: 10:00, 16:00, and 22:00 h. Each rabbit served as its own control by being given a single infusion at the three different times of day on three separate occasions. Ten arterial blood samples were collected during each clock-time experiment for propofol assay. A two-compartment model was used to describe propofol pharmacokinetics, and the pedal withdrawal reflex was used as the sedation pharmacodynamic response. The categorical data comprising the presence or absence of pedal withdrawal reflex was described by a logistic model. The typical volume of the central compartment equaled 7.67 L and depended on rabbit body weight. The elimination rate constant depended on drug administration time; it was lowest at 10:00 h, highest at 16:00 h, and intermediate at 22:00 h. Delay of the anesthetic effect, with respect to plasma concentrations, was described by the effect compartment, with the rate constant for the distribution to the effector compartment equal to 0.335 min(-1). Drug concentration had a large effect on the probability of anesthesia. The degree of anesthesia was largest at 10:00 h, lowest at 16:00 h, and intermediate at 22:00 h. In summary, both the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol in rabbits depended on administration time. The developed population approach may be used to assess chronopharmacokinetics and chronopharmacodynamics of medications in animals and humans.

This study evaluates possible circadian rhythms during prolonged propofol infusion in patients in the intensive care unit. Eleven patients were sedated with a constant propofol infusion. The blood samples for the propofol assay were collected every hour during the second day, the third day, and after the termination of the propofol infusion. Values of electroencephalographic bispectral index (BIS), arterial blood pressure, heart rate, blood oxygen saturation and body temperature were recorded every hour at the blood collection time points. A two-compartment model was used to describe propofol pharmacokinetics. Typical values of the central and peripheral volume of distribution and inter-compartmental clearance were V(C) = 27.7 l, V(T) = 801 l, and CL(D) = 2.73 l/min. The systolic blood pressure (SBP) was found to influence the propofol metabolic clearance according to Cl (l/min) = 2.65 x (1-0.00714 x (SBP-135)). There was no significant circadian rhythm detected with respect to propofol pharmacokinetics. The BIS score was assessed as a direct effect model with EC(50) equal 1.98 mg/l. There was no significant circadian rhythm detected within the BIS scores. We concluded that the light-dark cycle did not influence propofol pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in intensive care units patients. The lack of night-day differences was also noted for systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and blood oxygenation. Circadian rhythms were detected for heart rate and body temperature, however they were severely disturbed from the pattern of healthy patients.