Search

The cytokine hormone prolactin has a vast number of diverse functions. Unfortunately, it also exhibits tumor growth promoting properties, which makes the development of prolactin receptor antagonists a priority. Prolactin binds to its cognate receptor with much lower affinity at low pH than at physiological pH and since the extracellular environment around solid tumors often is acidic, it is desirable to develop antagonists that have improved binding affinity at low pH. The pKa value of a histidine side chain is ∼6.8 making histidine residues obvious candidates for examination. From evaluation of known molecular structures of human prolactin, of the prolactin receptor and of different complexes of the two, three histidine residues in the hormone–receptor binding site 1 were selected for mutational studies. We analyzed 10 variants by circular dichroism spectroscopy, affinity and thermodynamic characterization of receptor binding by isothermal titration calorimetry combined with in vitro bioactivity in living cells. Histidine residue 27 was recognized as a central hot spot for pH sensitivity and conservative substitutions at this site resulted in strong receptor binding at low pH. Pure antagonists were developed earlier and the histidine mutations were introduced within such background. The antagonistic properties were maintained and the high affinity at low pH conserved. The implications of these findings may open new areas of research in the field of prolactin cancer biology. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Human prolactin (PRL) is currently viewed as a hormone of pituitary origin, whose production (i.e. serum levels) is controlled by dopamine, whose biological actions relate exclusively to lactation and reproductive functions, for which any genetic disorder is yet to be identified, and whose unique associated pathology is hyperprolactinemia. Both experimental studies and human sample/cohort-based investigations performed during the past decade have considerably widened our perception of PRL biology: i) there are now strong epidemiological arguments supporting the fact that circulating PRL is a risk factor for breast cancer, ii) in addition to the endocrine hormone, locally produced PRL has been documented in several human tissues; there is increasing evidence supporting the tumor growth potency of local PRL, acting via autocrine/paracrine mechanisms, in both rodent models, and human breast and prostate tumors, iii) the first functional germinal polymorphisms of the PRL receptor were recently identified in patients presenting with breast tumors, which involve single amino acid substitution variants exhibiting constitutive activity, iv) human PRL analogs have been engineered, which were shown in experimental models to down-regulate the effects triggered by local PRL (competitive antagonism) or by the constitutively active receptor variants (inverse agonism). The aim of this review is to discuss these novel concepts in PRL biology, including their potential pathophysiological outcomes.

The N-terminus is the most divergent region within the prolactin (PRL)/placental lactogen (PL)/growth hormone (GH) family. Since all of these ligands are able to activate the lactogen receptor, it has been usually assumed that the N-terminus plays no major role in biological actions of any family member. In this study, we generated several analogs of human PRL in which the N-terminus was truncated by 9 and iteratively up to the 14 first residues. Truncation did not alter protein folding, and it even decreased the formation of PRL aggregates that appear during the purification of refolded protein. Removal of the entire N-terminal loop (14 residues) decreased the affinity for the receptor by two-three-fold, and reduced the ability of the hormone to activate the human lactogen receptor. In contrast, removal of 13 or less residues improves receptor activation since these analogs are able to produce supra-maximal activities in a transcriptional bioassay, or in proliferation assays exhibit dose-response curves that are less bell-shaped, which reflects enhanced stabilization of receptor dimers. Altogether, these data suggest that the N-terminus of PRL is actually slightly detrimental to bioactivity, but may be required for other properties of the hormone.

Prolactin (PRL) promotes tumor growth in various experimental models and leads to prostate hyperplasia and mammary neoplasia in PRL transgenic mice. Increasing experimental evidence argues for the involvement of autocrine PRL in this process. PRL receptor antagonists have been developed to counteract these undesired proliferative actions of PRL. However, all forms of PRL receptor antagonists obtained to date exhibit partial agonism, preventing their therapeutic use as full antagonists. In the present study, we describe the development of new human PRL antagonists devoid of agonistic properties and therefore able to act as pure antagonists. This was demonstrated using several in vitro bioassays, including highly sensitive assays able to detect extremely low levels of receptor activation. These new compounds also act as pure antagonists in vivo, as assessed by analyzing their ability to competitively inhibit PRL-triggered signaling cascades in various target tissues (liver, mammary gland, and prostate). Finally, by using transgenic mice expressing PRL specifically in the prostate, which exhibit constitutively activated signaling cascades paralleling hyperplasia, we show that these new PRL analogs are able to completely revert PRL-activated events. These second generation human PRL antagonists are good candidates to be used as inhibitors of growth-promoting actions of PRL.

The reference bioassay for lactogens is the Nb2 cell proliferation assay, whose extreme sensitivity allows the detection of very low amounts of lactogenic activity in biologic fluids. The use of rat Nb2 cells raises the problem of species specificity when analyzing lactogens of other origin, including human lactogenic hormones for which no reference bioassay currently exists. In this article, we describe two new homologous bioassays for human lactogens. One is a transcriptional bioassay generated by stably transfecting 293 human embryonic kidney fibroblasts using two plasmids, encoding the human prolactin receptor (hPRLR) and the PRL-responsive lactogenic hormone response element luciferase reporter gene. The second is a proliferation assay obtained by stably transfecting Ba/F3 cells with a plasmid encoding the hPRLR. We provide characterization of the various clones or cell populations that were isolated, and we describe experiments that were performed to achieve optimized protocols for both bioassays. These new assays were compared with other cells types exhibiting well-recognized PRL-mediated responses (proliferation of Nb2 or of human breast tumor cell lines), using various lactogen analogs. This comparative analysis provides strong evidence that the intrinsic characteristics of each bioassay dramatically affect the biologic properties attributed to the lactogen of interest. Depending on the assay, a given analog can exhibit agonistic or antagonistic properties. We hypothesize that in addition to species specificity, assay sensitivity is the key parameter in directing the apparent bioactivity of lactogens. Of course, in the end, it will be necessary to confirm the agonistic or antagonistic properties of the tested analogs, in vivo.

Prolactin (PRL) promotes tumor growth, as recently highlighted by the spontaneous appearance of prostate hyperplasia and mammary neoplasia in PRL transgenic mice. Increasing experimental evidence argues for the involvement of autocrine PRL in this process. Human (h)PRL receptor antagonists have been developed to counteract these undesired proliferative actions of PRL. However, all PRL receptor antagonists obtained to date exhibit partial agonism, limiting their therapeutic use as full antagonists. This is the case for the first generation antagonists (the prototype of which is G129R-hPRL) that we developed ten years ago, which display antagonistic activity in some, but not all in vitro bioassays, and fail to inhibit PRL activity in transgenic mice expressing this analog. We recently developed new human PRL antagonists devoid of agonistic properties, and therefore able to act as pure antagonists. This was demonstrated using several in vitro bioassays, including assays able to detect extremely low levels of receptor activation. These new compounds also act as pure antagonists in vivo, as demonstrated by their ability to competitively inhibit PRL-triggered signaling cascades in various target tissues (liver, mammary gland and prostate). Finally, using transgenic mice specifically expressing PRL in the prostate, which have constitutively activated signaling cascades and prostate hyperplasia, these new PRL analogs are able to completely revert PRL-activated events to basal levels. These second generation antagonists are good candidates to be used as inhibitors of the growth-promoting actions of hPRL.

The involvement of human prolactin (hPRL) in breast cancer has been recently reconsidered based on its autocrine/paracrine proliferative effect described in human mammary tumor epithelial cells. Therefore, there is growing interest in the development of potent hPRL antagonists that may inhibit this effect. We previously designed hPRL analogs displaying antagonistic properties in a human transcriptional bioassay. We now report that the most potent of those analogs, G129R-hPRL, antagonizes all hPRL-induced effects analysed in various breast cancer cell lines, including cell proliferation. The analog per se lacks intrinsic agonistic activity on PRL receptor-activated signaling cascades, cell proliferation and apoptosis, indicating that its mode of action only occurs through competitive inhibition of hPRL. We provide some molecular basis of this antagonistic effect by demonstrating that G129R-hPRL competitively inhibits hPRL-activation of the JAK-STAT and MAPK pathways, two signaling cascades involved in the mitogenic effect of hPRL in mammary epithelial cells. This competitive inhibition persists for at least 48 h, as evidenced by long term analysis of STAT5b activation or of progression through cell cycle. These results are the first demonstration at the molecular level that hPRL antagonists interfering with receptor dimerization disrupt signaling events in breast cancer cells, which prevents hPRL-induced cell proliferation.

The human growth hormone (hGH) antagonist B2036 combines a single amino acid substitution impairing receptor binding site 2 (G120K) with eight additional amino acid substitutions that improve binding site 1 affinity. This hGH antagonist is being tested for treating pathologies linked to excess hGH levels. B2036-PEG is a polyethylene glycol (PEG) conjugated form of B2036 that has an increased half-life due to reduced renal clearance. It is currently in phase III trials for acromegaly. Human GH is also able to bind to the receptor of prolactin (PRLR). Since activation of PRLR can promote an array of pathological states (reproduction disorders, breast cancer), the ability of B2036-PEG to interact with the PRLR had to be determined. In this study, we compared four hGH antagonists (G120K, G120K-PEG, B2036 and B2036-PEG) in three bioassays: proliferation of rat Nb2 cells, binding to the human PRLR and activation of human PRLR-mediated signaling in a cell line stably expressing this receptor and a luciferase reporter gene. Agonistic and antagonistic properties were characterized. Our data show that B2036-PEG does not bind, activate or antagonize PRLRs, either from rat or human origin. These observations further demonstrate that the eight amino acid substitutions within binding site 1 provide binding specificity directed towards the human GH receptor.

he anterior pituitary is permanently regulated by processes of apoptosis and proliferation in order to maintain tissue homeostasis. Several factors have been implicated in this regulation and lately, prolactin (PRL) has been included into that list. However, since PRL is secreted by anterior pituitary lactotropes, the actual outcome of its autocrine/paracrine actions on pituitary cells has remained difficult to assess. The availability of the pure PRL receptor antagonist Del1-9-G129R-hPRL has been helpful to circumvent this problem. While PRL has been traditionally associated with increased cell proliferation, recent studies revealed that this hormone actually induces apoptosis and decreases proliferation of anterior pituitary cells, by mechanisms involving the PRL receptor. The aim of this short review is to overview our current understanding of the regulation of pituitary homeostasis by PRL. Moreover, studies involving Del1-9-G129R-hPRL have helped anticipate to what extent future treatments involving PRL receptor inhibitors may interfere with processes regulated by PRL at the central level. Fil: Ferraris, Maria Jimena. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas; Argentina Fil: Bernichstein, Sophie. Inserm; Francia Fil: Pisera, Daniel Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas; Argentina Fil: Goffin, Vincent. Inserm; Francia

The role of prolactin (PRL) and its receptor (hPRLR) in promoting breast tumors is debated. We recently identified a gain-of-function hPRLR variant (I146L) in four women with multiple breast fibroadenomas (MFA) and no control subject.The specific aims were to describe this cohort of women presenting with MFA to identify and functionally characterize germline variants of hPRL/hPRLR genes and compare phenotypes of all patients.Ninety-five patients prospectively underwent clinical examination, breast ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and hormonal evaluation of gonadal and lactotrope functions. We analyzed hPRL/hPRLR coding sequences and made comparisons with a control population of 194 women. Functional characterization of hPRLR variants was performed. Pathology and immunochemistry were systematically carried out after surgical removal of tumors.One third of patients had a family history of breast disease. No hormonal imbalance was observed, except 30.7% of explosive stimulated PRL. Prolactin receptor variants were identified in exon 5 (I76V: 10 patients, eight controls) and exon 10 (one patient, no control). Both I146L and I76V variants exhibited constitutive activity. Pathology showed common fibroadenomas and identified six benign phyllodes tumors. Estrogen and progesterone receptors were detected in 85 and 98% of samples, respectively. Ki-67 median staining was less than 5%. No phenotypic difference was observed between carriers and noncarriers of either hPRLR variant.We present the largest population with MFA ever described, 15% of which had a hPRLR exhibiting basal activity in vitro. This questions the involvement of the hPRLR in MFA etiology and the potential relevance of therapeutic inhibition of PRLR signaling in patients.

There is a large body of literature showing that prolactin (PRL) exerts growth-promoting activities in breast cancer, and possibly in prostate cancer and prostate hyperplasia. In addition, increasing evidence argues for the involvement of locally produced (autocrine) PRL, perhaps even more than pituitary-secreted (endocrine) PRL, in tumor growth. Because dopamine analogs are unable to inhibit PRL production in extrapituitary sites, alternative strategies need investigation. To that end, several PRL receptor antagonists have been developed by introducing various mutations into its natural ligands. For all but one of these analogs, the mechanism of action involves a competition with endogenous PRL for receptor binding. Such compounds are thus candidates to counteract the undesired actions of PRL, not only in tumors, but also in dopamine-resistant prolactinomas. In this review, we describe the different versions of antagonists that have been developed, with emphasis on the controversies regarding their characterization, and the limits for their potential development as a drug. The most recently developed antagonist, Delta1-9-G129R-hPRL, is the only one that is totally devoid of residual agonistic activity, meaning it acts as pure antagonist. We discuss to what extent this new molecule could be considered as a lead compound for inhibiting the actions of human PRL in the above-mentioned diseases. We also speculate on the multiple questions that could be addressed with respect to the therapeutic use of PRL receptor antagonists in patients.

Prolactin (PRL), a polypeptide hormone secreted mainly by the pituitary and, to a lesser extent, by peripheral tissues, affects more physiological processes than all other pituitary hormones combined since it is involved in > 300 separate functions in vertebrates. Its main actions are related to lactation and reproduction. The initial step of PRL action is the binding to a specific membrane receptor, the PRLR, which belongs to the class 1 cytokine receptor superfamily. PRL-binding sites have been identified in a number of tissues and cell types in adult animals. Signal transduction by this receptor is mediated, at least in part, by two families of signaling molecules: Janus tyrosine kinases and signal transducers and activators of transcription (STATs). Disruption of the PRLR gene has provided a new mouse model with which to identify actions directly associated with PRL or any other PRLR ligands, such as placental lactogens. To date, several different phenotypes have been analyzed and are briefly described in this review. Coupled with the SAGE technique, this PRLR knockout model is being used to qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate the expression pattern of hepatic genes in two physiological situations: transcriptomes corresponding to livers from both wild type and PRLR KO mice are being compared, and following statistical analyses, candidate genes presenting a differential profile will be further characterized. Such a new approach will undoubtedly open future avenues of research for PRL targets. To date, no pathology linked to any mutation in the genes encoding PRL or its receptor have been identified. The development of genetic models provides new opportunities to understand how PRL can participate to the development of pathologies throughout life, as for example the initiation and progression of breast cancer.

Zinc increases the affinity of human growth hormone (hGH) for the human prolactin receptor (hPRLR) due to the coordination of one zinc ion involving Glu-174(hGH) and His-18(hGH). In contrast, binding of hPRL to the hPRLR is zinc-independent. We engineered in binding site 1 of hPRL a hGH-like zinc coordination site, by mutating Asp-183(hPRL) (homologous to Glu-174(hGH)) into Glu (D183E mutation). This mutation was also introduced into G129R hPRL, a binding site 2 mutant (Goffin, V., Kinet, S., Ferrag, F., Binart, N., Martial, J. A. , and Kelly, P. A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 16573-16579). These analogs were characterized using a stable clone expressing both the hPRLR and a PRLR-responsive reporter gene. The D183E mutation per se decreases the binding affinity and transcriptional activity of hPRL. However, this loss is partially rescued by the addition of zinc and the effect is much more marked on bioactivity than on binding affinity. These data indicate that the D183E mutation confers zinc sensitivity to hPRL biological properties. Due to an impaired site 2, the agonistic activity of G129R analog is almost nil. Although the double mutant D183E/G129R displays lower affinity ( approximately 1 log) compared with G129R hPRL, it unexpectedly recovers partial agonistic activity in the absence of zinc. Moreover, whereas zinc increases the affinity of D183E/G129R, it paradoxically abolishes its agonistic activity. Our results demonstrate that the biological properties of hPRL analogs do not necessarily parallel their overall affinity. Rather, the relative affinities of the individual binding sites 1 and 2 may play an even more important role.

Although prolactin (PRL) has been long suspected to be involved in the progression of human breast cancer, the failure of clinical improvement by treatment with dopamine agonists, which lower circulating levels of PRL, rapidly reduced the interest of oncologists concerning a potential role of this pituitary hormone in the development of breast cancer. Within the last few years, however, several studies reported first, that PRL is also synthesized in the mammary gland, and second that it exerts its proliferative action in an autocrine/paracrine manner. These observations have led to a reconsideration of the role of PRL as an active participant in breast cancer and are an impetus to search for alternative strategies aimed at inhibiting the proliferative effects of PRL on tumor mammary cells. In this report, we discuss the three possible levels that can be targeted for this purpose: the mammary synthesis of PRL, the interaction of the hormone with its receptor at the surface of mammary cells, and the intracellular signaling cascades triggered by the activated receptor. For each of these steps, we discuss the molecular event(s) that can be targeted, our understanding of the mechanisms involving these putative targets as well as the tools currently available for their inhibition. Besides its proliferative effect, PRL is also involved in the control of angiogenesis through one of its cleaved fragments, named PRL 16K, which has been shown to inhibit the angiogenic process. In view of this biological activity, we discuss first the cleavage of PRL with respect to the human mammary gland and, second, the hypothesis speculating that a balance between the proliferative effect of intact PRL and the anti-angiogenic activity of its 16K-like fragments might be physiologically relevant in the evolution of mammary tumors. If true, our hypothesis would suggest that the enzymatic cleavage of PRL could represent a new molecular target in the search for alternative strategies in the treatment of breast cancer.