Search

In the present study we investigated the mechanisms involved in the endocrine effect of nociceptin/orphanin FQ (OFQ) in the rat and the possible interaction between OFQ and morphine in the control of growth hormone (GH) secretion. The intracerebroventricular administration of OFQ (2.3 or 23 microg/rat, i.c.v.) in freely moving male rats caused an increase in the secretion of both GH and prolactin (PRL). The possible involvement of the catecholaminergic (CA) system was studied by administering OFQ to CA-depleted rats (rats given 200 mg/kg of alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine subcutaneously 2 h before the i.c.v. dose of OFQ). In these CA-depleted rats, administration of OFQ (23 microg/rat, i.c.v.) did not stimulate GH secretion, whereas it significantly enhanced PRL secretion. In rats anesthetized with ketamine, which induces a significant increase of GH, PRL and corticosterone secretion by activating the sympathetic tone, OFQ (23 microg/rat, i.c.v.) did not modify GH and corticosterone levels, whereas again it significantly potentiated PRL secretion. Overall these results indicate that CA system is involved in the stimulatory action of OFQ on GH but not on PRL secretion. In fact the stimulation of PRL, but not that of GH, was still evident after impairment of the CA system. Pretreatment with OFQ (23 microg/rat, i.c.v.) attenuated the GH secretion induced by morphine (1 mg/kg, given by intra-arterial injection), thus showing a negative interaction between OFQ and morphine in the control of GH secretion.

In this study we examined the possible interplay of amylin (AMY) and salmon calcitonin (sCT) in the central control of growth hormone (GH) and prolactin (PRL) secretion in male rats. For this purpose we first compared effects of central intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) admininstration of various doses of AMY (2.5-2,500 ng/rat) and sCT (2.2-220 ng/rat) on beta-endorphin (beta-END, 0.5 microg/rat)-induced GH and PRL secretion. AMY and sCT dose-dependently inhibited beta-END-induced GH secretion, whereas only sCT was able to inhibit beta-END-induced PRL secretion. To examine whether the GH inhibitory effect of AMY was due to the possible cross-reactivity of AMY and sCT on the same receptors in the CNS, we pretreated some rats with the AMY antagonist (AMY8-37, 2. 5 microg/rat, i.c.v.). AMY8-37 significantly enhanced the GH-stimulatory action of beta-END. AMY8-37, administered prior to AMY and sCT, significantly removed the inhibitory effect of both AMY and sCT on beta-END-induced GH release, suggesting that both peptides mediate their response on GH through a common receptor. In vitro competition binding studies on rat hypothalamic membranes have shown that both AMY and sCT compete with [125I]rAMY binding with half inhibition (IC50) values of 3.6 x 10(-11) and 1.6 x 10(-10) M, respectively. Binding of [125I]sCT was inhibited by sCT with an IC50 of 1.09 x 10(-10) M and to a lesser extent by AMY with an IC50 of 1. 3 x 10(-6) M. Thus it is possible that the two peptides recognize a common hypothalamic receptor but with different affinities (sCT > AMY). Overall these data indicate that AMY behaves as a mimic of sCT in the central control of GH secretion. The failure of AMY, at variance with sCT, to modify the PRL-releasing activity of beta-END indicates that different receptor subtypes for sCT are involved in the endocrine effects of sCT and only those mediating the modulatory action of GH respond to AMY.

The effects of intracarotid (i.a.) administration of the histamine (HA) H3-receptor agonist (R)-alpha-methyl-histamine (alpha MeHA) and of the H3-antagonist thioperamide, (THIO) on basal or morphine (M)-induced prolactin (PRL) and growth hormone (GH) secretion were studied in male rats. M was administered 3 h after the H3-drugs. Neither THIO (2.5 mg/kg) nor alpha MeHA (10 mg/kg) changed basal PRL levels and only THIO enhanced the PRL-releasing effect of M (6 mg/kg). Basal GH secretion was not modified by THIO. alpha MeHA slightly increased GH secretion. THIO significantly decreased M-stimulated GH secretion (1 mg/kg, i.a.) and alpha MeHA slightly increased it. These results, in agreement with previous evidence obtained after central HA administration, indicated that endogenous brain HA facilitates PRL and inhibits GH secretion.

We investigated the effects of /ASU1-7/eel calcitonin (ASU1-7eelCT) on basal and stimulated prolactin (PRL) release in male rats. /ASU1-7/eelCT was administered intracerebroventricularly (icv) into freely moving rats with indwelling catheters. The administration of /ASU1-7/eelCT (2.5 micrograms/rat, icv) significantly inhibited basal PRL secretion. When PRL secretion was stimulated by exposing rats to restraint stress, /ASU1-7/eelCT (250 ng; 800 ng; 2.5 micrograms/rat, icv) dose-relatedly inhibited the PRL surges at 10 min after stress. The same doses of icv /ASU1-7/eelCT were effective in inhibiting morphine (6 mg/kg, intracarotid, ia-induced PRL release. No effect on stress-induced PRL secretion was observed when the peptide was administered intracarotid at the dose of 10 micrograms/rat. These results demonstrate that /ASU1-7/eelCT, as we previously observed with salmon calcitonin (sCT), has central inhibitory activity on PRL secretion, probably through enhancement of hypothalamic inhibitory pathways involved in the control of PRL.

We studied the effects of histamine (HA) antagonists on the facilitatory action of morphine (M) and beta-endorphin (beta E) on prolactin (PRL) release and the effect of alpha-fluoromethylhistidine (alpha-FMH, inhibitor of HA synthesis) on beta E-induced PRL secretion. Male rats were injected intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) with mepyramine (MEP, H1-antagonist, 0.8 mumol/rat) or ranitidine (RAN, H2-antagonist, 0.4 mumol/rat) 10 min before M (6 mg/kg, intracarotid, i.a.) or beta E (0.25 micrograms/rat, i.c.v.). alpha-FMH (200 micrograms/rat, i.c.v.) was administered 3 h before beta E. Plasma PRL levels were measured at various times before and after drug treatment. RAN but not MEP significantly reduced PRL release induced by M whereas neither HA-antagonists nor alpha-FMH modified beta E-induced PRL release. The results obtained show that brain HA contributes through activation of H2-receptors to the PRL facilitatory action of M but not of beta E.

Various compounds with different blocking potencies on histamine H2-receptors were administered to rats both into the carotid (ia) and into the brain ventricles (icv) and their effects on PRL release were evaluated. The drugs were cimetidine, as reference compound, ranitidine, 5 to 7 times as potent, and oxmetidine, 8 to 10 times as potent. PRL was measured in blood samples collected at -15, 0 and +5, +10, +20 and +40 min after treatment. Cimetidine (80 mg/kg) and ranitidine (30 mg/kg), when injected ia as a single bolus, induced prompt increases (P less than 0.01) in PRL. On the contrary, oxmetidine (the most potent H2 antagonist), even at the high dose of 80 mg/kg ia, had no effect on PRL release. When the drugs were given icv (0.2 mumol/rat or 0.8 mumol/rat), none of them caused any significant PRL release. These results suggest that histamine H2-blocking potency is not correlated with PRL release. Furthermore, the PRL-releasing activity of the drugs seems not to be due to any action on the central neural control of PRL secretion. This comparative study shows that it is possible (as with oxmetidine) to achieve complete dissociation of the H2-receptor blocking action from the unwanted PRL-release stimulating effect.

The mechanism of cimetidine-induced prolactin (PRL) release was studied. Intracarotid (i.a.) administration of 1 mg/kg of impromidine, the most specific H2 histamine agonist known, did not counteract the cimetidine-induced hypersecretion of PRL. Pre-treatment with benzodiazepines (diazepam or lorazepam, 3 mg/kg/i.a.) completely suppressed it. Administration of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA 5 mg/kg/i.a.) was also able to prevent it, but to a lesser extent than benzodiazepines. Simultaneous administration of doses of diazepam (1.5 mg/kg/i.a.) and GABA (3 mg/kg/i.a.) ineffective per se markedly blunted the increase of PRL by cimetidine. We conclude that cimetidine does not induce hypersecretion of PRL by its action on histamine H2 receptors, but through other pharmacological activities of the drug, such as perhaps interaction with the GABA-ergic system in the pituitary.

We investigated whether inhibition of brain histamine (HA) synthesis by alpha-fluoromethylhistidine (alpha-FMH) can influence basal or stimulated prolactin (PRL) release in male rats. alpha-FMH was administered either into the carotid (i.a., 20 and 100 mg/kg) or intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v., 200 micrograms/rat) into freely moving rats with indwelling catheters. Plasma PRL levels were measured 90, 120, 180 min later. Both i.a. and i.c.v. administration of alpha-FMH significantly inhibited basal PRL secretion at 120 and 180 min. When PRL secretion was stimulated by exposing rats to restraint stress, alpha-FMH administered 3 h before the stress (20 and 100 mg/kg, i.a.; 200 micrograms/rat, i.c.v.) was able to prevent the PRL surges at 10 and 20 min after stress. These results suggest that endogenous brain HA has a facilitatory role in the control of PRL secretion in rats.

We examined the effects of an irreversible inhibitor of brain histamine (HA) synthesis, alpha-fluoromethyl-histidine (alpha-FMH), on prolactin (PRL) release induced by an opiate agonist (morphine, M) or by a serotonergic agonist (MK212). alpha-FMH was administered intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v., 200 micrograms/rat) into freely moving rats with indwelling catheters in the carotid. M (6 mg/kg, intracarotid, i.a.) was administered simultaneously with or 3 h after alpha-FMH. MK212 (2.5 mg/kg, i.a.) was administered 3 h after alpha-FMH. Blood samples for assay for PRL were drawn at 0, 10, 20, 40 min after M or MK212 administration. alpha-FMH (3 h before) significantly reduced the PRL-releasing effect of M and MK212 but did not modify PRL release by M when administered simultaneously. The present results showing that the facilitatory actions of the opiate and serotonergic systems on PRL are impaired when brain HA synthesis is reduced, suggest that there is an HA-dependent step in opiate and serotonergic control of PRL.

The effects of intracerebroventricular (icv;25ng/rat) or iv (10 micrograms/kg) salmon calcitonin (sCT) on PRL secretion were determined in lactating rats and compared to the effects in intact or ovariectomized-estrogen-treated female rats. The icv or iv injections of sCT 9 days after estrogen treatment did not significantly lower the PRL levels in intact rats. In ovariectomized-estrogen-primed animals, sCT (icv or iv) did not modify the afternoon surge of PRL secretion when injected during the surge, nor did it delay or attenuate the increasing secretory activity when administered (iv) before the afternoon surge had begun. On the contrary, 30 or 60 min after the icv or iv administration of sCT to lactating rats, suckling-induced PRL secretion was prevented. These results and our previous evidence that a greater dose of sCT is needed to decrease the less intense morphine- or stress-induced PRL secretion indicate differential hypoprolactinemic properties of sCT, which are particularly striking during lactation. While the mechanisms underlying these selective activities deserve further investigation, the proposed participation of PRL in the regulation of calcium metabolism during lactation suggests that the potent PRL inhibitory effect of CT in this condition should be regarded as one factor in the complex mechanism that prevents bone loss and protects the maternal skeleton.

The effects of administration into the brain ventricle of H2 receptor agonists (4-methylhistamine, 0.8 mumol/rat; dimaprit, 0.4-0.8 mumol/rat), H2 antagonists (cimetidine, 0.8 mumol/rat; ranitidine, 0.4-0.8 mumol/rat; famotidine, 0.03 mumol/rat) and of the dimaprit chemical analogue SK&F 91487 (0.4 mumol/rat) on unstimulated and histamine-stimulated prolactin secretion in normal male rats were studied. The H2 agonist 4-methylhistamine caused a significant increase in unstimulated blood PRL, whereas dimaprit, SK&F 91487, and the H2 antagonists tested did not change PRL levels. 4-Methylhistamine significantly enhanced the stimulatory effects of histamine on prolactin, whereas all the H2 antagonists inhibited histamine-induced prolactin release. The inhibition of histamine-induced prolactin secretion by the H2 agonist dimaprit is nonspecific, since its chemical analogue SK&F 91487, which has no H2 agonist activity, also inhibits it. These results indicate that stimulation of the H2 receptors in the central nervous system is facilitatory for PRL secretion, suggesting that the activation of H2 receptors may contribute to the PRL-releasing effects of histamine.