Search

Objectives: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is approximately 15% of all lung cancer. Topotecan is the preferred chemotherapy regimen in second-line treatment, but toxicity might be limiting to use in clinical routine. Physicians had more experience on weekly paclitaxel due to its easy access and good responses in many cancers. The present study aimed to examine the management of patients treated with topotecan and weekly paclitaxel as second-line treatment of SCLC. Methods: Patients were divided into two groups due to second-line treatment. The primary endpoint of this study was progression-free survival and overall survival. The secondary endpoint was overall response rate and disease control rate. Results: The median PFS was 4.5 months (Topotecan 3.7 vs. Paclitaxel 5.5, HR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.30-0.64, p=0.000) and the median OS was 11 months (Topotecan 9.5 vs. Paclitaxel 12.7, HR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.20-0.45, p=0.000). ORR was 10.2 % in topotecan group and 20.3%% in paclitaxel group (p: 0.047). DCR was 15.5% in patients treated with topotecan and 28.8% in paclitaxel group (p=0.033). Conclusion: The present study compared the currently preferred regimen topotecan with weekly paclitaxel and resulted in better survival and response rates with lower toxicity profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Advanced stage biliary tract cancers (BTC) are rare malignancies with poor prognosis. There are few prospective trials, but several retrospective studies regarding treatment options. In this study, we aimed to investigate the role of systemic inflammatory parameters (SIP) and other possible independent factors that may affect survival and treatment approaches and to determine the benefit of later-line treatments in these patients.Methods: A total of 284 patients, initially diagnosed with advanced stage or progressed after curative treatment of BTC, from different oncology centers in Turkey were included in this retrospective study. The prognostic significance of clinicopathological factors, SIPs and treatment options was analyzed.Results: At a median follow-up of 13 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.1 months (95% CI:5.51-6.82), and the median overall-survival (OS) time was 16.8 months (95% CI: 13.9-19.6). Treatment choice (p < 0.001 HR:0.70 CI95% 0.55-0.9), performance status (p < 0.001 HR:2.74 CI 95% 2.12-3.54) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (p = 0.02 HR:1.38 CI 95% 1.03-1.84) were independent prognostic factors for PFS. For OS, the independent prognostic indicators were determined as The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) (p < 0.001 HR:1.78 CI 95% 1.5-2.3), Systemic Immune-inflammation Index (SII) (p < 0.001 HR:0.51 CI95% 0.36-0.73) and stage at diagnosis (p = 0.002 HR:1.79 CI 95% 1.24-2.59). Furthermore, second and third line treatments significantly prolonged OS in advanced BTC (p < 0.001 HR:0.55 CI 95% 0.38-0.79; p = 0.007 HR:0.51 CI95% 0.31-0.83, respectively).Conclusion: SII and NLR are useful prognostic factors and may be helpful in making treatment decisions. Additionally, second and later-line treatments in advanced BTC have a significant impact on survival under real-life conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: A significant proportion of cervical cancer (CC) patients are diagnosed at a locally advanced stage. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the cornerstone of treatment for patients with locally advanced CC. However, the role of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) after CCRT is controversial. In this study, we analyzed the efficacy of AC after CCRT in stage III CC patients. Methods: We performed a multicenter, retrospective analysis of 139 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III CC patients treated with CCRT of whom 45.3% received AC. Our goal was to determine the impact of AC on survival in these patients. Results: Five-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 37.5% and 16% in patients receiving CCRT with and without AC, respectively (p = 0.008). Median PFS was 30.9 months (CI 95% 14.8–46.9) and 16.6 months (CI 95% 9.3–23.9) in patients receiving CCRT with and without AC, respectively. Five-year overall survival (OS) was 78.2% and 28.4% in patients receiving CCRT with and without AC, respectively (p < 0.001). Median OS was 132.2 months (CI 95, %66.5–197.8) and 34.9 months (CI 95% 23.1–46.7) in patients receiving CCRT with and without AC, respectively. Conclusion: Our study suggests that AC provides OS and PFS benefit in stage III CC patients. Larger studies are needed to identify subgroups of patients who would benefit from AC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mucinous colorectal adenocarcinoma (MCAC) is a distinct subtype of colorectal carcinoma (CRC). The prognostic and predictive significance of mucinous histology remains controversial. It was aimed to investigate the prognostic and/or predictive role of mucinous histology in left-sided metastatic CRC (mCRC) with wild-type RAS. This is a retrospective multicenter study of mCRC treated with first line anti-EGFR combined 5-fluorouracil based chemotherapy (CT). Patients were stratified according to presence (>50% extracellular mucin) or absence of mucinous histology. Survival analyses were performed firstly regardless of treatment options and then performed as separating according to CT regimens. Additional analyses were performed for MCAC patients considering backbone CT regimens. A total of 125 patients were included, consisting of 40 (32.0%) patients with MCAC and 85 (68.0%) patients with non-MCAC. Median follow-up time was 19.7 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.7 months in all patients, and PFS was lower in MCAC than non-MCAC (9.9 vs. 12.0 months, respectively, P=0.005). Median overall survival (OS) was 25.7 months in all patients. OS was lower in MCAC than non-MCAC (22.8 vs. 29.7 months, respectively, P=0.005). When considering backbone CT regimens, in multivariate analyses, mucinous histology was an independent prognostic factor for OS in both for mFOLFOX6 (HR: 1.92, P=0.04) and FOLFIRI (HR: 2.04, P=0.04) groups and was associated with poor PFS in only mFOLFOX6 (HR: 3.86, P<0.001) group. When outcomes were analyzed for the MCAC group, median OS of MCAC patients receiving mFOLFOX6 and FOLFIRI was 22.47 and 14.22 months, respectively (P=0.41). Median PFS of MCAC patients receiving mFOLFOX6 and FOLFIRI was 10.15 and 8.11 months, respectively (P=0.73). The study revealed poor prognosis of mucinous histology, both in whole study population and in backbone CT groups. Moreover, lower PFS of MCAC patients was revealed in only mFOLFOX6 group and this finding may be a valuable issue for the future research. However, considering all analyses, the present results did not indicate a special benefit of any backbone CT regimen for MCAC patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]