Search

Emerging biologic subsets and new prognostic markers are significantly important for aggressive diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Nevertheless, the high cost of testing limits the availability of these tests in most hospitals, thus making prognostic judgment based on basic immunohistochemical testing, whole blood Epstein–Barr virus DNA (WBEBV) surveillance and clinical features advantageous for hospitals and patients with poor medical conditions. We included 647 DLBCL patients treated in our hospital from January 2009 to March 2023. Non‐germinal center B‐cell like, Ki‐67, and International Prognostic Index (IPI) scores were related to cMYC/B‐cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl‐2)‐double expression. Age, Epstein–Barr virus‐encoded small RNA (EBER) positivity, and IPI scores were associated with mortality. The cutoffs for differential overall survival (OS) of age, WBEBV, Bcl‐2, and cMYC were 57 years, 1514 copies/mL (baseline), 5.89 × 104 copies/mL (treatment), 40%, and 55%, respectively. EBER positivity was significantly associated with a worse OS. Patients with newly defined DE (Bcl‐2 ≥ 40 and cMYC > 55) had a worse prognosis than controls (p = 0.04). We found that cMYC with an optimal cutoff of 47.5 could effectively predict high‐grade DLBCL with an area under the curve of 0.912, and the specificity and sensitivity were 70.7% and 100%, respectively. Our study provides valuable insights into the prognostic factors and biomarker cutoffs that influence OS in DLBCL patients, which may guide clinicians in tailoring treatment strategies and improving patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with MYC/BCL2 double-expression (DE), a recently proposed poor prognostic group, can be easily identified by immunohistochemistry in routine clinical practice. However, clinical outcomes of DE-DLBCL patients vary immensely after R-CHOP immunochemotherapy and prognostic impact of MYC/BCL2-DE was conflicting according to the cell-of-origin, i.e., between germinal center-B-cell (GCB)- and non-GCB-DLBCLs. This implies the heterogeneity within DE-DLBCLs and emphasizes a need for proper risk stratification to select the patients who require more intensive therapy. By analyzing a prospectively immunoprofiled cohort of consecutively diagnosed DLBCL patients, we confirmed the poor prognostic value of MYC/BCL2-DE in DLBCL patients treated with R-CHOP irrespective of the cell-of-origin and international prognostic index. DE-DLBCLs with a concurrent risk factor, especially, elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), had the worst survival and DE-DLBCL patients with normal LDH had clinical outcomes similar to those of non-DE-DLBCL patients. Risk stratification of DE-DLBCL based on serum LDH may guide clinical decision-making for DE-DLBCL patients. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients with MYC/BCL2 double expression (DE) show poor prognosis and their clinical outcomes after R-CHOP therapy vary immensely. We investigated the prognostic value of DE in aggressive B-cell lymphoma patients (n = 461), including those with DLBCL (n = 417) and high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL; n = 44), in a prospectively immunoprofiled cohort. DE was observed in 27.8% of DLBCLs and 43.2% of HGBLs (p = 0.058). DE-DLBCL patients were older (p = 0.040) and more frequently exhibited elevated serum LDH levels (p = 0.002), higher international prognostic index (IPI; p = 0.042), non-germinal-center B-cell phenotype (p < 0.001), and poor response to therapy (p = 0.042) compared to non-DE-DLBCL patients. In R-CHOP-treated DLBCL patients, DE status predicted poor PFS and OS independently of IPI (p < 0.001 for both). Additionally, in DE-DLBCL patients, older age (>60 years; p = 0.017), involvement of ≥2 extranodal sites (p = 0.021), bone marrow involvement (p = 0.001), high IPI (p = 0.017), CD10 expression (p = 0.006), poor performance status (p = 0.028), and elevated LDH levels (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with poor OS. Notably, DE-DLBCL patients with normal LDH levels exhibited similar PFS and OS to those of patients with non-DE-DLBCL. Our findings suggest that MYC/BCL2 DE predicts poor prognosis in DLBCL. Risk stratification of DE-DLBCL patients based on LDH levels may guide clinical decision-making for DE-DLBCL patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]