Search

Simple Summary: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) may be atypical in terms of the cell morphology picture, but also with regard to the surface immunophenotypic profile. Aiming at assessing the impact of morphology and immunophenotype in defining the atypical characteristics of CLL in terms of clinical–biological features and prognosis, a retrospective analysis of a large cohort of CLL patients was performed. We found that morphology better predicts the prognosis of atypical CLL compared to immunophenotypic analysis. Also, discordant cases in terms of immunophenotype and morphology did not identify specific prognostic groups. Overall, the question that still needs to be answered is: does it make sense to focus on morphology and immunophenotypic features in CLL in the era of molecular markers used as prognostic indicators? Atypical chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is still defined according to morphological criteria. However, deviance from the typical surface immunological profile suggests an atypical immunological-based CLL. A large cohort of patients with CLL was retrospectively evaluated aiming at assessing morphological (FAB criteria), immunophenotypical (two or more discordances from the typical profile), and clinical–biological features of atypical CLL. Compared to typical cases, morphologically atypical CLL showed a greater percentage of unmutated IgVH and CD38 positivity, and a higher expression of CD20. Immunophenotypically atypical CLL was characterized by more advanced clinical stages, higher expression of CD20, higher rate of FMC7, CD79b and CD49d positivity, and by an intermediate–high expression of membrane surface immunoglobulin, compared to typical cases. When patients were categorized based on immunophenotypic and morphologic concordance or discordance, no difference emerged. Finally, morphological features better discriminated patients' prognosis in terms of time-to-first treatment, while concordant atypical cases showed overall a worse prognosis. Discordant cases by immunophenotype and/or morphology did not identify specific prognostic groups. Whether—in the era of molecular markers used as prognostic indicators—it does make sense to focus on morphology and immunophenotype features in CLL is still matter of debate needing further research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This study aimed at investigating the prognostic significance of the soluble form of CD200 antigen evaluated at diagnosis in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In a large cohort of patients, we found that more aggressive features and a worse prognosis are correlated with higher baseline serum levels of CD200. These data support the relevant role of CD200 not only as a diagnostic tool but also as a prognostic indicator and a potential therapeutic target in CLL. Membrane-bound CD200 is overexpressed in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and there is some evidence that its soluble ectodomain (sCD200) could also be involved in the pathophysiology and the disease. However, very little is known about sCD200's prognostic significance. sCD200 was tested at diagnosis in 272 patients with CLL and in 78 age- and sex-matched healthy subjects using a specific human CD200 (OX-2 membrane glycoprotein) ELISA kit. A significantly higher concentration of sCD200 was found in CLL patients compared to controls. In our cohort, sCD200 was significantly higher in patients who were older than 66 years, with Binet stage C, unmutated IgVH and unfavorable (del11q or del17p) FISH. Time-to-first treatment and overall survival were significantly shorter in patients with higher sCD200 concentration, using as a cut-off 1281 pg/mL, the median value for sCD200 concentration in the whole CLL cohort. However, the prognostic impact of sCD200 was not confirmed in multivariate analysis. Baseline sCD200 values appeared to have an impact on the response to chemotherapy or chemo-immunotherapy, but not to targeted agents. Collectively, our data show that sCD200 serum levels correlate with more aggressive clinical and biological features and are able to predict a worse prognosis. This work supports the relevant role of CD200 not only as a diagnostic tool but also as a prognostic indicator and a potential therapeutic target in CLL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]