Search

This document is a response to a comment made by Haonan Wang et al. regarding a meta-analysis on the diagnostic and prognostic value of miR-155 in cancers. The authors of the original paper addressed the comment by removing three studies and conducting a new meta-analysis. The results of the new analysis were consistent with the overall results of the original paper. The authors also discussed the suggestion of stratifying the analysis by the type of miR-155, but stated that they did not find any studies on miR-155-3p that met the inclusion criteria. They agreed with the suggestion for more studies and larger sample sizes in the future to explore the relationship between miR-155 expression and the prognosis of specific cancers. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Tumor microenvironment is infiltrated by many immune cells, of which Regulatory T (Treg) cells are usually considered as negative regulators of the immune responses. However, the effect of FOXP3+ (forkhead box transcription factor 3) Treg cells infiltrated into the tumor areas on the prognosis of breast cancer is controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to dissect the potential values of FOXP3+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) as a prognosis predictor of breast cancer. Methods: After systematic retrieval of all relevant studies, 28 eligible articles were identified for meta-analysis. Odd ratio (OR), hazard ratio (HR), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were obtained for pooled analyses of pathological complete response (pCR), overall survival (OS), and corresponding forest plots and funnel plots were plotted, respectively. Results: Pooled results revealed that patients with higher levels of FOXP3+ TILs experienced better pCR (OR: 1.24, 95% CI 1.09–1.41) and OS (HR: 0.79, 95% CI 0.64–0.97). Subgroup analysis revealed that elevated FOXP3+ TILs were significantly associated with improved pCR (OR: 1.20, 95% CI 1.02–1.40) and OS (HR: 0.22, 95% CI 0.06–0.88) in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) breast cancer patients. Furthermore, FOXP3+ TILs in the stromal area were statistically correlated with the favorable pCR (OR: 1.22, 95% CI 1.08–1.38) and OS (HR: 0.68, 95% CI 0.49–0.96). Conclusions: The predictive role of FOXP3+ TILs in the prognosis of breast cancer is influenced by various factors such as molecular subtype of breast cancer and the location of Treg. In HER2+ breast cancer and triple-negative breast cancer, FOXP3+ TILs are associated with better pCR and OS. Additionally, FOXP3+ TILs in stromal represent a favourable prognosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: MicroRNA-155 has been discussed as a biomarker in cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Although relevant studies have been published, the role of microRNA-155 remains uncertain because of insufficient data. Methods: We conducted a literature search in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases to obtain relevant articles and extract data to evaluate the role of microRNA-155 in cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Results: The pooled results showed that microRNA-155 presented a remarkable diagnostic value in cancers (area under the curve = 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI 0.87–0.92; sensitivity = 0.83, 95% CI 0.79–0.87; specificity = 0.83, 95% CI 0.80–0.86), which was maintained in the subgroups stratified by ethnicity (Asian and Caucasian), cancer types (breast cancer, lung cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, leukemia, and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma), sample types (plasma, serum, tissue), and sample size (n >100 and n <100). In prognosis, a combined hazard ratio (HR) showed that microRNA-155 was significantly associated with poor overall survival (HR = 1.38, 95% CI 1.25–1.54) and recurrence-free survival (HR = 2.13, 95% CI 1.65–2.76), and was boundary significant with poor progression-free survival (HR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.00–1.44), but not significant with disease-free survival (HR = 1.14, 95% CI 0.70–1.85). Subgroup analyses in overall survival showed that microRNA-155 was associated with poor overall survival in the subgroups stratified by ethnicity and sample size. However, the significant association was maintained in cancer types subgroups of leukemia, lung cancer, and oral squamous cell carcinoma, but not in colorectal cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and breast cancer, and was maintained in sample types subgroups of bone marrow and tissue, but not in plasma and serum. Conclusions: Results from this meta-analysis demonstrated that microRNA-155 was a valuable biomarker in cancer diagnosis and prognosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To date, increasing evidences have demonstrated that the aberrant expression of miR-371–3 cluster has been verified in various cancers and could be potentially used as a biomarker for tumor diagnosis and prognosis. To explore the role of miR-371–3 cluster in tumor diagnosis and prognosis, we conducted this study based on the published data. Methods: We searched electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases) (Jan 1, 2007 to Jun 1, 2018). The pooled sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) of summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curve were used for diagnostic values, meanwhile the pooled hazard ration (HR) and 95% CI were used to explore the prognosis capacity of miR-372 and miR-373. In addition, the publication bias of the enrolled studies was tested and a sensitivity analysis of each study was performed to evaluate the stability of the pooled result. Results: A total of eleven eligible studies containing six eligible studies containing 870 participants for diagnosis and 1218 cancer cases for prognosis were selected for this study. For diagnosis, the pooled results revealed that the miR-371 (sensitivity: 0.85, specificity: 0.92, AUC: 0.92) and miR-373 (sensitivity: 0.81, specificity: 0.93, AUC: 0.93) could be used as diagnostic biomarkers. For prognosis, we observed that elevated miR-372 indicated poor prognosis (HR=2.31, 95% CI: 1.04–5.14), especially in the cutoff value subgroup of median (HR=2.62, 95% CI: 1.54–4.46). In addition, pooled results showed that expression of miR-373 was not related to prognosis because of the significant heterogeneity, and the high miR-373 expression presented favorable prognosis in Asians (HR=0.34, 95% CI: 0.23–0.50) after omitting the study of heterogeneity origin. Conclusion: The current studies demonstrated that miR-371 and miR-373 could be predictive tumor diagnostic biomarkers and the expression of miR-372 and miR-373 may indicate prognosis of cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Case-control study included 479 patients and 483 controls. • SNPs in IL17/IL23 were evaluated for risk and prognosis of gastric cancer. • Two SNPs (rs1884444 and rs6682925) in IL-23R were related OS of patients. IL-17/IL-23 pathway has been hypothesized to play a role in occurrence and progression of gastric cancer. To investigate the susceptibility and prognostic value of polymorphisms in genes in the IL-17/IL-23 pathway to gastric cancer, we performed a case-control study combined a retrospective study in a Chinese population. The Sequenom's MassARRAY® genotyping platform was used to genotype the polymorphisms, and infection of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) was determined by using a commercial H. pylori immunogold testing kit. The results showed that IL-17A rs3748067 T allele carriers have a higher gastric cancer risk than non-carriers in the subgroup of individuals with age >64 years old (CT/TT vs. CC: adjusted OR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.04–2.29). The result of prognosis shown that IL-23R rs1884444 GG and rs6682925 CC genotype were associated with unfavorable survival (rs1884444 GG vs. GT/TT: adjusted HR = 1.40, 95%CI:1.02–1.93; rs6682925 CC vs. CT/TT: HR = 1.43, 95%CI:1.06–1.92), respectively. The stratified analysis revealed that the significant association of rs1884444 was maintained in the subgroup of older than 64 years old, and that rs6682925 was associated with unfavorable survival in the subgroup of female and patients received chemotherapy. In short, we concluded two polymorphisms (rs1884444 and rs6682925) in IL-23R were associated with prognosis of gastric cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Exosomes mediated transfer of lncRNA 91H may play a critical role in the development of CRC. However, few studies have proved the mechanism. So we performed this study to deeply explore the biological functions of exosomal 91H in the development and progression of CRC. Methods: The association between lncRNA 91H and exosomes was detected in vitro and vivo. Then RNA pulldown and RIP were used to detect how lncRNA 91H affect CRC IGF2 express. At last, clinic pathological significance of exosomal 91H was evaluated by Cox proportional hazards model. Results: We found that serum lncRNA 91H expression was closely related to cancer exosomes in vitro and vivo which may enhance tumor-cell migration and invasion in tumor development by modifying HNRNPK expression. Then the clinic pathological significance of exosomal 91H was evaluated which demonstrated that CRC patients with high lncRNA 91H expression usually showed a higher risk in tumor recurrence and metastasis than patients with low lncRNA 91H expression (P < 0.05). Conclusion: All these data suggested that exosomal lncRNA 91H enhancing CRC metastasis by modifying HNRNPK expression might be an early plasma-based biomarker for CRC recurrence or metastasis. Further large-scale studies are needed to confirm our findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Recently, increasing studies investigated the association between inflammation parameter such as neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the prognosis of cancers. However, the clinical and prognostic significance of NLR in breast cancer remains controversial.Aim: This meta-analysis was conducted to establish the overall accuracy of the NLR test in the diagnosis of breast cancer.Materials and Methods: A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted using PubMed and Web of Science. Six studies dating up to July 2014 with 2267 patients were enrolled in the present study. STATA 11.0 software (STATA Corporation, College Station, TX, USA) was selected for data analysis. In order to evaluate the association between NLR and overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence-free survival or cancer-specific survival, the hazard ratios (HRs), and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted.Results: Subgroup analyses showed that NLR was a strong prognostic factor for OS in multivariate analysis (HR = 2.81, 95% CI = 2.13-3.71, PH = 0.992) and without metastasis (HR = 1.45, 95% CI = 0.37-5.66, PH < 0.001). Elevated NLR was associated with a high risk for DFS in subgroups of multivariate analysis (HR = 2.16, 95% CI = 1.67-2.80, PH = 0.977) and mixed metastasis (HR = 2.13, 95% CI = 1.38-3.30, PH = 0.84).Conclusion: In summary, NLR may be considered as a predictive factor for patients with breast cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Accumulating evidence highlights the important role of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in a large number of biological processes. However, the knowledge of genome scale expression of lncRNAs and their potential biological function in gastric cancer is still lacking. Using RNA-seq data from 420 gastric cancer patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), we identified 1,294 lncRNAs differentially expressed in gastric cancer compared with adjacent normal tissues. We also found 247 lncRNAs differentially expressed between intestinal subtype and diffuse subtype. Survival analysis revealed 33 lncRNAs independently associated with patient overall survival, of which 6 lncRNAs were validated in the internal validation set. There were 181 differentially expressed lncRNAs located in the recurrent somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs) regions and their correlations between copy number and RNA expression level were also analyzed. In addition, we inferred the function of lncRNAs by construction of a co-expression network for mRNAs and lncRNAs. Together, this study presented an integrative analysis of lncRNAs in gastric cancer and provided a valuable resource for further functional research of lncRNAs in gastric cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Inflammation is an essential component of pathogenesis and progression of cancer. A high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is considered as a prognostic indicator for breast cancer. This meta-analysis was conducted to establish the overall accuracy of the NLR test in the diagnosis of breast cancer. A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted by using PubMed, Web of Science and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). Published studies dating up to July 2014 and 4,293 patients were enrolled in the present study. In order to evaluate the association between NLR and overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) or cancer specific survival (CSS), the hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted. OS was the primary outcome. The results suggested that increased NLR was a strong predictor for OS with HR of 2.28 (95% CI = 1.08–4.80, P heterogeneity < 0.001). Stratified analyses indicated that a high NLR appeared to be a negative prognostic marker in Caucasian populations (HR = 4.53, 95% CI = 3.11–6.60, P heterogeneity = 0.096), multivariate analysis method (HR = 2.10, 95% CI = 1.52–2.89, P heterogeneity = 0.591), and mixed metastasis (HR = 4.53, 95% CI = 3.11–6.60, P heterogeneity = 0.096). Elevated NLR was associated with a high risk for DFS (HR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.09–1.74, P heterogeneity = 0.050) and in subgroups of multivariate analysis (HR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.25–2.14, P heterogeneity = 0.545) and mixed metastasis (HR = 1.99, 95% CI = 1.28–3.09, P heterogeneity = 0.992). In summary, NLR could be considered as a predictive factor for patients with breast cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Long non-coding RNA has been involved in cancer progression, and high HOX transcript antisense intergenic RNA (HOTAIR) is thought to be a poor prognostic indicator in tumorigenesis of multiple types of cancer. Hence, the present study further reveals its prognostic value in tumor malignancy. A systematic review of PubMed and Web of Science was carried out to select literatures relevant to the correlation between HOTAIR expression levels and clinical outcome of various tumors. Overall survival (OS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were subsequently analyzed. Data from studies directly reporting a hazard ratio (HR) and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) or a P value as well as survival curves were pooled in the current meta-analysis. A total of 2255 patients from 19 literatures almost published in 2011 or later were included in the analysis. The results suggest that HOTAIR was highly associated with HR for OS of 2.33 (95%CI = 1.77-3.09, Pheterogeneity = 0.016). Stratified analyses indicate that elevated levels of HOTAIR appears to be a powerful prognostic biomarker for patients with colorectal cancer (HR = 3.02, 95CI% = 1.84-4.95, Pheterogeneity = 0.699) and esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (HR = 2.24, 95CI% = 1.67-3.01, Pheterogeneity = 0.711), a similar effect was also observed in analysis method and specimen, except for ethnicity. In addition, Hazard ratios for up-regulation of HOTAIR for MFS, RFS, and DFS were 2.32 (P<0.001), 1.98 (P = 0.369), and 3.29 (P = 0.001), respectively. In summary, the high level of HOTAIR is intimately associated with an adverse OS in numerous cancers, suggesting that HOTAIR may act as a potential biomarker for the development of malignancies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) play widespread roles in gene regulation and cellular processes. However, the functional roles of lncRNAs in colorectal cancer (CRC) are not yet well elucidated. The aim of the present study was to measure the levels of lncRNA 91H expression in CRC and evaluate its clinical significance and biological roles in the development and progression of CRC. Methods: 91H expression and copy number variation (CNV) were measured in 72 CRC tumor tissues and adjacent normal tissues by real-time PCR. The biological roles of 91H were evaluated by MTT, scratch wound assay, migration and invasion assays, and flow cytometry. Results: 91H was significantly overexpressed in cancerous tissue and CRC cell lines compared with adjacent normal tissue and a normal human intestinal epithelial cell line. Moreover, 91H overexpression was closely associated with distant metastasis and poor prognosis in patients with CRC, except for CNV of 91H. Multivariate analysis indicated that 91H expression was an independent prognostic indicator, as well as distant metastasis. Our in vitro data indicated that knockdown of 91H inhibited the proliferation, migration, and invasiveness of CRC cells. Conclusions: 91H played an important role in the molecular etiology of CRC and might be regarded as a novel prognosis indicator in patients with CRC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

MicroRNA-27a (miR-27a) has been reported to be abnormally expressed in patients with cancer, and it could play potential roles as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker of cancers. However, the diagnostic and prognostic role remains unclear. Hence, this meta-analysis, based on published data, was conducted to assess the utility of miR-27a as a diagnostic and prognostic marker in various cancers. To identify eligible studies, databases: Web of Science, PubMed, and CNKI were searched, with 868 literatures obtained, 16 of which were included in the Meta-analysis. The pooled results of studies conducted with serum/plasma showed that miR-27a was a valuable diagnostic biomarker in cancers (area under curve (AUC)= 0.91, sensitivity (SEN)= 0.84, specificity (SPE)= 0.85), with the diagnostic value slightly reduced in tumor tissue samples (AUC=0.83, SEN=0.78, SPE: 0.74). Additionally, the pooled results revealed that high expression of miR-27a predicted poor prognosis of cancer in serum/plasma (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.63, P Heterogeneity = 0.278, I 2 = 21.50%) but not in tumor tissue (HR = 0.98, P Heterogeneity =0.577, I 2 = 0.0). In brief, our results suggested that miR-27a in serum/plasma or tumor tissue could act as a diagnostic biomarker, and that miR-27a in serum/plasma could predict cancer patients' survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]