Search

To explore the characteristics and prognostic significance of genetic mutations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), we screened the gene mutation profile of 171 previously untreated AML patients using a next‐generation sequencing technique targeting 127 genes with potential prognostic significance. A total of 390 genetic alterations were identified in 149 patients with a frequency of 87.1%. Younger age and high sensitivity to induction chemotherapy were associated with a lower number of mutations. NPM1 mutation was closely related to DNMT3A and FLT3‐internal tandem duplication (FLT3‐ITD) mutations, but mutually exclusive with ASXL1 mutation and CEBPAdouble mutation. In univariate analysis, ASXL1 or TET2 mutation predicted shorter overall survival (OS) or relapse‐free survival (RFS), DNMT3A, FLT3‐ITD, or RUNX1 mutation predicted a higher likelihood of remission‐induction failure, whereas NRAS mutation or CEBPAdouble mutation predicted longer OS. Concurrent DNMT3A, FLT3‐ITD, and NPM1 mutations predicted shorter OS. Hypomethylation agents could improve the OS in patients with DNA methylation‐related mutations. According to multivariate analysis, TET2 mutation was recognized as an independent prognostic factors for RFS. In summary, our study provided a detailed pattern of gene mutations and their prognostic relevance in Chinese AML patients based on targeted next‐generation sequencing screening. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection can cause overt CMV-associated disease, which is a main cause of transplantation-associated mortality. CMV infection correlates closely with donor's type. We therefore examined whether risk factors of CMV reactivation and clinical endpoints in patients with hematologic malignancies after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) differed between using matched-sibling donors (MSD-SCT) and haploidentical donors (HID-SCT). In this retrospective cohort study, we enrolled in 200 consecutive patients received an unmanipulated G-CSF-mobilized allogeneic PBSCT. Ninety (45%) patients received MSD-SCT and 110 (55%) received HID-SCT. Quantitative PCR was used for monitoring of CMV reactivation after transplantation. One-year cumulative incidence of CMV DNAemia was 55.0%, ranging from 23.5% in MSD-SCT group to 81.0% in HID-SCT group (p < 0.001). Although univariate analyses showed that non-myeloid malignancies, disease in complete remission status at transplantation, pretreatment with antithymocyte globulin, HLA-haploidentical donors, male donors, previous Epstein-Barr virus DNAemia, and absolute lymphocyte count on day 30 < 0.6 × 109/L were respectively associated with CMV reactivation after transplantation in total cohort of recipients (all p < 0.05), haploidentical donors were found to be the only independent predictor in multivariate analyses (Hazard ratio = 6.4, p < 0.001). Furthermore, univariate analyses revealed that non-myeloid malignancies and previous Epstein-Barr virus DNAemia were respectively associated with CMV reactivation in MSD-SCT recipients, and female was associated with CMV reactivation in HID-SCT recipients (all p < 0.05). In HID-SCT recipients, but not MSD-SCT recipients, previous CMV DNAemia was associated with a lower cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (49.2% vs. 72.6%, p < 0.001). CMV DNAemia did not play a role in the relapse rate, but it was strongly associated with an increased risk of non-relapse mortality either in total cohort of recipients (30.5% vs. 13.7%; p = 0.003) or in the HID-SCT subgroup (36.0% vs. 16.7%; p = 0.030). Relapse-free survival and overall survival in total cohort of recipients with CMV DNAemia were both inferior to those without CMV DNAemia (45.3% vs. 57.6% and 54.8% vs. 65.8%, respectively; both p < 0.05). However, in subgroup analysis according to donor's type, neither relapse-free survival nor overall survival was impacted by CMV status (both p > 0.05). This study addressed differences in incidence, risk factors, and associations with clinical outcomes of CMV reactivation after haploidentical versus matched-sibling PBSCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) might be used prophylactically to reduce relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for very high-risk leukemia/lymphoma without effective targeted therapy. To compare the safety and efficacy of prophylactic DLI for prevention of relapse after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation from haploidentical donors (HID-SCT) and matched-sibling donors (MSD-SCT) in patients with very high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML), we performed a retrospective analysis in a cohort of 21 HID-SCT and 13 MSD-SCT recipients, displaying similar baseline characteristics except for donor's gender distribution. Grade 2-4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at 100-day post-DLI was higher in HID-SCT group than that in MSD-SCT group (59.5% vs. 30.8%, p = 0.05). The grade 3-4 acute GVHD (17.5% vs. 7.7%), 1-year chronic GVHD (36.6% vs. 33.2%), and severe chronic GVHD (15.3% vs. 27.3%) were not statistically significant different between groups. One-year non-relapse mortality was higher in HID-SCT group than that in MSD-SCT group with marginal significance (27.9% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.061). One-year relapse rate was not statistically significant different between HID-SCT group and MSD-SCT group (21.6% vs. 36.5%, p = 0.543). For HID-SCT recipients, 1-year relapse rate was lower in patients receiving prophylactic DLI than that in a control cohort of eight patients with same very high-risk features but not receiving prophylactic DLI (62.5% vs. 28.3%, p = 0.037). No statistically significant difference was observed in 1-year overall survival (OS, 55.1% vs. 83.9%, p = 0.325) and relapse-free survival (RFS, 50.1% vs. 74.0%, p = 0.419) rates between HID-SCT group and MSD-SCT group. In multivariate analyses, non-remission status prior to transplant, poor-risk gene mutations, and donor's age ≥ 48 years predicted a higher risk of relapse after DLI. Non-remission status prior to transplant predicted inferior OS and RFS. Patient's age ≥ 40 years also predicted an inferior OS. In conclusion, prophylactic DLI was very safe and efficient for reducing relapse in patients with very high-risk AML receiving MSD-SCT. In the recipients of HID-SCT, the application of prophylactic DLI could reduce the risk of relapse, although with a higher incidence of DLI-associated acute GVHD than those of MSD-SCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Unmanipulated haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (haplo-PBSCT) has been an established treatment to cure high-risk leukemia/lymphoma. Relapse is the main cause of treatment failure for patients with relapsed/refractory disease or with very high-risk gene mutations such as TP53, TET2, and DNMT3a. In this study, we aimed to establish the tolerance and efficacy of prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) with G-CSF-primed peripheral blood progenitors for prevention of relapse in these very high-risk patients after haplo-PBSCT. The prophylactic DLI was given at a median of 77 days after transplantation in 31 of 45 consecutive patients with very high-risk leukemia/lymphoma. The median dose of CD3+ cells for infusion was 1.8 × 107/kg. The 100-day incidences of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grades 2-4 and 3-4 after DLI were 55.3% and 10.2%. The 2-year incidences of chronic GVHD and severe chronic GVHD were 52.0% and 18.2%. The 2-year incidences of non-relapse mortality and relapse were 33.1% and 32.5%. The 2-year probabilities of overall survival and relapse-free survival were 40.1% and 31.9%. Poor-risk gene mutations (p = 0.029), disease in non-remission status prior to transplantation (p = 0.005), and donors older than 40 years of age (p = 0.043) were associated with relapse after DLI. In multivariate analysis, disease in non-remission status prior to transplantation was an independent risk factor of relapse (hazard ratio = 4.079; p = 0.035). These data showed the feasibility of the prophylactic DLI in the haplo-PBSCT setting and the anti-leukemic efficacy in very high-risk leukemia/lymphoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]