Search

Abstract: Our aim was to develop a dynamic virtual model of the oral cavity and oropharynx so that we could incorporate patient-specific factors into the prediction of functional loss after advanced resections for oral cancer. After a virtual resection, functional consequences can be assessed, and a more substantiated decision about treatment can be made. In this study we used a finite element model of the tongue, which can be implemented in the total virtual environment in the future. We analysed the movements and changes in volume, and the effects of changes in the material variables, to mimic scar tissue. The observed movements were in accordance with descriptions of in vivo movements. Affected movements caused by the mimicked scar tissue were also similar to expectations. Some changes in volume were measured, particularly in individual elements. We have taken the first steps in the development of a finite element model of the tongue. Now, refinement is necessary to make the model suitable for future use in virtual surgery. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Summary: Objectives: Recent studies suggest that lymph node ratio (LNR) is a strong prognostic factor in head and neck cancer. This study aims to determine if the yield of harvested lymph nodes (LNs) influences the LNR. Methods: The study included 522 head and neck cancer patients, undergoing 638 primary and salvage (selective) neck dissections between 2002 and 2012. Before 2007 the neck dissection specimens were macroscopically and microscopically examined by pathologists and after 2007 the macroscopic examination was performed by pathology technicians. For comparison of mean LN yields, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Results: The mean number of LNs among 374 specimens examined by pathologists was 24 (range 0–89) vs. 32 (range 2–89) among 264 specimens examined by pathology technicians (P <.001). This caused the mean LNR in the non pre-treated patient group to drop from 11.4% to 8.7%. The counts of LNs per type of neck dissection were significantly different and increased with the number of levels involved. However, there was no linear relationship and the higher yields could be mostly ascribed to LNs in level V. The LNR varied from 8.1% to 18.4% among the different types of neck dissections. Conclusions: A significant increase in the number of harvested LNs, but a decrease in LNR was observed after introducing pathology technicians for macroscopic examination. A clear association between the extent of the dissection and the number of harvested LNs was observed. LNR appears to be strongly dependent on the harvesting protocol and the extent of the dissection. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Summary: This systematic review addresses the prognostic significance of neck node volume in head and neck cancer. Primary tumor volume evolved as an independent significant factor for survival in head and neck cancer patients. Besides primary tumor volume, multiple prognostic features related to the regional lymph nodes were studied in literature. In literature, some authors showed the significance of total tumor volume/nodal volume for survival and loco-regional control. Articles reporting prognosis and survival in nodal tumor volumes were collected by systematically reviewing publications listed in the Pubmed and Embase databases. Publications were included when they at least reported on total tumor volume (TTV) or nodal volume and survival. In this systematic review we studied 21 articles. For measurement of nodal volume different formulas were used. Until now, there’s no clear statistical evidence for the use of either TTV or nodal volume versus primary tumor volume to predict the individual loco-regional control or survival after treatment. There is wide variety of tumor measuring systems in the literature. The cut-off value for local tumor response also shows large variation. Firstly consensus should be accomplished on standardization of volume measurements, preferably automatic, and secondly large study groups are needed with identical treatment modalities to further unravel the role of neck node volume as separate staging tool. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]