Search

The objective of the study was to simultaneously compare ovarian follicular dynamics and endocrine parameters of taurine (Holstein; n = 14), zebuine (Gir; n = 5), and bubaline (Murrah; n = 15) heifers kept under the same environmental, nutritional and management conditions. Heifers were synchronized with two PGF treatments 14 days apart. Ovaries of cyclic heifers were scanned daily during two consecutive ovulations and blood samples were collected every 24 h from each animal. No significant difference was found for length of interovulatory interval, however, zebuine heifers presented a greater number of follicular waves, number of antral follicles on day of ovulation, and higher insulin concentration than the other two breeds. Taurine heifers had highest maximal diameter of first wave dominant and ovulatory follicles and CL volume. Taurine and bubaline heifer's dominant follicle of first wave had longer static and regression phases than zebuine heifers. Bubaline heifers presented overall lowest progesterone concentrations and CL volume, but higher IGF1 levels. No difference was observed between taurine and zebuine heifers regarding IGF1 concentration. Despite higher CL volume found in taurine heifers, no difference in mean progesterone concentration was observed between them and zebuine heifers. Insulin and IGF1 concentrations were greater in follicular phase than in luteal phase when breed was not evaluated. After evaluating the three breeds simultaneously, at the same nutritional and management status it is possible to conclude that each genetic group has a specific follicular development and endocrinology of the estrous cycle. • Bovine and bubaline estrous cycle have different follicular dynamics and endocrine parameters when evaluated temporally and maintained under the same nutritional management. • Some differences found among the three genetic groups were number of antral follicles, number of follicular waves in one estrous cycle, diameter of the ovulatory follicle, CL volume, and concentration of P4, insulin and IGF1. • Progesterone concentration is higher in zebuine than taurine heifers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of reproductive hormones (GnRH, hCG, LH and progesterone) on the regulation of corpus luteum (CL) and ovarian blood flow. Diestrous mares received a single treatment of saline, 100 μg gonadorelin (GnRH), or 1500 IU hCG 10 days after ovulation. Plasma LH and progesterone concentrations, resistance index (RI) for ovarian artery blood-flow, and percentage of corpus luteum (CL) with color-Doppler signals of blood flow were determined immediately before treatment (hour 0) and at hours 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. In the GnRH group, LH increased (P < 0.0001) between hours 0 and 0.25 and then progressively decreased; concentration of LH was not affected in the saline and hCG groups. Progesterone concentration was not different among groups. In the GnRH group, RI tended (P < 0.07) to decrease between hours 0 and 1.5 and increased (P < 0.01) between hours 1.5 and 4. In the hCG group, two transient RI decreases (P < 0.05) occurred before hour 2. The percentage change from hour 0 in the percentage of CL with blood-flow signals was greater at hour 0.5 in the GnRH group than in the saline group and was intermediate in the hCG group. The similarity among groups in progesterone concentration indicated that changes in progesterone were not involved in the GnRH and hCG stimulation of ovarian vascular perfusion. Effects of treatment might have been mediated through LH; however, since hCG biological activity is primarily LH-like, the differences in timing and degree of ovarian and luteal blood flow changes after GnRH or hCG administration in the present study suggest that GnRH might have a direct effect on ovarian blood vessels and vascular control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In experiment 1, daily blood samples were available from Days 0 to 20 (Day 0 = ovulation) in mares with an interovulatory interval (IOI, n = 5) and in mares that developed idiopathic persistent corpus luteum (PCL, n = 5). The PCL was confirmed by maintenance of progesterone (P4) concentration until end of the experiment (Day 20). Significant interactions of group and day revealed the novel findings that luteinizing hormone (LH) was lower ( P < 0.05) in the PCL group than that in the IOI group on Days 0 to 4, and prolactin was lower ( P < 0.05) on Days 1, 4, 6, and 7. In experiment 2, treatment with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (n = 6) significantly reduced LH on Days 1 to 6 compared with the controls (n = 6) but did not support the hypothesis that low LH during the postovulatory period increases the frequency of PCL. In experiment 3, P4, PGFM (a PGF2α metabolite), and prolactin concentrations on Days 12 to 20 from 2 reported experiments were combined to increase the number of mares with an IOI (n = 11) or a PCL (n = 11). An abrupt and complete decrease in P4 (luteolysis) began on Day 13 in the IOI group compared with a gradual and partial P4 decline after Day 12 in the PCL group. Concentrations of PGFM and prolactin were lower ( P < 0.05) in the PCL group than those in the IOI group on the day at the end of the most pronounced decrease in P4. The PCL mares were subgrouped into those with an abrupt but incomplete P4 decrease (partial luteolysis; n = 5) at the expected time and those without partial luteolysis (n = 6). There were no significant differences between the 2 subgroups in concentrations of PGFM and prolactin, but on a tentative basis ( P < 0.10), the concentration of PGFM seemed more focused on the day of the most pronounced decrease in P4 in the subgroup with partial luteolysis. Results for PCL compared with IOI indicated (1) postovulatory LH and prolactin were lower, (2) treatment to reduce postovulatory LH did not increase the incidence, and (3) both PGFM and prolactin were lower on the day of the most pronounced decrease in P4. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

During the last wave of the interovulatory interval (IOI), the permutations of the relationship between the ovulatory follicle and the CL (ipsilateral vs. contralateral) and the number of follicular waves (two vs. three) per IOI differ in frequency of occurrence as follows: ipsilateral relationship and two waves (34%), contralateral relationship and two waves (34%), ipsilateral relationship and three waves (8%), and contralateral relationship and three waves (24%). Deviation or the continuation in growth rate of the future ovulatory follicle and a decrease in growth rate of the future subordinate follicles begin well before luteolysis in two-wave IOIs and during luteolysis in three-wave IOIs. The largest follicle decreases in diameter and loses its dominant status before completion of deviation when it is ipsilateral and adjacent to the regressing CL during wave 3. Dominant status switches from the largest follicle in the ipsilateral ovary to the next-largest follicle which may be in either ovary. Switching accounts for the greater frequency of a contralateral follicle–CL relationship than for ipsilateral follicle–CL relationship during the ovulatory wave in three-wave IOIs. It is proposed that the phenomenon results from commonality in angioarchitecture so that the decrease in blood flow to the regressing CL is associated with a decrease in blood flow to adjacent follicles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Five mares that developed idiopathic persistent corpus luteum (PCL) were compared with 5 mares with apparently normal interovulatory intervals (IOIs). Progesterone (P4) and a metabolite of prostaglandin F2α (PGFM) were assayed daily beginning on the day of ovulation (Day 0). Transition between the end of an initial progressive P4 increase and the beginning of a gradual decrease in P4 occurred on mean Day 6. The gradual decrease in P4 between Days 6 and 12 was less (approached significance, P < 0.06) in the PCL group than in the IOI group. The P4 concentration on Day 12 (before luteolysis in IOI group) was greater ( P < 0.05) in the PCL group than in the IOI group. In a post hoc comparison, an interaction ( P < 0.04) of group by day for Days 4 to 7 indicated that the end of the progressive increase in P4 was temporally associated with a transient increase in concentration of PGFM in IOI mares but not in PCL mares. Complete luteolysis (P4 < 1 ng/mL) occurred in the IOI mares on Days 13 to 15. Partial luteolysis (mean P4 decrease, 62%) occurred in 3 of the 5 PCL mares. Normalization to the day at the end of the most pronounced P4 decrease in the IOI mares and in the 3 PCL mares with partial luteolysis resulted in a day-by-group interaction ( P < 0.05) for PGFM concentration. The interaction was partly from lower PGFM concentration on the day at the end of the pronounced P4 decrease in the 3 PCL mares than in the IOI mares. The peak of a transient PGFM increase and the day at the end of the most pronounced decrease in P4 were synchronized in each IOI mare but not in any of the 3 PCL mares. In the other 2 PCL mares, partial luteolysis did not occur, and a transient increase in PGFM was not apparent. Results tentatively indicated that the relationship between P4 and PGFM may be altered as early as Day 6 in PCL mares and supported the hypothesis that prostaglandin F2α secretion is defective in mares with idiopathic PCL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hourly circulating concentrations of a PGF2α metabolite (PGFM), progesterone (P4), and LH were obtained from a reported project, and concentrations of nitric oxide (NO) metabolites (NOMs; nitrates and nitrites) were determined in eight mares. Unlike the reported project, hormone concentrations were normalized to the peak of the first PGFM pulse of luteolysis (early luteolysis), second PGFM pulse (late luteolysis), and a pulse after luteolysis. The duration of luteolysis was 23.1 ± 1.0 hours, and the peak of the first and second PGFM pulses occurred 6.5 ± 0.9 and 14.8 ± 0.8 hours after the beginning of luteolysis. Concentration of P4 decreased progressively within and between the PGFM pulses Changes were not detected in LH concentration in association with the PGFM pulses. Concentration of NOMs was greater (P < 0.05) at the peak of the PGFM pulse during early luteolysis (88.8 ± 15.0 μg/mL) than during late luteolysis (58.8 ± 9.0 μg/mL). Concentration of NOMs began to decrease (P < 0.05) 4 hours before the peak of the PGFM pulse of early luteolysis. Concentration began to increase (P < 0.05) an hour after the peak of the PGFM pulse of late luteolysis. An NOM decrease and increase was not detected during the PGFM pulse after luteolysis. On a temporal basis, results indicated that NO either is not required for luteolysis in mares or has a role in or responds only during late luteolysis. A caveat is that the relative contribution of the CL versus other body tissues to circulating concentrations of NOMs in mares has not been determined. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A study was performed on the effect of a single dose per mare of 0 (n = 9), 100 (n = 8), or 300 (n = 9) of GnRH on Day 10 (Day 0 = ovulation) on concentrations of LH, FSH, and progesterone (P4) and blood flow to the CL ovary. Hormone concentration and blood flow measurements were performed at hours 0 (hour of treatment), 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6. Blood flow was assessed by spectral Doppler ultrasonography for resistance to blood flow in an ovarian artery before entry into the CL ovary. The percentage of the CL with color Doppler signals of blood flow was estimated from videotapes of real-time color Doppler imaging by an operator who was unaware of mare identity, hour, or treatment dose. Concentrations of LH and FSH increased (P < 0.05) at hour 0.25 and decreased (P < 0.05) over hours 1 to 6; P4 concentration was not altered by treatment. Blood flow resistance decreased between hours 0 and 1, but the decrease was greater (P < 0.05) for the 100-μg dose than for the 300-μg dose. The percentage of CL with blood flow signals increased (P < 0.05) between hours 0 and 1 with no significant difference between the 100- and 300-μg doses. The results supported the hypothesis that GnRH increases LH concentration, vascular perfusion of the CL ovary, and CL blood flow during the luteal phase; however, P4 concentration was not affected. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]