Search

Background: Antivirals are infrequently prescribed in European primary care for influenza-like illness, mostly because of perceived ineffectiveness in real world primary care and because individuals who will especially benefit have not been identified in independent trials. We aimed to determine whether adding antiviral treatment to usual primary care for patients with influenza-like illness reduces time to recovery overall and in key subgroups., Methods: We did an open-label, pragmatic, adaptive, randomised controlled trial of adding oseltamivir to usual care in patients aged 1 year and older presenting with influenza-like illness in primary care. The primary endpoint was time to recovery, defined as return to usual activities, with fever, headache, and muscle ache minor or absent. The trial was designed and powered to assess oseltamivir benefit overall and in 36 prespecified subgroups defined by age, comorbidity, previous symptom duration, and symptom severity, using a Bayesian piece-wise exponential primary analysis model. The trial is registered with the ISRCTN Registry, number ISRCTN 27908921., Findings: Between Jan 15, 2016, and April 12, 2018, we recruited 3266 participants in 15 European countries during three seasonal influenza seasons, allocated 1629 to usual care plus oseltamivir and 1637 to usual care, and ascertained the primary outcome in 1533 (94%) and 1526 (93%). 1590 (52%) of 3059 participants had PCR-confirmed influenza infection. Time to recovery was shorter in participants randomly assigned to oseltamivir (hazard ratio 1·29, 95% Bayesian credible interval [BCrI] 1·20-1·39) overall and in 30 of the 36 prespecified subgroups, with estimated hazard ratios ranging from 1·13 to 1·72. The estimated absolute mean benefit from oseltamivir was 1·02 days (95% [BCrI] 0·74-1·31) overall, and in the prespecified subgroups, ranged from 0·70 (95% BCrI 0·30-1·20) in patients younger than 12 years, with less severe symptoms, no comorbidities, and shorter previous illness duration to 3·20 (95% BCrI 1·00-5·50) in patients aged 65 years or older who had more severe illness, comorbidities, and longer previous illness duration. Regarding harms, an increased burden of vomiting or nausea was observed in the oseltamivir group., Interpretation: Primary care patients with influenza-like illness treated with oseltamivir recovered one day sooner on average than those managed by usual care alone. Older, sicker patients with comorbidities and longer previous symptom duration recovered 2-3 days sooner., Funding: European Commission's Seventh Framework Programme., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing, particularly for respiratory tract infections (RTI) in ambulatory care, has become a worldwide public health threat due to resulting antibiotic resistance. In spite of various interventions and campaigns, wide variations in antibiotic use persist between European countries. Cultural determinants are often referred to as a potential cause, but are rarely defined. To our knowledge, so far no systematic literature review has focused on cultural determinants of antibiotic use. The aim of this study was to identify cultural determinants, on a country-specific level in ambulatory care in Europe, and to describe the influence of culture on antibiotic use, using a framework of cultural dimensions., Method: A computer-based systematic literature review was conducted by two research teams, in France and in Norway. Eligible publications included studies exploring antibiotic use in primary care in at least two European countries based on primary study results, featuring a description of cultural determinants, and published between 1997 and 2015. Quality assessment was conducted independently by two researchers, one in each team, using appropriate checklists according to study design. Each included paper was characterized according to method, countries involved, sampling and main results, and cultural determinants mentioned in each selected paper were extracted, described and categorized. Finally, the influence of Hofstede's cultural dimensions associated with antibiotic consumption within a primary care setting was described., Results: Among 24 eligible papers, 11 were rejected according to exclusion criteria. Overall, 13 papers meeting the quality assessment criteria were included, of which 11 used quantitative methods and two qualitative or mixed methods. The study participants were patients (nine studies) and general practitioners (two studies). This literature review identified various cultural determinants either patient-related (illness perception/behaviour, health-seeking behaviour, previous experience, antibiotic awareness, drug perception, diagnosis labelling, work ethos, perception of practitioner) or practitioner-related (RTI management, initial training, antibiotic awareness, legal issues, practice context) or both (antibiotic awareness)., Discussion and Conclusion: Cultural factors should be considered as exerting an ubiquitous influence on all the consecutive stages of the disease process and seem closely linked to education. Interactions between determinant categories, cultural dimensions and antibiotic use in primary care are multiple, complex and require further investigation within overlapping disciplines. The context of European projects seems particularly relevant.

Purpose: To compare the outcome of multi-disciplinary, structured rehabilitation of older patients in a district inpatient rehabilitation centre (Model 1) versus standard primary health care rehabilitation (Model 2)., Method: Open, prospective, comparative observational study. Totally 302 patients, 202 in Model 1 and 100 in Model 2, aged ≥ 65 years, with stroke, osteoarthritis, hip fracture or other chronic diseases, considered to have a rehabilitation potential. Referred from district hospital, nursing- or own homes., Outcomes: Primary: Sunnaas ADL Index (SI). Secondary: Umeaa Life Satisfaction Checklist (LSC). Cognitive (MMSE), emotional (SCL-10) and marital status, residence, length of rehabilitation and hours/week care services. Follow-up 3 months after end of rehabilitation., Results: Patients in Model 1 improved and persisted 1.9 points higher in SI (CI (1.0, 2.8), p < 0.001) compared to Model 2, with 2.4 weeks shorter rehabilitation (CI (1.6, 3.1), p < 0.001). LSC indicated similar satisfaction within both models. Fewer Model 1 patients received home care services >3 h/week (OR = 0.6 CI (0.4, 0.8), p = 0.002). Cognitive status predicted the SI gain positively, and level of care services negatively, in both models., Conclusions: Disabled older patients increase their independency significantly more within shorter time upon structured, multi-disciplinary rehabilitation in a district inpatient centre compared to standard primary health care rehabilitation. [Box: see text].

Background: In 2000, the first national guideline is on antibiotic use in general practice wee distributed to all general practitioners and medical students in Norway. Here we describe the development of new guidelines., Material and Methods: A working group of 30 people searched relevant databases for literature. We have especially used research from Norway and from general practice and nursing homes., Results: The main recommendations of the 2000 guidelines are upheld. For upper respiratory tract infections there is now an even better evidence base to support strict indications for antibiotic treatment., Interpretation: A good evidence base supports continuation of the Norwegian tradition of prudent antibiotic use in primary health care. In some areas there is insufficient research. After an initiative from the Directorate of Health, the Antibiotic Centre for Primary Medicine have developed the new guidelines as a part of the governmental strategy to combat antimicrobial resistance. Prudent antibiotic use is seen as an important measure. For this reason, the guidelines will also be printed in a booklet that will be sent to general practitioners, medical students and nursing homes.

Objective: To evaluate health care providers' adherence to management guidelines for acute respiratory infection and diarrhoea in children under 5 years old in Botswana primary health care., Design: Cross-sectional prospective field survey. Data collection was carried out through observation of consecutive consultations at 30 randomly assigned clinics and health posts in three purposely chosen districts., Study Participants: This study comprises 185 cases of acute respiratory infection and 85 cases of diarrhoea., Main Measure: Criteria for acceptable standards of history taking and physical examination for acute respiratory infection and diarrhoea were defined as well as criteria for categorizing the appropriateness of antibiotic prescription. The percentage of oral dehydration salts provided in cases of diarrhoea was calculated., Results: Acute respiratory infection and diarrhoea accounted for 270 (including 15 missing cases) of all main diagnoses (n = 539). In 262 cases (97%) health care providers were nurses or enrolled nurses; in 3% family welfare educators. Acceptable history taking, physical examination, and both combined in acute respiratory infection was found in 113 (63%), 32 (18%), and 28 (16%), and in diarrhoea in 45 (58%), 26 (34%) and 20 (26%) cases, respectively. Antibiotics were prescribed in 76 of 255 (30%) cases. Prescription was assessed as inappropriate in 56 of 76 (74%) of all cases; in 41 of 52 (79%) cases with acute respiratory infection, in none of the pneumonia cases, and in all 15 cases of diarrhoea. Oral rehydration salts were prescribed in 74 (87%) of the diarrhoea cases., Conclusions: Health care providers' adherence to guidelines on history taking was suboptimal in acute respiratory infection and diarrhoea but poor on examination in both conditions. A high level of inappropriate antibiotic prescription was found in acute respiratory infection and diarrhoea. Overall, there is considerable scope for improving diagnostic and therapeutic management of these major childhood diseases in Botswana primary health care.

Background: Antibiotics are overused in patients with acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) as it is difficult to identify those who benefit from antibiotic treatment.Aim: To develop prediction models for computed tomography (CT)-confirmed ARS and culture-confirmed acute bacterial rhinosinusitis (ABRS) in adults presenting to primary care with symptoms suggestive of ARS.Design and Setting: This was a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.Method: CT-confirmed ARS was defined as the presence of fluid level or total opacification in any maxillary sinuses, whereas culture-confirmed ABRS was defined by culture of fluid from antral puncture. Prediction models were derived using logistic regression modelling.Results: Among 426 patients from three studies, 140 patients (32.9%) had CT-confirmed ARS. A model consisting of seven variables: previous diagnosis of ARS, preceding upper respiratory tract infection, anosmia, double sickening, purulent nasal discharge on examination, need for antibiotics as judged by a physician, and C-reactive protein (CRP) showed an optimism-corrected c-statistic of 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.69 to 0.78) and a calibration slope of 0.99 (95% CI = 0.72 to 1.19). Among 225 patients from two studies, 68 patients (30.2%) had culture-confirmed ABRS. A model consisting of three variables: pain in teeth, purulent nasal discharge, and CRP showed an optimism-corrected c-statistic of 0.70 (95% CI = 0.63 to 0.77) and a calibration slope of 1.00 (95% CI = 0.66 to 1.52). Clinical utility analysis showed that both models could be useful to rule out the target condition.Conclusion: Simple prediction models for CT-confirmed ARS and culture-confirmed ABRS can be useful to safely reduce antibiotic use in adults with ARS in high-prescribing countries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is little evidence about the relationship between aetiology, illness severity, and clinical course of respiratory tract infections (RTIs) in primary care. Understanding these associations would aid in the development of effective management strategies for these infections.Aim: To investigate whether clinical presentation and illness course differ between RTIs where a viral pathogen was detected and those where a potential bacterial pathogen was found.Design and Setting: Post hoc analysis of data from a pragmatic randomised trial on the effects of oseltamivir in patients with flu-like illness in primary care (n = 3266) in 15 European countries.Method: Patient characteristics and their signs and symptoms of disease were registered at baseline. Nasopharyngeal (adults) or nasal and pharyngeal (children) swabs were taken for polymerase chain reaction analysis. Patients were followed up until 28 days after inclusion. Regression models and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to analyse the relationship between aetiology, clinical presentation at baseline, and course of disease including complications.Results: Except for a less prominent congested nose (odds ratio [OR] 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.35 to 0.86) and acute cough (OR 0.42, 95% CI = 0.27 to 0.65) in patients with flu-like illness in whom a possible bacterial pathogen was isolated, there were no clear clinical differences in presentations between those with a possible bacterial aetiology compared with those with a viral aetiology. Also, course of disease and complications were not related to aetiology.Conclusion: Given current available microbiological tests and antimicrobial treatments, and outside pandemics such as COVID-19, microbiological testing in primary care patients with flu-like illness seems to have limited value. A wait-and-see policy in most of these patients with flu-like illness seems the best option. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recovery time and treatment effect of oseltamivir in influenza-like illness (ILI) differs between patient groups. A point-of-care test to better predict ILI duration and identify patients who are most likely to benefit from oseltamivir treatment would aid prescribing decisions in primary care. This study aimed to investigate whether a C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration of ≥30 mg/L can predict (1) ILI disease duration, and (2) which patients are most likely to benefit from oseltamivir treatment. Secondary analysis of randomized controlled trial data. Primary care in Lithuania, Sweden and Norway during three consecutive influenza seasons 2016–2018. A total of 277 ILI patients aged one year or older and symptom duration of ≤72 h. Capillary blood CRP concentration at baseline, and ILI recovery time defined as having 'returned to usual daily activity' with residual symptoms minimally interfering. At baseline, 20% (55/277) had CRP concentrations ≥30mg/L (range 0–210). CRP concentration ≥30 mg/L was not associated with recovery time (adjusted hazards ratio (HR) 0.80: 95% CI 0.50–1.3; p = 0.33). Interaction analysis of CRP concentration ≥30 mg/L and oseltamivir treatment did not identify which patients benefit more from oseltamivir treatment (adjusted HR 0.69: 95% CI 0.37–1.3; p = 0.23). There was no association between CRP concentration of ≥30 mg/L and recovery time from ILI. Furthermore, CRP could not predict which ILI patients benefit more from oseltamivir treatment. Hence, we do not recommend CRP testing for predicting ILI recovery time or identifying patients who will receive particular benefit from oseltamivir treatment. Predicting disease course of influenza-like illness (ILI), and identifying which patients benefit from oseltamivir treatment is a challenge for physicians. • There was no association between CRP concentration at baseline and recovery time in patients consulting with ILI in primary care. • There was no association between CRP concentration at baseline and benefit from oseltamivir treatment. • We, therefore, do not recommend CRP testing for predicting recovery time or in decision-making concerning oseltamivir prescribing in ILI patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Identifying influenza A or B as cause of influenza-like illness (ILI) is a challenge due to non-specific symptoms. An accurate, cheap and easy to use biomarker might enhance targeting influenza-specific management in primary care. The aim of this study was to investigate if C-reactive protein (CRP) is associated with influenza A or B, confirmed with PCR testing, in patients presenting with ILI. Cross-sectional study. Primary care in Lithuania, Norway and Sweden. A total of 277 patients at least 1 year of age consulting primary care with ILI during seasonal influenza epidemics. Capillary blood CRP analysed as a point-of-care test and detection of influenza A or B on nasopharyngeal swabs in adults, and nasal and pharyngeal swabs in children using PCR. The prevalence of positive tests for influenza A among patients was 44% (121/277) and the prevalence of influenza B was 21% (58/277). Patients with influenza A infection could not be identified based on CRP concentration. However, increasing CRP concentration in steps of 10 mg/L was associated with a significantly lower risk for influenza B with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.42 (0.25–0.70; p<.001). Signs of more severe symptoms like shortness of breath, sweats or chills and dizziness were associated with higher CRP. There was no association between CRP and influenza A. Increased concentration of CRP was associated with a lower risk for having influenza B, a finding that lacks clinical usefulness. Hence, CRP testing should be avoided in ILI, unless bacterial pneumonia is suspected. Identifying influenza A or B as cause of influenza-like illness (ILI) is a challenge due to non-specific symptoms. There was no association between concentration of CRP and influenza A. Increased concentration of CRP was associated with a lower risk for having influenza B, a finding that lacks clinical usefulness. A consequence is that CRP testing should be avoided in ILI, unless bacterial pneumonia or similar is suspected. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To identify baseline predictors of symptom duration after empirical treatment for uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI) and significant bacteriuria in a cohort of women treated for UTI. Design: Prospective single-centre cohort study. Setting: Outpatient clinic in Norway. Patients: From September 2010 to November 2011, 441 women aged 16-55 years with symptoms of uncomplicated UTI were included. Results: Dipstick findings of leukocyte esterase 1 + (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23-3.01, p < 0.01) and microbe resistant to mecillinam treatment (IRR 1.41, 95% CI 1.07-1.89, p = 0.02) predicted longer symptom duration. More pronounced symptoms did not predict longer symptom duration (IRR 1.18, 95% CI 0.94-1.46, p = 0.15) or significant bacteriuria (odds ratio [OR] 1.16, 95% CI 0.72-1.88, p = 0.54). Leukocyte esterase 2 + (OR 2.51, 95% CI 0.92-6.83, p = 0.07) or 3 + (OR 2.40, 95% CI 0.88-6.05, p = 0.09) and nitrite positive urine dipstick test (OR 3.22, 95% CI 1.58-7.01, p = <0.01) were associated with bacteriuria. Conclusion: More pronounced symptoms did not correlate with significant bacteriuria or symptom duration after empirical treatment for acute cystitis. One might reconsider the current practice of treating uncomplicated UTI based on symptoms alone. Key Points: Treatment strategies for milder infectious diseases must consider ways of reducing antibiotic consumption to decelerate the increase in antibiotic resistance. Our findings suggest that more emphasis should be put on urine dipstick results and bacteriological findings in the clinical setting. One might reconsider the current practice of treating uncomplicated UTIs based on symptoms alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. To compare the clinical outcome of patients presenting with symptoms of uncomplicated cystitis who were seen by a doctor, with patients who were given treatment following a diagnostic algorithm. Design. Randomized controlled trial. Setting. Out-of-hours service, Oslo, Norway. Intervention. Women with typical symptoms of uncomplicated cystitis were included in the trial in the time period September 2010-November 2011. They were randomized into two groups. One group received standard treatment according to the diagnostic algorithm, the other group received treatment after a regular consultation by a doctor. Subjects. Women (n = 441) aged 16-55 years. Mean age in both groups 27 years. Main outcome measures. Number of days until symptomatic resolution. Results. No significant differences were found between the groups in the basic patient demographics, severity of symptoms, or percentage of urine samples with single culture growth. A median of three days until symptomatic resolution was found in both groups. By day four 79% in the algorithm group and 72% in the regular consultation group were free of symptoms (p = 0.09). The number of patients who contacted a doctor again in the follow-up period and received alternative antibiotic treatment was insignificantly higher (p = 0.08) after regular consultation than after treatment according to the diagnostic algorithm. There were no cases of severe pyelonephritis or hospital admissions during the follow-up period. Conclusion. Using a diagnostic algorithm is a safe and efficient method for treating women with symptoms of uncomplicated cystitis at an out-of-hours service. This simplification of treatment strategy can lead to a more rational use of consultation time and a stricter adherence to National Antibiotic Guidelines for a common disorder. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The author reflects on the study "Delayed antibiotic prescribing strategies for respiratory tract infections in primary care: pragmatic, factorial, randomised controlled trial" by M. Moore and others, in the "British Medical Journal" in 2014. Topics discussed include effect of delay in prescribing for respiratory tract infections (RTIs) in lower antibiotic use, relationship between antibiotic prescribing and development of resistance and prescription of antibiotics by general practitioners.