Search

To assess receipt of anticipatory guidance and family-centered care during well-child care (WCC) for children of mothers with opioid use disorder (OUD). Cross-sectional survey of 157 mothers receiving treatment for OUD who had a child < 3 years old and received primary care. Survey items evaluated (1) receipt of anticipatory guidance on 15 topics during WCC for the participant's child and (2) whether WCC was family-centered. The percentage of participants who reported guidance for each topic and the distribution of responses on family-centered items were calculated. A Pearson correlation was conducted to evaluate the association between the total number of topics for which anticipatory guidance was received and the family centeredness summary score. Receipt of anticipatory guidance varied by topic, ranging from 59% for guidance on childcare to 98% for guidance on safe sleep. Less than two-thirds of mothers reported that their child's provider "always" knew their child's medical history (56%), listened carefully (58%), clearly explained things (61%), and respected the mother (62%). Less than half reported that the provider spent enough time with them, and less than one-third reported that they were asked for their viewpoints. Anticipatory guidance and family-centeredness scores were positively correlated (r = 0.22, P = 0.006). Mothers with OUD report gaps in anticipatory guidance on important WCC topics, and limited family-centered care for their children. Further research may focus on refinements to the delivery of care for this population.

Objectives: Practicing Safety is an American Academy of Pediatrics toolkit to help practices address child abuse and neglect (CAN) risk by increasing screening and providing resources. The objectives in an urban practice serving low-income children were to 1) standardize CAN risk assessment and developmental screening, and 2) improve resource provision., Methods: A quality improvement initiative to standardize CAN risk assessment, using materials adapted from Practicing Safety, was conducted through the use of SmartTools in an electronic health record. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Parents Evaluation of Developmental Status were used to assess maternal depression and child development, respectively. Charts were reviewed in waves-pre-, immediate post-, and early post-implementation (waves 1 to 3); monthly for 6 months (waves 4 to 9); and quarterly for 12 months (waves 10 to 13)-to assess screening and resource provision for 6 domains: infant crying, maternal depression, development, discipline, temper tantrums, and toilet training., Results: A total of 581 charts were reviewed (92, 95, and 94 for waves 1 to 3, respectively; 30 each for waves 4 to 13). Screening for infant crying, maternal depression, development, and discipline rose from 0% pre-implementation to over 50% post-implementation. Screening for temper tantrums and toilet training rose from 6% to 72% and from 36% to 82%, respectively. For all measures, resource provision improved over time, and all improvements were maintained for 1.5 years post-implementation., Conclusions: Incorporating an adapted version of Practicing Safety into an electronic health record is a practical and effective approach to improving CAN risk assessment and resource provision. This quality improvement initiative is an example of a practice-wide improvement that resulted in clinical practice change., (Copyright © 2018 Academic Pediatric Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Child maltreatment is a significant public health issue in the United States. Yet, fewer than half of pediatricians discuss behavioral, developmental, or parenting issues with parents., Objective: This paper describes the testing of bundles of tools and processes, part of a larger intervention, Practicing Safety, targeted at changing physician and staff behavior to identify families at risk for child maltreatment, provide anticipatory guidance, refer to community resources, and follow-up and track at-risk families. The intervention was implemented with 14 pediatric primary care practices throughout the United States; the study was completed in 2011., Methods: A within-subjects repeated measures pre-post follow-up design was used to evaluate the intervention. Baseline and repeated measurements of pediatric practices' processes were collected using qualitative and quantitative methods. In total, 14 core improvement teams from across the country tested three bundles of tools (maternal, infant, toddler) within a quality improvement framework over seven months., Results: Quantitative results showed statistically significant adoption of tools and processes and enhancement of practice behaviors and office environmental supports. The increase in tool use was immediate and was sustained for six months after implementation. Qualitative data provided insight as to how meaningful the intervention was to the core improvement teams, especially with more complicated behaviors (eg, engaging social workers or community agencies for referrals). Barriers included lack of community resources. Findings showed unanticipated outcomes such as helping practices to become medical homes., Conclusion: Lessons learned included that practices appreciate and can adopt brief interventions that have meaningful and useful tools and process to enhance psychosocial care for children 0-3 and that do not place a burden on pediatric practice. An innovative, quality improvement strategy, intuitive to pediatricians, with a brief intervention may help prevent child maltreatment.

A novel use of genograms in primary care practice is to identify processes and relationships among physicians and staff prior to implementing practice change. The authors hypothesized that the genogram would inform researchers and practice staff, participating in a child maltreatment prevention study, how practice members function in a practice. They describe the use of genograms and show how the genogram results are associated with intervention uptake. Researchers constructed genograms, collected baseline surveys, and conducted postintervention interviews with physicians. Data were analyzed to determine processes associated with intervention uptake. While survey results supported the relationships and conflicts observed in the genograms, the genogram provided more multilevel information that reflected practices' abilities to implement change. By providing a snapshot of the relationship and organizational dynamics within a practice, genograms can assess culture for practice change. Genograms describe organizational dynamics and are useful tools to use prior to initiating new programs.

Background: Historically, achieving a high response rate on physician surveys has been a challenging task. Given such concerns, understanding research strategies that facilitate adequate response rates is important. Primary care physician responses to a mail survey on smoking cessation are summarized by physician specialty and timing of incentive., Methods: A stratified random-sample design, stratified by patient populations-adults, adolescents, and pregnant women-was used. The sampling frame included New Jersey internists, general practitioners, family physicians, pediatricians, and obstetrician-gynecologists. A total of 2100 physicians, 700 physicians from each patient strata, were sampled and mailed a smoking-cessation survey in summer 2002. The sample was randomized by incentive timing: Half received the incentive (i.e., 25 dollars gift card) with the first survey mailing, and half received the incentive on receipt of their completed survey., Results: The promised-incentive group achieved a significantly lower response rate (56%) compared with the up-front-incentive group (71.5%). Response rates by medical specialty varied overall and within incentive groups. The difference between the incentive groups was greatest among obstetrician-gynecologists (i.e., 20.2 percentage points) and was least among pediatricians (i.e., 5.8 percentage points)., Conclusions: Physician response rates to mail surveys are greatly improved, especially among certain medical specialties, by using up-front incentives.