Search

Integrated and collaborative care models, in which mental/behavioral health providers work closely with primary care providers within a primary care setting, help support the quadruple aim of improved health outcomes, patient satisfaction, provider experience, and lower cost. In this paper, we describe patients' general perspectives of integrated care and their unique experiences accessing this care within one health system. Qualitative (interviews with patients) and quantitative (surveys with patients) methods were used to collect and analyze these results separately and together. The results highlight important features to the provision of integrated care from the perspective of patients using integrated care. They include the importance and experience of access, whole-person care and a team-based approach, the availability and use of telehealth when appropriate, having high quality mental health providers, scheduling and service usage suggestions, and means to connect with longer-term services for ongoing mental health care when needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Care management (CM) is a promising team-based, patient-centered approach "designed to assist patients and their support systems in managing medical conditions more effectively." As little is known about its implementation, this article describes CM implementation and associated lessons from 12 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality-sponsored projects. Two rounds of data collection resulted in project-specific narratives that were analyzed using an iterative approach analogous to framework analysis. Informants also participated as coauthors. Variation emerged across practices and over time regarding CM services provided, personnel delivering these services, target populations, and setting(s). Successful implementation was characterized by resource availability (both monetary and nonmonetary), identifying as well as training employees with the right technical expertise and interpersonal skills, and embedding CM within practices. Our findings facilitate future context-specific implementation of CM within medical homes. They also inform the development of medical home recognition programs that anticipate and allow for contextual variation.

PURPOSE To describe the characteristics of patients and practice of clinicians during standard- of-care for weight management in a large, multiclinic health system before the implementation of PATHWEIGH, a pragmatic weight management intervention. METHODS We analyzed baseline characteristics of patients, clinicians, and clinics during standard-of-care for weight management before the implementation of PATHWEIGH, which will be evaluated for effectiveness and implementation in primary care using an effectiveness-implementation hybrid type-1 cluster randomized stepped-wedge clinical trial design. A total of 57 primary care clinics were enrolled and randomized to 3 sequences. Patients included in the analysis met the eligibility requirements of age ≥18 years and body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m² and had a weight-prioritized visit (defined a priori) during the period March 17, 2020 to March 16, 2021. RESULTS A total of 12% of patients aged ≥18 years and with a BMI ≥25 kg/m² seen in the 57 practices during the baseline period (n = 20,383) had a weight-prioritized visit. The 3 randomization sequences of 20, 18, and 19 sites were similar, with an overall mean patient age of 52 (SD 16) years, 58% women, 76% non-Hispanic White patients, 64% with commercial insurance, and with a mean BMI of 37 (SD 7) kg/m². Documented referral for anything weight related was low (<6%), and 334 prescriptions of an antiobesity drug were noted. CONCLUSIONS Of patients aged ≥18 years and with a BMI ≥25 kg/m² in a large health system, 12% had a weight-prioritized visit during the baseline period. Despite most patients being commercially insured, referral to any weight-related service or prescription of antiobesity drug was uncommon. These results fortify the rationale for trying to improve weight management in primary care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The delivery of Intensive Behavioral Therapy (IBT) for obesity by primary care providers (PCPs) has been covered by Medicare to support elderly individuals with obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m2) in managing their weight since 2011 for individual therapy and 2015 for group therapy. We conducted a cohort study of PCPs in an attempt to understand patterns of uptake of IBT for obesity services among PCPs serving the Medicare population across the U.S. Methods: We used the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Provider Utilization and Payment Data from 2013 to 2019 to identify all PCPs who served more than 10 Medicare beneficiaries in each of the seven-year period to form a longitudinal panel. The procedure codes G0447 and G0473 were used to identify PCPs who provided IBT; and the characteristics of these providers were compared by the IBT-uptake status. Results: Of the 537,754 eligible PCPs who served Medicare patients in any of the seven years, only 1.2% were found to be IBT service providers in at least one year from 2013 through 2019 (246 always users, 1,358 early adopters, and 4,563 late adopters). IBT providers shared a few common characteristics: they were more likely to be male, internal medicine providers, saw a higher number of Medicare beneficiaries, and practiced in the South and Northeast regions. Having higher proportion of patients with hyperlipidemia was associated with higher likelihood of a provider being an IBT-user. Conclusions: Very few PCPs continuously billed IBT services for Medicare patients with obesity. Further investigation is needed to mitigate barriers to the uptake of IBT services among PCPs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: It is important to understand the unique perspectives and values that motivate patients and clinicians in rural primary care settings to participate in clinical care activities. Our objective was to explore perspectives, preferences, and values related to primary care that could influence implementation of evidence-based programs. Methods: Qualitative study utilizing semi-structured interviews and using immersion/crystallization and thematic analysis. Participants were primary care practice members (clinicians, clinical staff, and administrators) and their patients in rural Colorado. Results: Twenty-six practice members and 23 patients across 9 practices participated. There were 4 emergent themes that were consistent across practice members and some patients. Patient perspectives are located in parenthesis. They included: (1) Focus on quality patient care, patient satisfaction, and continuity of care (patients appreciated quality and compassionate care), (2) Importance of prevention and wellness (patients appreciated help with preventing health problems), (3) Clinician willingness and ability to meet patient preferences for care (patients described comfort with local care), and (4) Passion for serving underserved, uninsured, or vulnerable populations (patients described their vulnerabilities). There were differences in how the perspectives were operationalized by practice member role, illustrating the importance of different ways of addressing these values. Conclusions: Successful implementation requires consideration of context, and much of context is understanding what is important to those involved in the primary care experience. This study sheds light on salient values of rural primary care practice members and their patients, which may inform interventions designed with and for this setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Evidence supports treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) with buprenorphine in primary care practices (PCPs). Barriers that slow implementation of this treatment include inadequately trained staff. This study aimed to increase the number of rural PCPs providing OUD treatment with buprenorphine. This evaluation describes the impact of a practice team training on the implementation and delivery of OUD treatment with buprenorphine in PCPs of rural Colorado.Methods: Implementing Technology and Medication Assisted Treatment Team Training in Rural Colorado (IT MATTTRs) was a multilevel implementation study that included a practice-focused intervention to improve awareness, adoption, and use of buprenorphine treatment for OUD. Participating PCP teams received the IT MATTTRs Practice Team Training and support. Practices' implementation of treatment components was assessed before and after training. Practice-reported and population-level data from the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program were obtained to describe changes in delivery of treatment after training.Results: Forty-two practices received team training. Practices reported an average of 4.7 treatment-related components in place at baseline compared with 13.0 at 12-month follow-up (F[2,56] = 31.17, P <.001). The proportion of participating practices providing or referring patients for treatment increased from 18.8% to 74.4%. The increase in number of people with a prescription for buprenorphine was significantly greater in the study region over a 4-year period compared with the rest of the state (Wald χ2 = 15.73, P <.001).Conclusions: The IT MATTTRs training for PCP teams in OUD treatment with buprenorphine addressed elements beyond clinician waiver training to make implementation feasible and effectively increased implementation and delivery of this treatment in rural Colorado. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To fill the gap in knowledge on systematic differences between primary care practices (PCP) that do or do not provide intensive behavioral therapy (IBT) for obese Medicare patients. Methods: A mixed modality survey (paper and online) of primary care practices obtained from a random sample of Medicare databases and a convenience sample of practice-based research network practices. Key Results: A total of 287 practices responded to the survey, including 140 (7.4% response rate) from the random sample and 147 (response rate not estimable) from the convenience sample. We found differences between the IBT-using and non-using practices in practice ownership, patient populations, and participation in Accountable Care Organizations. The non-IBT-using practices, though not billing for IBT, did offer some other assistance with obesity for their patients. Among those who had billed for IBT, but stopped billing, the most commonly cited reason was billing difficulties. Many providers experienced denied claims due to billing complexities. Conclusions: Although the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services established payment codes for PCPs to deliver IBT for obesity in 2011, very few providers submitted fee-for-service claims for these services after almost 10 years. A survey completed by both a random and convenience sample of practices using and not using IBT for obesity payment codes revealed that billing for these services was problematic, and many providers that began using the codes discontinued using them over the past 7 years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Care management and care managers are becoming increasingly prevalent in primary care medical practice as a means of improving population health and reducing unnecessary care. Care managers are often involved in chronic disease management and associated transitional care. In this study, we examined the communication regarding chronic disease care within 24 primary care practices in Michigan and Colorado. We sought to answer the following questions: Do care managers play a key role in chronic disease management in the practice? Does the prominence of the care manager's connectivity within the practice's communication network vary by the type of care management structure implemented?Methods: Individual written surveys were given to all practice members in the participating practices. Survey questions assessed demographics as well as practice culture, quality improvement, care management activities, and communication regarding chronic disease care. Using social network analysis and other statistical methods, we analyzed the communication dynamics related to chronic disease care for each practice.Results: The structure of chronic disease communication varies greatly from practice to practice. Care managers who were embedded in the practice or co-located were more likely to be in the core of the communication network than were off-site care managers. These care managers also had higher in-degree centrality, indicating that they acted as a hub for communication with team members in many other roles.Discussion: Social network analysis provided a useful means of examining chronic disease communication in practice, and highlighted the central role of care managers in this communication when their role structure supported such communication. Structuring care managers as embedded team members within the practice has important implications for their role in chronic disease communication within primary care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Self-management, including diet, exercise, use of medications, and stress management, is essential for good outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). Shared medical appointments (SMAs) are an avenue for primary care practices to support development of self-management, but implementation of SMAs is context dependent and often requires adaptations for each practice. Objective: To describe adaptations made by practices participating in the Invested in Diabetes (IID) project during implementation of SMAs. Study design and Analysis: IID is a pragmatic cluster-randomized, comparative effectiveness trial designed to compare two different approaches to delivery of diabetes shared medical appointments (SMAs). Key informant interviews with traditional qualitative thematic analysis, thematic analysis of coach notes and session observations; multi-step process to categorize adaptations using FRAME. Population studied: primary care team members involved in delivering SMAs including medical and behavioral health providers, health educators, coordinators. Intervention/Measurement: Semi-structured interview guide, session observation guide. Outcome measures: Emergent themes pertaining to adaptations made by participating practices Results: Four dominant themes emerged: 1) Adaptations are common in implementation of SMAs. 2) Implementation challenges can be improved or overcome through actively identifying those challenges and making changes in response. Specific challenges identified include recruitment and retention, physical space, staff involvement and turnover, and scheduling 3) Content changes in the classes were often planned and enacted to better address the contextual circumstances such as patient needs and culture. 4) Adaptation components tend to cluster together in certain types that may reveal ways to improve on desired implementation outcomes. Conclusions: SMA implementation in real-world primary care settings requires adaptations related to practice-specific contexts. Practices benefit from support to identify and address areas that need adaptation for successful implementation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

CONTEXT: Despite the fact that obesity is both treatable and preventable, treating the comorbidities, rather than obesity per se remains the mainstay of therapy. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and implementation of a pragmatic approach to weight management in primary care that prioritizes treatment of weight rather than weight-related diseases (PATHWEIGH). Study design and ANALYSIS: PATHWEIGH is a hybrid type 1 cluster randomized stepped wedge clinical trial. Clinics were enrolled and randomized to three sequences using covariate constrained randomization. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize clinic and patient characteristics with t-tests, Wilcoxon rank sums or Fisher's exact tests used to compare groups. SETTING: Fifty-seven primary care clinics in rural, suburban and urban Colorado in a single healthcare system were utilized. Population studied: Patients age >18 years and body mass index (BMI) >25 kg/m2 who had a weight-prioritized visit (WPV) in the prior year were enrolled. A WPV was defined as a chief complaint or reason for visit that included "weight", ICD-10 codes for weight or use of an intake questionnaire for weight. Intervention: None. This abstract describes the baseline (pre-intervention) characteristics of the clinics and patients treated with standard-of-care (SOC) for weight management. Outcome measures: Baseline characteristics of the clinics and patients undergoing a WPV from March 17, 2020 - March 16, 2021. Results: 20,410 patients met these eligibility requirements representing 12% of patients >18 years and body mass index (BMI) >25 kg/m2 seen at the clinic during this baseline period. The three randomization sequences of 20, 18, and 19 sites were similar with an overall median age of 53 years (IQR: 39-65), 58% women, 76% non-Hispanic whites, 64% commercial insurance, and median BMI of 36 kg/m2 (IQR: 32-41). No sequence differences were seen for vital signs, relevant laboratory values, or numbers of comorbidities or medications that cause weight loss or weight gain. Referral for anything weight-related was low (<6%) and only 334 prescriptions of an anti-obesity medication were noted. Conclusions: Of patients >18 years and body mass index (BMI) >25 kg/m2 seen in the 57 primary care clinics, 12% had a weightprioritized visit during the baseline period. Despite most being commercially insured, referral to any weight-related service or prescription of anti-obesity medication was uncommon. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Care management in primary care can be effective in helping patients with chronic disease improve their health status. Primary care practices, however, are often challenged with its implementation. Incorporating care management involves more than a simple physical process redesign to existing clinical care routines. It involves changes to who is working with patients, and consequently such things as who is making decisions, who is sharing patient information, and how. Studying the range of such changes in "knowledge work" during implementation requires a perspective and tools designed to do so. We used the macrocognition perspective, which is designed to understand how individuals think in dynamic, messy real-world environments such as care management implementation. To do so, we used cognitive task analysis to understand implementation in terms of such thinking as decision making, knowledge, and communication.Methods: Data collection involved semi-structured interviews and observations at baseline and at approximately 9 months into implementation at five practices in one physician-owned administratively connected group of practices in the state of Michigan, USA. Practices were intervention participants in a larger trial of chronic care model implementation. Data were transcribed, qualitatively coded and analyzed, initially using an editing approach and then a template approach with macrocognition as a guiding framework.Results: Seventy-four interviews and five observations were completed. There were differences in implementation success across the practices, and these differences in implementation success were well explained by macrocognition. Practices that used more macrocognition functions and used them more often were also more successful in care management implementation.Conclusions: Although care management can introduce many new changes into the delivery of primary care clinical practice, implementing it successfully as a new complex intervention is possible. Macrocognition is a useful perspective for illuminating the elements that facilitate new complex interventions with a view to addressing them during implementation planning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Care management in primary care can be effective in helping patients with chronic disease improve their health status, however, primary care practices are often challenged with implementation. Further, there are different ways to structure care management that may make implementation more or less successful. Normalization process theory (NPT) provides a means of understanding how a new complex intervention can become routine (normalized) in practice. In this study, we used NPT to understand how care management structure affected how well care management became routine in practice.Methods: Data collection involved semi-structured interviews and observations conducted at 25 practices in five physician organizations in Michigan, USA. Practices were selected to reflect variation in physician organizations, type of care management program, and degree of normalization. Data were transcribed, qualitatively coded and analyzed, initially using an editing approach and then a template approach with NPT as a guiding framework.Results: Seventy interviews and 25 observations were completed. Two key structures for care management organization emerged: practice-based care management where the care managers were embedded in the practice as part of the practice team; and centralized care management where the care managers worked independently of the practice work flow and was located outside the practice. There were differences in normalization of care management across practices. Practice-based care management was generally better normalized as compared to centralized care management. Differences in normalization were well explained by the NPT, and in particular the collective action construct. When care managers had multiple and flexible opportunities for communication (interactional workability), had the requisite knowledge, skills, and personal characteristics (skill set workability), and the organizational support and resources (contextual integration), a trusting professional relationship (relational integration) developed between practice providers and staff and the care manager. When any of these elements were missing, care management implementation appeared to be affected negatively.Conclusions: Although care management can introduce many new changes into delivery of clinical practice, implementing it successfully as a new complex intervention is possible. NPT can be helpful in explaining differences in implementing a new care management program with a view to addressing them during implementation planning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Integrating behavioral health care into primary care has increased access to care for patients with behavioral health needs. Within primary care there is a broad range of need, including traditional mental health diagnoses as well as support in disease management and health-related behavior change. Most BHPs report spending a majority of their clinical time addressing traditional mental health diagnoses. Objective: Understanding current BHP practice with traditional diagnoses as well as supporting health-related behavior change may illuminate new approaches that could be undertaken in primary care to improve patient outcomes. Study design and Analysis: Survey research using Qualtrics. Results were analyzed using simple statistics as well as simple correlations (chi-squared and Spearman's rank correlation). Setting: Practices participating in the State Innovation Model in Colorado, a CMS supported behavioral health integration project. Population: Behavioral health providers in participating practices. Instrument: Survey designed by project team to understand approaches BHPs use and range of treatments provided to patients. Outcome measures: Survey responses. Results: We received 79 BHP surveys representing 64 practices out of a total of 319 SIM practices. BHPs reported addressing healthrelated behaviors like diet, physical activity, and weight management with many patients who were referred to them strictly for mental health diagnoses. They expressed interest in working with patients in these areas and believe that the skills and techniques they use for traditional mental health diagnoses are effective for supporting behavior change. LCSWs are more likely to address behavior change than LMFTs and LACs. BHPs who have been in practice for longer also are more likely to address behavior change. There was no relationship between type of practice and BHPs intervention on behavior change, but BHPs in practices that had case managers or health coaches were more likely to report addressing behavior change. Health-related behavior change topics were more likely to be addressed in co-visits with providers. Conclusions: BHPs frequently address health related behavior whether that is the reason for referral or not and in general are interested in providing these services. Understanding how to formalize that in primary care may provide opportunities to better support patients with behavior change and subsequently improve health outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study used nurses as practice change consultants to help primary care medical practices improve their delivery of health behavior services to patients. Nurse consultants worked with 20 practices from 2 healthcare systems. In each practice, the nurses helped clinicians and staff to develop a practice-specific protocol so that they could identify and intervene with the health behavior of their patients. As a result of the nurse consultant intervention, health behavior delivery was improved. This article describes the specific methods and the lessons learned through this study. We encourage practices to use nurse consultants as one way of improving duality of care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Referral of patients to smoking cessation telephone counseling (i.e., quitline) is an underutilized resource by primary care physicians. Previously, we conducted a randomized trial to determine the effectiveness of benchmarked feedback on clinician referrals to a quitline. Subsequently, we sought to understand the successful practices used by the high-referring clinicians, and the perceptions of the barriers of referring patients to a quitline among both high and non-referring clinicians in the trial. Methods: We conducted a qualitative sub-study with subjects from the randomized trial, comparing high- and non-referring clinicians. Structured interviews were conducted and two investigators employed a thematic analysis of the transcribed data. Themes and included categories were organized into a thematic framework to represent the main response sets. Results: As compared to non-referring clinicians, high-referring clinicians more often reported use of the quitline as a primary source of referral, an appreciation of the quitline as an additional resource, reduced barriers to use of the quitline referral process, and a greater personal motivation related to tobacco cessation. Time and competing demands were critical barriers to initiating smoking cessation treatment with patients for all clinicians. Clinicians reported that having one referral source, a referral coordinator, and reimbursement for tobacco counseling (as a billable code) would aid referral. Conclusion: Further research is needed to test the effectiveness of new approaches in improving the connection of patients with smoking cessation resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Publication of results from the Women's Health Initiative study in July 2002 was a landmark event in biomedical science related to postmenopausal women. The purpose of this study was to describe the impact of new hormone therapy recommendations on patients' attitudes and decision-making in a primary care practice. Methods: A questionnaire including structured and open-ended questions was administered in a family practice office waiting room from August through October 2003. Rationale for taking or not taking hormone therapy was specifically sought. Women 50-70 years old attending for office visits were invited to participate. Data were analyzed qualitatively and with descriptive statistics. Chart review provided medication use rates for the entire practice cohort of which the sample was a subset. Results: Respondents (n = 127) were predominantly white and well educated, and were taking hormone therapy at a higher rate (38%) than the overall rate (26%) for women of the same age range in this practice. Belief patterns about hormone therapy were, in order of frequency, 'use is risky', 'vindication or prior beliefs', 'benefit to me outweighs risk', and 'unaware of new recommendations'. Twenty-eight out of 78 women continued hormones use after July 2002. Of 50 women who initially stopped hormone therapy after July 2002, 12 resumed use. Women who had stopped hormone therapy were a highly symptomatic group. Responses with emotional overtones such as worry, confusion, anger, and grief were common. Conclusion: Strategies for decision support about hormone therapy should explicitly take into account women's preferences about symptom relief and the trade-offs among relevant risks. Some women may need emotional support during transitions in hormone therapy use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE In what ways is primary care practice-based research a facilitator of practice improvement vs a barrier to practice change? This article aims to alert investigators to the pitfalls they may face in undertaking the dual agenda of research and practice improvement. METHODS We derived examples of the relationship between the research and practice improvement goals of 17 Prescription for Health (P4H) grantees from verbal communications with the grantees, fi eld notes from interviews and site visits, and entries made by grantees to an online diary managed by the P4H Analysis Team. RESULTS An analysis of key themes identifi ed factors facilitating and impeding the dual goals of research and practice improvement. The requirements of conducting research mandated by institutional review boards, including patient enrollment and consent, often constituted barriers to practice improvement. The choice of practices in which to conduct research and improvement activities and the manner in which the practices are approached may affect the outcome of both research and practice improvement goals. Approaching practices with a time-limited project mentality can interfere with a process of permanent practice change. The RE-AIM construct (reach, effi cacy/effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance) is useful in designing research interventions that facilitate practice improvement. CONCLUSIONS Projects that meld research studies and practice improvement goals must pay attention to the potential confl icts between research and practice change, and must attempt to design research studies so that they facilitate rather than inhibit practice improvement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE The purpose of this analysis and commentary was to explore the rationale for an integrated approach, within and outside the offi ce, to help patients pursue healthy behaviors. METHODS We examined the role of integration, building on (1) patterns observed in a limited qualitative evaluation of 17 Prescription for Health projects, (2) several national policy initiatives, and (3) selected research literature on behavior change. RESULTS The interventions evaluated in Prescription for Health not only identifi ed unhealthy behaviors and advised change, but also enabled patients to access information at home, use self-help methods, obtain intensive counseling, and receive follow-up. Few practices can replicate such a model with the limited staff and resources available in their offi ces. Comprehensive assistance can be offered to patients, however, by integrating what is feasible in the offi ce with additional services available through the community and information media. CONCLUSIONS Blending diverse clinical and community services into a cohesive system requires an infrastructure that fosters integration. Such a system provides the comprehensive model on which the quality of both health promotion and chronic illness care depend. Integrating clinical and community services is only the fi rst step toward the ideal of a citizen-centered approach, in which diverse sectors within the community—health care among them—work together to help citizens sustain healthy behaviors. The integration required to fulfi ll this ideal faces logistical challenges but may be the best way for a fragmented health care system to fully serve its patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Tobacco use, unhealthy diet, physical inactivity, and risky alcohol use are leading causes of preventable death. As there are many barriers that prevent primary care clinicians from effectively assisting patients with these behaviors, connecting patients with health behavior resources may reduce these unhealthy behaviors. Methods: A new adjunct role in primary care practice, the community health educator referral liaison (CHERL), was tested in 15 practices in three Michigan communities. All practices were advised how to access this liaison, and nine practices were randomly selected to receive support to develop a systematic referral process. Adult patients needing improvement in at least one of the four unhealthy behaviors were eligible for referral. The CHERL contacted referred patients by telephone; assessed health risks; provided health behavior–change counseling, referral to other resources, or both; and sent patient progress reports to referring clinicians. Data were collected from February 2006 through July 2007. Results: The CHERLs received 797 referrals over 8 months, a referral rate of 0%–2% per practice. Among referred patients, 55% enrolled, and 61% of those participated in multiple-session telephone counseling; 85% were referred to additional resources. Among patients enrolling, improvements (p<0.001) were reported at 6 months for BMI, dietary patterns, alcohol use, tobacco use, health status, and days of limited activity in the past month. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that through relationships with practices, patients, and community resources, these liaisons successfully facilitated patients'' behavior change. The CHERL role may fill a gap in promoting healthy behaviors in primary care practices and merits further exploration. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPTF) recognizes that behaviors have a major impact on health and well-being. Currently, the USPSTF has 11 behavioral counseling intervention (BCI) recommendations. These BCIs can be delivered in a primary care setting or patients can be referred to other clinical or community programs. Unfortunately, many recommended BCIs are infrequently and ineffectually delivered, suggesting that more evidence is needed to understand which BCIs are feasible and referable. In response, the USPSTF convened an expert forum in 2013 to inform the evaluation of BCI feasibility. This manuscript reports on findings from the forum and proposes that researchers use several frameworks to help clinicians and the USPSTF evaluate which BCIs work under usual conditions. A key recommendation for BCI researchers is to use frameworks whose components can support dissemination and implementation efforts. These frameworks include the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR), which helps describe the essential components of an intervention, and pragmatic frameworks like Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) or Pragmatic–Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary (PRECIS), which help to report study design elements and outcomes. These frameworks can both guide the design of more-feasible BCIs and produce clearer feasibility evidence. Critical evidence gaps include a better understanding of which patients will benefit from a BCI, how flexible interventions can be without compromising effectiveness, required clinician expertise, necessary intervention intensity and follow-up, impact of patient and clinician intervention adherence, optimal conditions for BCI delivery, and how new care models will influence BCI feasibility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Primary care offices have been characterized as underutilized settings for routinely addressing health behaviors that contribute to premature death and unnecessary suffering. Practical tools are needed to routinely assess multiple health risk behaviors among diverse primary care patients. The performance of a brief set of behavioral measures used in primary care practice is reported here. Methods: Between August 2005 and January 2007, 75 primary care practices assessed four health behaviors, using a 21-item patient self-report questionnaire for adults or a 16-item questionnaire for adolescents. Data were collected via telephone, paper, or electronic means, either with or without assistance. The performance of these measures was evaluated by describing risk-behavior prevalences, combinations of risk behaviors, and missing data. Results: Of 227 adolescents and 5358 adults, most patients completed all of the survey questions. Two or more unhealthy behaviors were reported by 47.1% of adolescents and 69.2% of adults. Percentages of adults who completed all the survey items varied by health behavior: tobacco use, 98.5%; diet, 98.2%; physical activity, 96.2%; alcohol use, 85.1%. Missing data rates were higher for unassisted patient self-reporting. Conclusions: A relatively brief set of health behavior measures was usable in a variety of primary care settings with adults and adolescents. The performance of these measures was uneven across behaviors and administration modes, but yielded estimates of unhealthy behaviors consistent overall with what would be expected based on published population estimates. Further work is needed on measures for alcohol use and physical activity to bring practical assessment tools for key health behaviors to routine primary care practice. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Primary care practices able to create linkages with community resources may be more successful at helping patients to make and sustain health behavior changes. Methods: Health behavior-change interventions in eight practice-based research networks were examined. Data were collected July 2005–October 2007. A comparative analysis of the data was conducted to identify and understand strategies used for linking primary care practices with community resources. Results: Intervention practices developed three strategies to initiate and/or implement linkages with community resources: pre-identified resource options, referral guides, and people external to the practice who offered support and connection to resources. To initiate linkages, practices required the capacity to identify patients, make referrals, and know area resources. Linkage implementation could still be defeated if resources were not available, accessible, affordable, and perceived as valuable. Linkages were facilitated by boundary-spanning strategies that compensated for the lack of infrastructure between practices and resources, and by brokering strategies that identified interested community partners and aided mutually beneficial connections with them. Linkages were stronger when they incorporated practice or resource abilities to motivate the patient, such as brief counseling or postreferral outreach. Further, data suggested that sustaining linkages requires continuous attention and ongoing communication between practices and resources. Conclusions: Creating linkages between primary care practices and community resources has the potential to benefit both patients and clinicians and to lessen the burden on the U.S. healthcare system resulting from poor health behaviors. Infrastructure support and communication systems must be developed to foster sustainable linkages between practices and local resources. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]