Search

To describe perceptions of cancer fatalism and identify demographic correlates; to explore whether providers believe their patients are fatalistic about cancer and compare these views to the patients’ views. Both patients ( n= 52) and providers ( n= 35) were recruited at federally funded, community primary care centers. Data were collected using the Powe Fatalism Inventory, the Perceived Patient Fatalism Inventory, and a demographic data questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, and t-test. The majority of patients were African American women. The majority of providers were physicians and nurses. Patients indicated low perceptions of cancer fatalism, but providers believed patients were highly fatalistic. As the patients’ educational level increased, perceptions of cancer fatalism decreased. The providers’ belief that patients are fatalistic about cancer may influence patient–provider communication. They may be less likely to recommend screening, and patients may be less likely to initiate a discussion about cancer. Strategies are needed that target providers and their patients to address actual and/or perceived perceptions and their influence on cancer screening. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To assess the effectiveness of an intervention designed to increase compliance with national asthma cure guidelines in primary care safety net health centers serving high-disparity patient populations, we conducted a group-randomized controlled trial (seven intervention sites and nine control sites) in federally funded community health centers in eight southeastern states. There were three components involved in the intervention: resources (asthma kits including peak flow meter, MDI spacer device, plus educational materials), training of all health center staff in asthma care guidelines, and tools or templates for practice-level systems change (asthma flow sheets and standing orders). Control group sites received only copies of the national asthma guidelines. Chart reviews were performed to determine practitioner's compliance with national guidelines for asthma care. Clinicians practicing in intervention health centers showed significantly (p < 0.01) greater improvement on some measures than did the control health centers, although postintervention compliance with guidelines was still suboptimal. Disseminating national guidelines is not enough. Providing training and guideline-specific resources, in combination with tools tor practice change, improved care significantly even in safety net health centers .serving high-disparity patient populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]