Search

Genome-wide sequencing, which includes exome sequencing and genome sequencing, has revolutionized the diagnostics of genetic disorders in both postnatal and prenatal settings. Compared to exome sequencing, genome sequencing enables the detection of many additional types of genomic variants, although this depends on the bioinformatics pipelines used. Variant classification might vary among laboratories. In the prenatal setting, variant classification may change if new fetal phenotypic features emerge as the pregnancy progresses. There is still a need to evaluate the incremental diagnostic yield of genome sequencing compared to exome sequencing in the prenatal setting. This article reviews the advantages and limitations of genome sequencing, with an emphasis on fetal diagnostics., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To investigate how many novel pathogenic (P) and likely pathogenic (LP) nonprotein-truncating or noncanonical splicing variants would be classified as variants of unknown significance (VUS) if they were detected in fetuses without abnormalities., Methods: The study included 156 patients with neurodevelopmental disorders diagnosed through postnatal exome sequencing. Causative P/LP nonprotein-truncating and noncanonical splicing variants were retrospectively reclassified in cases without specific prenatal manifestations, disregarding postnatal symptoms., Results: Of the 156 patients, 72 had a nontruncating or noncanonical splicing variant. Six patients were excluded for having more than one possible causative variant. Twelve patients had prenatal malformations known to be associated with the diagnosed disorder; therefore, variant interpretation remained unchanged. In 33 of the 54 remaining cases, the variant had been previously reported as P/LP. Reclassification of the other 21 LP/P variants revealed that 16 would have been classified as VUS if detected prenatally., Conclusion: In our cohort, ∼24% (16/66) of causative nonprotein-truncating/noncanonical splicing variants would have been classified as VUS if sequencing had been conducted during pregnancy. The potential for false-negative results, stemming from limitations in the phenotypic information available prenatally, should be discussed with prospective parents. The criteria for classifying and reporting variants in the prenatal setting may require adjustment., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: The rate of clinically significant copy number variants in chromosomal microarray analysis in low-risk pregnancies is approximately 1%. However, these results include copy number variants with low and variable penetrance, although some patients might be interested only in the detection of high-penetrant variants., Objective: This study aimed to calculate the prevalence of high-penetrant copy number variants in a large cohort of low-risk pregnancies., Study Design: This retrospective study was performed using microarray results of pregnancies with normal ultrasound and maternal serum screening. All clinically significant (pathogenic and likely pathogenic) copy number variants were recorded. Of these, only high-penetrant findings were selected. Findings with low and medium penetrance and copy number variants with unknown clinical penetrance, including uniparental disomy of segments not related to known imprinted syndromes, mosaic aneuploidy of <50%, and segmental mosaicism, were excluded. The calculation was performed for the overall cohort, for women aged >35 years and women aged <35 years, and after omission of noninvasive prenatal screening theoretically detectable findings (trisomies 13, 18, and 21)., Results: Clinically significant copy number variants were detected in 118 of 7734 cases (1.50% or 1:65), and high-penetrant copy number variants were detected in 33 of 7734 cases (0.43% or 1:234). In women aged ≥35 years, the rates of high-penetrant copy number variants were 29 of 5734 cases (0.51% or 1:198) and 4 of 2000 cases (0.20% or 1:500) in women aged <35 years (P=.0747). Following the omission of 12 theoretically noninvasive prenatal screening-detectable findings, the rates of high-penetrant copy number variants declined to 21 of 7722 cases (0.27% or 1:368) in the whole cohort-18 of 5723 cases (0.31% or 1:318) in woman aged ≥35 years and 3 of 1999 cases (0.15% or 1:666) in younger women (P=.319)., Conclusion: The risk of high-penetrant copy number variants in low-risk pregnancies exceeds the risk of miscarriage after invasive testing, even after normal noninvasive prenatal screening results. These results are of importance to genetic counselors and obstetricians, to facilitate maternal informed decision-making when considering invasive prenatal testing in low-risk pregnancies., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Chromosomal microarray analysis is standard of care in fetuses with malformations, detecting clinically significant copy number variants in 5-7% of cases over conventional karyotyping. However, it also detects variants of uncertain significance in 1.6-4.2% of the cases, some of which are low-penetrance neuro-susceptibility loci. The interpretation of these variants in pregnancy is particularly challenging because the significance is often unclear and the clinical implications may be difficult to predict., Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe counseling dilemmas regarding low-penetrance neuro-susceptibility loci that are detected by prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis., Study Design: During the study period (January 2014 to December 2015), 700 prenatal chromosomal microarray analyses were performed. Cases were categorized as "indicated" (n=375) if there were abnormal sonographic findings or suggestive medical history and "patient choice" (n=325) in the presence of a structurally normal fetus with no other particular indication. The laboratory reported on copy number variants ≥400 Kb in size in loci known to be associated with genetic syndromes and ≥1 Mb in other areas of genome. Results were classified as gross aneuploidy, copy number variants, and normal. Copy number variants were categorized according to the American College of Medical Genetics standards and guidelines: pathogenic, variants of uncertain significance, or benign. Variants of uncertain significance were further subdivided into categories of likely pathogenic, variants of uncertain significance with no subclassification, and likely benign. Statistical analysis was performed with the use of Chi square test and Fisher's exact test to compare intergroup differences in incidence of the different result categories and demographic data., Results: Patient choice cases became more prevalent with time (35.5% in the beginning of the study, compared with 48.4% at the end of the study period). Clinically significant copy number variants were found in 14 of 375 (3.7%) of indicated cases vs only 2 of 325 (0.6%) of patient choice cases (P=.009). All "likely benign" variants consisted of low-penetrance neuro-susceptibility loci. The incidence thereof was similar between the indicated and patient choice groups (3.7% vs 3.4%; P=.85). In the indicated group, some variants of uncertain significance may have contributed to the abnormal anatomic findings. Conversely, in the patient choice group, the finding of low-penetrance neuro-susceptibility loci was often unexpected and confounding for prospective parents., Conclusion: Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis added clinically significant information in both groups. However, it also detected low-penetrance neuro-susceptibility loci in approximately 3.5% of the cases. This fact should be conveyed during pretest counseling to allow patients to make informed choices, particularly when chromosomal microarray is to be performed for patient choice., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To evaluate the theoretical added value of two types of non‐invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) expansions in pregnancies without major structural anomalies over the commonly used NIPS for chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y (5‐NIPS) and to compare them with the added value of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study based on CMA results of all pregnancies with normal ultrasound (including pregnancies with soft markers and with abnormal maternal serum screening) that had undergone amniocentesis between January 2013 to February 2022 and were registered in the database of the Rabin Medical Center genetic laboratory. We calculated the theoretical yield of 5‐NIPS and compared the added value of expanded 5‐NIPS for common microdeletions (1p36.3–1p36.2, 4p16.3–4p16.2, 5p15.3–5p15.1, 15q11.2–15q13.1 and 22q11.2) and genome‐wide NIPS (including variants > 5 Mb) with the added value of CMA in the overall cohort and in subgroups according to indication for invasive testing. Results: Among the 8605 examined pregnancies, 122 (1.4%) clinically significant CMA results were demonstrated. Of these, 44 (36.1%) were theoretically detectable on 5‐NIPS, with the rates of 1.56% in 642 pregnancies with abnormal maternal serum screening, 0.63% in 318 pregnancies with soft markers, 0.62% in 4378 women with advanced maternal age (≥ 35 years) and 0.15% in 3267 women younger than 35 years. In addition to aneuploidies detectable on 5‐NIPS, three (0.03%) cases detectable on 5‐NIPS expanded for common microdeletions and nine (0.10%) cases detectable on genome‐wide NIPS (excluding common microdeletions) were identified in the overall cohort. The added value of expanded NIPS tools over 5‐NIPS was significantly lower compared with that of CMA, for the overall cohort and subgroups. Conclusions: 5‐NIPS and even genome‐wide NIPS would miss 63.9% and 54.1% of clinically significant CMA findings, respectively. The added value of 5‐NIPS expanded to detect common microdeletions over 5‐NIPS is about 0.035%, and the overall added value of genome‐wide NIPS aimed at large CNVs is about 0.14%, both much lower compared with the added value of CMA (0.91%). These findings should assist healthcare practitioners in guiding couples towards informed decision‐making regarding the choice between prenatal invasive testing and NIPS. © 2023 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Linked article: There is a comment on this article by Lei et al. Click here to view the Correspondence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Prenatally detected central nervous system (CNS) anomalies present a diagnostic challenge. In this study, we compared the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing (ES) and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in fetuses with a major CNS anomaly.Methods: This was a retrospective study of 114 cases referred for genetic evaluation following termination of pregnancy (TOP) due to a major CNS anomaly detected on prenatal ultrasound. All fetuses were first analyzed by CMA. All CMA-negative cases were offered ES. CMA-positive cases were reanalyzed using ES to assess its ability to detect copy-number variants (CNVs).Results: CMA identified a pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) CNV in 11/114 (10%) cases. Eighty-six CMA-negative cases were analyzed using ES, which detected P/LP sequence variants in 38/86 (44%). Among recurrent cases (i.e. cases with a previously affected pregnancy), the incidence of P/LP sequence variants was non-significantly higher compared with non-recurrent ones (12/19 (63%) vs 26/67 (39%); P = 0.06). Among the 38 cases with an ES diagnosis, 20 (53%) were inherited and carried a significant risk of recurrence. Reanalysis of 10 CMA-positive cases by ES demonstrated that the bioinformatics pipeline used for sequence variant analysis also detected all P/LP CNVs, as well as three previously known non-causative CNVs.Conclusions: In our study, ES provided a high diagnostic yield (> 50%) in fetuses with severe CNS structural anomalies, which may have been partly due to the highly selected case series that included post-TOP cases from a specialist referral center. These data suggest that ES may be considered as a first-tier test for the prenatal diagnosis of major fetal CNS anomalies, detecting both P/LP sequence variants and CNVs. This is of particular importance given the time constraints of an ongoing pregnancy and the risk of recurrence in future pregnancies. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]