Search

Introduction: Targeted routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis was introduced to the national prophylaxis program in Finland in late 2013. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence, time-points, and risk factors for Rhesus D immunization after the implementation of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis, in all women in Finland with antenatal anti-D antibodies detected in 2014-2017., Material and Methods: In a nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study, the incidence, time-points, and risk factors of anti-D immunizations were analyzed. Information on antenatal screening was obtained from the Finnish Red Cross Blood Service database, and obstetric data from hospital records and the Finnish Medical Birth Register., Results: The study included a total of 228 women (197 with complete data for all pregnancies). After the implementation of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis, the prevalence of pregnancies with anti-D antibodies decreased from 1.52% in 2014 to 0.88% in 2017, and the corresponding incidence of new immunizations decreased from 0.33% to 0.10%. Time-points for detection of new anti-D antibodies before and after 2014 were the first screening sample at 8-12 weeks of gestation in 52% vs 19%, the second sample at 24-26 weeks in 20% vs 50%, and the third screening at 36 weeks in 28% vs 32%., Conclusions: The incidence of new anti-D immunizations decreased as expected after the implementation of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis. True failures are rare and they mainly occur when the prophylaxis is not given appropriately, suggesting a need for constant education of healthcare professionals on the subject., (© 2021 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.)

Objective: To compare birth outcomes and maternity care use in 1991 and 2008 by age among primiparous Finnish women., Design: Register-based study., Setting: Nationwide Medical Birth Register., Population: All primiparous women in 1991 (n = 24,765) and 2008 (n = 23,511)., Methods: Women aged 35-39 and ≥40 years were compared with women aged 20-34 years in 1991 and 2008, using logistic regression to adjust for women's background., Main Outcome Measures: Maternity care: prenatal visits, hospitalisation during pregnancy, labour induction, delivery mode, long postpartum hospital stay; and birth outcomes: birthweight, preterm birth, Apgar scores, intensive/observation unit, respiratory care, perinatal death., Results: In both years, older women's deliveries were more often induced, instrumental, or by caesarean section. In 2008 compared with 1991, hospitalisations were lower and instrumental deliveries and labour induction were higher in older women. A significant decrease in adjusted odds ratios (OR, 95% confidence intervals) between 1991 and 2008 among women aged 35-39 was found for preterm birth (1.47, 1.18-1.84 versus 0.96, 0.86-1.07) and for intensive/observation unit (1.73, 1.47-2.05 versus 1.21, 1.07-1.37) and, among women aged ≥40 years, for intensive/observation unit (3.14, 2.30-4.29 versus 1.64, 1.31-2.07). The risk for perinatal death (1.66, 0.60-4.60 versus 2.69, 1.07-6.79) was higher in 2008 than in 1991 among women aged ≥40., Conclusions: In 2008, older primiparous women still used more maternity care, had more interventions, and poorer birth outcomes than younger women, regardless of care advances. Additional risks declined among women aged 35-39 but not among aged ≥40., (© 2013 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.)

Prenatal treatment of fetomaternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FMAIT) in previously affected families is of great clinical importance. We report here our experience in the prenatal treatment of 15 severely thrombocytopenic fetuses. Thrombocytopenia was in 13 cases due to immunization to HPA-1a, in one case to HPA-5b, and in one case to HPA-6b. Thirteen fetuses received altogether 34 intrauterine platelet transfusions, seven of them in combination with maternal-administered intravenous gammaglobulin (IVIG) and two in combination with IVIG and prednisone. Six of the 13 fetuses had only one transfusion just prior to delivery. In our experience, IVIG seemed to be less effective than reported; only two fetuses of eight treated initially with weekly maternal-administered IVIG responded, and these were the mildest affected cases in the study. On the other hand, owing to the short survival time, weekly platelet transfusions could only partly maintain a safe platelet count in the four fetuses treated with serial intrauterine platelet transfusions. The number of transfusions needed to be limited because of the high cumulative risk associated with repeated procedures. Three of 34 intrauterine platelet transfusions were associated with near-loss of three different fetuses due to prolonged fetal bradycardia after the transfusion. In conclusion, overall neonatal outcome was good, with no mortality; among the study group there was no intracranial haemorrhage (evaluated by postnatal ultrasonography) compared with one case in their untreated siblings. However, the problem of the optimal treatment of FMAIT remains to be solved. For the moment, the treatment of choice is a combination of maternal IVIG and platelet transfusions in severely affected cases. Serial fetal blood samplings (FBS) are needed in order to monitor the fetus with sufficient care.