Search

Objective: To evaluate whether caesarean delivery before 26 weeks of gestation was associated with symptoms of depression and anxiety in mothers in comparison with deliveries between 26 and 34 weeks. Design: Prospective national population‐based EPIPAGE‐2 cohort study. Setting: 268 neonatology departments in France, March to December 2011. Population: Mothers who delivered between 22 and 34 weeks and whose self‐reported symptoms of depression (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: CES‐D) and anxiety (State‐Trait Anxiety Inventory: STAI) were assessed at the moment of neonatal discharge. Methods: The association of caesarean delivery before 26 weeks with severe symptoms of depression (CES‐D ≥16) and anxiety (STAI ≥45) was assessed by weighted and design‐based log‐linear regression model. Main outcome measures: Severe symptoms of depression and anxiety in mothers of preterm infants. Results: Among the 2270 women completing CES‐D and STAI questionnaires at the time of neonatal discharge, severe symptoms of depression occurred in 25 (65.8%) women having a caesarean before 26 weeks versus in 748 (50.6%) women having a caesarean after 26 weeks. Caesarean delivery before 26 weeks was associated with severe symptoms of depression compared with caesarean delivery after 26 weeks (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 1.42, 95% CI 1.12–1.81) adjusted to neonatal birthweight and severe neonatal morbidity among other factors. There was no evidence of an association between mode of delivery and symptoms of anxiety. Conclusions: Mothers having a caesarean delivery before 26 weeks' gestation are at high risk of symptoms of depression and may benefit from specific preventive care. Mothers having caesarean delivery before 26 weeks' gestation are at high risk of symptoms of depression. Mothers having caesarean delivery before 26 weeks' gestation are at high risk of symptoms of depression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To compare the short- and mid-term outcomes of preterm twins by chorionicity of pregnancy.Design: Prospective nationwide population-based EPIPAGE-2 cohort study.Setting: 546 maternity units in France, between March and December 2011.Population: A total of 1700 twin neonates born between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation.Methods: The association of chorionicity with outcomes was analysed using multivariate regression models.Main Outcome Measures: First, survival at 2-year corrected age with or without neurosensory impairment, and second, perinatal, short-, and mid-term outcomes (survival at discharge, survival at discharge without severe morbidity) were described and compared by chorionicity.Results: In the EPIPAGE 2 cohort, 1700 preterm births were included (850 twin pregnancies). In all, 1220 (71.8%) were from dichorionic (DC) pregnancies and 480 from monochorionic (MC) pregnancies. MC pregnancies had three times more medical terminations than DC pregnancies (1.67 versus 0.51%, P < 0.001), whereas there were three times more stillbirths in MC than in DC pregnancies (10.09 versus 3.78%, P < 0.001). Both twins were alive at birth in 86.6% of DC pregnancies compared with 80.0% among MC pregnancies (P = 0.008). No significant difference according to chorionicity was found regarding neonatal deaths and morbidities. Likewise, for children born earlier than 32 weeks, the 2-year follow-up neurodevelopmental results were not significantly different between DC and MC twins.Conclusions: This study confirms that MC pregnancies have a higher risk of adverse outcomes. However, the outcomes among preterm twins admitted to neonatal intensive care units are similar irrespective of chorionicity.Tweetable Abstract: Monochorionicity is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes, but outcomes for preterm twins are comparable irrespective of their chorionicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To assess whether planned route of delivery is associated with perinatal and 2-year outcomes for preterm breech singletons.Design: Prospective nationwide population-based EPIPAGE-2 cohort study.Setting: France, 2011.Sample: Three hundred and ninety women with breech singletons born at 26-34 weeks of gestation after preterm labour or preterm prelabour rupture of membranes.Methods: Propensity-score analysis.Main Outcome Measures: Survival at discharge, survival at discharge without severe morbidity, and survival at 2 years of corrected age without neurosensory impairment.Results: Vaginal and caesarean deliveries were planned in 143 and 247 women, respectively. Neonates with planned vaginal delivery and planned caesarean delivery did not differ in survival (93.0 versus 95.7%, P = 0.14), survival at discharge without severe morbidity (90.4 versus 89.9%, P = 0.85), or survival at 2 years without neurosensory impairment (86.6 versus 91.6%, P = 0.11). After applying propensity scores and assigning inverse probability of treatment weighting, as compared with planned vaginal delivery, planned caesarean delivery was not associated with improved survival (odds ratio, OR 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 95% CI 0.67-2.59), survival without severe morbidity (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.45-1.27), or survival at 2 years without neurosensory impairment (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.60-1.80). Results were similar after matching on propensity score.Conclusions: No association between planned caesarean delivery and improved outcomes for preterm breech singletons born at 26-34 weeks of gestation after preterm labour or preterm prelabour rupture of membranes was found. The route of delivery should be discussed with women, balancing neonatal outcomes with the higher risks of maternal morbidity associated with caesarean section performed at low gestational age. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cesarean delivery rates at extreme prematurity have regularly increased over the past years, and few previous studies have investigated severe maternal morbidity associated with extreme preterm cesarean delivery.Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether gestational age <26 weeks of gestation (weeks) was associated with severe maternal morbidity and mortality (SMMM) of preterm cesarean deliveries in comparison with cesarean deliveries between 26 and 34 weeks.Materials and Methods: The Etude Epidémiologique sur les petits âges gestationnels (EPIPAGE) 2 is a national prospective population-based cohort study of preterm births in 2011. We included mothers with cesarean deliveries between 22 and 34 weeks, excluding those who had a cesarean delivery for the second twin only and those with pregnancy terminations. SMMM was analyzed as a composite endpoint defined as the occurrence of at least 1 of the following complications: severe postpartum hemorrhage defined by the use of a blood transfusion, intensive care unit admission, or death. To assess the association of gestational age <26 weeks and SMMM, we used multivariate logistic regression and a propensity score-matching approach.Results: Among 2525 women having preterm cesarean deliveries, 116 before 26 weeks and 2409 between 26 and 34 weeks, 407 (14.4%) presented with SMMM. The SMMM occurred in 31 mothers (26.7%) who were at gestational age <26 weeks vs 376 (14.2%) between 26 and 34 weeks (P < .001). Cluster multivariate logistic regression showed significant association of gestational age <26 weeks and SMMM (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.42-4.40) and propensity score-matching analysis was consistent with these results (aOR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.31-3.93).Conclusion: Obstetricians should know about the higher SMMM associated with cesarean deliveries before 26 weeks, integrate this knowledge into decisions regarding cesarean delivery, and be prepared to manage the associated complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Most clinical guidelines state that with early preterm premature rupture of membranes, obstetric and pediatric teams must share a realistic and individualized appraisal of neonatal outcomes with parents and consider their wishes for all decisions. However, we currently lack reliable and relevant data, according to gestational age at rupture of membranes, to adequately counsel parents during pregnancy and to reflect on our policies of care at these extreme gestational ages.Objective: We sought to describe both perinatal and 2-year outcomes of preterm infants born after preterm premature rupture of membranes at 22-25 weeks' gestation.Study Design: EPIPAGE-2 is a French national prospective population-based cohort of preterm infants born in 546 maternity units in 2011. Inclusion criteria in this analysis were women diagnosed with preterm premature rupture of membranes at 22-25 weeks' gestation and singleton or twin gestations with fetus(es) alive at rupture of membranes. Latency duration, antenatal management, and outcomes (survival at discharge, survival at discharge without severe morbidity, and survival at 2 years' corrected age without cerebral palsy) were described and compared by gestational age at preterm premature rupture of membranes.Results: Among the 1435 women with a diagnosis of preterm premature rupture of membranes, 379 were at 22-25 weeks' gestation, with 427 fetuses (331 singletons and 96 twins). Median gestational age at preterm premature rupture of membranes and at birth were 24 (interquartile range 23-25) and 25 (24-27) weeks, respectively. For each gestational age at preterm premature rupture of membranes, nearly half of the fetuses were born within the week after the rupture of membranes. Among the 427 fetuses, 51.7% were survivors at discharge (14.1%, 39.5%, 66.8%, and 75.8% with preterm premature rupture of membranes at 22, 23, 24, and 25 weeks, respectively), 38.8% were survivors at discharge without severe morbidity, and 46.4% were survivors at 2 years without cerebral palsy, with wide variations by gestational age at preterm premature rupture of membranes. Survival at 2 years without cerebral palsy was low with preterm premature rupture of membranes at 22 and 23 weeks but reached approximately 60% and 70% with preterm premature rupture of membranes at 24 and 25 weeks.Conclusion: Preterm premature rupture of membranes at 22-25 weeks is associated with high incidence of mortality and morbidity, with wide variations by gestational age at preterm premature rupture of membranes. However, a nonnegligible proportion of children survive without severe morbidity both at discharge and at 2 years' corrected age. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To assess the impact of latency duration on survival, survival without severe morbidity, and early-onset sepsis in infants born after preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) at 24-32 weeks' gestation.Study Design: This study was based on the prospective national population-based Etude Épidémiologique sur les Petits Ȃges Gestationnels 2 cohort of preterm births and included 702 singletons delivered in France after PPROM at 24-32 weeks' gestation. Latency duration was defined as the time from spontaneous rupture of membranes to delivery, divided into 4 periods (12 hours to 2 days [reference], 3-7 days, 8-14 days, and >14 days). Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between latency duration and survival, survival without severe morbidity at discharge, or early-onset sepsis.Results: Latency duration ranged from 12 hours to 2 days (18%), 3-7 days (38%), 8-14 days (24%), and >14 days (20%). Rates of survival, survival without severe morbidity, and early-onset sepsis were 93.5% (95% CI 91.8-94.8), 85.4% (82.4-87.9), and 3.4% (2.0-5.7), respectively. A crude association found between prolonged latency duration and improved survival disappeared on adjusting for gestational age at birth (aOR 1.0 [reference], 1.6 [95% CI 0.8-3.2], 1.2 [0.5-2.9], and 1.0 [0.3-3.2] for latency durations from 12 hours to 2 days, 3-7 days, 8-14 days, and >14 days, respectively). Prolonged latency duration was not associated with survival without severe morbidity or early-onset sepsis.Conclusion: For a given gestational age at birth, prolonged latency duration after PPROM does not worsen neonatal prognosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]