Search

Summary: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrine disorder in females. Modest weight loss improves reproductive and metabolic PCOS features. While lifestyle modifications and pharmacotherapies remain first‐line weight loss strategies, bariatric surgery is emerging as a potentially effective treatment. We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis of published literature to examine the impact of bariatric surgery in PCOS to inform the 2023 International PCOS Evidence‐based Guidelines. Electronic databases were searched for observational studies and trials comparing pharmacologic or lifestyle treatments to bariatric surgery in women with PCOS or bariatric surgery in women with or without PCOS. Anthropometric, reproductive, hormonal, and metabolic outcomes were included and, where possible, meta‐analyzed using random‐effects models. Risk of bias and evidence quality were assessed. Ten studies were included involving 432 women with and 590 women without PCOS. Comparisons between bariatric surgery and pharmacologic or lifestyle treatments were only reported in one study each, and most reproductive outcomes were limited to a single study; therefore, meta‐analyses could not be performed. Meta‐analysis found that women with PCOS experience similar improvements in anthropometric, hormonal, and metabolic outcomes after bariatric surgery compared to those without PCOS. Existing research is limited and of low quality with high risk of bias, especially in comparison to existing PCOS treatments and with respect to reproductive outcomes including pregnancy, highlighting the need for additional studies to inform clinical recommendations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This year's diabetes pregnancy manuscripts, three for each of type 1 diabetes (T1D), type 2 diabetes (T2D), and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), were chosen from over 3500 published articles. Data were collected on pregnant women with diabetes (any type) with DKA events (cases) and pregnant women with diabetes without DKA (controls) from 194 maternity units between April 2019 and September 2020. Another concerning finding is the prevalence of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) during pregnancy in all types of diabetes. Seventy DKA events (85%) occurred in women with T1D (incidence 16.6/100,000; 95% CI, 13.0-20.9), 5 DKA events (6%) in women with T2D (incidence 1.1/100,000; 95% CI, 0.4-2.5), and 7 (9%) in women diagnosed with GDM. [Extracted from the article]

Background: There is limited information regarding the association between missed appointments and neonatal outcomes for diabetes in pregnancy. Study Methods: This retrospective live birth cohort included pregnant women with Type 1 or 2 diabetes who attended specialized clinics from 2008 to 2020. The association between at least one missed antenatal diabetes appointments and outcomes were assessed using logistic regression and reported as adjusted odds ratios (aOR) (95% confidence interval). Mediation analyses were conducted to examine if above target HbA1c mediated these relationships. Results: The cohort included 407 and 902 women with Type 1 and 2 diabetes, respectively, of whom 25.1% and 34.5% missed at least one appointment. Women with Type 1 diabetes who missed an appointment were more likely to have a caesarean section (aOR 1.95 [1.15, 3.31]) and their babies more likely to be admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (aOR 2.25 [1.35, 3.75]). Women with Type 2 diabetes who missed an appointment were more likely to have a large‐for‐gestational‐age infant (aOR 1.61 [1.13, 2.28]), and an extreme large‐for‐gestational‐age infant (aOR 1.69 [1.02, 2.81]) compared with women who did not miss appointments. Above target HbA1c mediated the relationship between missed appointments and caesarean delivery in Type 1 diabetes and large‐for‐gestational age and extreme large‐for‐gestational age in Type 2 diabetes. Conclusion: In individuals with Type 1 and 2 diabetes, there are differences in neonatal outcomes between those who missed an appointment compared to those who did not. It remains unclear if missed diabetes appointments are causative or a marker of other health behaviours or risk factors leading to neonatal morbidity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Women with hypothyroidism before pregnancy often require an increase in their levothyroxine dosage to maintain a euthyroid state during pregnancy. The objectives of this study were to investigate: (i) the frequency and distribution of thyrotropin (TSH) testing and levothyroxine dosage adjustment by gestational age, (ii) the magnitude of levothyroxine increase by the underlying etiology of hypothyroidism, and (iii) the relationship of overtreatment or undertreatment during pregnancy with adverse pregnancy outcomes among women using thyroid replacement before pregnancy. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of pregnancies in women on thyroid replacement before pregnancy in Alberta, Canada, was performed. Women using thyroid replacement anytime during the two years before pregnancy who delivered between October 2014 and September 2017 were included. Delivery records, physician billing, and laboratory and pharmacy administrative data were linked. Outcomes included characteristics of TSH testing, levothyroxine dosing, and pregnancy outcomes. The frequency and gestational timing of TSH testing and levothyroxine adjustments were calculated. Multiple logistic regression was used to test whether pregnancies with TSH <0.10 mIU/L (overtreatment) or TSH ≥10.00 mIU/L (undertreatment) compared with control pregnancies (TSH 0.10–4.00 mIU/L) were associated with adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. Results: Of the 10,680 deliveries, 8774 (82.2%) underwent TSH testing at least once during pregnancy, at a median gestational age of six weeks. An adjustment of levothyroxine dosage was made for 4321 (43.7%) during pregnancy. TSH in pregnancy below 0.10 mIU/L increased the odds of preterm delivery when compared with control pregnancies (adjusted odds ratio, 2.14 [95% confidence interval 1.51–2.78]). TSH ≥10.00 mIU/L during pregnancy was not associated with any adverse pregnancy or neonatal outcomes in the multivariable analysis. Conclusions: Although most women on thyroid replacement before conception had TSH measured at some point during pregnancy, it is concerning that 17.8% did not. Levothyroxine overtreatment in pregnancy was associated with preterm delivery. These findings suggest that clinicians should be careful to avoid overtreatment with levothyroxine in pregnancy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In recent years, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has become increasingly available with the introduction of devices that are specifically approved for use during pregnancy. Evidence in the form of randomized-controlled trials and cohort studies continues to build support for the use of CGM during pregnancy to improve measures of maternal glycemia as well as obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Based on data from the CGM in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes (CONCEPTT) trial alongside a Swedish cohort study of real-world outcomes of pregnant women with type 1 diabetes, the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines now recommend that real-time CGM be offered to all pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. Based on these guidelines, all pregnant individuals in the United Kingdom with type 1 diabetes will receive government-funded real-time CGM for a 12-month duration. These guidelines are a game-changer and will continue to facilitate more widespread access to CGM use in the United Kingdom and beyond. This review describes the role of CGM in the management of diabetes in pregnancy, discusses contemporary maternal glucose levels and their relationship with outcomes in diabetes pregnancies, and examines the high-quality, randomized-controlled trial and the real-world clinical data evaluating the impact of CGM use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The optimal method of monitoring glycemia in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the predictive performance of HbA1c, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics, and alternative biochemical markers of glycemia to predict obstetric and neonatal outcomes.Research Design and Methods: One hundred fifty-seven women from the Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Women With Type 1 Diabetes in Pregnancy Trial (CONCEPTT) were included in this prespecified secondary analysis. HbA1c, CGM data, and alternative biochemical markers (glycated CD59, 1,5-anhydroglucitol, fructosamine, glycated albumin) were compared at ∼12, 24, and 34 weeks' gestation using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to predict pregnancy complications (preeclampsia, preterm delivery, large for gestational age, neonatal hypoglycemia, admission to neonatal intensive care unit).Results: HbA1c, CGM metrics, and alternative laboratory markers were all significantly associated with obstetric and neonatal outcomes at 24 weeks' gestation. More outcomes were associated with CGM metrics during the first trimester and with laboratory markers (area under the ROC curve generally <0.7) during the third trimester. Time in range (TIR) (63-140 mg/dL [3.5-7.8 mmol/L]) and time above range (TAR) (>140 mg/dL [>7.8 mmol/L]) were the most consistently predictive CGM metrics. HbA1c was also a consistent predictor of suboptimal pregnancy outcomes. Some alternative laboratory markers showed promise, but overall, they had lower predictive ability than HbA1c.Conclusions: HbA1c is still an important biomarker for obstetric and neonatal outcomes in type 1 diabetes pregnancy. Alternative biochemical markers of glycemia and other CGM metrics did not substantially increase the prediction of pregnancy outcomes compared with widely available HbA1c and increasingly available CGM metrics (TIR and TAR). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]