Search

Objective: This study aimed to determine the relationship between spousal deployment and postpartum depression diagnosis among U.S. military wives, accounting for the timing of deployment with respect to pregnancy and delivery. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the association between spousal deployment and postpartum depression among pregnant wives of active-duty service members. Electronic medical records for 161,454 births occurring between 2004 and 2009 were used to define postpartum depression. Three non-mutually exclusive exposure variables were created to categorize deployments as occurring before, during, or after the infant's delivery. A multivariable logistic regression model mutually adjusted for these exposure variables was fitted, producing an odds ratio for each of the three timing categories. Results: A modest significant association was detected only in those whose husbands deployed in pregnancy and returned after delivery (i.e., deployed during delivery) [odds ratio (OR) 1.10, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.15]. An interactive effect between preexisting depression or anxiety and deployment during delivery was also detected in the data (OR 1.13, 95 % CI 1.07-1.20 for those without a preexisting diagnosis; OR 0.87, 95 % CI 0.80-0.95 for those with a preexisting diagnosis). Conclusion: Health care providers should continue to be aware of spousal deployment as a military-unique stressor in this population and rigorously screen for potential symptoms of postpartum depression, especially among those whose husbands are absent at delivery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Infants in utero during the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 may have been negatively affected by maternal stress. Studies to date have produced contradictory results. Methods: Data for this retrospective cohort study were obtained from the Department of Defense Birth and Infant Health Registry and included up to 164,743 infants born to active-duty military families. Infants were considered exposed if they were in utero on September 11, 2001, while the referent group included infants gestating in the same period in the preceding and following year (2000 and 2002). We investigated the association of this acute stress during pregnancy with the infant health outcomes of male:female sex ratio, birth defects, preterm birth, and growth deficiencies in utero and in infancy. Results: No difference in sex ratio was observed between infants in utero in the first trimester of pregnancy on September 11, 2001 and infants in the referent population. Examination of the relationship between first-trimester exposure and birth defects also revealed no significant associations. In adjusted multivariable models, neither preterm birth nor growth deficiencies were significantly associated with the maternal exposure to the stress of September 11 during pregnancy. Conclusion: The findings from this large population-based study suggest that women who were pregnant during the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 had no increased risk of adverse infant health outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents a study which examines the birth outcomes among military men and women after exposure recorded open-air burn pits during and before pregnancy. It states that the prevalence of preterm birth and birth defects was examined using the electronic data from the U.S. Defense Manpower Data Center and Department of Defense Birth and Infant Health Registry. Results show inconsistency in the relationship between burn pit exposure and birth defects.

Objective To update a previous assessment of birth defects among infants born to active duty U.S. military mothers who received the 2009–2010 pandemic H1N1 vaccine, in comparison to the 2008–2009 seasonal influenza vaccine, during pregnancy. Here, we updated the previous comparative analyses with a more refined definition for birth defects using an additional year of follow-up data from both inpatient and outpatient medical encounters. Methods The study population included 15,510 live born infants born to active duty mothers vaccinated during pregnancy with either the 2009–2010 pandemic H1N1 vaccine (n = 9033) or the 2008–2009 seasonal influenza vaccine (n = 6477). Birth defect cases were defined as those infants who received a birth defect diagnosis on one inpatient record or two outpatient records on different days within the first year of life. Multivariable logistic regression models were conducted to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between birth defects and maternal vaccination during pregnancy with pandemic H1N1 vaccine versus seasonal influenza vaccine. Results Infants born to mothers vaccinated during pregnancy with the pandemic H1N1 vaccine, versus the seasonal influenza vaccine, were not at increased odds of birth defects in univariable (OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.95–1.34) or multivariable (OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.96–1.35) models. Findings were not significant when further limited to first trimester exposure. Multivariable models were adjusted for infant sex and plurality; maternal age, race/ethnicity, marital status, service branch, military rank, and occupation; timing of vaccination; and receipt of vaccination(s) not routinely recommended during pregnancy. Conclusion Comparable to our previous analyses assessing birth defects diagnosed at birth, no significant association was found between the pandemic H1N1 vaccination during pregnancy and birth defects, versus the seasonal influenza vaccine. These findings are reassuring and provide additional support for H1N1-containing seasonal influenza vaccination during pregnancy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Anthrax vaccine adsorbed (AVA) vaccination is compulsory for United States military servicemembers with operational indicators. As the number of female military servicemembers has increased, so has the chance of inadvertent AVA vaccination during pregnancy. Building upon past analyses assessing AVA vaccination during pregnancy and birth defects risk, this study sought to determine if inadvertent AVA vaccination during pregnancy is significantly associated with risk of birth defects after adjusting for other potential risk factors. Methods The study population included 126,839 liveborn infants in the Department of Defense Birth and Infant Health Registry (2003–2010). Mothers were categorized by AVA vaccination exposure timing in relation to pregnancy. Infant medical records were assessed for birth defect diagnoses within the first year of life. Multivariable logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Infants of first trimester AVA vaccinated mothers versus receipt at any other time point (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.93–1.29) were not at higher odds of birth defects in adjusted models. Infants of mothers vaccinated prepregnancy versus postpregnancy had a 1.11 (95% CI, 1.01–1.22) higher odds of having a birth defect. Vaccination postpregnancy versus never vaccinated revealed a 10% lower odds of birth defects (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.83–0.99). Conclusions No strong associations between inadvertent AVA vaccination during pregnancy and birth defects risk were observed. Marginal associations between prepregnancy vaccination or never vaccinated women and birth defects risk was observed when compared to postpregnancy vaccination. These findings may be due to self-selection and/or reverse causation bias when assessing comparisons with postpregnancy vaccination, and a “healthy worker” effect when assessing comparisons with women never vaccinated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]