Search

BACKGROUND: Assisted reproductive technology (ART) has allowed couples with a family history of a monogenic genetic disease, or a disease-carrying gene, to reduce the chance of them having a child with the genetic disorder. This is achieved by genetically testing the embryos using an advanced process called preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic or single gene disorders (PGT-M), such as Huntington's disease or cystic fibrosis. This current terminology (PGT-M) has replaced the formerly-known preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). During PGT-M, one or more embryo cells are biopsied and analysed for genetic or chromosomal anomalies before transferring the embryos to the endometrial cavity. Biopsy for PGT-M can be performed at day 3 of cleavage-stage embryo development when the embryo is at the six- to the eight-cell stage, with either one or two blastomeres being removed for analysis. Biopsy for PGT-M can also be performed on day 5 of the blastocyst stage of embryo development when the embryo has 80 to 100 cells, with five to six cells being removed for analysis. Day 5 biopsy has taken over from day 3 biopsy as the most widely-used biopsy technique; however, there is a lack of summarised evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that assesses the effectiveness and safety of day 5 biopsy compared to day 3 biopsy. Since biopsy is an invasive process, whether it is carried out at day 3 or day 5 of embryo development may have different impacts on further development, implantation, pregnancy, live birth and perinatal outcomes.OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and harms of day 5 embryo biopsy, in comparison to day 3 biopsy, in PGT-M in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles.SEARCH METHODS: We searched the following electronic bibliographic databases in December 2021 to identify relevant RCTs: the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group (CGFG) Specialised Trials Register; CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO. We also handsearched grey literature, such as trial registers, relevant journals, reference lists, Google Scholar, and published conference abstracts.SELECTION CRITERIA: Eligible RCTs compared day 5 versus day 3 embryo biopsy for PGT-M. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane. The primary review outcomes were live births and miscarriages. We calculated outcomes per woman/couple randomised and reported odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).MAIN RESULTS: We included one RCT involving 20 women. The evidence was of very low certainty; the main limitations of the study were serious risk of bias due to lack of blinding of study personnel, and imprecision. We are uncertain whether day 5 embryo biopsy compared to day 3 biopsy has an effect on live births (OR 1.50, 95% CI 0.26 to 8.82; 1 RCT, 20 women; very low-certainty evidence). The evidence suggests that if the chance of live birth following day 3 biopsy was assumed to be 40%, then the chance with day 5 biopsy is between 15% and 85%. It is also uncertain whether day 5 embryo biopsy compared to day 3 biopsy has an effect on miscarriages (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.05 to 18.57; 1 RCT, 20 women; very low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether day 5 embryo biopsy compared to day 3 biopsy has an effect on other secondary outcome measures, including viable intrauterine pregnancies (OR 2.25, 95% CI 0.38 to 13.47; 1 RCT, 20 women; very low-certainty evidence), ectopic pregnancies (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.01 to 3.85; 1 RCT, 20 women; very low-certainty evidence), stillbirths (OR not estimable as no events in either group; 1 RCT, 20 women; very low-certainty evidence) or termination of pregnancies (OR 3.32, 95% CI 0.12 to 91.60; 1 RCT, 20 women; very low-certainty evidence). No studies reported on gestational age at birth, birthweight, neonatal mortality and major congenital anomaly.AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We are uncertain if there is a difference in live births and miscarriages, viable intrauterine pregnancies, ectopic pregnancies, stillbirths or termination of pregnancies between day 5 and day 3 embryo biopsy for PGT-M. There was insufficient evidence to draw any conclusions regarding other adverse outcomes. The results should be interpreted with caution, as the evidence was of very low certainty due to limited studies, high risk of bias in the included study, and an overall low level of precision.

One challenge in the field of in-vitro fertilisation is the selection of the most viable embryos for transfer. Morphological quality assessment and morphokinetic analysis both have the disadvantage of intra-observer and inter-observer variability. A third method, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), has limitations too, including its invasiveness and cost. We hypothesised that differences in aneuploid and euploid embryos that allow for model-based classification are reflected in morphology, morphokinetics, and associated clinical information.In this retrospective study, we used machine-learning and deep-learning approaches to develop STORK-A, a non-invasive and automated method of embryo evaluation that uses artificial intelligence to predict embryo ploidy status. Our method used a dataset of 10 378 embryos that consisted of static images captured at 110 h after intracytoplasmic sperm injection, morphokinetic parameters, blastocyst morphological assessments, maternal age, and ploidy status. Independent and external datasets, Weill Cornell Medicine EmbryoScope+ (WCM-ES+; Weill Cornell Medicine Center of Reproductive Medicine, NY, USA) and IVI Valencia (IVI Valencia, Health Research Institute la Fe, Valencia, Spain) were used to test the generalisability of STORK-A and were compared measuring accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).Analysis and model development included the use of 10 378 embryos, all with PGT-A results, from 1385 patients (maternal age range 21-48 years; mean age 36·98 years [SD 4·62]). STORK-A predicted aneuploid versus euploid embryos with an accuracy of 69·3% (95% CI 66·9-71·5; AUC 0·761; positive predictive value [PPV] 76·1%; negative predictive value [NPV] 62·1%) when using images, maternal age, morphokinetics, and blastocyst score. A second classification task trained to predict complex aneuploidy versus euploidy and single aneuploidy produced an accuracy of 74·0% (95% CI 71·7-76·1; AUC 0·760; PPV 54·9%; NPV 87·6%) using an image, maternal age, morphokinetic parameters, and blastocyst grade. A third classification task trained to predict complex aneuploidy versus euploidy had an accuracy of 77·6% (95% CI 75·0-80·0; AUC 0·847; PPV 76·7%; NPV 78·0%). STORK-A reported accuracies of 63·4% (AUC 0·702) on the WCM-ES+ dataset and 65·7% (AUC 0·715) on the IVI Valencia dataset, when using an image, maternal age, and morphokinetic parameters, similar to the STORK-A test dataset accuracy of 67·8% (AUC 0·737), showing generalisability.As a proof of concept, STORK-A shows an ability to predict embryo ploidy in a non-invasive manner and shows future potential as a standardised supplementation to traditional methods of embryo selection and prioritisation for implantation or recommendation for PGT-A.US National Institutes of Health.

To evaluate potential variation in the euploid blastocyst rate and live birth rate (LBR) per single frozen euploid blastocyst transfer, among 4 unique United States reproductive genetics laboratories. Analyses were limited to blastocysts derived from vitrified donor oocytes, to minimize variation in oocyte quality.Retrospective cohort study from 2016 to 2020.Donor Egg Bank Database.Patients undergoing in vitro fertilization with donor oocytes. We excluded patients with uterine factor, male factor, or surgically extracted sperm. Only healthy women34 years old were accepted as oocyte donors.Next generation sequencing platforms for chromosomal analysis MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Euploid blastocyst rate and LBR per euploid transfer. Secondary outcomes included the rate of aneuploidy, mosaic calls, biochemical pregnancy loss, and miscarriage rate.A total of 2,633 embryos were included. Four laboratories had200 embryos tested. Euploid blastocyst rate was significantly higher in laboratory A (73.6%) vs. B (63.3%), C (60.9%), and D (52.3%). Mosaic rate was significantly lower for Laboratories B (2.8%) and C (5.5%) vs. Laboratories A (9.9%) and D (11.5). The LBR was significantly higher in laboratory A (58.73%) vs. laboratory D (47.3%). There were no significant differences in the implantation or miscarriage rate among laboratories.In this large study, controlling for oocyte quality, some preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) laboratories report a significantly higher euploid blastocyst rate with concurrent higher LBR. This type of comparison is important as it provides insight into the role of the PGT-A process in outcomes. Further research is needed to evaluate the differences in laboratory techniques and bioinformatic algorithms accounting for variable outcomes across PGT-A laboratories.

Hemophilia A (HA) is an X-linked recessive bleeding disease caused by a deficiency or dysfunction of blood coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). Available treatment to replenish the missing factor may not reach a good outcome for all patients because of potential complications that include the development of inhibitor antibodies directed against factor VIII. Therefore, the prevention of transmitting pathogenic mutations to the next generation is the best solution for this disease. Preimplantation genetic testing for a monogenic disorder (PGT-M) has become a standard method to prevent the transmission of monogenic heritable disease. The gold standard of the molecular technique used for PGT-M nowadays is the co-amplification of the polymorphic microsatellite linkage markers that use microsatellite DNA technique that overcomes the limitation of other methods. The important issue of this technique is the definition of markers that are specific for each allele on different loci. Each gene locus needs a characteristic design to allow accurate diagnosis that can be applied on PGT-M due to the limited quantity of DNA available. Here we present our study of four specific self-designed linked polymorphic markers applied on screening the embryos before implantation for hemophilia A families in Vietnam.In this study, we investigated the feasibility of application and diagnostic value of 4 STR loci (FXS1108, DXS9897, F8int22, DXS9901) in the intragenic or neighbouring regions of the F8 gene. 35 hemophilia A families were recruited for STR analysis to define at least two characteristic heterologous markers for each family and 12 cases of pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT-M) for carrier mothers were performed.All 4 of these loci (FXS1108, DXS9897, F8int22, DXS9901) were found practical and useful for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT-M). All 12 cases of PGT-M using the method had informative STR results and correct diagnosis was achieved. 9 out of the 12 mothers (75%) were implanted with 1-2 thawed embryos after the biopsy resulting in the birth of 5 healthy babies (55%).We conclude that specific 4 STR markers for rapid pre-implantation genetic testing of hemophilia A can be successfully applied with high confidence and accuracy in clinical settings. The results of the study provide solid evidence confirming that the microsatellite DNA technique is a highly reliable method, suitable for hemophilia A families wishing to determine carrier status or having healthy babies.

This study aimed to evaluate the rates of euploidy, aneuploidy, and mosaicism in preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) cycles from chromosomal inversion carriers. In addition, this work also focused on assessing the impact of some contributors on the incidence of parental originating aneuploidy and mosaicism.This retrospective review enrolled chromosomal inversion carrier couples of whom the females were under 38 years old undergoing PGT-SR at a single academic reproductive center. Subgroups were divided according to the gender of carriers, the inversion type, and the semen parameters of male carriers (male factor infertility (MF) or non-MF). Patient demographics, cycle characteristics, and PGT-SR outcomes were compared among subgroups.A total of 71 PGT-SR cycles from 57 inversion carrier couples were included for analysis. Among the 283 blastocysts, 48.4% were identified as euploidy, 27.9% as aneuploidy, and the remaining 23.7% as mosaicism. Only 32.9% of aneuploid embryos and 1.5% of mosaic embryos involved the parental inversion chromosomes. Notably, the female inversion carriers seemed to produce more parental originating aneuploid embryos than male inversion carriers (45.5% vs 23.9%, p = 0.044).The type of inversion and sperm parameters of male chromosomal inversion carriers did not affect the ploidy status of embryos. The incidence of parental originating aneuploidy in inversion carrier couples is lower than expected. For male chromosomal inversion carriers with normal sperm condition whose female partners are under 38 years old, natural conception combined with prenatal diagnosis could be provided as an option during fertility counseling.

Is there any imbalance in the sex ratio at the blastocyst stage of human embryos? And what is the sex ratio in euploid, transferred, implanted blastocysts and at birth?Embryos from 646 women undergoing 921 preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles from September 2017 to February 2020 were included. Data from the chromosomal constitution of 2637 biopsied blastocysts were retrospectively analysed. Trophectoderm samples were analysed by next-generation sequencing. Embryos were categorized as euploid, mosaic or aneuploid. A total of 548 blastocysts diagnosed as euploid were warmed and transferred in a subsequent single-embryo transfer cycle.The blastocyst sex ratio was skewed in favour of male sex with 53.1% (1401/2637) of blastocysts diagnosed as male and 46.9% (1236/2637) as female (sex ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.22). Following biopsy and PGT-A, 41.2% (1086/2637) of blastocysts were classified as euploid, 7.7% (202/2637) as mosaic and 51.2% (1349/2637) as aneuploid. More chromosome euploidy was observed among female than male blastocysts (adjusted odds ratio 1.29, 95% CI 1.08-1.55) after adjusting for female age, male age and gonadotrophin dose. Euploid blastocysts were comparable between the sexes (sex ratio 0.99, 95% CI 0.88-1.11). No significant differences were observed between the sexes in implantation (sex ratio 0.86, 95% CI 0.68-1.08), miscarriage (sex ratio 1, 95% CI 0.51-1.97) or live birth rate (sex ratio 0.85, 95% CI 0.66-1.08).More male than female embryos develop to the blastocyst stage. Male blastocysts exhibit a higher aneuploidy rate. The capacity to implant and lead to a live birth is similar between the sexes.

To evaluate the current evidence of pregnancy outcomes among couples with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) with abnormal karyotypes vs. those with normal karyotypes and among couples with RPL and abnormal karyotypes after receiving expectant management vs. preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD).Systematic review and meta-analysis.Academic medical centers.Pregnancy outcomes in 6,301 couples with RPL who conceived without medical intervention in 11 studies were analyzed. However, only 2 studies addressed the outcomes of couples with RPL and abnormal karyotypes after expectant management (75 cases) vs. PGD (50 cases).None.The pregnancy outcomes in couples with RPL with abnormal and normal karyotypes across included studies were evaluated.Compared with those with a normal karyotype, a significantly lower first pregnancy live birth rate (LBR) was found in couples with RPL with abnormal karyotypes (58.5% vs. 71.9%; odds ratio [OR], 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46-0.65; ICouples with RPL and abnormal karyotypes had a higher miscarriage rate than couples with normal karyotypes but achieved a noninferior accumulated LBR through multiple conception attempts. In couples with RPL and abnormal karyotypes, PGD treatment did not increase the accumulated LBR but markedly reduced miscarriage rate compared with expectant management.

To propose a working framework for patients with inherited eye diseases presenting to ophthalmologists who are interested in assisted reproductive technology and preimplantation genetic testing.Retrospective chart review and case series of three families with inherited eye diseases who successfully underwent preimplantation genetic testing, in vitro fertilization, and birth of unaffected children.Preimplantation genetic testing was performed for three families with different inherited eye diseases, which included autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa, autosomal recessive achromatopsia, and X-linked Goltz syndrome. Preimplantation genetic testing led to the identification of unaffected embryos, which were then selected for in vitro fertilization and resulted in the birth of unaffected children.A close collaboration between patients, families, ophthalmologists, reproductive genetic counselors, and reproductive endocrinology and infertility specialists is the ideal model for taking care of patients interested in preimplantation genetic testing for preventing the transmission of inherited eye diseases.

Can models based on artificial intelligence predict embryonic ploidy status or implantation potential of euploid transferred embryos? Can the addition of clinical features into time-lapse monitoring (TLM) parameters as input data improve their predictive performance?A single academic fertility centre, retrospective cohort study. A total of 773 high-grade euploid and aneuploid blastocysts from 212 patients undergoing preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) between July 2016 and July 2021 were studied for ploidy prediction. Among them, 170 euploid embryos were single-transferred and included for implantation analysis. Five machine learning models and two types of deep learning networks were used to develop the predictive algorithms. The predictive performance was measured using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), in addition to accuracy, precision, recall and F1 score.The most predictive model for ploidy prediction had an AUC, accuracy, precision, recall and F1 score of 0.70, 0.64, 0.64, 0.50 and 0.56, respectively. The DNN-LSTM model showed the best predictive performance with an AUC of 0.78, accuracy of 0.77, precision of 0.79, recall of 0.86 and F1 score of 0.83. The predictive power was improved after the addition of clinical features for the algorithms in ploidy prediction and implantation prediction.Our findings emphasize that clinical features can largely improve embryo prediction performance, and their combination with TLM parameters is robust to predict high-grade euploid blastocysts. The models for ploidy prediction, however, were not highly predictive, suggesting they cannot replace preimplantation genetic testing currently.

The worldwide demand of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is still growing. However, chromosomal mosaic results greatly challenge the clinical practice. The recently published PGDIS Position Statement on the Transfer of Mosaic Embryos is the third PGDIS position statement on how to deal with embryos diagnosed as chromosomal mosaics (CM) and, one of many attempts of different societies and working groups to provide a guideline for clinicians, laboratories, clinics, and genetic counselors. But still, as in previous statements, many issues remained unresolved. Moreover, from our point of view, the question how to deal with embryos diagnosed as CM, consisting of two or more karyological cell lines cannot be separated from all the other aspects of PGT-A including its accuracy. The paucity of clearcut indications for PGT-A and evidence of benefit as well as an overall cost-benefit assessment is given below.

STUDY QUESTION Is there an efficient and cost-effective detection platform for different genetic conditions about embryos? SUMMARY ANSWER A multifunctional haplotyping-based preimplantation genetic testing platform was provided for detecting different genetic conditions. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Genetic disease and chromosomal rearrangement have been known to significantly impact fertility and development. Therefore, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), monogenic disorders (PGT-M) and structural rearrangements (PGT-SR), a part of ART, has been presented together to minimize the fetal genetic risk and increase pregnancy rate. For patients or their families who are suffering from chromosome abnormality, monogenic disease, unexplained repeated spontaneous abortion or implantation failure, after accepting genetic counseling, they may be suggested to accept detection from more than one PGT platforms about the embryos to avoid some genetic diseases. However, PGT platforms work through different workflows. The high costliness, lack of material and long-time operation of combined PGT platforms limit their application. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION All 188 embryonic samples from 43 families were tested with HaploPGT platform, and most of their genetic abnormalities had been determined by different conventional PGT methods beforehand. Among them, there were 12 families only carrying structural rearrangements (115 embryos) in which 9 families accepted implantation and 5 families had normal labor ART outcomes, 7 families only carrying monogenic diseases (26 embryos) and 3 families carrying both structural rearrangements and monogenic diseases (26 embryos). Twelve monopronucleated zygotes (1PN) samples and 9 suspected triploid samples were collected from 21 families. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTINGS, METHODS Here, we raised a comprehensive PGT method called HaploPGT, combining reduced representation genome sequencing, read-count analysis, B allele frequency and haplotyping analysis, to simultaneously detect different genetic disorders in one single test. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE With 80 million reads (80M) genomic data, the proportion of windows (1 million base pairs (Mb)) containing two or more informative single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) sites was 97.81%, meanwhile the genotyping error rate stabilized at a low level (2.19%). Furthermore, the informative SNPs were equally distributed across the genome, and whole-genomic haplotyping was established. Therefore, 80M was chosen to balance the cost and accuracy in HaploPGT. HaploPGT was able to identify abnormal embryos with triploid, global and partial loss of heterozygosity, and even to distinguish parental origin of copy number variation in mosaic and non-mosaic embryos. Besides, by retrospectively analyzing 188 embryonic samples from 43 families, HaploPGT revealed 100% concordance with the available results obtained from reference methods, including PGT-A, PGT-M, PGT-SR and PGT-HLA. LIMITATIONS, REASON FOR CAUTION Despite the numerous benefits HaploPGT could bring, it still required additional family members to deduce the parental haplotype for identifying balanced translocation and monogenic mutation in tested embryos. In terms of PGT-SR, the additional family member could be a reference embryo with unbalanced translocation. For PGT-M, a proband was normally required. In both cases, genomic information from grandparents or parental siblings might help for haplotyping theoretically. Another restriction was that haploid, and diploid resulting from the duplication of a haploid, could not be told apart by HaploPGT, but it was able to recognize partial loss of heterozygosity in the embryonic genome. In addition, it should be noted that the location of rearrangement breakpoints and the situation of mutation sites were complicated, which meant that partial genetic disorders might not be completely detected. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS HaploPGT is an efficient and cost-effective detection platform with high clinical value for detecting genetic status. This platform could promote the application of PGT in ART, to increase pregnancy rate and decrease the birth of children with genetic diseases. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81873478, to L.H.), National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC1003100, to L.H.), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (Grant 2022JJ30414, to P.X.), Hunan Provincial Grant for Innovative Province Construction (2019SK4012) and the Scientific Research Foundation of Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of China International Trust & Investment Corporation (CITIC)-Xiangya (YNXM-201910). Haplotyping analysis has been licensed to Basecare Co., Ltd. L.K., Y.M., K.K., D.Z., N.L., J.Z. and R.D. are Basecare Co., Ltd employees. The other authors declare no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.

Can preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangement (PGT-SR) based on low-coverage next-generation sequencing (NGS) accurately discriminate between normal and carrier embryos of reciprocal translocation (RecT) and Robertsonian translocation (RobT)?A total of 109 couples with RecT or RobT were included in this study. The ages, bad obsteric histories (BOH), blood karyotype and IVF cycle information, including the number of cumulus-oocyte complexes, metaphase II oocytes, two pronuclei oocytes and blastocysts were recorded. 0.1 × whole genome sequencing (WGS) of embryos followed by copy number variation (identifying unbalanced/balanced) and 2 × WGS of parents and embryos followed by haplotype analysis (discriminating between normal and carrier) were carried out in PGT-SR cycles. The embryos without translocation were transferred and clinical outcomes evaluated.Among all the couples in this study, 67 patients had RecT and 42 had RobT. After unbalanced and balanced detection, 103 balanced embryos underwent a further normal and carrier discrimination procedure, and 53 normal embryos were identified. Finally, 32 normal embryos were transferred, with an ongoing pregnancy rate of 46.88% (15/32). All ongoing pregnancies underwent amniocentesis, and the amninocentesis karyotyping results showed 100% concordance with PGT-SR diagnosis.Our low-coverage NGS-based PGT-SR method can accurately discriminate between normal and carrier status of balanced embryos. The method is cost-effective and has broad clinical applicability.

To estimate the aneuploidy rates in young women with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) before treatment and poor ovarian response (POR) postretrieval.Retrospective cohort study.A single academically-affiliated fertility clinic.Autologous frozen embryo transfer cycles from December 2014 to June 2020 were reviewed. Demographic and clinical factors that impact outcomes were used for propensity score matching (PSM) in a ratio of 2:1 and 4:1 for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy pre-cycle DOR and POR after stimulation, respectively.None.Aneuploid rates, defined as the number of aneuploid blastocysts divided by the number of biopsied blastocysts per cycle. No euploid embryos to transfer, defined as all cohorts of embryos being aneuploid.A total of 383 women diagnosed with DOR were compared with matched controls. Aneuploid rates did not differ significantly between the two groups (42.2% vs. 41.7%; RR = 1.06; 95% CI, 0.95-1.06). No differences were identified in live birth rates per transfer between women with and without DOR after euploid single-embryo transfers (56.0% and 60.5%, respectively). An additional PSM analysis to assess aneuploidy rates for patients with POR (5 oocytes) vs. those without it, resulted in similar rates of aneuploidy between the two comparison groups (41.1% vs. 44%, R = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.91-1.14). The prevalence of cycles with "no euploid embryos" in the POR cohort was higher (26% vs. 13%); however, rates of cases with a single embryo available for biopsy were lower in the DOR group, relative to controls (11% vs. 31%).Young women diagnosed with DOR or POR exhibited equivalent aneuploidy rates and live birth rates per euploid embryo transfer in a large matched population, based on age, body mass index, and IVF cycle initiation. The lower percentage of cycles with no euploid embryo available for transfer in DOR and POR patients is because of the decreased total number of oocytes/developing embryos and not because of increased aneuploidy rates in these groups.

To identify specific likelihoods that an embryo will be classified as appropriate for transfer after preimplantation genetic testing for detection of a monogenic disorder (PGT-M), with or without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), separated by inheritance pattern.Retrospective chart review of 181 selected PGT-M cycles performed at CooperGenomics in 2018 or 2019. For each cycle, the following main outcome data was collected: the number of embryos classified as affected with monogenic disease, the number detected to be chromosomally abnormal, the number that were recombinant, the number that had no result, and if applicable, the number which were aneuploid.There were significantly fewer embryos appropriate to consider for transfer when PGT-A was included for autosomal recessive and X-linked disorders. There were also fewer for autosomal dominant disorders, though this was not statistically significant. When PGT-A was not included, 45.8% of autosomal dominant, 69% of autosomal recessive, and 47.8% of X-linked embryos were appropriate to consider for transfer. When PGT-A analysis was included, 29% of autosomal dominant, 41% of autosomal recessive, and 22% of X-linked embryos were appropriate to consider for transfer. 96.8% of women elect to include PGT-A when pursuing PGT-M.This study resulted in specific likelihoods that an embryo would be found appropriate for clinicians and patients to consider for transfer based on the inheritance pattern of the monogenic disease being tested for and whether aneuploidy analysis was included.

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) content can reflect the state of mosaic embryos.The study included 1669 blastocysts derived from 394 PGT-A cycles between January 2018 and December 2020, in which preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy was performed and mtDNA content was determined. The standard deviation (SD) of whole genomic sequencing data was calculated for quality control. mtDNA content was measured as the proportion of mtDNA to genomic DNA. 1558 blastocysts with SD values less than 4.0 and mtDNA values less than 0.4% were selected for statistical analysis.The mtDNA content of the PGT mosaic group was significantly higher than that of the PGT normal group (P 0.001). Twenty-six mosaic embryos were transferred, and the results were as follows: 2 out of 26 had undergone a spontaneous miscarriage, 15 were not pregnant, and 9 resulted in a live birth. There were significant differences in the mtDNA content between the miscarriage/non-pregnancy group and the live birth group (**P 0.01; ***P 0.001). There was no mosaic embryo with more than 0.157% mtDNA content found in the live birth group.This study demonstrates that mtDNA analysis has the ability to identify mosaic embryos with high developmental potential. It can be a valuable supplementary index for the selection of mosaic embryos for transfer. Larger studies with a greater sample size will further our understanding of the relationships between metabolic activity and mosaicism.

Preimplantation Genetic Testing - Aneuploidy (PGT-A) for embryo selection has undergone significant advancements in the last 2 decades and yet many studies still fail to demonstrate any clinical benefits over traditional embryo morphology selection (Mo-S). To understand this conundrum, we performed a multi-center clinical study of PGT-A patients, where Mo-S and euploid selection (Eu-S) outcomes were directly compared.All suitable blastocysts were biopsied and analyzed for chromosome copy number. Outcomes (positive beta hCG, implantation, ongoing pregnancy, and live birth rates) for Eu-S were compared to Mo-S using single embryo transfers.Compared to Eu-S embryos, Mo-S embryos resulted in significant reduction of outcomes for positive beta hCG (p = 0.0005), implantation (p = 0.0008), ongoing pregnancy (p = 0.0046), livebirth (p = 0.0112), babies per transfer (p = 0.0112), and babies per embryo transferred (p = 0.0112). Morphology selection resulted in patients of all age groups having non-euploid embryos chosen for transfer. Post-hoc evaluation of individual clinic performances showed variable transfer outcomes that could potentially confound the true benefits of PGT-A.Embryo chromosome status is central to improved embryo transfer outcomes and sole reliance on current morphology-based selection practices, without Eu-S, will always compromise outcomes. Often overlooked but a major effector of successful PGT-A outcomes are individual clinic performances.

Can a non-invasive embryo transfer strategy provide a reference for embryo selection to be established?Chromosome sequencing of 345 paired blastocyst culture medium and whole blastocyst samples was carried out and a non-invasive embryo grading system was developed based on the random forest machine learning algorithm to predict blastocyst ploidy. The system was validated in 266 patients, and a blinded prospective observational study was conducted to investigate clinical outcomes between machine learning-guided and traditional non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (niPGT-A) analyses. Embryos were graded as A, B or C according to their euploidy probability levels predicted by non-invasive chromosomal screening (NICS).Higher live birth rate was observed in A- versus C-grade embryos (50.4% versus 27.1%, P = 0.006) and B- versus C-grade embryos (45.3% versus 27.1%, P = 0.022) and lower miscarriage rate in A- versus C-grade embryos (15.9% versus 33.3%, P = 0.026) and B- versus C-grade embryos (14.3% versus 33.3%, P = 0.021). The embryo utilization rate was significantly higher through the machine learning strategy than the conventional dichotomic judgment of euploidy or aneuploidy in the niPGT-A analysis (78.8% versus 57.9%, P0.001). Better outcomes were observed in A- and B-grade embryos versus C-grade embryos and higher embryo utilization rates through the machine learning strategy compared with traditional niPGT-A analysis.A machine learning guided embryo grading system can be used to optimize embryo selection and avoid wastage of potential embryos.

Thalassaemia is the commonest monogenic disease and causes a health and economic burden worldwide. Karyomapping can be used for pre-implantation genetic testing of monogenic disorders (PGT-M). This study applied karyomapping in two PGT-M cycles and made a comparison to polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Two families at risk of having beta-thalassaemia-haemoglobin E disease offspring decided to join the project and informed consent was obtained. Karyomapping results of family A (beta-thalassaemia (c.41_42delTCTT)-Hb E (c.26GA) disease) revealed four normal, two beta-thalassaemia traits, one Hb E trait and six affected. Three embryos exhibited unbalanced chromosomes. One normal male embryo was transferred. Karyomapping results of family B (beta-thalassaemia (c.17AT)-Hb E (c.26GA) disease) revealed six Hb E traits and three affected. Three embryos were chromosomally unbalanced. One Hb E trait embryo was transferred. Two successful karyomapping PGT-M were performed, including deletion and single-base mutations. Karyomapping provides accuracy as regards the protocol and copy number variation which is common in pre-implantation embryos. Impact Statement

STUDY QUESTION Is it possible to develop a comprehensive pipeline for all-in-one preimplantation genetic testing (PGT), also suitable for parents-only haplotyping and, for the first time, third-party reproduction? SUMMARY ANSWER Optimized reduced representation sequencing (RRS) by GENType, along with a novel analysis platform (Hopla), enables cheap, accurate and comprehensive PGT of blastocysts, even without the inclusion of additional family members or both biological parents for genome-wide embryo haplotyping. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Several haplotyping strategies have proven to be effective for comprehensive PGT. However, these methods often rely on microarray technology, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) or a combination of strategies, hindering sample throughput and cost-efficiency. Moreover, existing tools (including other RRS-based strategies) require both prospective biological parents for embryo haplotyping, impeding application in a third-party reproduction setting. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This study included a total of 257 samples. Preliminary technical validation was performed on 81 samples handpicked from commercially available cell lines. Subsequently, a clinical validation was performed on a total of 72 trophectoderm biopsies from 24 blastocysts, tested for a monogenic disorder (PGT-M) (n = 15) and/or (sub)chromosomal aneuploidy (PGT-SR/PGT-A) (n = 9). Once validated, our pipeline was implemented in a diagnostic setting on 104 blastocysts for comprehensive PGT. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Samples were whole-genome amplified (WGA) and processed by GENType. Quality metrics, genome-wide haplotypes, b-allele frequencies (BAFs) and copy number profiles were generated by Hopla. PGT-M results were deduced from relative haplotypes, while PGT-SR/PGT-A results were inferred from read-count analysis and BAF profiles. Parents-only haplotyping was assessed by excluding additional family members from analysis and using an independently diagnosed embryo as phasing reference. Suitability for third-party reproduction through single-parent haplotyping was evaluated by excluding one biological parent from analysis. Results were validated against reference PGT methods. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Genome-wide haplotypes of single cells were highly accurate (mean > 99%) compared to bulk DNA. Unbalanced chromosomal abnormalities (>5 Mb) were detected by GENType. For both PGT-M as well as PGT-SR/PGT-A, our technology demonstrated 100% concordance with reference PGT methods for diverse WGA methods. Equally, for parents-only haplotyping and single-parent haplotyping (of autosomal dominant disorders and X-linked disorders), PGT-M results were fully concordant. Furthermore, the origin of trisomies in PGT-M embryos was correctly deciphered by Hopla. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Intrinsic to linkage-analysis strategies, de novo single-nucleotide variants remain elusive. Moreover, parents-only haplotyping is not a stand-alone approach and requires prior diagnosis of at least one reference embryo by an independent technology (i.e. direct mutation analysis) for haplotype phasing. Using a haplotyping approach, the presence of a homologous recombination site across the chromosome is biologically required to distinguish meiotic II errors from mitotic errors during trisomy origin investigation. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS We offer a generic, fully automatable and accurate pipeline for PGT-M, PGT-A and PGT-SR as well as trisomy origin investigation without the need for personalized assays, microarray technology or WGS. The unique ability to perform single-parent assisted haplotyping of embryos paves the way for cost-effective PGT in a third-party reproduction setting. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) L.D.W. is supported by the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO; 1S74619N). L.R. and B.M. are funded by Ghent University and M.B., S.S., K.T., F.V.M. and A.D. are supported by Ghent University Hospital. Research in the N.C. lab was funded by Ghent University, VIB and Kom op Tegen Kanker. A.D.K and N.C. are co-inventors of patent WO2017162754A1. The other authors have no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.

PURPOSE: Successful identification of transcriptomic biomarkers within human IVF embryos may enhance implantation prediction and provide insights not available through conventional embryo biopsy genomic analysis. We demonstrate proof-of-concept for a methodology to assess overall embryo gene expression using qPCR with blastocoel fluid-conditioned media by examining the comparative presence of apoptotic genes. METHODS: Blastocoel fluid-conditioned media were collected from 19 embryos (11 euploid) following trophectoderm biopsy of day-5 ICSI-IVF blastocysts. Media were assessed for apoptotic gene expression via qPCR. Statistical analysis of gene expression was conducted via Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks test (overall expression), multivariate ANOVA (functional gene groups), and chi-square test of independence (gene level). RESULTS: A significantly higher overall apoptotic gene expression within euploid versus aneuploid embryos (p = 0.001) was observed. There was significantly (p = 0.045) higher expression of pro-apoptotic genes between implanted and not implanted embryos. Pro- vs. anti-apoptotic gene expression from all euploid embryos approached significance (p = 0.053). The ploidy status-based claim is further substantiated at the gene level with significantly higher expression of BBC3 (p = 0.012) and BCL2L13 (p = 0.003) in euploid embryos compared to aneuploid embryos. CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary study, we demonstrate that (1) qualitative analysis of blastocoel fluid-conditioned media gene expression is possible, (2) global trends of expression are potentially related to clinical outcomes, and (3) gene-level expression trends exist and may be another viable metric for comparative expression between samples. The presence of statistical significance within analyses conducted with this sample size warrants a larger investigation of blastocoel fluid-conditioned media as an additional beneficial predictive tool for future IVF cases. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10815-022-02510-3.

For 3 decades, couples at increased risk for a genetic disorder have been offered preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). Simultaneously, PGT for aneuploidy (PGT-A) to improve in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes was introduced, but evidence of value-added remains inconsistent. Recently, lower genetic testing costs and shorter turnaround time have reinvigorated PGT-A. Additionally, a shift from blastomere (day 3) to blastocyst (day 5) transfer and embryo freezing advances support PGT without the time constraints of immediate transfer. PGT-A transformed from a time-constrained analysis of 1-2 cells to an "add on" study for all IVF. But should it be offered to all IVF patients? And if not, under what conditions? Pre-debate polling found 64% opposed to PGT for all IVF cycles with concerns voiced about cost, informed consent, and a "slippery slope". Leaving aside the inconsistent evidence of IVF improvement whether measured as miscarriage or livebirths with PGT-A, the debaters grappled with patient and provider desires versus the ethical concerns for the unborn child. However, the audience was not swayed; two thirds remained opposed to PGT for all IVF cycles.

What is the reproductive potential of embryos that achieve blastulation on day 7 followed by preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) for infertility patients with slow embryo development?This was a retrospective cohort study in a private IVF clinic of consecutive female infertility patients (n = 2966) aged 24-48 (36.3 ± 3.8) years who underwent frozen embryo transfer (FET) of a single euploid blastocyst.The women underwent single euploid FET of an embryo that achieved blastulation on day 5 (n = 1880), day 6 (n = 986) or day 7 (n = 100). Day 7 embryos resulted in lower implantation and live birth rates compared with both day 5 and day 6 embryos (P 0.001). The day 5, day 6 and day 7 groups had 68.5%, 55.2% and 36.0% live birth rates, respectively. The day 7 group was older than the day 5 group (P 0.001); comparing age-matched cohorts, the day 7 group still had lower implantation and live birth rates (P 0.0001 and P 0.001, respectively). Embryo grade was unrelated to live birth rates. Day 7 embryos of expansion grade 5 or 6 or trophectoderm grade A were more likely to be euploid compared with expansion grade 3 or trophectoderm grade B.Euploid day 7 embryos represented reduced implantation potential, even when controlling for maternal age. Of all day 7 embryos that underwent PGT-A, euploidy was associated with expansion grade 5 or 6 and trophectoderm grade A. These results can help providers manage patient expectations in cases where infertile women have slow embryo development.

Assisted reproduction technology has two significant problems: low success rates and multiple pregnancies. Because of these problems, the priority in IVF clinics is to develop a potential diagnostic test that can be used to select the embryos with the ultimate developmental competence. Aneuploidy screening as embryo selection criteria will ensure that the transferred embryos are euploid and high implantation rate. We hypothesize that aneuploidy in human preimplantation embryos could be discriminated by their amino acid metabolism profile in the spent culture media. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy results and spent embryo culture medium amino acid content were analyzed for 58 couples. The nextgeneration sequencing technique was used and coupled with TE biopsy. Forty euploid and 71 aneuploid blastocysts were evaluated. Embryos were cultured individually until day 5 or 6 of embryo development. Spent culture medium was collected after finishing the culture. There was no statistical difference between D3 and D5 embryo morphology between euploid and aneuploid embryos (p > .05). Eight amino acids, including SER, GLY, HIS, ARG, THR, ALA, PRO, and TYR, were detected in the culture medium from the blank control group, euploid group, and aneuploid group. Only TYR amino acid concentration was found significantly higher in the aneuploid group compared to the euploid group (p < .003). Tyrosine amino acid levels equal to and above 76.38 mmol/L could be considered aneuploid. Aneuploid embryos demonstrate altered amino acid turnover in vitro relative to euploid counterparts. A noninvasive method of amino acid profiling will be of value as a tool for routine preimplantation embryo selection among all patient groups.

PURPOSE: Does re-biopsy of blastocysts classified as abnormal (ABN) due to segmental aneuploidy (SA) have clinical utility? METHODS: The live birth (LB) outcomes of mosaic SAs, compared to other categories, were determined after transfer of 3084 PGT-A tested blastocysts. An initial 12-month trial thawed 111 blastocysts classified as ABN due to a SA for clinical re-biopsy, with an additional 58 from a subsequent 16-month revised protocol. Where re-biopsy failed to corroborate the original classification, blastocysts were reported as mosaic and suitable for clinical use. RESULTS: Segmental mosaics had a LB rate (54.1%) which was indistinguishable from that of euploid (53.7%). Numeric mosaics had statistically significant (P

Hemoglobinopathies constitute some of the most common inherited disorders worldwide. Manifestations are very severe, patient management is difficult and treatment is not easily accessible. Preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) is a valuable reproductive option for hemoglobinopathy carrier-couples as it precludes the initiation of an affected pregnancy. PGT-M is performed on embryos generated by assisted reproductive technologies and only those found to be free of the monogenic disorder are transferred to the uterus. PGT-M has been applied for 30 years now and β-thalassemia is one of the most common indications. PGT may also be applied for human leukocyte antigen typing to identify embryos that are unaffected and also compatible with an affected sibling in need of hemopoietic stem cell transplantation. PGT-M protocols have evolved from PCR amplification-based, where a small number of loci were analysed, to whole genome amplification-based, the latter increasing diagnostic accuracy, enabling the development of more generic strategies and facilitating multiple diagnoses in one embryo. Currently, numerous PGT-M cycles are performed for the simultaneous diagnosis of hemoglobinopathies and screening for chromosomal abnormalities in the embryo in an attempt to further improve success rates and increase deliveries of unaffected babies.

Should whole-genome investigations be considered systematically before a complex chromosomal abnormality preimplantation genetic testing for structural chromosomal rearrangements (PGT-SR) management is carried out using conventional cytogenetic techniques?A male carrying a putative rare interchromosomal reciprocal insertion (IRI) 46,XY,ins(14;?)(q11;?).ish der(14)ins(14;22)(q11.2;q11.2q11.2)(xcp14+,xcp22+,N25+,3'TRA/D+),der(22)ins(22;14)(q11.2;q11.2q11.2)(xcp22+,xcp14+,N25-,5'TRA/D+), and his partner were referred to our centre for preimplantation genetic testing analysis after three spontaneous miscarriages. Whole-genome sequencing was used to distinguish between the proposed IRI and an alternative explanation of reciprocal translocation. Fluorescence in-situ hybridization was used to detect all chromosome segments involved in this chromosomal rearrangement, to identify transferable normal and balanced embryos.Whole-genome sequencing allowed the determination of the number of chromosomal breakpoints involved in chromosomal rearrangement between chromosomes 14 and 22. Finally, only two breakpoints were identified instead of four in IRI rearrangements, which suggests a reciprocal translocation rearrangement. A probe strategy was established to highlight all chromosomal imbalances, whether IRI or reciprocal translocation, and preimplantation genetic testing cycles were achieved.Conventional cytogenetic techniques are not capable of identifying all complex chromosomal rearrangements, especially those involving centromeric regions and short arms of acrocentric chromosomes. The advent of new sequencing technologies has allowed for a better appreciation of genome complexity. In this study, whole-genome analysis provided additional information to explain the occurrence of genomic events and confirmed that the initial diagnosis of IRI identified by conventional cytogenetic techniques was, in fact, a simple reciprocal translocation. A reliable PGT-SR strategy was proposed for this couple to achieve their parental project.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) improves the clinical outcome in patients with advanced maternal age (AMA), recurrent miscarriages (RM), and recurrent implantation failure (RIF). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study from a single IVF center and a single genetics laboratory. One hundred seventy-six patients undergoing PGT-A were assigned to three groups: an AMA group, an RM group, and a RIF group. Two hundred seventy-nine patients that did not undergo PGT-A were used as controls and subgrouped similarly to the PGT-A cohort. For the PGT-A groups, trophectoderm biopsy was performed and array comparative genomic hybridization was used for PGT-A. Clinical outcomes were compared with the control groups. RESULTS: In the RM group, we observed a significant decrease of early pregnancy loss rates in the PGT-A group (18.1% vs 75%) and a significant increase in live birth rate per transfer (50% vs 12.5%) and live birth rate per patient (36% vs 12.5%). In the RIF group, a statistically significant increase in the implantation rate per transfer (69.5% vs 33.3%) as well as the live birth rate per embryo transfer (47.8% vs 19%) was observed. In the AMA group, a statistically significant reduction in biochemical pregnancy loss was observed (3.7% vs 31.5%); however, live birth rates per embryo transfer and per patient were not significantly higher than the control group. CONCLUSION: Our results agree with recently published studies, which suggest caution in the universal application of PGT-A in women with infertility. Instead, a more personalized approach by choosing the right candidates for PGT-A intervention should be followed.

Embryos are diagnosed as mosaic if their chromosomal copy number falls between euploid and aneuploid. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of mosaicism on global gene expression. This study included 42 blastocysts that underwent preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) and were donated for IRB approved research. Fourteen blastocysts were diagnosed as mosaic with Next-generation Sequencing (NGS). Three NGS diagnosed euploid embryos, and 25 aneuploid embryos (9 NGS, 14 array Comparative Genomic Hybridization, 2 Single Nucleotide Polymorphism array) were used as comparisons. RNA-sequencing was performed on all of the blastocysts. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were calculated using DESeq2/3.5 (R Bioconductor Package) with p 0.05 considered significantly differentially expressed. Pathway analysis was performed on mosaic embryos using EnrichR with p 0.05 considered significant. With euploid embryo gene expression used as a control, 12 of 14 mosaic embryos had fewer DEGs compared to aneuploid embryos involving the same chromosome. On principal component analysis (PCA), mosaic embryos mapped separately from aneuploid embryos. Pathways involving cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis were the most disrupted within mosaic embryos. Mosaic embryos have decreased disruption of global gene expression compared to aneuploid embryos. This study was limited by the small sample size, lack of replicate samples for each mosaic abnormality, and use of multiple different PGT-A platforms for the diagnosis of aneuploid embryos.

PURPOSE: To determine the application value of next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case–control study on a cohort of frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles following preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) between 2014 and 2017. Cycles that produced live births or early miscarriages were divided into live birth group (n = 76) or miscarriage group (n = 19), respectively. The NGS-based aneuploidy screening was performed on the multiple displacement amplification (MDA) products of the embryonic trophectoderm biopsy samples that were cryopreserved following PGT-M. RESULTS: In the live birth group, 75% (57/76) embryos were euploid and 14.5% (11/76) were aneuploid. The remaining 10.5% (8/76) embryos were NGS-classified mosaic with the high- (≥ 50%) and low-level (

To determine whether singleton pregnancy achieved after preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is associated with a higher risk of adverse perinatal outcomes than in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) singleton pregnancy.A retrospective cohort study.A university-affiliated fertility center.This cohort study included singleton live births resulting from PGT (n = 232) and IVF/ICSI singleton pregnancies (n = 2,829) with single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer. Multiple baseline covariates were used for propensity score matching, yielding 214 PGT singleton pregnancies matched to 617 IVF/ICSI singleton pregnancies.Trophectoderm biopsy.The primary outcome was gestational hypertension, and various clinical perinatal secondary outcomes related to maternal and neonatal health were measured.Compared with IVF/ICSI singleton pregnancy, PGT singleton pregnancy was associated with a significantly higher risk of gestational hypertension (adjusted odds ratio, 2.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.32, 5.05). In the matched sample, the risk of gestational hypertension remained higher with PGT singleton pregnancy (odds ratio, 2.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.04, 5.22) than with IVF/ICSI singleton pregnancy. No statistical differences were noted in any other measured outcomes between the groups.The perinatal outcomes of PGT and IVF/ICSI singleton pregnancies were similar except for the observed potentially higher risk of gestational hypertension with PGT singleton pregnancy. However, because the data on PGT singleton pregnancies are limited, this conclusion warrants further investigation.

With the COVID-19 pandemic prompting predictions of a “grief pandemic,” rates and risks for Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD) warrant further investigation. Data were collected online from 1470 respondents between October 2020 and July 2021. Shorter time since death, deaths of siblings and “others,” and deaths from accidents and homicides were positively associated with potential risk of probable PGD; deaths of extended family and from dementia were negatively associated with probable PGD. When compared directly to deaths from COVID-19, natural causes of death were associated with lower potential risk of probable PGD, while deaths from unnatural causes were associated with higher potential risk.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the value of long-read sequencing for preimplantation haplotype linkage analysis. METHODS: The genetic material of the three β-thalassemia mutation carrier couples was sequenced using single-molecule real-time sequencing in the 7.7-kb region of the HBB gene and a 7.4-kb region that partially overlapped with it to detect the presence of 17 common HBB gene mutations in the Chinese population and the haplotypes formed by the continuous array of single-nucleotide polymorphisms linked to these mutations. By using the same method to analyze multiple displacement amplification products of embryos from three families and comparing the results with those of the parents, it could be revealed whether the embryos carry disease-causing mutations without the need for a proband. RESULTS: The HBB gene mutations of the three couples were accurately detected, and the haplotype linked to the pathogenic site was successfully obtained without the need for a proband. A total of 68.75% (22/32) of embryos from the three families successfully underwent haplotype linkage analysis, and the results were consistent with the results of NGS-based mutation site detection. CONCLUSION: This study supports long-read sequencing as a potential tool for preimplantation haplotype linkage analysis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10815-022-02415-1.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and nature of human embryonic aneuploidy based on the preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), the distribution of aneuploidy across the individual chromosomes, and their relationship to maternal age. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted at a single center. The study includes subjects who opted for PGT-A in their in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle from 2016 to 2020. PGT-A was performed on 1501 embryos from 488 patients in 535 cycles. PGT-A was performed using NGS-based technique on Ion Torrent PGM (Life Technologies). Analysis was performed to determine the (i) frequency of the aneuploidy, (ii) the chromosome most commonly affected, (iii) relationship between maternal age and the rate of aneuploidy, and (iv) incidence of segmental aneuploidy. RESULTS: The overall frequency of aneuploidy was observed to be 46.8%. The incidence of aneuploidy rate was ~ 28% at maternal age

STUDY QUESTION Can non-invasive imaging with fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) detect metabolic differences in euploid versus aneuploid human blastocysts? SUMMARY ANSWER FLIM has identified significant metabolic differences between euploid and aneuploid blastocysts. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Prior studies have demonstrated that FLIM can detect metabolic differences in mouse oocytes and embryos and in discarded human blastocysts. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This was a prospective observational study from August 2019 to February 2020. Embryo metabolic state was assessed using FLIM to measure the autofluorescence metabolic factors nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide dehydrogenase together with nicotinamide adenine phosphate dinucleotide dehydrogenase (NAD(P)H) and flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD). Eight metabolic FLIM parameters were obtained from each blastocyst (four for NAD(P)H and four for FAD): short (T1) and long (T2) fluorescence lifetime, fluorescence intensity (I) and fraction of the molecules engaged with enzymes (F). The redox ratio (NAD(P)H-I)/(FAD-I) was also calculated for each image. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS This study was performed at a single academically affiliated centre where there were 156 discarded frozen blastocysts (n = 17 euploids; 139 aneuploids) included. Ploidy status was determined by pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). Discarded human blastocysts were compared using single FLIM parameters. Additionally, inner cell mass (ICM) and trophectoderm (TE) were also evaluated. Multilevel models were used for analysis. A post-hoc correction used Benjamini–Hochberg’s false discovery rate, at a q-value of 0.05. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Comparing euploid (n = 17) versus aneuploid (n = 139) embryos, a significant difference was seen in NAD(P)H-F (P < 0.04), FAD-I (P < 0.04) and redox ratio (P < 0.05). Euploid ICM (n = 15) versus aneuploid ICM (n = 119) also demonstrated significantly different signatures in NAD(P)H-F (P < 0.009), FAD-I (P < 0.03) and redox ratio (P < 0.03). Similarly, euploid TE (n = 15) versus aneuploid TE (n = 119) had significant differences in NAD(P)H-F (P < 0.0001) and FAD-I (P < 0.04). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION This study utilized discarded human blastocysts, and these embryos may differ metabolically from non-discarded human embryos. The blastocysts analysed were vitrified after PGT-A biopsy and it is unclear how the vitrification process may affect the metabolic profile of blastocysts. Our study was also limited by the small number of rare donated euploid embryos available for analysis. Euploid embryos are very rarely discarded due to their value to patients trying to conceive, which limits their use for research purposes. However, we controlled for the imbalance with the bootstrap resampling analysis. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS These findings provide preliminary evidence that FLIM may be a useful non-invasive clinical tool to assist in identifying the ploidy status of embryos. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The study was supported by the Blavatnik Biomedical Accelerator Grant at Harvard University. Becker and Hickl GmbH and Boston Electronics sponsored research with the loaning of equipment for FLIM. D.J.N. is an inventor on patent US20170039415A1. There are no other conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A

To determine whether glutamine consumption is associated with embryo quality and aneuploidy, a retrospective study was conducted in an in vitro fertilization center. Spent embryo culture media from patients undergoing assisted reproduction treatment and preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) were obtained on day 3 of in vitro culture. Embryo quality was assessed for cell number and fragmentation rate. PGT for aneuploidy was performed using whole genome amplification and DNA sequencing. Glutamine levels in spent embryo culture media were analyzed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. The results demonstrated that glutamine was a primary contributor to the classification of the good-quality and poor-quality embryos based on the orthogonal partial least-squares discriminant analysis model. Glutamine consumption in the poor-quality embryos was significantly higher than that in the good-quality embryos (P P

PURPOSE: To assess the costs and benefits of carrier screening and preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for recessive autosomal monogenic disorders for couples attempting assisted conception. METHODS: A simulated first full cycle for women less than 35 years transferring embryos one at a time. The effect of testing on pregnancy outcomes was evaluated for different reporting scenarios. A Monte Carlo method utilising 1000 trials for 10,000 couples, testing 4, 16 and 38 genes, was used to assess the numbers likely to be at high risk and to estimate the incremental cost of screening and PGT to avoid an affected child. RESULTS: PGT for high-risk couples: testing embryos only for the monogenic condition avoided 1 affected pregnancy for 4 cycles started. Combined with testing for chromosomal aneuploidy: ranking test results avoided 1 adverse pregnancy (affected, biochemical, clinical miscarriage) from 3 cycles started; 1 in 2 when excluding from transfer all embryos with an abnormal test result, within 1 in 25 fewer women achieving an unaffected live birth. Carrier screening for 4, 16 and 38 gene scenarios, where 1:250, 1:196 and 1:29 couples were at high risk: the incremental cost to prevent 1 affected live birth was estimated to be less than GBP 1,150,000 (US $1,587,000)

PURPOSE: Aneuploidy is one genetic factor leading to the failure of embryo implantation. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the day of embryo blastulation and the ploidy status of embryo, to aid in selecting embryos with the most likelihood of of being euploid in a noninvasive way. METHODS: This retrospective study recruited women undergoing preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for aneuploidy (PGT-A) with trophectoderm biopsy from January 2019 to December 2020. The ploidy status of embryos was determined by next-generation sequencing (NGS). RESULTS: Altogether, 2531 blastocysts from 839 PGT-A cycles were evaluated. The euploid rate of day 5 blastocysts was significantly higher than that of day 6 blastocysts, either from the same ovarian stimulation (OS) cycles (49.9% vs 35.7%, P