1. Comparison of the standard GnRH antagonist protocol and the luteal phase estradiol/GnRH antagonist priming protocol in poor ovarian responders
- Author
-
Ahmet Erdem, Mehmet Erdem, Ilknur Mutlu, Ismail Guler, and Mehmet Firat Mutlu
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,endocrine system ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.drug_class ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Stimulation ,Fertilization in Vitro ,Luteal Phase ,Luteal phase ,Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone ,03 medical and health sciences ,Hormone Antagonists ,0302 clinical medicine ,Human fertilization ,Ovulation Induction ,Pregnancy ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Treatment Failure ,reproductive and urinary physiology ,Retrospective Studies ,030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine ,In vitro fertilisation ,Estradiol ,business.industry ,Pregnancy Outcome ,General Medicine ,medicine.disease ,Embryo transfer ,030104 developmental biology ,Endocrinology ,Female ,Gonadotropin ,business ,Live birth ,hormones, hormone substitutes, and hormone antagonists - Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM The aim of the study was to compare the luteal estradiol patch/GnRH antagonists priming protocol (LPP) with the standard GnRH antagonist protocol in poor ovarian responders (PORs) in terms of the outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS IVF outcomes of 265 cycles in 265 patients (106 in the LPP group, 159 in the standard GnRH antagonist group) were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS Mean length of stimulation (11.4 ± 2.7 vs. 10.0 ± 2.7 days; P < 0.05) and the total gonadotropin dose (3403 ± 1060 vs. 2984 ± 1112) used were significantly greater in the LPP group than in the standard GnRH antagonist protocol group. The mean number of oocytes retrieved (3.5 ± 2.6 vs. 3.7 ± 2.8), the number of mature oocytes (2.8 ± 2.2 vs. 2.6 ± 2.2), fertilization rates (65% vs. 62%), the number of embryos transferred (1.6 ± 0.6 vs. 1.7 ± 0.6), and implantation rates (16% vs. 13%) were similar. The cancellation rate did not significantly differ between the groups (9.4% vs. 13.2%). There were no significant differences in the clinical pregnancy (11.3% vs. 13.2%) or live birth rates per patient (3.8% vs. 9.4%) and clinical pregnancy (18.8% vs. 22.6%) or live birth rates per embryo transfer (6.3% vs. 12.9%) between the groups. CONCLUSION LPP does not improve IVF outcomes when compared with the standard GnRH antagonist protocol in PORs.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF