Search

Your search keyword '"Mattei, Alberto"' showing total 6 results
Start Over Author "Mattei, Alberto" Topic pregnancy
6 results on '"Mattei, Alberto"'

1. Case report: vertical transmission of Plesiomonas shigelloides. Is it time to strengthen information on safety concerns for raw seafood dietary exposure in pregnancy?

Author

Cavaliere, Anna Franca, Perelli, Federica, Mattei, Alberto, Dal Poggetto, Paolo, Marchi, Laura, Vidiri, Annalisa, Turrini, Irene, Aquilini, Donatella, Brunelli, Tamara, Scambia, Giovanni, Straface, Gianluca, Orfeo, Luigi, and Vasarri, Pierluigi

Subjects
FOODBORNE diseases, SEAFOOD, NEONATAL infections, FISH pathogens, NEONATAL death, AEROMONAS diseases, NEONATAL diseases
Abstract

The consumption of raw seafood, generally considered to be a healthy food, has greatly increased worldwide. Pathogens of fish can cause foodborne illnesses in humans, especially following the consumption of raw seafood from contaminated water. Foodborne illness in pregnant women is seldom the cause of neonatal infection, but, as in the reported cases, it has been associated with a high degree of morbidity and mortality. We present the case of a newborn with septicemia and meningitis caused by Plesiomonas shigelloides acquired via the transplacental route. There was a maternal history of ingestion of raw seafood 1 week prior to delivery. A few similar cases are described in the existing literature, which reports 7 neonatal deaths. Therefore, the primary objective of this paper is to highlight the fact that the popularity of raw seafood such as sushi, sashimi, and oysters, requires an improvement in dietary advice regarding unsafe choices in pregnancy in order to avoid preventable foodborne diseases, sometimes fatal for the newborn. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Fertility Sparing Treatments in Endometrial Cancer Patients: The Potential Role of the New Molecular Classification.

Author

Cavaliere, Anna Franca, Perelli, Federica, Zaami, Simona, D'Indinosante, Marco, Turrini, Irene, Giusti, Marco, Gullo, Giuseppe, Vizzielli, Giuseppe, Mattei, Alberto, Scambia, Giovanni, Vidiri, Annalisa, and Signore, Fabrizio

Subjects
ENDOMETRIAL cancer, FERTILITY, CANCER patients, HUMAN fertility, FERTILITY preservation, CANCER treatment
Abstract

Endometrial cancer is the most frequent gynecological malignancy, and, although epidemiologically it mainly affects advanced age women, it can also affect young patients who want children and who have not yet completed their procreative project. Fertility sparing treatments are the subject of many studies and research in continuous evolution, and represent a light of hope for young cancer patients who find themselves having to face an oncological path before fulfilling their desire for motherhood. The advances in molecular biology and the more precise clinical and prognostic classification of endometrial cancer based on the 2013 The Cancer Genome Atlas classification allow for the selection of patients who can be submitted to fertility sparing treatments with increasing oncological safety. It would also be possible to predict the response to hormonal treatment by investigating the state of the genes of the mismatch repair. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Laparoscopic removal of benign uterine and adnexal masses during pregnancy.

Author

Mattei, Alberto, Giannone, Ettore, Carlo Di Renzo, Gian, Gerli, Sandro, and Gerli

Subjects
*LAPAROSCOPIC surgery, *UTERINE cancer, *PREGNANCY
Abstract

ObjectiveTo report three cases of laparoscopic treatment of benign uterine and adnexal masses during pregnancy and to discuss the feasibility of such procedures. InterventionsA pedunculated myoma, an ovarian teratoma and a luteal ovarian cyst were laparoscopically treated during pregnancy. The patients' pregnancies were at 8, 7 and 11 weeks of gestation, respectively. The procedure times were 72, 65 and 53 min, while the estimated blood losses were 60, 100 and 80 ml, respectively. No complications were observed and the pregnancies were completed with a vaginal delivery in the first two cases and with a Caesarean section in the third case. ConclusionsLaparoscopic management of gynaecological masses during pregnancy is still controversial. This report confirms that laparoscopy might be considered to be a safe, reliable and advantageous technique for the management of selected gynaecological pathologies during pregnancy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
1999
Full Text
View/download PDF

4. Adenomyosis. what the patient needs

Author

Paolo Vercellini, Alessio Perandini, Paola Viganò, Annalisa Di Cello, Renato Seracchioli, Eliana Fuggetta, Elena Lavarini, Serena Pinzauti, Roberta Venturella, Valentino Remorgida, Saverio Arena, Laura Gabbi, Mauro Busacca, Umberto Leone Roberti Maggiore, Luca Pagliardini, Luigi Alio, Francesco Maneschi, Michele Vignali, Maria Grazia Porpora, Luca Mannini, Eugenio Solima, Allegra Barbasetti di Prun, Valentino Bergamini, Massimo Candiani, Errico Zupi, Elisa Geraci, Lucia Lazzeri, G. Alabiso, Gabriele Centini, Federica Perelli, Letizia Zannoni, Edgardo Somigliana, Caterina Exacoustos, Domenico Incandela, Luigi Fedele, Antonio Maiorana, Ludovico Muzii, Alberto Mattei, Claudia Tosti, Nicola Berlanda, Fulvio Zullo, Ludovica Imperiale, Stefano Luisi, Alabiso, G, Alio, L, Arena, S, Barbasetti di Prun, A, Bergamini, V, Berlanda, N, Busacca, M, Candiani, M, Centini, G, Di Cello, A, Exacoustos, C, Fedele, L, Fuggetta, E, Gabbi, L, Geraci, E, Imperiale, L, Lavarini, E, Incandela, D, Lazzeri, L, Luisi, S, Maiorana, A, Maneschi, F, Mannini, L, Mattei, A, Muzii, L, Pagliardini, L, Perandini, A, Perelli, F, Pinzauti, S, Porpora, Mg, Remorgida, V, Leone Roberti Maggiore, U, Seracchioli, R, Solima, E, Somigliana, E, Tosti, C, Venturella, R, Vercellini, P, Viganò, P, Vignali, M, Zannoni, L, Zullo, F, Zupi, E, Alabiso, Giulia, Alio, Luigi, Arena, Saverio, Barbasetti di Prun, Allegra, Bergamini, Valentino, Berlanda, Nicola, Busacca, Mauro, Candiani, Massimo, Centini, Gabriele, Di Cello, Annalisa, Exacoustos, Caterina, Fedele, Luigi, Fuggetta, Eliana, Gabbi, Laura, Geraci, Elisa, Imperiale, Ludovica, Lavarini, Elena, Incandela, Domenico, Lazzeri, Lucia, Luisi, Stefano, Maiorana, Antonio, Maneschi, Francesco, Mannini, Luca, Mattei, Alberto, Muzii, Ludovico, Pagliardini, Luca, Perandini, Alessio, Perelli, Federica, Pinzauti, Serena, Porpora, Maria Grazia, Remorgida, Valentino, Leone Roberti Maggiore, Umberto, Seracchioli, Renato, Solima, Eugenio, Somigliana, Edgardo, Tosti, Claudia, Venturella, Roberta, Vercellini, Paolo, Vigano', Paola, Vignali, Michele, Zannoni, Letizia, Zullo, Fulvio, Zupi, Errico, and Zupi, E.

Subjects
Cyclic pelvic pain, diagnosis, Endometriosis, adenomyosis, treatment, expert opinion, Multimodal Imaging, Preconception Care, 0302 clinical medicine, Pelvic pain, Obstetrics and gynaecology, Pregnancy, Medicine, Endometriosi, Ultrasonography, 030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine, medicine.diagnostic_test, Adenomyosis, Diagnosis, Pregnancy desire, Treatment, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Obstetrics, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Pregnancy Complication, Algorithm, Adenomyosis, Diagnosis, Pelvic pain, Pregnancy desire, Treatment, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, Needs assessment, Female, medicine.symptom, Algorithms, Needs Assessment, Human, Diagnosi, Adult, medicine.medical_specialty, Clinical Decision-Making, Physical examination, Hysteroscopy, 03 medical and health sciences, Humans, Intensive care medicine, Physical Examination, business.industry, medicine.disease, Pregnancy Complications, pelvic pain, pregnancy desire, Settore MED/40 - Ginecologia e Ostetricia, Adenomyosi, business
Abstract

A panel of experts in the field of endometriosis expressed their opinions on management options in a 28-year-old patient, attempting pregnancy for 1 year, with severe cyclic pelvic pain and with clinical examination and imaging techniques suggestive of adenomyosis. Many questions this paradigmatic patient may pose to the clinician are addressed, and all clinical scenarios are discussed. A decision algorithm derived from this discussion is also proposed.

Published
2016

5. A multicenter randomized, controlled study comparing laparoscopic versus minilaparotomic myomectomy: short-term outcomes

Author

Daniela Marconi, Francesco Manguso, Tiziana Russo, Errico Zupi, Angela Falbo, Stefano Palomba, Fulvio Zullo, Alberto Mattei, Achille Tolino, Palomba, Stefano, Zupi, Errico, Russo, Tiziana, Falbo, Angela, Marconi, Daniela, Tolino, Achille, Manguso, Francesco, Mattei, Alberto, and Zullo, Fulvio

Subjects
Adult, medicine.medical_specialty, Fibroid, Blood Loss, Surgical, minilaparotomy, law.invention, surgery, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Randomized controlled trial, Gynecologic Surgical Procedure, Pregnancy, law, Uterine Neoplasm, Humans, Medicine, Laparoscopy, myomectomy, Laparotomy, Leiomyoma, medicine.diagnostic_test, business.industry, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Surgery, Term (time), Treatment Outcome, Reproductive Medicine, Uterine Neoplasms, Myometrium, Female, business, Human
Abstract

To compare the laparoscopic and minilaparotomic approaches for symptomatic uterine leiomyomas treatment in terms of safety and feasibility.Randomized controlled trial.Three university departments of obstetrics and gynecology of Catanzaro, Rome, and Florence, Italy.One hundred thirty-six women wishing to conceive and candidate for myomectomy due to symptomatic uterine leiomyomas or unexplained infertility.Myomectomy through laparoscopic or minilaparotomic access.Surgical outcomes.Leiomyoma enucleation and hysterotomy suturing times were significantly shorter after minilaparotomic myomectomy, whereas the degree of surgical difficulty was significantly higher for the laparoscopic myomectomy. Intraoperative blood loss, variation in hemoglobin levels, quantity of pain control drugs used postoperatively, and hospitalization were significantly lower in the laparoscopic group than in the minilaparotomic one. Our surgical outcomes were significantly influenced by specific investigational centers involved, and by leiomyoma dimensions and localizations. This last variable is the strongest predictor of surgical outcome.Laparoscopic and minilaparotomic approaches to myomectomy are two safe and minimally invasive surgical procedures. A careful evaluation of the dimensions and localizations of fibroids are needed to address to the right choice to the best approach.

Published
2007

6. A multicenter randomized, controlled study comparing laparoscopic versus minilaparotomic myomectomy: reproductive outcomes

Author

Achille Tolino, Daniela Marconi, Angela Falbo, Stefano Palomba, Alberto Mattei, Francesco Manguso, Errico Zupi, Fulvio Zullo, Tiziana Russo, Palomba, Stefano, Zupi, Errico, Falbo, Angela, Russo, Tiziana, Marconi, Daniela, Tolino, Achille, Manguso, Francesco, Mattei, Alberto, Zullo, Fulvio, Palomba, S., Zupi, E., Falbo, A., Russo, T., Marconi, D., Manguso, F., Mattei, A., and Zullo, F.

Subjects
Infertility, Adult, medicine.medical_specialty, Pregnancy Rate, Reproductive medicine, laparoscopy, Abortion, minilaparotomy, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Obstetrics and gynaecology, Gynecologic Surgical Procedure, Pregnancy, Fertility, fibroid, infertility, leiomyomas, medicine, Uterine Neoplasm, Humans, Unexplained infertility, Gynecology, Laparotomy, Leiomyoma, Obstetrics, business.industry, Pregnancy Outcome, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Myoma, medicine.disease, Pregnancy rate, Reproductive Medicine, Uterine Neoplasms, Myometrium, Female, business, Infertility, Female, Human
Abstract

Objective: To assess the reproductive outcomes after minilaparotomic and laparoscopic myomectomy in patients wishing to conceive. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Departments of obstetrics and gynecology of the universities of Catanzaro, Rome, and Florence, Italy. Patient(s): One hundred thirty-six women with symptomatic uterine leiomyomas or unexplained infertility. Intervention(s): Laparoscopic and minilaparotomic myomectomy. Main Outcome Measure(s): Pregnancy, abortion, and live-birth rates. Result(s): Between the laparoscopic and minilaparotomic groups no difference was observed in cumulative pregnancy, live-birth, and abortion rates, whereas pregnancy and live-birth rates per cycle, and time to first pregnancy and live-birth were significantly higher in the laparoscopic than in the minilaparotomic group. Categorizing the patients according to surgical indication for myomectomy, cumulative pregnancy rate, pregnancy, and live-birth rates per cycle, and time to first pregnancy and live-birth were significantly better after laparoscopic myomectomy in symptomatic patients, whereas all reproductive outcomes were similar between the two groups in patients with unexplained infertility. Conclusion(s): Minilaparotomic and laparoscopic myomectomy improves in a similar manner the reproductive outcomes in patients with unexplained infertility, whereas the laparoscopic approach provides the best benefits in fertile patients with symptomatic leiomyomas. (Fertil Steril� 2007;88:933–41. � 2007 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

Published
2007

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results