Search

In this work the sensitivity of summer Probabilistic Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts (PQPF) to alternative ensemble generation methods over southeastern South America is examined. A perturbed initial condition ensemble using the breeding technique, a multimodel ensemble and a pragmatic ensemble based on spatial shifts of the forecast fields have been used to generate calibrated PQPF over the selected region and the results were evaluated using the Brier Skill Score. Results show that calibrated PQPF quality exhibits sensitivity to the ensemble system used and this sensitivity is mainly related with the resolution component of the Brier Skill Score. For the 24 h lead time, the pragmatic approach shows surprisingly good results while for the 48 h lead time, the best results are obtained with the multimodel ensemble. The combination of the spatial shift technique with the multimodel and with the perturbed initial conditions ensemble has also been evaluated and resulted in an increase of the PQPF skill at all lead times. Copyright © 2011 Royal Meteorological Society [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Different techniques for obtaining probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasts (PQPFs) over South America are tested during the 2002-2003 warm season. They have been applied to a regional ensemble system which uses the breeding technique to generate initial and boundary conditions perturbations. This comparison involves seven algorithms and also includes experiments to select an adequate size for the training period. Results show that the sensitivity to different calibration strategies is small with the exception of the rank histogram algorithm. The inclusion of the ensemble spread or the use of different ensemble members for the computation of probabilities shows almost no improvement with respect to probabilistic forecasts computed using the ensemble mean. This is basically due to the strong relationship between precipitation error and its amount. Copyright © 2011 Royal Meteorological Society [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this work, the quality of several probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasts (PQPFs) is examined. The analysis is focused over South America during a 2-month period in the warm season. Several ways of generating and calibrating the PQPFs have been tested, using different ensemble systems and single-model runs. Two alternative calibration techniques (static and dynamic) have been tested. To take into account different precipitation regimes, PQPF performance has been evaluated over two regions: the northern part of South America, characterized by a tropical regime, and the southern part, where synoptic-scale forcing is stronger. The results support the adoption of such area separation, since differences in the precipitation regimes produce significant differences in PQPF performance. The more skillful PQPFs are the ones obtained after calibration. PQPFs derived from the ensemble mean also show higher skill and better reliability than those derived from the single ensemble members. The performance of the PQPFs derived from both ensemble systems is similar over the southern part of the region; however, over the northern part the superensemble approach seems to achieve better results in both reliability and skill. Finally, the impact of using Climate Prediction Center morphing technique (CMORPH) estimates to calibrate the precipitation forecast has been explored since the more extensive coverage of this dataset would allow its use over areas where the rain gauge coverage is insufficient. Results suggest that systematic biases present in the CMORPH estimates produce only a slight degradation of the resulting PQPF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper describes the lessons learned from the implementation of a regional ensemble data assimilation and forecast system during the intensive observing period of the Remote sensing of Electrification, Lightning, And Mesoscale/microscale Processes with Adaptive Ground Observations (RELAMPAGO) field campaign (central Argentina, November–December 2018). This system is based on the coupling of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model and the Local Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter (LETKF). It combines multiple data sources both global and locally available like high-resolution surface networks, AMDAR data from local aircraft flights, soundings, AIRS retrievals, high-resolution GOES-16 wind estimates, and local radar data. Hourly analyses with grid spacing of 10 km are generated along with warm-start 36-h ensemble-forecasts, which are initialized from the rapid refresh analyses every three hours. A preliminary evaluation shows that a forecast error reduction is achieved due to the assimilated observations. However, cold-start forecasts initialized from the Global Forecasting System Analysis slightly outperform the ones initialized from the regional assimilation system discussed in this paper. The system uses a multi-physics approach, focused on the use of different cumulus and planetary boundary layer schemes allowing us to conduct an evaluation of different model configurations over central Argentina. We found that the best combinations for forecasting surface variables differ from the best ones for forecasting precipitation, and that differences among the schemes tend to dominate the forecast ensemble spread for variables like precipitation. Lessons learned from this experimental system are part of the legacy of the RELAMPAGO field campaign for the development of advanced operational data assimilation systems in South America. • A LETKF-WRF system was run successfully in real-time to support RELAMPAGO operations. • A reduction in forecast error was shown due to data assimilation cycles. • 60-member RRR analyses and forecasts are available for the research community. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]