Search

Preeclampsia is associated with significant perinatal morbidity and mortality. Aspirin has been long purported and extensively studied for prevention of preeclampsia. For this reason, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine recommend its use in pregnancy for preeclampsia prevention in those at high risk. Yet, much controversy exists regarding optimal use in pregnancy with guidelines across global organizations varying. In this narrative review, we summarize the published literature related to the safety, optimal dose, and timing and duration of use of aspirin, as well as other indications for which aspirin has been studied in pregnancy., Competing Interests: Financial Disclosure The authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Despite substantial research, the early diagnosis of preeclampsia remains elusive. Lipids are now recognized to be involved in regulation and pathophysiology of some disease. Shotgun lipidomic studies were undertaken to determine whether serum lipid biomarkers exist that predict preeclampsia later in the same in pregnancy. A discovery study was performed using sera collected at 12-14 weeks pregnancy from 27 controls with uncomplicated pregnancies and 29 cases that later developed preeclampsia. Lipids were extracted and analyzed by direct infusion into a TOF mass spectrometer. MS signals, demonstrating apparent differences were selected, their abundances determined, and statistical differences tested. Statistically significant lipid markers were reevaluated in a second confirmatory study having 43 controls and 37 preeclampsia cases. Multi-marker combinations were developed using those lipid biomarkers confirmed in the second study. The initial study detected 45 potential preeclampsia markers. Of these, 23 markers continued to be statistically significant in the second confirmatory set. Most of these markers, representing several lipid classes, were chemically characterized, typically providing lipid class and potential molecular components using MS(2) Several multi-marker panels with areas under the curve >0.85 and high predictive values were developed. Developed panels of serum lipidomic biomarkers appear to be able to identify most women at risk for preeclampsia in a given pregnancy at 12-14 weeks gestation., (Copyright © 2016 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.)

Background: Over 20% of pregnancies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and/or antiphospholipid antibodies (APL) result in an adverse pregnancy outcome (APO) related to abnormal placentation. The ability to identify, early in pregnancy, patients who are destined for poor outcomes would significantly impact care of this high-risk population. In nonautoimmune patients, circulating angiogenic factors are dysregulated in disorders of placentation, such as preeclampsia (PE) and fetal growth restriction., Objective: We sought to determine whether early dysregulation of circulating angiogenic factors can predict APO in high-risk SLE and/or APL pregnancies., Study Design: We used data and samples from the Predictors of Pregnancy Outcome: Biomarkers in APL Syndrome and SLE (PROMISSE), a multicenter prospective study that enrolled 492 pregnant women with SLE and/or APL from September 2003 through August 2013. Patients were followed through pregnancy from <12 weeks gestation. Circulating levels of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt1), placental growth factor (PlGF), and soluble endoglin were measured monthly and subjects followed up for APO, classified as severe (PE <34 weeks, fetal/neonatal death, indicated preterm delivery <30 weeks) or moderate (PE ≥34 weeks, indicated preterm delivery 30-36 weeks, growth restriction without PE)., Results: Severe APOs occurred in 12% and moderate APOs in 10% of patients. By 12-15 weeks, sFlt1, PlGF, and soluble endoglin levels were markedly altered in women who developed severe APO. After adjusting for clinical risk factors, sFlt1 was the strongest predictor of severe APO among 12-15 week measures (odds ratio, 17.3 comparing highest and lowest quartiles; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.5-84.8; positive predictive value [PPV], 61%; negative predictive value [NPV], 93%). At 16-19 weeks, the combination of sFlt1 and PlGF was most predictive of severe APO, with risk greatest for subjects with both PlGF in lowest quartile (<70.3 pg/mL) and sFlt1 in highest quartile (>1872 pg/mL; odds ratio, 31.1; 95% CI, 8.0-121.9; PPV, 58%; NPV, 95%). Severe APO rate in this high-risk subgroup was 94% (95% CI, 70-99.8%), if lupus anticoagulant or history of high blood pressure was additionally present. In contrast, among patients with both sFlt1 <1872 pg/mL and PlGF >70.3 pg/mL, rate of severe APO was only 4.6% (95% CI, 2.1-8.6%)., Conclusion: Circulating angiogenic factors measured during early gestation have a high NPV in ruling out the development of severe adverse outcomes among patients with SLE and/or APL syndrome. Timely risk stratification of patients is important for effective clinical care and optimal allocation of health care resources., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aim: We sought serum biomarkers predictive of pre-eclampsia (PE)., Materials & Methods: Sera obtained at 12-14 weeks of pregnancy from 24 cases who later developed PE and 24 controls with uncomplicated pregnancies were processed and analyzed using a serum proteomic approach., Results: Many statistically significant serum PE biomarker candidates (n > 60) were found comparing cases and controls. In addition, logistic regression analysis modeled biomarker data resulted in 14 different multimarker combinations having high detection sensitivity and specificity (AUC >0.9)., Conclusions: Developed panels of serum biomarkers appeared effective in identifying pregnant women at 12-14 weeks gestation at risk of PE later in their pregnancy.

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether positive results of tests for any of 5 antiphospholipid antibodies are associated with recurrent preeclampsia among women with a history of preeclampsia in a previous pregnancy., Study Design: Second-trimester serum samples were obtained from 317 women with preeclampsia in a previous pregnancy who were being followed up in a prospective treatment trial. The serum samples were measured by enzyme-linked immunoassay for immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin M antibodies against 5 phospholipids. Positive results were analyzed with regard to preeclampsia, severe preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction, and preterm delivery., Results: Sixty-two of the 317 women (20%) had recurrent preeclampsia develop, 19 (6%) had severe preeclampsia, and 18 (5.8%) were delivered of infants with growth restriction. Positive results of tests for immunoglobulin G or immunoglobulin M antiphospholipid antibodies were not associated with recurrent preeclampsia. Positive results for immunoglobulin G or immunoglobulin M antibodies at the 99th percentile were also not associated with preterm delivery. Positive results at the 99th percentile for immunoglobulin G antiphosphatidylserine antibody were associated with severe preeclampsia, and positive results at the 99th percentile for immunoglobulin G anticardiolipin, antiphosphatidylinositol, and antiphosphatidylglycerol antibodies were associated with intrauterine growth restriction. The positive predictive values for these outcomes all were approximately 30%., Conclusion: Positive results of testing for antiphospholipid antibodies in the second trimester were not associated with recurrent preeclampsia among women at risk because of a history of preeclampsia. Positive results for immunoglobulin G antiphosphatidylserine antibody were associated with severe preeclampsia, and positive results for immunoglobulin G anticardiolipin, antiphosphatidylinositol, and antiphosphatidylglycerol antibodies were associated with intrauterine growth restriction. However, the positive predictive values for all these associations were modest. Testing for antiphospholipid antibodies during pregnancy is of little prognostic value in the assessment of the risk for recurrent preeclampsia among women with a history of preeclampsia.