Search

Climate classification systems are tools that facilitate the analysis, grouping, delimitation, and dissemination of the climatic characteristics of a region, contributing to the circumscribing of areas suitable for the agriculture and to the validation of various models of climate change. In this study, Brazilian life zone types were identified by using the initial variant of the well-known Holdridge eco-climatological classification, under different climate change scenarios. To describe current conditions in Brazil, daily time series of temperature and precipitation for the period 1989–2019 are used, derived from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration/Prediction of Worldwide Energy Resources (NASA/POWER) platform. Climate change was considered through four alternative scenarios. According to the original classification, under current conditions, the dominant life zone type is the type tropical basal moist forest, covering 60.57% of the country. An increase in temperature can cause a decrease in the dominance of this life zone type, though approximately half of the country may be covered by this type. Furthermore, in case of an increase of 3 °C, the type tropical basal dry forest could already cover a third of Brazil. An increase of 30% in precipitation could cause the emergence of several new life zone types, while the extent of the type tropical basal moist forest could then decrease to 50.12%. Due to the high variability of the life zone types obtained, the Holdridge system can be considered a useful tool to illustrate climate change impacts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Brown eye spot (Cercospora coffeicola) is one of the main fungal diseases of coffee, leading to a significant drop in crop productivity and beverage quality in Brazil. The identification of potential risk areas for the development of the disease provides promising information for the management of the pathogen. This study aimed to elaborate an agroclimatic zoning for the incidence of brown eye spot on coffee under climate change scenarios, as suggested by IPCC (IPCC-AR5), in the main coffee-growing regions. Climate data of air temperature, precipitation, and relative humidity were collected from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration/Prediction of Worldwide Energy Resources (NASA/POWER) platform from 1989 to 2020 for 46 municipalities in the states of Paraná, São Paulo, Minas Gerais, Espírito Santo, Goiás, and Bahia. The ideal climate for brown eye spot occurrence consists of an air temperature (Tmean) between 18 and 30 °C, relative humidity (RHmean) > 90%, and leaf wetness duration (LWD) > 9 h. The number of hours of leaf wetness was determined by the sum of hours with relative humidity > 90%. Relative humidity was estimated for each hour of the day using air temperature and estimated data of mean dew point temperature, maximum relative humidity, and minimum relative humidity. Climate change scenarios were designed based on sets of climate simulations for the twenty-first century. Scenario S1 is the current scenario without changes, while scenarios S2 and S3 show Tmean + 1.5 °C and 3.0 °C, respectively, with RHmean without changes. Scenarios S4 and S5 present RHmean varying from − 30% to + 30%, respectively, with Tmean unchanged. In the current scenario (S1), Minas Gerais presented a predominance of 100% for low climate risk to brown eye spot in September. Paraná presented a medium risk in 76.15% of the state in April. Scenarios S2 and S3 showed significant changes, increasing the average fitness class in the study region, mainly in the states of São Paulo, Minas Gerais, Rio de Janeiro, and Paraná. Scenario S4 showed 100% predominance of the low-risk class. In contrast, S5 showed the occurrence of the high-risk class for the study region with a + 30% increase in relative humidity. Minas Gerais presented a predominance of the high-risk class for the development of C. coffeicola in 76%, 100%, 97.83%, 89.30%, 93.46%, 80.64%, and 57.77% from November to May, respectively. The presence of high relative humidity represents the main factor for the expansion of the high-risk class for the development of C. coffeicola. Producers knowing the months of the year and the places in Brazil with the highest incidence of brown eye spot will be able to prevent the disease in a more sustainable way, using more ecological products, such as the early application of copper. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Climate Classification System (CCS) is an important tool for validating climate change models, subsidizing the characterization of new areas suitable or unfit for agricultural activity according to future climate change scenarios. This study aims to classify the climate of the Brazilian territory in the various climate change scenarios of the IPCC through the Thornthwaite system (1948). We used a 30-year historical series (1989–2019) of climatic data of average air temperature (°C) and rainfall (mm), obtained from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration/Prediction of Worldwide Energy Resources platform (NASA/POWER). Potential evapotranspiration (ETP) was estimated by the method of Camargo (1971); the climatological water balance (CWB) was calculated by the method of Thornthwaite and Mather (1955), using 100 mm of soil water storage capacity. CWB extracts were combined for classification by Thornthwaite (1948). The scenarios used were based on the IPCC (2014) projections and the study of Pirttioja et al. (2015). The Brazilian territory had an average air temperature of 22.20 °C (± 3.20) °C and annual precipitation of 1987 mm (± 725) mm. The climatic classification of Thornthwaite presented 108 climatic classes for the current scenario with a more significant predominance of the classes ArAʹaʹ, B4rAʹaʹ, and B3rAʹaʹ representing 20.54%, 15.62%, and 9.46% of the Brazilian territory, respectively. The climate class ArAʹaʹ had 39.20% in the North and 14.97% in the Midwest. The South region has a predominance of 24.31% for the class ArBʹ3aʹ. In the Southeast and Northeast, the climate classes B2rBʹ3aʹ and DdBʹ2aʹ represented 14.80% and 15.26% of the regions, respectively. The S5 scenario was considered more favorable to establishing crops, with 48.04% of Brazil represented by the climate class ArAʹaʹ. Furthermore, the most catastrophic scenarios for crops were S3 and S4, promoting Brazil a predominance of classes B3rAʹaʹ in 18.02% and B1rAʹaʹ in 21.04%, respectively, favoring the occurrence of arid and dry climates in large part of the Brazilian territory. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]