6 results on '"Nentwich MM"'
Search Results
2. Reply: To PMID 25532634.
- Author
-
Nentwich MM and Miño de Kaspar H
- Subjects
- Female, Humans, Male, Anti-Infective Agents, Local administration & dosage, Cataract Extraction, Endophthalmitis epidemiology, Eye Infections epidemiology, Postoperative Complications, Povidone-Iodine administration & dosage, Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Incidence of postoperative endophthalmitis from 1990 to 2009 using povidone-iodine but no intracameral antibiotics at a single academic institution.
- Author
-
Nentwich MM, Ta CN, Kreutzer TC, Li B, Schwarzbach F, Yactayo-Miranda YM, Kampik A, and Miño de Kaspar H
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anterior Chamber drug effects, Anti-Bacterial Agents therapeutic use, Bacteria isolation & purification, Child, Child, Preschool, Endophthalmitis diagnosis, Endophthalmitis microbiology, Eye Infections diagnosis, Eye Infections microbiology, Female, Fungi isolation & purification, Humans, Incidence, Infant, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Anti-Infective Agents, Local administration & dosage, Cataract Extraction, Endophthalmitis epidemiology, Eye Infections epidemiology, Postoperative Complications, Povidone-Iodine administration & dosage, Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis
- Abstract
Purpose: To correlate the incidence of postoperative endophthalmitis with changes in the preoperative prophylaxis over a 20-year period., Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany., Design: Retrospective chart review., Methods: Patients diagnosed with postoperative endophthalmitis from 1990 to 2009 after intraocular surgery performed at the same institution were included. Because of changes in the preoperative prophylaxis during the study period, 3 groups were formed for data analysis: Period 1 (1990 to 1992), no standardized prophylaxis regimen; period 2 (1993 to 1998), preoperative topical medication, povidone-iodine 10.0% periorbitally, and 1 drop of povidone-iodine 1.0% in the conjunctiva sac; and period 3 (1999 to 2009), similar to period 2 except with irrigation of the conjunctival sac with 10 mL of povidone-iodine 1.0%., Results: The overall rate of postoperative endophthalmitis was 0.113% (77/68,323) for all intraocular surgeries. It decreased significantly from 0.291% (16/5505) in period 1 to 0.170% (33/19,413) in period 2 to 0.065% (28/43,405) in period 3 (P < .001). In cataract surgery, the overall rate of postoperative endophthalmitis was 0.125% (30/24,034). It decreased in each subsequent period, from 0.338% (9/2662) in period 1 to 0.224% (15/6696) in period 2 to 0.041% (6/14,676) in period 3 (P < .001). Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus was the most commonly isolated organism (47.4%)., Conclusions: The rate of postoperative endophthalmitis decreased over a 20-year period at a single academic institution. Although multiple factors might have contributed to this decline, implementation of a preoperative prophylaxis protocol using copious povidone-iodine might have been the most important contributor., Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned., (Copyright © 2015 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Reply: To PMID 23680628.
- Author
-
Nentwich MM, Li B, and Miño de Kaspar H
- Subjects
- Female, Humans, Male, Anti-Bacterial Agents therapeutic use, Anti-Infective Agents, Local therapeutic use, Antibiotic Prophylaxis, Cataract Extraction, Levofloxacin therapeutic use, Povidone-Iodine therapeutic use
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Comparison of the efficacy of povidone-iodine 1.0%, 5.0%, and 10.0% irrigation combined with topical levofloxacin 0.3% as preoperative prophylaxis in cataract surgery.
- Author
-
Li B, Nentwich MM, Hoffmann LE, Haritoglou C, Kook D, Kampik A, Sheng M, and Miño de Kaspar H
- Subjects
- Administration, Topical, Aged, Bacteria isolation & purification, Bacterial Load, Bacteriological Techniques, Conjunctiva microbiology, Drug Therapy, Combination, Endophthalmitis prevention & control, Female, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Therapeutic Irrigation, Treatment Outcome, Anti-Bacterial Agents therapeutic use, Anti-Infective Agents, Local therapeutic use, Antibiotic Prophylaxis, Cataract Extraction, Levofloxacin therapeutic use, Povidone-Iodine therapeutic use
- Abstract
Purpose: To compare the efficacy of povidone-iodine 1.0%, 5.0%, and 10.0% in combination with topical levofloxacin 0.3% in reducing the preoperative conjunctival bacterial load before cataract surgery., Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany., Design: Randomized clinical trial., Methods: This study enrolled patients scheduled for cataract surgery between July 2010 and January 2011. All patients received topical levofloxacin 0.3% 4 times on the preoperative day and were randomly assigned to these study groups: Group 1 (povidone-iodine 1.0%), Group 2 (povidone-iodine 5.0%), and Group 3 (povidone-iodine 10.0%). In all groups, the conjunctiva was flush irrigated with 10 mL of povidone-iodine of the respective concentration. Conjunctival specimens were obtained at 4 timepoints: baseline (no-surgery eye), before povidone-iodine irrigation, after povidone-iodine irrigation, and at the end of surgery. All specimens were inoculated onto blood and chocolate agars and into thioglycolate broth., Results: The study was completed by 271 patients. In the control smear (no-surgery eye), no significant difference in positive cultures was found. After 10 mL povidone-iodine irrigation, a considerable reduction in the conjunctival bacterial load occurred in all groups. The difference in positive cultures was statistically significant between Group 1 and Group 3 (P=.024) and between Group 2 and Group 3 (P=.029). Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus was the most commonly isolated bacteria in all groups., Conclusion: Povidone-iodine 10.0% was more effective than povidone-iodine 1.0% and 5.0% in decreasing the conjunctival bacterial load before surgery., Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned., (Crown Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Application of 10% povidone iodine reduces conjunctival bacterial contamination rate in patients undergoing cataract surgery.
- Author
-
Nentwich MM, Rajab M, Ta CN, He L, Grueterich M, Haritoglou C, Gandorfer A, Kampik A, and Mino De Kaspar H
- Subjects
- Anti-Infective Agents, Local administration & dosage, Bacteria isolation & purification, Bacteriological Techniques, Conjunctivitis, Bacterial microbiology, Disinfection methods, Humans, Ophthalmic Solutions, Povidone-Iodine administration & dosage, Prospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Anti-Infective Agents, Local therapeutic use, Antibiotic Prophylaxis, Conjunctiva microbiology, Conjunctivitis, Bacterial prevention & control, Phacoemulsification, Povidone-Iodine therapeutic use
- Abstract
Purpose: To determine the efficacy of 10% povidone iodine (PVI) drops given before cataract extraction in addition to routine irrigation of the conjunctival sac with 1% PVI., Methods: This prospective, randomized, single-center study at the Department of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, includes 263 eyes of 242 patients undergoing cataract surgery. Patients were randomized to receive 3 drops of 10% PVI into the conjunctival sac (study group) or no PVI drops (control group). All patients underwent periorbital disinfection with 10% PVI followed by irrigation of the conjunctiva with 10 mL of 1% PVI. Specimens were obtained prior to the application of PVI, after antibiotic administration (T1), after irrigation with PVI but before surgery (T2), and at the conclusion of surgery (T3)., Results: After PVI disinfection, the number of positive cultures was significantly reduced in all groups (p<0.0001) from 69%-93% at T1 to 1%-16% at T3. In outpatients, the study group showed significantly fewer positive cultures at the conclusion of surgery compared to the control group (4% vs 16%; p=0.03). Also in inpatients significant fewer positive cultures were found in the study group compared to the control group at T2 (12% vs 28%; p=0.03) and at T3 (1% vs 10%; p=0.03)., Conclusions: Three additional drops of 10% PVI prior to surgery provided additional benefit by reducing the conjunctival bacterial contamination rate even in the setting of preoperative irrigation of the conjunctiva with 1% PVI.
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.