Search

Aims/introduction: Poverty is an important social determinant of diabetes. Poverty is a multidimensional concept including non-financial difficulties, such as social isolation and exclusion from communities. Many countries provide financial social assistance programs for those in need. This study aimed to explore non-financial social determinants of diabetes among public assistance recipients in Japan, by using linkage data of two municipal public assistance databases and medical assistance claim data., Materials and Methods: We carried out a retrospective cohort study. Public assistance is provided to households below the poverty line to ensure their income security. We extracted recipients' sociodemographic factors of January 2016 (household number and employment status as non-financial social determinants of diabetes) and identified the incidence of diabetes diagnosis until December 2016 as the outcome., Results: We included the data of 2,698 younger individuals (aged <65 years) and 3,019 older individuals (aged >65 years). A multivariable Poisson regression, with a robust standard error estimator, showed that among 2,144 younger recipients at risk, unemployment and living alone were slightly associated with 1-year cumulative incidence of diabetes diagnosis (adjusted incidence ratio 1.20, 95% confidence interval 0.93-1.54 and adjusted incidence ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval 0.89-1.48, respectively). Among 2,181 older recipients at risk, there was no strong association between their sociodemographic factors and incidence of diabetes diagnosis., Conclusions: Unemployment and living alone might be additional risk factors for diabetes among younger public assistance recipients. Multidimensional supports assuring financial and non-financial securities are required to prevent diabetes among people living in poverty., (© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Diabetes Investigation published by Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Objectives　Poverty is a well-known major social determinant of health. Poverty has been conceptualized as multidimensional livelihood difficulties that include material deprivation, financial difficulties, and social isolation. Through their clinical practice, some health care institutions have tried to address social risks among patients. However, standardized assessment tools that can detect patients' livelihood difficulties are not well established. The aims of this study were to develop brief screening tools to assess patients' livelihood difficulties, and to examine the validity and reliability of these tools in Japanese health care institutes.Methods　We used secondary data from a cross-sectional questionnaire survey. The respondents of the survey were adult patients from five hospitals belonging to Japan Health Promoting Hospitals and Service Networks. The questionnaire included 25 questions that assessed patients' poverty. An iterated principal factor analysis with Promax rotation was performed and scales to assess patients' livelihood difficulties were developed. This was followed by an examination of the scales' validity and internal consistency using standardized Cronbach's alpha. Further, we built brief assessment tools by selecting questions that showed high factor loading.Results　A total of 265 participants were included in the study. The response rate was 75.1%. The results of factor analysis suggested that data was affected by patients' financial difficulties and social isolation. Eight questions on the financial difficulty scale and five questions on the social isolation scale showed factor loadings greater than 0.40. The standardized Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.88 for the financial difficulty scales and 0.74 for the social isolation scales. Finally, a brief assessment tools that included two questions from each scale was developed.Conclusion　This tool may be used as a screening tool for patients' livelihood difficulties in the health records of each clinic/hospital, and may help patients effectively receive integrated medical and social care. In order to use this scale in practice, under a well-established community-based integrated care system, it may be necessary to establish a standardized scoring system and diagnostic threshold to verify the generalizability of the scale at healthcare institutes with different characteristics.

• We examined factors governing commencement and termination of public assistance. • Higher perception of mutual help is a predictor of initiation of public assistance. • Higher attachment to community is a predictor of termination of public assistance. • Social role in community is a predictor of termination of public assistance. • Psychosocial factors are key to accessing and terminating public assistance. Public assistance programs guarantee a minimum living standard, promoting independence for impoverished citizens. Although public assistance eligibility is mainly based on economic factors like poverty, psychosocial factors may be important in initiating and terminating participation. We explored factors governing commencement and termination of public assistance by the older Japanese population between 2013 and 2016. We used panel data from the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study (JAGES), conducted in 2013 and 2016. Fixed-effects regression was used to examine variables in 2013 that were related to receiving public assistance in 2016. The Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology -competence index (TMIG-CI) was used to assess higher-level activities of daily living (ADL, i.e., instrumental ADL, intellectual activity, and social role). The role of individual perceptions of community social cohesion (community trust, mutual help, and attachment), and sociodemographic factors were considered. While 215 people (0.5%) started receiving public assistance between 2013 and 2016, almost 50% stopped participating. People with higher perceived mutual community help were 1.21 times (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02–1.46) more likely to commence public assistance three years later. Public assistance recipients who felt community attachment to their resident community, and had social roles were 1.16 (95% CI: 1.06–1.28) and 1.15 (95% CI: 1.01–1.30) times more likely to give up public assistance three years later, respectively, independent of socioeconomic statuses. Psychosocial factors, including maintaining good relationships with community residents, could be important in accessing and terminating public assistance services. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]