7 results on '"Katz LF"'
Search Results
2. The Effects of Exposure to Better Neighborhoods on Children: New Evidence from the Moving to Opportunity Experiment.
- Author
-
Chetty R, Hendren N, and Katz LF
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Birth Rate, Child, Child, Preschool, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Illegitimacy, Marriage, Pregnancy, United States, Young Adult, Housing, Income, Poverty, Residence Characteristics, Social Determinants of Health economics, Social Determinants of Health statistics & numerical data, Social Mobility
- Abstract
The Moving to Opportunity (MTO) experiment offered randomly selected families housing vouchers to move from high-poverty housing projects to lower-poverty neighborhoods. We analyze MTO's impacts on children's long-term outcomes using tax data. We find that moving to a lower-poverty neighborhood when young (before age 13) increases college attendance and earnings and reduces single parenthood rates. Moving as an adolescent has slightly negative impacts, perhaps because of disruption effects. The decline in the gains from moving with the age when children move suggests that the duration of exposure to better environments during childhood is an important determinant of children’s long-term outcomes.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Associations of housing mobility interventions for children in high-poverty neighborhoods with subsequent mental disorders during adolescence.
- Author
-
Kessler RC, Duncan GJ, Gennetian LA, Katz LF, Kling JR, Sampson NA, Sanbonmatsu L, Zaslavsky AM, and Ludwig J
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Counseling, Female, Financing, Personal, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Public Policy, Risk, Sex Factors, Young Adult, Mental Disorders epidemiology, Poverty, Public Housing, Residence Characteristics
- Abstract
Importance: Youth in high-poverty neighborhoods have high rates of emotional problems. Understanding neighborhood influences on mental health is crucial for designing neighborhood-level interventions., Objective: To perform an exploratory analysis of associations between housing mobility interventions for children in high-poverty neighborhoods and subsequent mental disorders during adolescence., Design, Setting, and Participants: The Moving to Opportunity Demonstration from 1994 to 1998 randomized 4604 volunteer public housing families with 3689 children in high-poverty neighborhoods into 1 of 2 housing mobility intervention groups (a low-poverty voucher group vs a traditional voucher group) or a control group. The low-poverty voucher group (n=1430) received vouchers to move to low-poverty neighborhoods with enhanced mobility counseling. The traditional voucher group (n=1081) received geographically unrestricted vouchers. Controls (n=1178) received no intervention. Follow-up evaluation was performed 10 to 15 years later (June 2008-April 2010) with participants aged 13 to 19 years (0-8 years at randomization). Response rates were 86.9% to 92.9%., Main Outcomes and Measures: Presence of mental disorders from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition) within the past 12 months, including major depressive disorder, panic disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), oppositional-defiant disorder, intermittent explosive disorder, and conduct disorder, as assessed post hoc with a validated diagnostic interview., Results: Of the 3689 adolescents randomized, 2872 were interviewed (1407 boys and 1465 girls). Compared with the control group, boys in the low-poverty voucher group had significantly increased rates of major depression (7.1% vs 3.5%; odds ratio (OR), 2.2 [95% CI, 1.2-3.9]), PTSD (6.2% vs 1.9%; OR, 3.4 [95% CI, 1.6-7.4]), and conduct disorder (6.4% vs 2.1%; OR, 3.1 [95% CI, 1.7-5.8]). Boys in the traditional voucher group had increased rates of PTSD compared with the control group (4.9% vs 1.9%, OR, 2.7 [95% CI, 1.2-5.8]). However, compared with the control group, girls in the traditional voucher group had decreased rates of major depression (6.5% vs 10.9%; OR, 0.6 [95% CI, 0.3-0.9]) and conduct disorder (0.3% vs 2.9%; OR, 0.1 [95% CI, 0.0-0.4])., Conclusions and Relevance: Interventions to encourage moving out of high-poverty neighborhoods were associated with increased rates of depression, PTSD, and conduct disorder among boys and reduced rates of depression and conduct disorder among girls. Better understanding of interactions among individual, family, and neighborhood risk factors is needed to guide future public housing policy changes.
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Neighborhood effects on the long-term well-being of low-income adults.
- Author
-
Ludwig J, Duncan GJ, Gennetian LA, Katz LF, Kessler RC, Kling JR, and Sanbonmatsu L
- Subjects
- Adult, Humans, Income, Social Conditions, United States, United States Government Agencies, Happiness, Housing, Mental Health, Personal Satisfaction, Poverty, Quality of Life, Residence Characteristics
- Abstract
Nearly 9 million Americans live in extreme-poverty neighborhoods, places that also tend to be racially segregated and dangerous. Yet, the effects on the well-being of residents of moving out of such communities into less distressed areas remain uncertain. Using data from Moving to Opportunity, a unique randomized housing mobility experiment, we found that moving from a high-poverty to lower-poverty neighborhood leads to long-term (10- to 15-year) improvements in adult physical and mental health and subjective well-being, despite not affecting economic self-sufficiency. A 1-standard deviation decline in neighborhood poverty (13 percentage points) increases subjective well-being by an amount equal to the gap in subjective well-being between people whose annual incomes differ by $13,000--a large amount given that the average control group income is $20,000. Subjective well-being is more strongly affected by changes in neighborhood economic disadvantage than racial segregation, which is important because racial segregation has been declining since 1970, but income segregation has been increasing.
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Legacy for ChildrenTM: a pair of randomized controlled trials of a public health model to improve developmental outcomes among children in poverty.
- Author
-
Perou R, Elliott MN, Visser SN, Claussen AH, Scott KG, Beckwith LH, Howard J, Katz LF, and Smith DC
- Subjects
- Adult, Female, Florida, Housing economics, Humans, Los Angeles, Male, Maternal Age, Mothers psychology, Mothers statistics & numerical data, Program Evaluation, Research Design, Sample Size, Socioeconomic Factors, Young Adult, Continuity of Patient Care standards, Outcome Assessment, Health Care methods, Patient Acceptance of Health Care ethnology, Patient Acceptance of Health Care psychology, Patient Acceptance of Health Care statistics & numerical data, Poverty ethnology, Poverty psychology, Poverty statistics & numerical data, Public Health methods
- Abstract
Background: One in five Americans under age 18 lives in a family below the Federal poverty threshold. These more than 15 million children are at increased risk of a wide variety of adverse long-term health and developmental outcomes. The early years of life are critical to short- and long-term health and well-being. The Legacy for ChildrenTM model was developed in response to this need and marries the perspectives of epidemiology and public health to developmental psychology theory in order to better address the needs of children at environmental risk for poor developmental outcomes., Methods/design: The Legacy for ChildrenTM group-based parenting intervention model was evaluated as a pair of randomized controlled trials among low-income families in Miami and Los Angeles. The study was designed to allow for site-stratified analysis in order to evaluate each model implementation separately. Evaluation domains include comprehensive assessments of family, maternal, and child characteristics, process outcomes, and prospective programmatic cost. Data collection began prenatally or at birth and continues into school-age., Discussion: The societal costs of poor developmental outcomes are substantial. A concerted effort from multiple sectors and disciplines, including public health, is necessary to address these societal concerns. Legacy uses a public health model to engage parents and promote overall child well-being in families in poverty through rigorous evaluation methodologies and evidence-based intervention strategies. This study collects rich and modular information on maternal and child outcomes, process, and cost that will enable a detailed understanding of how Legacy works, how it can be refined and improved, and how it can be translated and disseminated. Taken together, these results will inform public policy and help to address issues of health disparities among at-risk populations., Trial Registration: NCT00164697.
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Notice of Retraction and Replacement: Kessler RC, et al. Associations of Housing Mobility Interventions for Children in High-Poverty Neighborhoods With Subsequent Mental Disorders During Adolescence. JAMA. 2014;311(9):937-947
- Author
-
Kessler, RC, Duncan, GJ, Gennetian, LA, Katz, LF, Kling, JR, Sampson, NA, Sanbonmatsu, L, Zaslavsky, AM, and Ludwig, J
- Subjects
Male ,Public Housing ,Residence Characteristics ,Mental Disorders ,General & Internal Medicine ,Humans ,Female ,Poverty ,Medical and Health Sciences - Published
- 2016
7. Associations of housing mobility interventions for children in high-poverty neighborhoods with subsequent mental disorders during adolescence
- Author
-
Kessler, RC, Duncan, GJ, Gennetian, LA, Katz, LF, Kling, JR, Sampson, NA, Sanbonmatsu, L, Zaslavsky, AM, and Ludwig, J
- Subjects
Risk ,Counseling ,Male ,Adolescent ,Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities ,Public Policy ,Medical and Health Sciences ,Young Adult ,Sex Factors ,Residence Characteristics ,Clinical Research ,General & Internal Medicine ,Behavioral and Social Science ,Humans ,Child ,Preschool ,Personal ,Poverty ,Pediatric ,Public Housing ,Depression ,Mental Disorders ,Prevention ,Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder ,Serious Mental Illness ,Brain Disorders ,Mental Health ,Female ,Financing ,Follow-Up Studies - Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Youth in high-poverty neighborhoods have high rates of emotional problems. Understanding neighborhood influences on mental health is crucial for designing neighborhood-level interventions. OBJECTIVE: To perform an exploratory analysis of associations between housing mobility interventions for children in high-poverty neighborhoods and subsequent mental disorders during adolescence. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Moving to Opportunity Demonstration from 1994 to 1998 randomized 4604 volunteer public housing families with 3689 children in high-poverty neighborhoods into 1 of 2 housing mobility intervention groups (a low-poverty voucher group vs a traditional voucher group) or a control group. The low-poverty voucher group (n=1430) received vouchers to move to low-poverty neighborhoods with enhanced mobility counseling. The traditional voucher group (n=1081) received geographically unrestricted vouchers. Controls (n=1178) received no intervention. Follow-up evaluation was performed 10 to 15 years later (June 2008-April 2010) with participants aged 13 to 19 years (0-8 years at randomization). Response rates were 86.9%to 92.9%. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Presence of mental disorders from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition) within the past 12 months, including major depressive disorder, panic disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), oppositional-defiant disorder, intermittent explosive disorder, and conduct disorder, as assessed post hoc with a validated diagnostic interview. RESULTS: Of the 3689 adolescents randomized, 2872 were interviewed (1407 boys and 1465 girls). Compared with the control group, boys in the low-poverty voucher group had significantly increased rates of major depression (7.1% vs 3.5%; odds ratio (OR), 2.2 [95% CI, 1.2-3.9]), PTSD (6.2% vs 1.9%; OR, 3.4 [95% CI, 1.6-7.4]), and conduct disorder (6.4% vs 2.1%; OR, 3.1 [95% CI, 1.7-5.8]). Boys in the traditional voucher group had increased rates of PTSD compared with the control group (4.9%vs 1.9%, OR, 2.7 [95% CI, 1.2-5.8]). However, compared with the control group, girls in the traditional voucher group had decreased rates of major depression (6.5% vs 10.9%; OR, 0.6 [95% CI, 0.3-0.9]) and conduct disorder (0.3% vs 2.9%; OR, 0.1 [95% CI, 0.0-0.4]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Interventions to encouragemoving out of high-poverty neighborhoods were associated with increased rates of depression, PTSD, and conduct disorder among boys and reduced rates of depression and conduct disorder among girls. Better understanding of interactions among individual, family, and neighborhood risk factors is needed to guide future public housing policy changes. Copyright 2014 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
- Published
- 2014
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.