1. Ames-2016 line lists for 13 isotopologues of CO2: Updates, consistency, and remaining issues
- Author
-
Timothy J. Lee, David W. Schwenke, Richard Freedman, and Xinchuan Huang
- Subjects
Radiation ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Rotational–vibrational spectroscopy ,Quantum number ,01 natural sciences ,Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics ,Spectral line ,Computational physics ,Nuclear magnetic resonance ,Consistency (statistics) ,0103 physical sciences ,Potential energy surface ,Isotopologue ,HITRAN ,010303 astronomy & astrophysics ,Spectroscopy ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Mathematics ,Line (formation) - Abstract
A new 626-based Ames-2 PES refinement and Ames-2016 line lists for 13 CO2 isotopologues are reported. A consistent σRMS = ±0.02 cm−1 is established for hundreds of isotopologue band origins using the Ames-2 PES. Ames-2016 line lists are computed at 296 K, 1000 K and 4000 K using the Ames-2 PES and the same DMS-N2 dipole surface used previously, with J up to 150, E′ up to 24,000 cm−1 or 18,000 cm−1 and appropriate intensity cutoffs. The lists are compared to the CDSD-296, CDSD-4000 databases, UCL line lists, and a few recent highly accurate CO2 intensity measurements. Both agreements and discrepancies are discussed. Compared to the old Ames CO2 lists, the Ames-2016 line lists have line position deviations reduced by 50% or more, which consequently leads to more reliable intensities. The line shape parameters in the Ames-2016 line lists are predicted using the newly assigned conventional vibrational polyad quantum numbers for rovibrational levels below 12,000 cm−1 so the quality of the line shape parameters is similar to that of CDSD or HITRAN. This study further proves that a semi-empirically refined PES (Ames-1 and Ames-2) coupled with a high quality ab initio DMS (DMS-N2 and UCL) may generate IR predictions with consistent accuracy and is thus helpful in the analysis of laboratory spectra and simulations of various isotopologues. The Ames-2016 lists based on DMS-N2 have reached the ∼1% intensity prediction accuracy level for the recent 626 30013-00001 and 20013-00001 bands, but further quantification and improvements require sub-percent or sub-half-percent accurate experimental intensities. The inter-isotopologue consistency of the intensity prediction accuracies should have reached better than 1–3% for regular bands not affected by resonances. Since the Effective Dipole Models (EDM) in CDSD and HITRAN have 1–20% or even larger uncertainties, we show that the Ames lists can provide better alternative IR data for many hard-to-determine isotopologue bands. Comparison at 4000 K suggests that the Ames-4000 K 12C16O2 line list is reliable and consistent within the current cutoffs of J ≤ 150 and E′ ≤ 24,000 cm−1, but intensity contributions involving higher energy levels should not be omitted and future computations need to be converged up to at least 32,000 cm−1 or higher. The remaining issues are discussed regarding the source of energy level discrepancies, intensity underestimations by ∼50% for some weak bands, etc. and also future work.
- Published
- 2017