Search

Background: Smartphones have become increasingly more popular and complicated tasks can be performed with these devices. However, the increasing use is associated with shoulder and neck pain, as well as with psychological addiction., Research Question: Do different smartphone tasks lead to changes in spinal posture and pelvic position? Is there a relationship between smartphone addiction and changes in posture?, Methods: A cross-sectional study including 50 participants was performed. Test subjects completed the Smartphone Addiction Scale and the SF-36 health questionnaire. Subjects spinal posture and pelvic position during different smartphone tasks were measured through a surface topography system. The different tasks were: standing in an upright position, simulating a phone call, texting with one or two hands during standing or while walking on a treadmill. Paired T-tests and ANOVA tests were performed to evaluate differences. The Kendall rank test was used to investigate the association between clinical scores and changes in spinal posture., Results: All smartphone tasks lead to a significant increase in thoracic kyphosis and trunk inclination during standing and while walking. A significant increased lumbar lordosis was also found. Texting with one or two hands correlated with increased surface rotation. No associations between smartphone addiction and changes of the spinal posture were reported., Significance: This represents the first surface topography study that investigated the influence of different smartphone tasks on the spinal posture and pelvic position during standing and while walking. With the results of this study we demonstrated that smartphone use leads to significant changes of sagittal and frontal spine parameters. Further research should focus on the evaluation of possible detrimental effects of long-term smartphone use on the spinal posture and on the development of preventive measures., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Until recently, rasterstereographic analysis of the spine was limited to static measurements. However, understanding and evaluating the motion of the spine under dynamic conditions is an important factor in the diagnosis and treatment of spinal pathologies. The aim of this study was to study the spinal posture and pelvic position under dynamic conditions and compare it to static measurements using a dynamic rasterstereographic system., Methods: A total of 121 healthy volunteers (56 females; 65 males) were included in this observational study. The parameters trunk inclination, trunk imbalance, pelvic obliquity, kyphotic angle, lordotic angle, surface rotation, and lateral deviation were studied and compared under static and dynamic (1, 2, 4, 5 km/h) conditions using the system "Formetric 4D Motion®" (DIERS International GmbH, Germany)., Results: Female volunteers had a higher lordotic angle than males under static conditions (p < 0.001). Trunk inclination (5.31° vs. 6.74°), vertebral kyphotic angle (42.53° vs. 39, 59°), and surface rotation (3.35° vs. 3.81°) increase under dynamic conditions (p < 0.001). Trunk inclination and lordotic angle both show significant changes during walking compared to static conditions (p < 0.001)., Conclusion: The spinal posture differs between females and males during standing and during walking. Rasterstereography is a valuable tool for the dynamic evaluation of spinal posture and pelvic position, which can also be used to quantify motion in the spine and therefore it has the potential to improve the understanding and treatment of spinal pathologies., Trial Registration: Retrospectively registered.

Background: The purpose of forefoot off-loader shoes (FOS) is to unload the operated region of the foot in order to allow early mobilization and rehabilitation. However, little is known about the actual biomechanical effects of different designs of FOS on gait, pelvis and spine., Research Question: Aim of this study was to analyse and compare the effects of two different designs of forefoot unloader shoes., Methods: Ortho-Wedge (FOS A) and Relief-Dual® (FOS B) were evaluated in this study during standing and while walking. Changes of the pelvic position and spinal posture were measured with a surface topography system and an instrumented treadmill. Gait phases were detected automatically by a built-in pressure plate., Results: Both FOS resulted in a significant increase of pelvic obliquity, pelvic torsion, lateral deviation and surface rotation (p < 0.001) while standing. Between both shoe models, pelvic obliquity and lateral deviation (p < 0.05) were significantly different. During walking, both FOS had a significant effect on spine and pelvis (p < 0.05), however only minor differences were found between the designs. All gait parameters were affected more, wearing FOS A than B. Step length were significantly longer by wearing FOS (p < 0.005). However stance phase raised and swing phase is reduced on the leg wearing FOS A (p < 0.001)., Significance: The study showed that FOS lead to significant changes in pelvic position and spinal posture during standing and while walking. A compensating shoe on the contralateral side is therefore recommend. Gait parameters however were affected more by the traditional FOS A half-shoe. The sole- design and shape of FOS B leads to a more physiological roll-over of the foot., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The purpose of this study was to examine the spinal posture in young athletes depending on training intensity. The spinal curvature of 245 children, age 8 to 12 years, was evaluated using rasterstereography. According to their weekly training time group 1 (mean age: 9.54 ± 1.18) did 2-6, group 2 (mean age: 9.49 ± 0.87) did 6-15 and group 3 (mean age: 9.68 ± 0.87) did over 15 hours of training. Group 1 had a significantly higher weight (p = 0.028) (33.86 ± 7. kg) than those of the more active groups (30.67 ± 6.49 kg and 29.46 ± 4.33 kg). The mean kyphotic angle decreased significantly (p < 0.001) with the amount of training per week from 46.86 ± 8.2° in group 1 to 40.08 ± 8° in group 3. We also found a significant decrease (p = 0.047) in lateral deviation with training from group 1 with 5.3 ± 3 mm to group 2 with 4.1 ± 1.6 mm. The results of our study suggest that higher training time can be associated with lower weight and decreases in thoracic kyphosis and lateral deviation of the spine.

Background: Surface topography can be used for the evaluation of spinal deformities without any radiation. However, so far this technique is limited to posterior trunk measurements due to the use of a single posterior camera.Research Question: Purpose of this study was to introduce a new multi camera surface topography system and to test its reliability and validity.Methods: The surface topograph uses a two-camera system for imaging and evaluating the subjects front and back simultaneously. Inter- and intra-rater reliability was tested on 40 human subjects by two observers. For validation human, subjects were scanned by MRI and surface-topography. For additional validation we used a phantom with an anthropomorphic body which was scanned by CT and surface topography.Results: Inter- (0.97-0.99) and intra-rater reliability (0.81-0.98) testing revealed good and excellent results in the detection of the body surface structures and measurement of areas and volumes. CT based validation revealed good correspondence between systems in the imaging and evaluation of the phantom model (0.61-10.52 %). Results on validation of human subjects revealed good to moderate results in the detection and measurements of almost all body surface structures (1.36-13.34 %). Only measurements using jugular notch as a reference showed moderate results in validity (0.62-27.5%) testing.Significance: We have introduced a novel and innovative surface topography system that allows for simultaneous anterior and posterior trunk measurements. The results of our reliability and validity tests are satisfactory. However, in particular around the jugular notch region further improvements in the surface topography reconstruction are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Surface-topography has been used for almost two decades in the radiation-free clinical evaluation of spinal posture. So far, it was limited to the analysis of back surface and spine. In order to better understand, diagnose and treat complex spinal pathologies, it is important to measure the whole torso.Research Question: Purpose of this study was to introduce and test an application that allows 360° reconstruction and analysis of the patient's torso.Methods: The application uses the information gathered from eight distinct scans and angles. For validation we used an Alderson phantom as an anthropomorphic body. Defined areas and volumes were measured by CT and surface-topography. Inter- and intra-rater reliability was tested in 35 healthy subjects by two observers.Results: The results revealed good correspondence between systems in the imaging and evaluation of the Alderson model (5.3-0.5%). Inter- (0.9-0.98) and intra-rater reliability (0.8-0.95) testing revealed good and excellent results in the detection of almost all body surface structures and measurement of areas and volumes. Only area and volume measurements using jugular notch as a reference showed partly moderate results in reliability (0.62-0.93) testing.Significance: We were able to introduce a novel 360° torso scan application using surface topography to reconstruct torso measurements. The results of our study showed its high validity and reliability. In the future, this application needs to be tested in patients with spinal pathologies. In summary, this new application may help to better understand, diagnose and treat patients with pathologies of torso and spine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]