Search

Background: Postural control is an essential ability for functional independence modified by therapeutic approaches and morbidities secondary to breast cancer. The anchor system enables additional haptic perception of body position in front of the support base and can be used alone or in conjunction with sensorimotor training., Research Question: What is the influence of the anchor system, through different manual contacts on the upper limb, on body sway in women affected and not affected by lymphedema secondary to breast cancer treatment?, Methods: Cross-sectional study involving 60 women homogeneously distributed to the group affected by lymphedema (GAL), with a mean age of 62.53 (SD = 12.54) years and upper limb volume difference (ULVD = Ipsilateral - Contralateral) of 636.21 (SD = 387.94) cm 3 , and group not affected by lymphedema (GNAL), with a mean age of 57.24 (SD = 11.43) years and ULVD of -8.91 (SD = 121.72) cm 3 . Baropodometry was used to assess body sway, through the presence and absence of the visual sense, associated with different manual contacts of the anchor system designated absence, simulation of use, unilateral and bilateral contact. The Shapiro-Wilk and Student's T-tests with Bonferroni Post-Hoc were used in the statistical analysis (p ≤ 0.05)., Results: The GAL expressed non-significant values compared to the GNAL in the absence of visual sense and non-use of the anchor system. The unilateral contact of the anchor system on the preferred upper limb in the presence of the visual sense, and bilateral contact of the anchor system in the presence and absence of the visual sense promoted a significant reduction of body sway in both groups., Significance: In breast cancer survivors, the anchor system with bilateral contact effectively maintains postural control, regardless of the visual sense and the volume of the upper limb., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors Flávia Belavenuto Rangon, Isabella Lopo Marinho and Elaine Caldeira de Oliveira Guirro declare no competing financial and conflicts of interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Baropodometric evaluation has been used in research and clinical environments by professionals who are working on the physical rehabilitation of patients. However, to date, there is no published data on the use of baropodometry in patients with chronic neck pain., Objective: To analyze peak plantar pressure and center of pressure oscillation in individuals with chronic neck pain compared to a control group., Methods: This was a blind cross-sectional study. It included 44 participants of both genders, between 18 and 45 years old, distributed into a chronic neck pain group (n= 22) and a control group (n= 22). Participants were assessed by means of baropodometry, the Numeric Rating Scale, the Neck Disability Index, and the Pain-Related Self Statement Scale. The Mann-Whitney test was used for comparison of baropodometric variables between the two groups, and the Spearman correlation coefficient was used to check possible associations between the variables., Results: No significant differences (p> 0.05) in peak plantar pressure or center of pressure oscillation were detected in the comparisons between the chronic neck pain and control groups. In addition, no significant correlation was observed (p> 0.05) between baropodometric variables and neck pain., Conclusion: Individuals with chronic neck pain with mild disability did not differ from a control group in terms of peak plantar pressure or center of pressure oscillation.

We evaluate the effects of somatosensory training on the mean amplitude of the center of pressure (COP) in the upright position and the sustained benefits after 6-month. Twelve elderly patients with type II diabetes (T2DM) participated in the study. Patients with T2DM were allocated to the somatosensory protocol, which consisted of a circuit composed of 13 stations with different textures. The rehabilitation protocol was applied twice a week during the period of 12 weeks. Upright balance, in 2 situations (fixed platform with eyes open and closed) to evaluate the mean amplitude of COP oscillation in the anterior-posterior and medial-lateral directions and the total area of COP oscillation. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, post-exercise and 6-month follow-up. The somatosensory training protocol was beneficial to reduce the AP oscillation of the COP, remaining after 6 months of the end of intervention in elderly with T2DM., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)