Search

Postpartum hemorrhage remains a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality in the United States. Several state maternal morbidity and mortality committees have reviewed areas of opportunity concerning postpartum hemorrhage management and found that common patterns include delays in recognition and response to hemorrhage. Hospital systems and state perinatal quality collaboratives have found that comprehensive, interdisciplinary response to postpartum hemorrhage care improves patient outcomes and, in some instances, reduces racial disparities. A key component of this focus involves the implementation of stage-based hemorrhage protocols for postpartum hemorrhage management. Stage-based hemorrhage protocols are designed to reduce delays in the diagnosis and management and avoid the pitfalls of cognitive biases. These protocols are complex, and their effectiveness is tied to the quality of their implementation. Systematic benchmarking and development of quality metrics for adherence to postpartum hemorrhage bundles would be expected to improve clinical outcomes, but evidence regarding the effectiveness of this practice in the literature is limited. Here, key features of stage-based interventions and evidence regarding the use of quality metrics for postpartum hemorrhage protocol adherence have been outlined., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Obstetrical hemorrhage is the leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide, and the rates of severe hemorrhage are increasing. There is a crucial need to expand treatment options for hemorrhage to address this global crisis. Over the last decade, the evolution of hemorrhage control devices has contributed to advancements in obstetrical hemorrhage management. The number of existing hemorrhage control devices and techniques has increased markedly in recent years, and new devices are in development. The current evidence for established and investigational hemorrhage control devices has been summarized in this review. Of note, 2 main categories of devices exist: traditional uterine tamponade and vacuum-induced uterine tamponade. Although traditional intrauterine balloon tamponade devices are currently used widely in postpartum hemorrhage management, novel hemorrhage control devices and techniques have been developed. These include the minisponge tamponade device, the Jada System, a modified Bakri balloon technique, and a suction tube uterine tamponade technique. Reassuring safety data and preliminary efficacy data from pilot studies of these novel techniques support the powerful role intrauterine devices can play in obstetrical hemorrhage management. This review aimed to improve awareness of device options so that continued efforts can be made to integrate new technology into hemorrhage management protocols. Well-designed studies inclusive of new hemorrhage control devices are essential to understanding where new technology fits into preexisting obstetrical hemorrhage algorithms. In addition, access to new tamponade technology remains limited on a global scale. Programs aimed at both increasing access to devices and expanding educational initiatives are essential to make new technology a standard component for hemorrhage management., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: In a 2015 Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network study, only half of placenta accreta spectrum cases were suspected before delivery, and the outcomes in the anticipated cases were paradoxically poorer than in unanticipated placenta accreta spectrum cases. This was possibly because the antenatally suspected cases were of greater severity. We sought to compare the outcomes of expected vs unexpected placenta accreta spectrum in a single large US center with multidisciplinary management protocol., Study Design: This was a retrospective cohort study carried out between Jan. 1, 2011, and June 30, 2018, of all histology-proven placenta accreta spectrum deliveries in an academic referral center. Patients diagnosed at the time of delivery were cases (unexpected placenta accreta spectrum), and those who were antentally diagnosed were controls (expected placenta accreta spectrume). The primary and secondary outcomes were the estimated blood loss and the number of red blood cell units transfused, respectively. Variables are reported as median and interquartile range or number (percentage). Analyses were made using appropriate parametric and nonparametric tests., Results: Fifty-four of the 243 patients (22.2%) were in the unexpected placenta accreta spectrum group. Patients in the expected placenta accreta spectrum group had a higher rate of previous cesarean delivery (170 of 189 [89.9%] vs 35 of 54 [64.8%]; P < .001) and placenta previa (135 [74.6%] vs 19 [37.3%]; P < .001). There was a higher proportion of increta/percreta in expected placenta accreta spectrum vs unexpected placenta accreta spectrum (125 [66.1%] vs 9 [16.7%], P < .001). Both primary outcomes were higher in the unexpected placenta accreta spectrum group (estimated blood loss, 2.4 L [1.4-3] vs 1.7 L [1.2-3], P = .04; red blood cell units, 4 [1-6] vs 2 [0-5], P = .03)., Conclusion: Our data contradict the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units results and instead show better outcomes in the expected placenta accreta spectrum group, despite a high proportion of women with more severe placental invasion. We attribute this to our multidisciplinary approach and ongoing process improvement in the management of expected cases. The presence of an experienced team appears to be a more important determinant of maternal morbidity in placenta accreta spectrum than the depth of placental invasion., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To determine whether shock index (SI) is superior to traditional vital signs in predicting postpartum hemorrhage and need for intervention., Methods: Retrospective case-control study in an academic tertiary-care county hospital. Forty-one consecutive postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) cases and 41 controls were frequency-matched by mode of delivery and maternal weight. We measured four criteria: heart rate, systolic blood pressure (SBP), SI (HR/SBP), and delta-SI (peak SI - baseline SI). Using received operating characteristic curves, we compared the discrimination performance of each criterion to predict PPH, transfusion, and surgical intervention, and identified thresholds with the strongest classification., Results: SI ≤1.1 can be normal in peripartum. Peak SI and delta-SI were generally superior to heart rate (HR) and SBP in predicting PPH, transfusion, and surgical intervention. SI ≥1.143 and SI ≥1.412 were strong initial and "critical" thresholds. Delta-SI was the strongest classifier overall; both SI and delta-SI remain sensitive and specific when adjusted for potential confounders., Conclusions: SI and delta-SI appear to be superior to HR and SBP in predicting PPH and need for intervention. Utility of delta-SI should be prospectively explored.