1. The small abdominal aortic aneurysm: the eternal dilemma.
- Author
-
Dryjski M, Driscoll JL, Blair RC, McGurrin MA, Dagher FJ, Ceraolo MJ, O'Donnell, and Blackshear WM Jr
- Subjects
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal pathology, Hospital Mortality, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Morbidity, Myocardial Infarction etiology, Postoperative Complications mortality, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Treatment Outcome, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal surgery, Postoperative Complications epidemiology
- Abstract
In order to evaluate morbidity and mortality after elective resection of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) as it relates to aneurysm size, a retrospective review of 111 elective aneurysmectomies over a 5 year period was undertaken in a VA population. Thirty seven AAA's measured < 5 cm in diameter and 74 were > or = 5 cm by CT scan. Patients with small AAA (S-AAA) were significantly younger (mean 64 years) than those with large AAA (L-AAA) (mean 69 years) (p < 0.003). Both groups were similar with respect to prevalence of cardiovascular, pulmonary and renal disease. Aortic cross-clamping time was significantly shorter in L-AAA, possibly because those with S-AAA had a higher prevalence of associated occlusive disease requiring more femoral anastomoses (p < 0.04). Postoperatively six patients (8%) had a myocardial infarction (MI) in the L-AAA group and four (5%) of these died. In contrast no patient with S-AAA suffered a postoperative MI. The rates of non-cardiac complications and length of hospital stay were not significantly different between the two groups. However, the patients with L-AAA stayed longer in ICU (p < 0.05) and the overall combined morbidity rate was significantly higher in this group (p < 0.02). Our results suggest that resection of S-AAA upon diagnosis in acceptable risk patients appears to be the safest overall therapeutic plan.
- Published
- 1994