Search

Background: Patients with liver cirrhosis (LC) undergoing cardiac surgery (CS) face perioperative high mortality and morbidity, but extensive studies on this topic are lacking., Methods: All adult patients with LC undergoing a CS procedure between 2000 and 2017 at 10 Italian Institutions were included in this retrospective cohort study. LC was classified according to preoperative Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. Early-term and medium-term outcomes analysis was performed in the overall population and according to CTP classes., Results: The study population included 144 patients (mean age 66 ± 9 years, 69% male). Ninety-eight, 20, and 26 patients were in CTP class A, in early CTP class B (MELD score <12), or advanced CTP class B (MELD score >12), respectively. The main LC etiologies were viral (43%) and alcoholic (36%). Liver-related clinical presentation (ascites, esophageal varices, and encephalopathy) and laboratory values (estimated glomerular filtration rate, serum albumin, and bilirubin, platelet count) significantly worsened across the CTP classes (P = .001). Coronary artery bypass grafting or valve surgery (87% bioprosthesis) were performed in 36% and 50%, respectively. Postoperative complications (especially acute kidney injury, liver complication, and length of stay) significantly worsened in advanced CTP class B (P = .001). Notably, observed mortality was 3-fold or 4-fold higher than the EuroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation) II-predicted mortality, in the overall population, and in the subgroups. At Kaplan-Meier analysis, 1-year and 5-year cumulative survival in the overall population was 82% ± 3% and 77% ± 4%, respectively. The 5-year survival in CTP class A, early CTP class B, and advanced CTP class B was 72% ± 5%, 68% ± 11%, and 61% ± 10%, respectively (P = .238)., Conclusions: CS outcomes in patients with LC are significantly affected in relation to the extent of preoperative liver dysfunction, but in early CTP classes, medium-term survival is acceptable. Further analysis are needed to better estimate the preoperative risk stratification of these patients., (Copyright © 2021 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) represents a rare complication after cardiac surgery, with no uniform agreement on timing and no information on follow-up. A multicenter retrospective study was designed to assess pacemaker dependency (PMD) and long-term mortality after cardiac surgery procedures. Between 2004 and 2016, PPI-patients from 18 centers were followed. Time-to-event data were evaluated with semiparametric regression Cox models and semiparametric Fine and Gray model for competing risk framework. Of 859 (0.90%) PPI-patients, 30% were pacemaker independent (PMI) at 6 months. PMD showed higher mortality compared with PMI (10-year survival 80.1% ± 2.6% and 92.2% +2.4%, respectively, log-rank p-value < 0.001) with an unadjusted hazard ratio for death of 0.36 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.65, p< 0.001 favoring PMI) and an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.19 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.45, p< 0.001 with PMD as reference). Crude cumulative incidence function of restored PMI rhythm at follow-up at 6 months, 1 year and 12 years were 30.5% (95% CI 27.3% to 33.7%), 33.7% (95% CI 30.4% to 36.9%) and 37.2% (95% CI 33.8% to 40.6%) respectively. PMI was favored by preoperative sinus rhythm with normal conduction (SR) (HR 2.37, 95% CI 1.65 to 3.40, p< 0.001), whereas coronary artery bypass grafting and aortic valve replacement were independently associated with PMD (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.88, p = 0.006 and HR 0.807, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.99, p = 0.047 respectively). Time-to-implantation was not associated with increased rate of PMI. Although 30% of PPI-patients are PMI after 6 months, PMD is associated with higher mortality at long term., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relations that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this study., (Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the immediate and late outcome of emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in a multicenter setting., Design: Multicenter, retrospective study., Setting: Four university hospitals., Participants: 596 patients were included in this study., Interventions: Included patients underwent isolated, emergency CABG., Measurements and Main Results: Sixty patients (absolute rate: 10.1%, pooled rate: 8.7%) died during the in-hospital stay period. Increasing emergency CABG classes (p<0.0001), recent myocardial infarction (p=0.019), left ventricular ejection fraction≤30% (p=0.034), on-pump surgery (p=0.012), and participating centers (p<0.0001) were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. Survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 86.4%, 81.6%, and 76.1%, respectively. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was used in 6 patients and 3 of them (50.0%) survived the immediate postoperative period. Patient populations of participating centers differed significantly in most of baseline characteristics. The preoperative use of intra-aortic balloon pump (8% to 51%) and off-pump surgery (2.8% to 56.3%) varied significantly between institutions. In-hospital mortality (2.8%, 5.9%, 7.7% and 19.8%, p<0.0001), as well as midterm survival, significantly differed between institutions (at 3 years, 90.6%, 89.8%, 81.2%, and 67.2%, p<0.0001)., Conclusions: The outcome after emergency CABG is satisfactory despite a significant operative risk. However, the results of emergency CABG significantly differed between the participating institutions, likely due to differences in the referral pathways and perioperative treatment strategies. Evaluation of these factors is crucial for implementation of treatment in centers with suboptimal results., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a vexing complication of cardiac surgery. Since exposure to contrast agents is a relevant contributing factor in the development of postoperative AKI, the optimal timing between cardiac catheterization and surgery is decisive., Methods: A total of 2504 consecutive nonemergent patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), valve surgery (with or without concomitant CABG), and proximal aortic procedures were enrolled. AKI was defined by consensus RIFLE (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of function, End-stage renal disease) criteria. The association of postoperative AKI and time between cardiac catheterization and operation was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression modeling and propensity-matched analysis., Results: Postoperative AKI occurred in 230 (9%) patients. The median number of days from cardiac catheterization to operation was 5 (25th to 75th percentile: 2 to 10). The incidence of AKI was significantly higher in patients operated on ≤1 day after cardiac catheterization compared to those operated on >1 day after (13% vs. 8%, p=0.004). The time interval between cardiac catheterization and surgery (tested both as a continuous and a categorical variable) was not an independent AKI predictor in the propensity-matched population or the pre-matched one. Contrast exposure≤1 day before surgery was independently associated with postoperative AKI in patients undergoing valve surgery with concomitant CABG only (post-matched: OR 3.68, 95%CI 1.30 to 10.39, p=0.014)., Conclusions: Delaying cardiac surgery beyond 24h of exposure to contrast agents seems to be justified only in patients undergoing valve surgery with concomitant CABG., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)