The goal of this three-year study was to develop a quarantine-like treatment for two commercial sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) cultivars, based on physical treatments and packaging materials, and to understand, in part, the chilling resistance-mode-of-action. This research has revealed that individual shrink packaging following prestorage-HWRB treatment, significantly reduced chilling injuries and chilling severity, as shown by very low percentage of CI and a very low CI index, while maintaining a good overall quality (less decay incidence and weight loss) after 21 d at 1.5°C plus 3 d at 20°C (sea transport to USA and Japan from Israel + marketing simulation). 88 Prevention of chilling injury in pepper The chilling injury reduction is mainly due to a significant water loss reduction by the shrink film, while HWRB treatment contributed mainly to a significant decay reduction, and to some degree of inhibition of chilling development. Cultivar ‘Selika’ was found less susceptible to chilling then cultivar ‘7158’. Abbreviations: chilling index CINX chilling injury CI hot water rinsing and brushing HWRB hot water dip HWD shrink packaging SP tap water rinsing and brushing TWRB. INTRODUCTION Sweet bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) is an important vegetable crop worldwide and can be consumed in many colours (Frank et al. 2001). Pepper is rich in vitamins, especially A and C, and is low in calories (Howard et al. 1994). The storage life of pepper fruit is limited by pathological deterioration (Ceponis et al. 1987), rapid water loss during prolonged storage (Diaz-Perez et al. 2007), and susceptibility to chilling injury (CI), which limits storage to temperatures above 7°C (Paull 1990). At temperatures below 7°C, within several days chilling injuries appear and are associated with severe pitting, weight loss, calyx darkening and decay development (Lim et al. 2007). Cold-based quarantine treatments (exposure to 1.1-2.2°C for 14-18 d) (Palou et al. 2008), or heat-based quarantine treatments, commonly followed by cold storage to extend shelf-life (Neven 2003), against quarantine pests, such as the Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata Wiedemann (Diptera: Tephritidae), must be currently applied to fresh fruits and vegetables exports to pest-free markets such as the United States or Japan. However, cold-based quarantine treatment is not feasible for bell peppers due to its susceptibility to chilling at temperatures below 7°C (Lim et al. 2007). Several technologies have been reported to induce fresh produce tolerance to cold temperature and to reduce the development of CI symptoms during cold storage and cold quarantine treatments; postharvest heat treatments (Sapitnitskaya et al. 2006, Ghasernnezhad et al. 2008) and/or plastic materials (Kehr 2002, Kosson 2003). E. Fallik, A. Bar-Yosef, S. Alkalai-Tuvia, Z. Aharon, Y. Perzelan, Z. Ilic, S. Lurie 89 The goal of this three-year study was to develop a quarantine-like treatment for sweet pepper based on physical treatments and packaging materials, and to understand, in part, the chilling resistance-mode-of-action. MATERIAL AND METHODS Plant material Two red sweet bell pepper cultivars (Capsicum annuum L. ‘Selika’ and ‘7158’), of uniform size (about 190 ± 10 g each), without defects or diseases were harvested at 90% coloration, during the growing season from late December to April in 2005, 2006 and 2007, from the Arava valley in the south of Israel. Four harvests were conducted during each year. Treatments and years of studies The following treatments have been conducted: 1. TWRB Fruits were rinsed over brushes with tap water (~22°C) for 15 s. This treatment served as control; 2005, 2006, 2007, 2. HWRB (commercial treatment) Fruits were rinsed over brushes with hot water at 55°C for 15 s (Fallik et al. 1999); 2005, 2006, 2007, 3. HWD Hot water dips at 52°C for 2 min; 2005, 4. Curing Incubation at 44°C for 8.5h (US-APHIS, 1994/6); 2005, 5. HWRB + Curing 6 h incubation at 38°C and 85% RH; 2006, 6. HWRB + SP Individual shrink packaging (Cryovac ® D-940, 19 μm thick, shrink tunnel oven temperature 170°C for 2-3 s); 2005, 2006, 2007, 7. TWRB + SP; 2007. Quality traits Fruit quality parameters were evaluated at the end of 21 day-storage at 1.5°C and relative humidity (RH) of 93% followed by 3 days at 20°C, RH 70% (marketing simulation). Weight loss was expressed as percentage of weight loss from the initial weight of ten fruits per carton. Fruit firmness was evaluated on ten fruit per carton by placing each fruit horizontally between two flat surfaces and 2 kg weight loaded (Fallik et al. 1999). Fruit was considered very firm with 0-1.5 mm residual deformation; firm = 1.6-3.0 mm deformation; soft = 3.1-4.5 mm deformation; very soft = more than 4.6 mm deformation. Fruit was considered decayed once fungal mycelia appeared on the peel or calyx. Decay was expressed as a percentage of the total initial fruit number. Chilling injury – a fruit with a sunken pitting of more than 2 mm on the skin or calyx was considered as a damaged fruit. CI was expressed as 90 Prevention of chilling injury in pepper a percentage of damaged fruits from the total initial fruit number. The severity of the chilling injury was expressed as chilling index (CINX) – on a scale of 0 to 3 with 0 = no chilling injury; 1 = minor damage of less than 10% covering the fruit peel; 2 = moderate damage with 10 to 30% of damage covering the peel, and 3 = severe damage with more than 30% chilling damage. The index was calculated as follows: (number of fruits without damage X 0 + number of fruits with minor damage X 1 + number of fruits with moderate damage X 2 + number of fruits with severe index X 3) / total number of fruit. Chilling injury development The development of CINX was monitored for TWRB-treated fruit and HWRBtreated fruit stored 21 days at 1.5°C plus 3 days at 20°C. CINX was evaluated every 3 days and each treatment consisted of four boxes with 5 kg fruit. The results are shown for ‘Selika’ only as similar results were obtained also for cultivar ‘7158’. The experiment was repeated twice. Statistical analysis Four experiments were conducted each year, from late December to late March, once a month. Each treatment consisted of four export cartons with 5 kg fruit. Angular transformation was applied before the analysis of the incidence of decay. All data were subjected to one or two-way statistical analysis at p = 0.05 using JMP6 Statistical Analysis Software Program (SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC., USA). RESULTS Chilling injury development Chilling injury became visible at day 6, in both TWRB and HWRB (Fig. 1). Until day 15 th , the CINX was similar. From day 15 and onward, CINX of HWRB-treated fruit increased more slowly than TWRB-treated fruit. Quality evaluation 2005 – After 21 d at 1.5°C plus 3 d at 20°C, HWRB + shrink (SP) in both cultivars, significantly maintained fruit quality as shown by lower weight loss and firmer fruit, a relative low decay incidence, and low percentage of CI which was associated with a low CINX (Tab. 1). Except for HWRB + SP, all other treatments significantly lost more weigh and fruits were soft. TWRB-treated fruit and ‘curing’ had a significant higher decay incidence. The pepper cultivar ‘7158’ was found to be more susceptible to CI than ‘Selika’. Fruit kept at 44.5°C for 8 h (Curing) and E. Fallik, A. Bar-Yosef, S. Alkalai-Tuvia, Z. Aharon, Y. Perzelan, Z. Ilic, S. Lurie 91 fruit treated at 52°C for 2 min (HWD) suffered from severe heat damage (data not shown). 2006 – Based on the 2005 results, instead of 44.5°C for 8 h, fruit were kept at 38°C for 6 h (Curing) and HWD was omitted. In both cultivars, HWRB + SP significantly maintained fruit quality based on weight loss, firmness, decay incidence, CI and CINX (Tab. 2). Cultivar ‘7158’ was more susceptible to CI than ‘Selika’, however the chilling severity (CINX) was similar. The fruits treated with WRB and curing lost significant weight which also affected fruit firmness, and had a significantly higher decay incidence. 2007 – TWRB + SP and HWRB + SP-treated fruits, in both cultivars, had the lowest weight loss and firmer fruits after 21 d at 1.5°C plus 3 d at 20°C. These two treatments significantly reduced CI and CINX compared to the other treatments (Tab. 3). A high decay incidence was monitored in TWRB + SP-treated fruits, in both cultivars, while HWRB + SP-treated fruit had low to moderate decay incidence. Nonshrink-packed fruit of cultivar ‘7158’ was significantly more susceptible to CI, then ‘Selika’. Day 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 C h il li n g I n ju ry I n d e x 0.0 .2 .4 .6 .8 1.0 1.2 1.4 TWRB HWRB Figure 1. The effect of tap water rinsing and brushing (TWRB) and hot water rinsing and brushing (HWRB) on pepper ‘Selika’ chilling index during 21 day storage at 1.5°C + 3 days at 20°C 92 Prevention of chilling injury in pepper T ab le 1 . T h e in fl u en ce o f v ar io u s p h y si ca l tr ea tm en ts i n c o m b in at io n w it h s h ri n k p ac k ag in g , o n f ru it q u al it y a ft er 2 1 d s to ra g e at 1 .5 °C p lu s 3 d a t 2 0 °C i n 2 0 0 5 , th e re su lt s ar e th e m ea n o f 3 e x p er im en ts