Search

Background: Working alliance has been shown to predict outcome of psychological treatments in multiple studies. Conversely, changes in outcome scores have also been found to predict working alliance ratings. Objective: To assess the temporal relationships between working alliance and outcome in 230 patients receiving trauma-focused cognitive behavioral treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Methods: Ratings of working alliance were made by both the patient and therapist after sessions 1, 3, and 5 of a course of Cognitive Therapy for PTSD (CT-PTSD). Autoregressive, cross-lagged panel models were used to examine whether working alliance predicted PTSD symptom severity at the next assessment point and vice versa. Linear regressions tested the relationship between alliance and treatment outcome. Results: Both patients' and therapists' working alliance ratings after session 1 predicted PTSD symptom scores at the end of treatment, controlling for baseline scores. At each assessment point, higher therapist working alliance was associated with lower PTSD symptoms. Crossed-lagged associations were found for therapist-rated alliance, but not for patient-rated alliance: higher therapists' alliance ratings predicted lower PTSD symptom scores at the next assessment point. Similarly, lower PTSD symptoms predicted higher therapist working alliance ratings at the next assessment point. Ruminative thinking was negatively related to therapists' alliance ratings. Conclusions: Working alliance at the start of treatment predicted treatment outcome in patients receiving CT-PTSD and may be an important factor in setting the necessary conditions for effective treatment. For therapists, there was a reciprocal relationship between working alliance and PTSD symptom change in their patients during treatment, suggesting that their alliance ratings predicted symptom change, but were also influenced by patients' symptom change. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Although most studies investigating sudden gains in treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) report a positive association between sudden gains and outcomes at the end of treatment, less is known about sudden gains in routine clinical care and the processes involved in their occurrence. This study investigated changes in cognitive factors (negative appraisals, trauma memory characteristics) before, during, and after sudden gains in PTSD symptom severity. Method: Two samples (N1 = 248, N2 = 234) of patients who received trauma-focused cognitive therapy for PTSD in routine clinical care were analyzed. Mahalanobis distance matching, including the propensity score, was used to compare patients with sudden gains and similar patients without sudden gains. Estimates from both samples were meta-analyzed to obtain pooled effects. Results: Patients with sudden gains (n1 = 76, n2 = 87) reported better treatment outcomes in PTSD symptom severity, depression, and anxiety at the end of therapy and follow-up than those without sudden gains. No baseline predictors of sudden gains could be reliably identified. During sudden gains, those with sudden gains had greater changes in both cognitive factors than matched patients. Meta-analyses of the two samples showed that negative appraisals had already decreased in the session prior to sudden gains compared with matched patients. Conclusions: The pooled estimates suggest that changes in negative trauma-related appraisals precede sudden gains in PTSD symptoms. The results suggest that interventions that promote change in appraisals may also facilitate sudden gains in therapy. What is the public health significance of this article?: This study highlights that a substantial subgroup of patients with PTSD showed concurrent large improvements in PTSD, appraisals, and memory features from one treatment session to the next. Sudden gains were also preceded by greater changes in appraisals than sessions that did not include sudden gains. This supports interventions that target the identification and modification of negative appraisals in PTSD, which, if successful, can result in sudden symptom improvements that are associated with better treatment outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Numerous studies have shown that trauma-focused psychological treatments for PTSD are effective (Lewis, Roberts, Andrew, Starling, & Bisson, 2020). Few studies to date have investigated the processes of change during treatment. There is initial evidence that these treatments change problematic beliefs about the trauma and its consequences, and that belief change drives symptom change (Brown, Belli, Asnaani, & Foa, 2018). Further studies of other candidate processes are needed. Objective: To investigate the temporal relationships between changes in theory-derived (Ehlers & Clark, 2000) treatment specific processes (appraisals, trauma memory characteristics, and unhelpful cognitive and behavioural responses) and non-specific processes (working alliance) and symptom change during a course of cognitive therapy for PTSD (e.g. Wild et al., 2020). Study 1 Methods: Session by session changes in self-reports of cognitive factors and PTSD symptoms obtained from patients treated in routine clinical care were analysed with bivariate latent change score models (LCSM). Results: Were preceded by changes in for most measures, changes in cognitive factors preceded changes in PTSD symptoms, but not vice versa. Study 2 Methods: Patient and therapist ratings of working alliance were taken repeatedly. Autoregressive, cross-lagged models were used to examine whether working alliance predicted PTSD symptom severity at the next assessment point and vice versa. Results: Higher patient and therapist working alliance was associated with lower PTSD symptoms. Crossed-lagged associations were found for therapist-rated alliance, but not for patient-rated alliance. A better working alliance at the start of treatment predicted treatment outcome. For most measures, changes in cognitive factors preceded changes in PTSD symptoms, but not vice versa. Conclusions: Study 1 extended previous findings that that cognitive and behavioural processes suggested by theoretical models of PTSD play a key role in driving symptom improvement during trauma-focused CBT. Changes in cognitive factors preceded symptom change. This result suggests that monitoring these processes during therapy may help therapist in maximising treatment outcomes in individual patients, and may also point to further ways of optimising treatments in general. Study 2 suggested that working alliance may be an important factor in setting the necessary conditions for effective treatment, but did not find evidence of a temporal precedence of changes in working alliance driving symptom change. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Theories of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) highlight the role of cognitive and behavioral factors in its development, maintenance, and treatment. This study investigated the relationship between changes in factors specified in Ehlers and Clark's (2000) model of PTSD and PTSD symptom change in 217 patients with PTSD who were treated with cognitive therapy for PTSD (CT-PTSD) in routine clinical care. Bivariate latent change score models (LCSM) of session-by-session changes in self-report measures showed that changes in PTSD symptoms were preceded by changes in negative appraisals, flashback characteristics of unwanted memories, safety behaviours, and unhelpful responses to intrusions, but not vice versa. For changes in trauma memory disorganization and PTSD symptoms we found a bidirectional association. This study provides evidence that cognitive and behavioral processes proposed in theoretical models of PTSD play a key role in driving symptom improvement during CT-PTSD. • Our study found that cognitive and behavioural processes play a key role in symptom improvements during cognitive therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder. • This supports psychological interventions that target the modification of negative appraisals, the elaboration of trauma memories, and work on giving up unhelpful coping strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]