Search

Objective: To test the performance of a software able to control mechanical ventilator cycling-off by means of automatic, real-time analysis of ventilator waveforms during pressure support ventilation., Design: Prospective randomised crossover study., Setting: University Intensive Care Unit., Patients: Fifteen difficult-to-wean patients under pressure support ventilation., Interventions: Patients were ventilated using a G5 ventilator (Hamilton Medical, Bonaduz, Switzerland) with three different cycling-off settings: standard (expiratory trigger sensitivity set at 25% of peak inspiratory flow), optimised by an expert clinician and automated; the last two settings were tested at baseline pressure support and after a 50% increase in pressure support., Measurements and Main Results: Ventilator waveforms were recorded and analysed by four physicians experts in waveforms analysis. Major and minor asynchronies were detected and total asynchrony time computed. Automation compared to standard setting reduced cycling delay from 407 ms [257-567] to 59 ms [22-111] and ineffective efforts from 12.5% [3.4-46.4] to 2.8% [1.9-4.6]) at baseline support (p < 0.001); expert optimisation performed similarly. At high support both cycling delay and ineffective efforts increased, mainly in the case of expert setting, with the need of reoptimisation of expiratory trigger sensitivity. At baseline support, asynchrony time decreased from 39.9% [27.4-58.7] with standard setting to 32% [22.3-39.4] with expert optimisation (p < 0.01) and to 24.4% [19.6-32.5] with automation (p < 0.001). Both at baseline and at high support, asynchrony time was lower with automation than with expert setting., Conclusions: Cycling-off guided by automated real-time waveforms analysis seems a reliable solution to improve synchronisation in difficult-to-wean patients under pressure support ventilation., (Copyright © 2022 Société française d'anesthésie et de réanimation (Sfar). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: An inspiratory hold during patient-triggered assisted ventilation potentially allows to measure driving pressure and inspiratory effort. However, muscular activity can make this measurement unreliable. We aim to define the criteria for inspiratory holds reliability during patient-triggered breaths., Material and Methods: Flow, airway and esophageal pressure recordings during patient-triggered breaths from a multicentre observational study (BEARDS, NCT03447288) were evaluated by six independent raters, to determine plateau pressure readability. Features of "readable" and "unreadable" holds were compared. Muscle pressure estimate from the hold was validated against other measures of inspiratory effort., Results: Ninety-two percent of the recordings were consistently judged as readable or unreadable by at least four raters. Plateau measurement showed a high consistency among raters. A short time from airway peak to plateau pressure and a stable and longer plateau characterized readable holds. Unreadable plateaus were associated with higher indexes of inspiratory effort. Muscular pressure computed from the hold showed a strong correlation with independent indexes of inspiratory effort., Conclusion: The definition of objective parameters of plateau reliability during assisted-breath provides the clinician with a tool to target a safer assisted-ventilation and to detect the presence of high inspiratory effort., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Whether respiratory efforts and their timing can be reliably detected during pressure support ventilation using standard ventilator waveforms is unclear. This would give the opportunity to assess and improve patient-ventilator interaction without the need of special equipment., Methods: In 16 patients under invasive pressure support ventilation, flow and pressure waveforms were obtained from proximal sensors and analyzed by three trained physicians and one resident to assess patient's spontaneous activity. A systematic method (the waveform method) based on explicit rules was adopted. Esophageal pressure tracings were analyzed independently and used as reference. Breaths were classified as assisted or auto-triggered, double-triggered or ineffective. For assisted breaths, trigger delay, early and late cycling (minor asynchronies) were diagnosed. The percentage of breaths with major asynchronies (asynchrony index) and total asynchrony time were computed., Results: Out of 4426 analyzed breaths, 94.1% (70.4-99.4) were assisted, 0.0% (0.0-0.2) auto-triggered and 5.8% (0.4-29.6) ineffective. Asynchrony index was 5.9% (0.6-29.6). Total asynchrony time represented 22.4% (16.3-30.1) of recording time and was mainly due to minor asynchronies. Applying the waveform method resulted in an inter-operator agreement of 0.99 (0.98-0.99); 99.5% of efforts were detected on waveforms and agreement with the reference in detecting major asynchronies was 0.99 (0.98-0.99). Timing of respiratory efforts was accurately detected on waveforms: AUC for trigger delay, cycling delay and early cycling was 0.865 (0.853-0.876), 0.903 (0.892-0.914) and 0.983 (0.970-0.991), respectively., Conclusions: Ventilator waveforms can be used alone to reliably assess patient's spontaneous activity and patient-ventilator interaction provided that a systematic method is adopted., (© 2022. The Author(s).)