Search

The reduced nature of the subducting slab has been used to explain the relatively poor endowment of economic porphyry copper deposits in Paleo-Tethyan arc systems. The presence of numerous porphyry Cu deposits in the southern Yidun terrane potentially challenges this model, because these deposits are thought to be the product of Paleo-Tethyan subduction. To investigate this, two representative deposits (i.e., Pulang and Songnuo porphyry Cu deposits) from the southern Yidun terrane have been studied. Zircon U-Pb ages of pre- and syn-mineral porphyries in Pulang are 221 ± 2 Ma (MSWD = 0.89) and 215 ± 2 Ma (MSWD = 1.50), respectively. Zircon and garnet U-Pb ages of the Songnuo syn-mineral porphyry are 217 ± 2 Ma (MSWD = 1.15) and 223 ± 5 Ma (MSWD = 0.97), respectively. The Pulang and Songnuo porphyries both have high whole-rock Sr/Y ratios with minor or no negative Eu anomalies, consistent with derivation from hydrous magmas that underwent minor early plagioclase crystallization but abundant amphibole fractionation. The two porphyry intrusions are characterized by high large-ion-lithophile elements (LILE: Th, U, Ba, Rb) abundances, and low concentrations of high-field-strength elements (HFSE: Nb, Ta, Ti, Zr, Hf). They have similar initial Sr isotope ratios from 0.7055 to 0.7073, ƐNd (t) values from − 4.3 to − 1.6 and zircon ƐHf (t) values of − 1.81 ± 1.34 (n = 47) that are distinct from published results for the Permian–Early Triassic Paleo-Tethyan arc granitoids in the Sanjiang region but similar to the Neoproterozoic arc intrusions in the nearby western Yangtze craton. The Pulang and Songnuo porphyries have relatively high zircon EuN/EuN* ratios (0.59 ± 0.04, n = 52) and calculated Δ log fO2 (FMQ) values (1.61 ± 0.23, n = 52), consistent with relatively oxidized magmas. This feature is similar to the published data for the Neoproterozoic arc intrusions (EuN/EuN* = 0.55 ± 0.08; Δ log fO2 (FMQ) = 2.14 ± 0.60), but distinct from the published data for the reduced normal Paleo-Tethyan arc magmas (EuN/EuN* = 0.29 ± 0.10; Δ log fO2 (FMQ) = − 0.68 ± 0.88). Given that the most recent tectonic reconstruction models suggest that the Paleo-Tethys Ocean closed before ~ 220 Ma, we propose that the Pulang and Songnuo porphyries Cu deposits were formed in a postsubduction setting from oxidized melts generated by reactivating the Neoproterozoic arc root, unrelated to Paleo-Tethyan subduction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Paleo-Tethyan arc belt is host to a small number of porphyry Cu deposits the key controls on which remains poorly understood. It has been hypothesized that the Paleo-Tethyan arc magmas were reduced and therefore less fertile for porphyry Cu formation but few studies have been conducted to directly assess the magmatic oxygen fugacity. We investigate the magma fertility of eastern Paleo-Tethyan arc igneous rocks in the Sanjiang region, SW China, represented by the Maoding (268.3 ± 2.3 Ma), Suwalong (275.6 ± 1.4 Ma to 264.7 ± 1.4 Ma) and Baimaxueshan (255.7 ± 1.5 Ma to 249.3 ± 1.1 Ma) granitoids. They have geochemical features consistent with typical continental arc rocks, formed from partial melting of the mantle wedge, with increasing contamination of crust-derived melts over time. The presence of amphibole, high Sr/Y ratios (35 ± 20, n = 17), and lack of negative Eu anomalies (Eu N /Eu N ⁎ = 1.04 ± 0.3, n = 17) are consistent with derivation from hydrous magmas. Zircons from the intrusive rocks have relatively low Eu N /Eu N ⁎ (mostly <0.4) ratios and calculated ΔFMQ values (−2.1 ± 1.2, n = 86). Combined with apatite microphenocrysts with extremely low sulfur contents (< 0.12 wt% SO 3), it suggests that the intrusions originated from water-rich but reduced arc magmas, that were less fertile for porphyry Cu formation. Our study highlights that magmatic f O 2 is probably a critical control on the prospectivity of arc systems and confirms that zircon and apatite compositions can be used to evaluate porphyry Cu fertility. • The Paleo-Tethyan arc igneous rocks were dated from ~275 to 249 Ma. • They were derived from partial melting of mantle wedge during MASH processes. • These arc magmas were reduced and less fertile for porphyry Cu formation. • Zircon and apatite compositions can be used to evaluate porphyry Cu fertility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Highlights: [•] New geochronology data to constrain the duration of magmatic-hydrothermal activity. [•] Two stages cooling history, early rapid cooling and late slow cooling. [•] Hydrothermal fluid circulation related to multiple stages of magma emplacement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Magmatic sources of porphyry deposits in postcollisional settings remain controversial. We have used new and published petrological and geochemical data for the Eocene–Oligocene porphyry Cu ± Mo ± Au deposits in the Sanjiang region, SW China, to address this outstanding issue. New data for three deposits (Machangqing, Tongchang, and Beiya) in the Ailaoshan–Red River porphyry Au-Cu-Mo belt (southern part of the Sanjiang region) suggest that ore-forming porphyries were emplaced at ~ 35 Ma, have high (87Sr/86Sr)i (0.7068–0.7071) and negative εNd(t) (− 6.9 to − 5.0), low zircon εHf(t) (− 5.3 to 4.5), and relatively high δ18O (5.9–9.0‰). Magmatic amphibole phenocryst compositions indicate that the parental magmas are all relatively oxidized (ΔFMQ = 1.7 ± 0.6), and H2O-rich (3.8 ± 0.3 wt% H2O). These results are consistent with those estimated from zircon compositions (ΔFMQ = 1.8 ± 0.8) and high whole-rock Sr/Y ratios (75 ± 31), respectively. Based on the new and published data, we suggest that the parental magmas for the Ailaoshan–Red River porphyry Au-Cu-Mo belt were derived from a preserved juvenile arc lower-crust and the underlying metasomatized subcontinental lithospheric mantle (SCLM) attributed to a Neoproterozoic subduction event, whereas the parental magmas for the Yulong porphyry Cu-Mo belt (northern part of the Sanjiang region) originated from the Permian–Triassic juvenile arc lower-crust and metasomatized SCLM. Additionally, parental magmas for these porphyry deposits are all oxidized and H2O-rich, and we attribute such characteristics to inheritance from mixed mantle-crust sources that were modified by previous oceanic slab subduction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The Jinshajiang–Red River porphyry Cu–Mo metallogenic belt is an important Cenozoic porphyry Cu–Mo mineralization concentrating zone in the eastern Indo‐Asian collision zone. New zircon U–Pb and molybdenite Re–Os ages and compilation of previously published ages indicate that porphyry Cu–Mo deposits in the belt did not form at the same time, i.e., the porphyry emplacement and relevant Cu–Mo mineralization ages of the Ailaoshan–Red River ore belt in south range from 36.3Ma to 34.6Ma, and from 36.0Ma to 33.9Ma, respectively, which are obviously younger than the porphyry emplacement ages of 43.8–36.9Ma and the relevant Cu–Mo mineralization ages of 41.6–35.8Ma of the Yulong ore belt in north. Tectonic studies indicated that the Jinshajiang fault system in north and Ailaoshan–Red River fault system in south of the Jinsjiang–Red river belt had different strike-slip patterns and ages. The right-lateral strike-slip motion of the Jinshajiang fault system initiated at ca. 43Ma with corresponding formation of the Yulong porphyry Cu–Mo system, whereas the left-lateral strike-slip motion of the Ailaoshan–Red River fault system initiated at ca. 36Ma with corresponding formation of the Ailaoshan–Red River porphyry Cu–Mo system. Therefore, the different ages of porphyry Cu–Mo systems, between in north and south of the Jinshajiang–Red River belt, indicate that the porphyry Cu–Mo mineralization is closely related to the divergent strike-slip movements between the Jinshajiang and Ailaoshan–Red River strike-slip faulting resulted from the Indo‐Asian collision. The tanslithospheric Jinshajiang–Red River faulting caused partial melting of the enriched mantle sources of alkali-rich porphyries by depressurization or/and asthenospheric heating, and facilitated the migration of alkali-rich magmas and the corresponding formation of alkali-rich porphyries and relevant Cu–Mo deposits in the belt. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]