1. SARS-CoV-2 infection and adverse outcomes in users of ACE inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor blockers: a nationwide case-control and cohort analysis.
- Author
-
Christiansen CF, Pottegård A, Heide-Jørgensen U, Bodilsen J, Søgaard OS, Maeng M, Vistisen ST, Schmidt M, Lund LC, Reilev M, Hallas J, Voldstedlund M, Husby A, Thomsen MK, Johansen NB, Brun NC, Thomsen RW, Bøtker HE, and Sørensen HT
- Subjects
- Adult, COVID-19 epidemiology, Case-Control Studies, Denmark epidemiology, Female, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Male, Middle Aged, Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists adverse effects, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors adverse effects, Pandemics, Population Surveillance, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Drug Treatment
- Abstract
Objective: To examine the impact of ACE inhibitor (ACE-I)/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) use on rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection and adverse outcomes., Methods: This nationwide case-control and cohort study included all individuals in Denmark tested for SARS-CoV-2 RNA with PCR from 27 February 2020 to 26 July 2020. We estimated confounder-adjusted ORs for a positive test among all SARS-CoV-2 tested, and inverse probability of treatment weighted 30-day risk and risk ratios (RRs) of hospitalisation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mortality comparing current ACE-I/ARB use with calcium channel blocker (CCB) use and with non-use., Results: The study included 13 501 SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive and 1 088 695 PCR-negative individuals. Users of ACE-I/ARB had a marginally increased rate of a positive PCR when compared with CCB users (aOR 1.17, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.37), but not when compared with non-users (aOR 1.00 95% CI 0.92 to 1.09).Among PCR-positive individuals, 1466 (11%) were ACE-I/ARB users. The weighted risk of hospitalisation was 36.5% in ACE-I/ARB users and 43.3% in CCB users (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.02). The risk of ICU admission was 6.3% in ACE-I/ARB users and 5.4% in CCB users (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.64 to 2.16), while the 30-day mortality was 12.3% in ACE-I/ARB users and 13.9% in CCB users (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.30). The associations were similar when ACE-I/ARB users were compared with non-users., Conclusions: ACE-I/ARB use was associated neither with a consistently increased rate nor with adverse outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our findings support the current recommendation of continuing use of ACE-Is/ARBs during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic., Trial Registration Number: EUPAS34887., Competing Interests: Competing interests: CFC, UH-J, RWT and HTS have not received any personal fees, grants, travel grants or teaching grants from companies, but the Department of Clinical Epidemiology is involved in studies with funding from various companies as research grants to (and administered by) Aarhus University. MR, LCL, AP and JH have participated in industry-funded projects with money paid to their employer, the University of Southern Denmark. MM has received speaker or advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Novo Nordisk., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF